Background: Among patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD), homelessness poses significant medical and psychosocial risks; however, less is known about the effects of race and sex on the hospital outcomes of admitted homeless patients with ALD. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample database from 2012 to 2017 was used to isolate homeless patients with ALD, and the cohort was further stratified by race and sex for comparisons. Propensity score matching was utilized to minimize covariate confounding. The primary endpoints of this study include mortality, hospital length of stay, and hospital costs; secondary endpoints included the incidence of liver complications. Results: There were 3972 females/males postmatch, as well as 2224 Blacks/Whites and 4575 Hispanics/Whites postmatch. In multivariate, there were no significant differences observed in mortality rate, length of stay, and costs between sexes. Comparing liver outcomes, females had a higher incidence of hepatic encephalopathy [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04, P<0.001]. In comparing Blacks versus Whites, Black patients had higher hospitalization costs (aOR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03-1.24, P=0.01); however, there were no significant differences in mortality, length of stay, or liver complications. In comparing Hispanics versus Whites, Hispanic patients had longer length of hospital stay (aOR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.06-1.19, P<0.001), greater costs (aOR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.09-1.22, P<0.001), as well as higher prevalence of liver complications including varices (aOR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06, P<0.001), hepatic encephalopathy (aOR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.04, P<0.001), and hepatorenal syndrome (aOR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.01, P=0.03). However, there was no difference in mortality between White and Hispanic patients. Conclusions: Black and Hispanic ALD patients experiencing homelessness were found to incur higher hospital charges; furthermore, Hispanic patients also had greater length of stay and higher incidence of liver-related complications compared with White counterparts.

BACKGROUND Primary liver cancer (PLC) has placed an increasing economic and resource burden on the health care system of the United States. We attempted to quantify its epidemiology and associated costs using a national inpatient database. METHODS Hospital discharge and insurance claims data from the National Inpatient Sample were used to conduct this analysis. Patients diagnosed with PLC (hepatocellular carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma) were included in the study population, which was then stratified using patient demographics, comorbidities, degree of cancer spread, liver disease complications, and other descriptors. Trends were analyzed via regression curves for each of these strata from the years 2016 to 2019, with special attention to patterns in hospitalization incidence, inpatient mortality rate, total costs, and average per-capita costs. The resulting curves were evaluated using goodness-of-fit statistics and P-values. RESULTS Aggregate hospitalization incidence, inpatient mortality rates, and total costs were found to significantly increase throughout the study period (P=0.002, 0.002, and 0.02, respectively). Relative to their demographic counterparts, males, White Americans, and those older than 65 years of age contributed the largest proportions of total costs. These population segments also experienced significant increases in total expenditure (P=0.04, 0.03, and 0.02, respectively). Admissions deemed to have multiple comorbidities were associated with progressively higher total costs throughout the study period (P=0.01). Of the categorized underlying liver diseases, only admissions diagnosed with alcoholic liver disease or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease saw significantly increasing total costs (P=0.006 and 0.01), although hepatitis C was found to be the largest contributor to total expenses. CONCLUSIONS From 2016 to 2019, total costs, admission incidence, and inpatient mortality rates associated with PLC hospitalization increased. Strata-specific findings may be reflective of demographic shifts in the PLC patient populations, as well as changes in underlying chronic liver disease etiologies.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:This study evaluates the cost burdens of inpatient care for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to stratify the patients based on the presence of cirrhosis and conduct subgroup analyses on patient demographics and medical characteristics. METHODS:The 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample was used to select individuals diagnosed with CHB. The weighted charge estimates were derived and converted to admission costs, adjusting for inflation to the year 2016, and presented in United States Dollars. These adjusted values were stratified using select patient variables. To assess the goodness-of-fit for each trend, we graphed the data across the respective years, expressed in a chronological sequence with format (R2, p-value). Analysis of CHB patients was carried out in three groups: the composite CHB population, the subset of patients with cirrhosis, and the subset of patients without cirrhosis. RESULTS:From 2016 to 2019, the total costs of hospitalizations in CHB patients were $603.82, $737.92, $758.29, and $809.01 million dollars from 2016 to 2019, respectively. We did not observe significant cost trends in the composite CHB population or in the cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis cohorts. However, we did find rising costs associated with age older than 65 (0.97, 0.02), white race (0.98, 0.01), Hispanic ethnicity (1.00, 0.001), and Medicare coverage (0.95, 0.02), the significance of which persisted regardless of the presence of cirrhosis. Additionally, inpatients without cirrhosis who had comorbid metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) were also observed to have rising costs (0.96, 0.02). CONCLUSIONS:We did not find a significant increase in overall costs with CHB inpatients, regardless of the presence of cirrhosis. However, certain groups are more susceptible to escalating costs. Therefore, increased screening and nuanced vaccination planning must be optimized in order to prevent and mitigate these growing cost burdens on vulnerable populations.

