The NASA POLarimetric (NPOL) Radar is based at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center(GSFC) Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) in Wallops Island, Virginia, and is physically located about 38 km northeast in Newark, MD (38.263N, 75.342W). NPOL is NASA's flagship weather radar and provides well-calibrated high-quality data for the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Ground Validation (GV) program. NPOL is an S-band, Doppler, dual-polarimetric radar that measures reflectivity, radial velocity, and spectrum width, as well as differential reflectivity, differential phase, and co-polar correlation. Subsequent data processing provides retrievals of rain rate, specific differential phase, and particle size distribution parameters.A discussion of the NPOL system is provided in Section 6.1. The various means of both engineering and data-based calibration of the radar are given in Section 6.2. A summary of the software tools that have been developed and used by GPM GV personnel is provided in Section 6.3. A brief review of the NPOL-based GPM field campaigns, as well as NPOL's contributions to the WFF Precipitation Research Facility, is given in Section 6.4. Finally, Section 6.5 provides some examples that utilize NPOL for validation.

The Wallops Precipitation Research Facility (WPRF) at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Wallops Island, Virginia, has been established as a semipermanent supersite for the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Ground Validation (GV) program. WPRF is home to research-quality precipitation instruments, including NASA's S-band dual-polarimetric radar (NPOL), and a network of profiling radars, disdrometers, and rain gauges. This study investigates the statistical agreement of the GPM Core Observatory Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR), combined DPR-GPM Microwave Imager (GMI) and GMI level II precipitation retrievals compared to WPRF ground observations from a 6-yr collection of satellite overpasses. Multisensor observations are integrated using the System for Integrating Multiplatform Data to Build the Atmospheric Column (SIMBA) software package. SIMBA ensures measurements recorded in a variety of formats are synthesized into a common reference frame for ease in comparison and analysis. Given that instantaneous satellite measurements are observed above ground level, this study investigates the possibility of a time lag between satellite and surface mass-weighted mean diameter (D-m), reflectivity (Z), and precipitation rate (R) observations. Results indicate that time lags vary up to 30 min after overpass time but are not consistent between cases. In addition, GPM Core Observatory D-m retrievals are within level I mission science requirements as compared to WPRF ground observations. Results also indicate GPM algorithms overestimate light rain (< 1.0 mm h(-1)). Two very different stratiform rain vertical profiles show differing results when compared to ground reference data. A key finding of this study indicates multisensor DPR/GMI combined algorithms outperform single-sensor DPR algorithm. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Satellites are beneficial for global precipitation surveillance because extensive ground instruments are lacking, especially over oceans. Ground validation studies are required to calibrate and improve precipitation algorithms from satellite sensors. The primary goal of this study is to quantify the differences between satellite raindrop size and rain-rate retrieval with ground-based observations. Rainfall-rate algorithms require assumptions about the mean raindrop size. Results indicate Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM)/satellite-based mean raindrop size is within acceptable error (& PLUSMN;0.5 mm) with respect to ground measurements. In addition, GPM satellite measurements overestimate light rain (< 1.0 mm h(-1)), which is important during the winter months and at high latitudes. Illuminating the challenges of GPM satellite-based precipitation estimation can guide algorithm developers to improve retrievals.

Earth and Space Science Open Archive PosterOpen AccessYou are viewing the latest version by default [v1]A Python-based Radar Data Processing System for the NASA GPM Ground Validation ProgramAuthorsJasonPippittiDDavidWolffiDDavidMarksCharanjitPablaBrandonGardnerSee all authors Jason PippittiDCorresponding Author• Submitting AuthorNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterSSAIiDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6698-0756view email addressThe email was not providedcopy email addressDavid WolffiDNASA Goddard Space Flight Center Wallops Flight FacilityiDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0005-3754view email addressThe email was not providedcopy email addressDavid MarksScience Systems and Applications, Inc.view email addressThe email was not providedcopy email addressCharanjit PablaScience Systems and Applications, Inc.view email addressThe email was not providedcopy email addressBrandon GardnerNASA Goddard Space Flight Center Wallops Flight Facilityview email addressThe email was not providedcopy email address

The integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) Version V05B and V06B precipitation products from the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission are validated against ground-based observations from the Kwajalein Polarimetric S-band Weather Radar (KPOL) deployed at Kwajalein Atoll in the central Pacific Ocean. Such a validation is particularly important as comprehensive surface measurements over the oceans are practically infeasible, which hampers the identification of possible errors, and improvement of future versions of IMERG and other satellite-based retrieval algorithms. The V05B and V06B IMERG products are validated at their native 0.1°, 30 min resolution from 2014 to 2018 based on both volumetric and categorical metrics. This validation study indicates that precipitation rates from both IMERG V05B and V06B are underestimated with respect to radar surface estimates, but the underestimation is much reduced from V05B to V06B. IMERG V06B outperforms V05B with reduced systematic bias and improved precipitation detectability. The IMERG performance is further traced back to its individual sensors and morphing-based algorithms. The overall underestimation in V05B is mainly driven by the negative relative biases from morphing-based algorithms which are largely corrected in V06B. Imagers perform generally better than sounders because of the usage of low-frequency channels in imagers which can better detect emission signals by the hydrometeors. Among imagers, the GPM Microwave Imager (GMI) and Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer Version 2 (AMSR2) are the best, followed by Special Sensor Microwave Imager/Sounder (SSMIS). Among sounders, the Microwave Humidity Sounder (MHS) is the best, followed by Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS) and the Sounder for Atmospheric Profiling of Humidity in the Intertropics by Radiometry (SAPHIR) for V06B. Among all categories, morph-only and IR + morph only perform better than SAPHIR. SAPHIR shows the worst performance among all categories, likely due to its limited channel selection. It is envisaged that these results will improve our understanding of IMERG performance over oceans and aid in the improvement of future versions of IMERG.