Pre-liver transplant (LT) functional status is an important determinant of prognosis post LT. There is insufficient data on how functional status affects outcomes of transplant recipients based on the specific etiology of liver disease. We stratified LT recipients by etiology of liver disease to evaluate the effects of functional status on post-LT prognosis in each subgroup. 2005–2019 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) was used to select patients with liver transplant. A total of 14,290 patients were included in the analysis. These patients were stratified by functional status according to Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score: no assistance, some assistance, or total assistance. They were then further divided into six diagnosis categories: metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), hereditary disorders, hepatitis C, hepatitis B, autoimmune disease (AID), and alcoholic liver disease (ALD). Primary endpoints included all-cause mortality and graft failure, while secondary endpoints included organ-specific causes of death. Those under the age of 18 and those with non-whole liver or prior liver transplantation were excluded. Patients with MASLD requiring some assistance (aHR: 1.57, 95

Background:The incidence of hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection is on the rise, with a minority of patients at risk for poor outcomes. This study investigates the prognostic impacts of race and gender on hospital outcomes among admitted HAV-infected patients. Methods:Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2012 to 2017, patients admitted with HAV were selected and stratified by gender (male and female) and race (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian-Pacific Islander, Other). Propensity score-matching and statistical analysis were implemented with comparison to the controls ("Female" and "White"). Primary endpoints included mortality, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs, while secondary endpoints consisted of hepatic-related medical complications such as ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, varices, and acute liver failure. Results:Females with compensated cirrhosis had increased odds of mortality (aOR 2.59, 95% CI: 1.14-5.91, P = 0.02). Otherwise, no other differences in mortality were detected between genders and races. Females had a shorter hospital LOS (aOR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96-0.98, P < 0.001), lower adjusted cost ($12,241 vs. $13,510, aOR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.92-0.92, P < 0.001), lower odds of esophageal varices (aOR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57-0.97, P = 0.03) and hepatic encephalopathy (aOR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.53-0.84, P < 0.001) compared to males. Black patients exhibited higher LOS (aOR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04-1.08, P < 0.001) and adjusted costs ($13,392 vs $12,592, aOR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.02-1.03, P < 0.001). Hispanic patients exhibited higher rates of esophageal varices (aOR 2.19, 95% CI: 1.28-3.76, P = 0.005) and adjusted costs ($14,202 vs. $12,381, aOR 1.07, 95% CI: 1.07-1.07, P < 0.001), and Asian patients experienced higher adjusted costs ($18,426 vs. $13,137, aOR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.10-1.10, P < 0.001) compared to White patients. Conclusion:Various nuanced impacts of gender and race on hospitalization outcomes in HAV infection were observed, with only one subgroup analysis demonstrating a higher rate of mortality. Further research is warranted to better understand these findings and their implications.

Background and aims: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) can result in hepatic decompensation and require liver transplantation (LT). This study investigates the effect of the sex of the donor and recipient as a prognostic risk factor for adverse outcomes after LT in patients with PSC. Methods: UNOS registry was used to select LT patients with PSC from 1987 to 2019. The study cohort was stratified based on the sex of the recipient and further subdivided based on the sex of the donor. The primary endpoints of this study were all-cause mortality and graft failure, which were evaluated using a sequential Cox regression analysis. Results: This study included 2829 patients; 906 female recipients were transplanted from 441 male donors and 465 female donors. 1923 male recipients were transplanted from 1194 male donors and 729 female donors. Within the mismatch analyses, the male-to-male recipients also had a significantly reduced hazard ratio of graft failure compared to female-to-male transplants [aHR 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33–0.79, P = 0.003]. No difference in graft failure was observed in the mismatched female recipient subgroup. The mismatched male recipient group also showed a decreased hazard ratio of mortality from graft rejection and respiratory causes. No differences in specific mortality causes were identified in the mismatched female recipient group. Conclusion: This study demonstrated an increase in the risk of graft failure and mortality secondary to graft failure in male recipients of female donor livers. No differences in mortality or graft failure were identified in female recipients of male livers.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:The presence of steatosis in a donor liver and its relation to post-transplantation outcomes are not well defined. This study evaluates the effect of the presence and severity of micro- and macro-steatosis of a donor graft on post-transplantation outcomes. METHODS:The UNOS-STAR registry (2005-2019) was used to select patients who received a liver transplant graft with hepatic steatosis. The study cohort was stratified by the presence of macro- or micro-vesicular steatosis, and further stratified by histologic grade of steatosis. The primary endpoints of all-cause mortality and graft failure were compared using sequential Cox regression analysis. Analysis of specific causes of mortality was further performed. RESULTS:There were 9184 with no macro-steatosis (control), 150 with grade 3 macro-steatosis, 822 with grade 2 macro-steatosis and 12 585 with grade 1 macro-steatosis. There were 10 320 without micro-steatosis (control), 478 with grade 3 micro-steatosis, 1539 with grade 2 micro-steatosis and 10 404 with grade 1 micro-steatosis. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality or graft failure among recipients who received a donor organ with any evidence of macro- or micro-steatosis, compared to those receiving non-steatotic grafts. There was increased mortality due to cardiac arrest among recipients of a grade 2 macro-steatosis donor organ. CONCLUSION:This study shows no significant difference in all-cause mortality or graft failure among recipients who received a donor liver with any degree of micro- or macro-steatosis. Further analysis identified increased mortality due to specific aetiologies among recipients receiving donor organs with varying grades of macro- and micro-steatosis.

SummaryBackgroundThe incidence of hospitalisations related to acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (ACLF) is increasing. Liver transplantation (LT) remains the definitive treatment for the condition.AimTo evaluate the influence of race and ethnicity on LT outcomes in ACLF.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis utilising LT data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. White patients served as the control group and patients of other races were compared at each ACLF grade. The primary outcomes assessed were graft failure and all‐cause mortality.ResultsBlacks exhibited a higher all‐cause mortality (Grade 1: aHR 1.36, 95% CI 1.18–1.57, p < 0.001; Grade 2: aHR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08–1.48, p = 0.003; Grade 3: aHR 1.19, 95% CI 1.04–1.37, p = 0.01) and graft failure (Grade 1: aHR 2.05, 95% CI 1.58–2.67, p < 0.001; Grade 2: aHR 1.91, 95% CI 1.43–2.54, p < 0.001; Grade 3: aHR 1.50, 95% CI 1.15–1.96, p = 0.002). Hispanics experienced a lower all‐cause mortality at grades 1 and 3 (Grade 1: aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.96, p = 0.01; Grade 3: aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70–0.91, p < 0.001) and Asians with severe ACLF demonstrated decreased all‐cause mortality (Grade 3: aHR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42–0.73, p < 0.001).ConclusionBlack patients experienced the poorest outcomes and Hispanic and Asian patients demonstrated more favourable outcomes compared to Whites.

Background:Primary liver cancer (PLC) has placed an increasing economic and resource burden on the health care system of the United States. We attempted to quantify its epidemiology and associated costs using a national inpatient database.Methods:Hospital discharge and insurance claims data from the National Inpatient Sample were used to conduct this analysis. Patients diagnosed with PLC (hepatocellular carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma) were included in the study population, which was then stratified using patient demographics, comorbidities, degree of cancer spread, liver disease complications, and other descriptors. Trends were analyzed via regression curves for each of these strata from the years 2016 to 2019, with special attention to patterns in hospitalization incidence, inpatient mortality rate, total costs, and average per-capita costs. The resulting curves were evaluated using goodness-of-fit statistics and P-values.Results:Aggregate hospitalization incidence, inpatient mortality rates, and total costs were found to significantly increase throughout the study period (P=0.002, 0.002, and 0.02, respectively). Relative to their demographic counterparts, males, White Americans, and those older than 65 years of age contributed the largest proportions of total costs. These population segments also experienced significant increases in total expenditure (P=0.04, 0.03, and 0.02, respectively). Admissions deemed to have multiple comorbidities were associated with progressively higher total costs throughout the study period (P=0.01). Of the categorized underlying liver diseases, only admissions diagnosed with alcoholic liver disease or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease saw significantly increasing total costs (P=0.006 and 0.01), although hepatitis C was found to be the largest contributor to total expenses.Conclusions:From 2016 to 2019, total costs, admission incidence, and inpatient mortality rates associated with PLC hospitalization increased. Strata-specific findings may be reflective of demographic shifts in the PLC patient populations, as well as changes in underlying chronic liver disease etiologies.

Background and Aims: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive technique used to treat esophageal motility disorders. Opioid use has been demonstrated to adversely affect esophageal dysmotility and is associated with an increased prevalence of esophageal motility disorders. Our aim was to investigate the effect of narcotic use on success rates in patients undergoing POEM. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study of patients undergoing POEM between February 2017 and September 2021. Primary outcomes were post -POEM Eckardt score (ES), distensibility index, and length of procedure. Secondary outcomes included technical success, myotomy length, length of stay, adverse events, reintervention rates, and postprocedure GERD. Results: During the study period, 90 patients underwent POEM for treatment of esophageal dysmotility disorders. Age, sex, race, indications for POEM, and body mass index were not signi fi cant between those with or without narcotic use. There were no differences in procedure time, preprocedure ESs, or length of stay. Postprocedure ESs were higher in the group with active narcotic use compared to the group with no prior history (2.73 vs 1.2, P Z .004). Distensibility indexes measured with EndoFLIP (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn, USA) were not different in patients using narcotics compared with opioid-na & iuml;ve patients. Conclusion: Active narcotic use negatively affects symptom improvement after POEM for the treatment of esophageal motility disorders. (Gastrointest Endosc 2024;99:490-8.)

Background and aim In this study, we used a national cohort of patients with Wilson’s disease (WD) to investigate the admissions, mortality rates, and costs over the captured period to assess specific subpopulations at higher burden. Methods Patients with WD were selected using 2016–2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS). The weighted estimates and patient data were stratified using demographics and medical characteristics. Regression curves were graphed to derive goodness-of-fit for each trend from which R 2 and P values were calculated. Results Annual total admissions per 100 000 hospitalizations due to WD were 1075, 1180, 1140, and 1330 (R 2 = 0.75; P = 0.13) from 2016 to 2019. Within the demographics, there was an increase in admissions among patients greater than 65 years of age (R 2 = 0.90; P = 0.05) and White patients (R 2 = 0.97; P = 0.02). Assessing WD-related mortality rates, there was an increase in the mortality rate among those in the first quartile of income (R 2 = 1.00; P < 0.001). The total cost for WD-related hospitalizations was $20.90, $27.23, $24.20, and $27.25 million US dollars for the years 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively (R 2 = 0.47; P = 0.32). There was an increasing total cost trend for Asian or Pacific Islander patients (R 2 = 0.90; P = 0.05). Interestingly, patients with cirrhosis demonstrated a decreased trend in the total costs (R 2 = 0.97; P = 0.02). Conclusion Our study demonstrated that certain ethnicity groups, income classes and comorbidities had increased admissions or costs among patients admitted with WD.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:Liver transplant patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis often present with concurrent inflammatory bowel disease. The effect of comorbid conditions on post-transplant prognosis was evaluated.METHODS:The 2005-2019 United Network of Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research database was used to identify patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Patients were categorized as having Crohn's Disease, ulcerative colitis, unclassified inflammatory bowel disease, or no inflammatory bowel disease. Baseline characteristics were assessed between cohorts, and outcomes were examined using Cox regression. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, graft failure, infection-induced mortality, and organ system-delineated mortality. Supplementary analyses with unique exclusion and stratification criteria were also performed.RESULTS:Among 2829 patients undergoing transplant, 1360 were considered to have ulcerative colitis, 372 were considered to have Crohn's Disease, and 69 were considered to have an unclassified form of inflammatory bowel disease. Primary sclerosing cholangitis patients with some form of inflammatory bowel disease had no increased risk for any outcomes. However, patients with ulcerative colitis had lower risks of general infectious (aHR 0.65 95%CI 0.44-0.95) and sepsis-induced (aHR 0.56 95%CI 0.35-0.91) mortality, whereas patients with Crohn's Disease had higher risks of sepsis-induced mortality (aHR 2.13 95%CI 1.22-3.70). Supplementary analyses showed effect modification by abdominal surgery history and era.CONCLUSION:The type of inflammatory bowel disease in liver transplant patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis was found to portend risk difference for infection-induced mortality, with ulcerative colitis found to be protective and Crohn's Disease predictive of increased mortality secondary to infectious etiologies. These associations warrant further investigation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:Palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO) allows resumption of peroral intake. Although surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ) provides durable relief, it may be associated with a higher morbidity, interfere with chemotherapy, and require an optimum nutritional status. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. We aimed to conduct the largest comparative series to date between EUS-GE and SGJ for mGOO. METHODS:This multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing SGJ or EUS-GE at 6 centers. Primary outcomes included time to resumption of oral intake, length of stay (LOS), and mortality. Secondary outcomes included technical and clinical success, reintervention rates, adverse events (AEs), and resumption of chemotherapy. RESULTS:A total of 310 patients were included (EUS-GE, n = 187; SGJ, n = 123). EUS-GE exhibited significantly lower time to resumption of oral intake (1.40 vs 4.06 days, P < .001), at lower albumin levels (2.95 vs 3.33 g/dL, P < .001), and a shorter LOS (5.31 vs 8.54 days, P < .001) compared with SGJ; there was no difference in mortality (48.1% vs 50.4%, P = .78). Technical (97.9% and 100%) and clinical (94.1% vs 94.3%) success was similar in the EUS-GE and SGJ groups, respectively. EUS-GE had lower rates of AEs (13.4% vs 33.3%, P < .001) but higher reintervention rates (15.5% vs 1.63%, P < .001). EUS-GE patients exhibited significantly lower interval time to resumption of chemotherapy (16.6 vs 37.8 days, P < .001). Outcomes between the EUS-GE and laparoscopic (n = 46) surgical approach showed that EUS-GE had shorter interval time to initiation/resumption of oral intake (3.49 vs 1.46 days, P < .001), decreased LOS (9 vs 5.31 days, P < .001), and a lower rate of AEs (11.9% vs 17.9%, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS:This is the largest study to date showing that EUS-GE can be performed among nutritionally deficient patients without affecting the technical and clinical success compared with SGJ. EUS-GE is associated with fewer AEs while allowing earlier resumption of diet and chemotherapy.

Background and aim: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a prominent cause of chronic liver disease in the United States. This study aims to characterize the incidence, mortality, and cost implications of this condition using a national database. Method: The 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample was used to select patients with AIH. After adjusting for inflation, weighted charge data were used to calculate the admission costs using chargeto-cost ratios. Demographic, socioeconomic status, and comorbidity values were used to build strata to characterize admission incidence, mortality data and aggregate and per-capita cost values. Furthermore, additional sensitivity analysis was performed using a stratified set of patients with AIH as one of the top 10 diagnosis (AIH-specific subsample). Multinomial regression curves were graphed and assessed to derive goodness-of-fit for each trend. R2 and P-values were calculated. Results: From 2016 to 2019, the total admissions related to AIH were approximately 20,984, 21,905, 22,055, and 22,680 cases, respectively (R2: 0.93, Pvalue: 0.03). AIH-related hospitalization aggregate costs came to $338.18, $369.17, $355.98, and $387.25 million dollars (R2: 0.75, P-value: 0.17). Significant admission growth was seen in the Southern region (R2: 0.91, P-value: 0.05). Most notably, increasing trends in total admissions were found across older age, those of White and Hispanic descent, and those with comorbidities. On the other hand, the AIH-specific subsample illustrated decreasing trends in admissions across demographics (i.e., age, gender, and race) and comorbidities; however, those with hepatic complications saw a rise in the admission trends (cirrhosis - R2: 0.98, Pvalue: 0.009; multiple liver complications - R2: 0.95, P-value: 0.03). Conclusion: Among AIH-specific admissions, there was a decreasing trend overall; however, there was an exceptional increase in the admissions among those with hepatic complications. ( J CLIN EXP HEPATOL 2024;14:101279)

Background & Aims: We investigate the effects of advancing donor age on the prognostic outcomes of patients with NASH who undergo liver transplant (LT), with a specialized attention toward infectious outcomes post-LT. Methods: The UNOS-STAR registry was used to select 2005 to 2019 LT recipients with NASH, who were stratified by donor age into the following categories: recipients with younger donors (less than 50 years of age-reference), quinquagenarian donors, sexagenarian donors, septuagenarian donors, and octogenarian donors. Cox regression analyses were conducted for all-cause mortality, graft failure, infectious causes of death. Results: From a total of 8888 recipients, the quinquagenarian, septuagenarian, and octogenarian donor cohorts showed greater risk of all-cause mortality (quinquagenarian: aHR 1.16 95%CI 1.03-1.30; septuagenarian: aHR 1.20 95%CI 1.00-1.4 4; octogenarian: aHR 2.01 95%CI 1.40-2.88). With advancing donor age, there was an increased risk of death from sepsis (quinquagenarian: aHR 1.71 95% CI 1.24-2.36; sexagenarian: aHR 1.73 95% CI 1.21-2.48; septuagenarian: aHR 1.76 95% CI 1.07-2.90; octogenarian: aHR 3.58 95% CI 1.42-9.06) and infectious causes (quinquagenarian: aHR 1.46 95% CI 1.12-1.90; sexagenarian: aHR 1.58 95% CI 1.18-2.11; septuagenarian: aHR 1.73 95% CI 1.15-2.61; octogenarian: aHR 3.70 95% CI 1.78-7.69). Conclusion: NASH patients who receive grafts from elderly donors exhibit higher risk of post-LT mortality, especially due to infection. & COPY; 2023 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.