Measurements of full drop size distribution (DSD) spectra were used as input for scattering calculations to derive fitted equations for light rain and drizzle for estimating the mass-weighted mean diameter, Dm, from radar reflectivity (Zh) at S-band. Testing was performed using Zh measured S-band polarimetric radars over two different disdrometer locations versus Dm from disdrometer measurements. Consistent results were obtained but only for Zh < 18 dBZ for light rain and <5 dBZ for drizzle. Additionally, gridded radar data were used to identify light rain and drizzle regions, and their Dm histograms were compared with those derived from stratiform and convective rain regions.

A novel method for retrieving the moments of rain drop size distribution (DSD) from the dual-frequency precipitation radar (DPR) onboard the global precipitation mission satellite (GPM) is presented. The method involves the estimation of two chosen reference moments from two specific DPR products, namely the attenuation-corrected Ku-band radar reflectivity and (if made available) the specific attenuation at Ka-band. The reference moments are then combined with a function representing the underlying shape of the DSD based on the generalized gamma model. Simulations are performed to quantify the algorithm errors. The performance of methodology is assessed with two GPM-DPR overpass cases over disdrometer sites, one in Huntsville, Alabama and one in Delmarva peninsula, Virginia, both in the US. Results are promising and indicate that it is feasible to estimate DSD moments directly from DPR-based quantities.

Data from an S-band polarimetric radar located at a mid-latitude, coastal location are used to compare two different methods for identifying stratiform and convective rain regions. The first method entails the retrievals of two (main) parameters of the rain drop size distributions using the radar reflectivity and the differential reflectivity. The second technique is a well-known texture-based method which utilizes the radar reflectivity and its spatial variability. A widespread event with embedded line convection was used as a test case. The two methods were compared using 500 m by 500 m pixel resolution gridded data constructed from the radar volume scans. Only 12% of the pixels showed disagreement between the two methods.

Stratiform and convective rain are associated with different microphysical processes and generally produce drop-size distributions (DSDs) with different characteristics. Previous studies using data from (a) a tropical coastal location, (b) a mid-latitude continental location with semi-arid climate, and (c) a sub-tropical continental location, found that the two rain types could be separated in the NW–Dm space, where Dm is the mass-weighted mean diameter and NW is the normalized intercept parameter. In this paper, we investigate the same separation technique using data and observations from a mid-latitude coastal region. Three-minute DSDs from disdrometer measurements are used for the NW- versus Dm-based classification and are compared with simultaneous observations from an S-band polarimetric radar 38 km away from the disdrometer site. Specifically, RHI (range-height indicator) scans over the disdrometer were used for confirmation. Results show that there was no need to modify the separation criteria from previous studies. Three-minute DSDs from the same location were used as input to scattering calculations to derive retrieval equations for NW and Dm for the S-band radar using an improved technique and applied to the RHI scans to identify convective and stratiform rain regions. Two events are shown as illustrative examples.

Hurricane rainbands are very efficient rain producers, but details on drop size distributions are still lacking. This study focuses on the rainbands of hurricane Dorian as they traversed the densely instrumented NASA precipitation-research facility at Wallops Island, VA, over a period of 8 h. Drop size distribution (DSD) was measured using a high-resolution meteorological particle spectrometer (MPS) and 2D video disdrometer, both located inside a double-fence wind shield. The shape of the DSD was examined using double-moment normalization, and compared with similar shapes from semiarid and subtropical sites. Dorian rainbands had a superexponential shape at small normalized diameter values similar to those of the other sites. NASA’s S-band polarimetric radar performed range height-indicator (RHI) scans over the disdrometer site, showing some remarkable signatures in the melting layer (bright-band reflectivity peaks of 55 dBZ, a dip in the copolar correlation to 0.85 indicative of 12–15 mm wet snow, and a staggering reflectivity gradient above the 0 °C level of −10 dB/km, indicative of heavy aggregation). In the rain layer at heights < 2.5 km, polarimetric signatures indicated drop break-up as the dominant process, but drops as large as 5 mm were detected during the intense bright-band period.

The ground-based-radar-derived raindrop size distribution (DSD) parameters—mass-weighted drop diameter Dmass and normalized intercept parameter NW—are the sole resource for direct validation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Core Observatory satellite-based retrieved DSD. Both Dmass and NW are obtained from radar-measured reflectivity ZH and differential reflectivity ZDR through empirical relationships. This study uses existing relationships that were determined for the GPM ground validation (GV) program and directly compares the NASA S-band polarimetric radar (NPOL) observables of ZH and ZDR and derived Dmass and NW with those calculated by two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD). The joint NPOL and 2DVD datasets were acquired during three GPM GV field campaigns conducted in eastern Iowa, southern Appalachia, and western Washington State. The comparative study quantifies the level of agreement for ZH, ZDR, Dmass, and log(NW) at an optimum distance (15–40 km) from the radar as well as at distances greater than 60 km from radar and over mountainous terrain. Interestingly, roughly 10%–15% of the NPOL ZH–ZDR pairs were well outside the envelope of 2DVD-estimated ZH–ZDR pairs. The exclusion of these pairs improved the comparisons noticeably.

Hurricane Harvey hit the Texas Gulf Coast as a major hurricane on 25 August 2017 before exiting the state as a tropical storm on 29 August 2017. Left in its wake was historic flooding, with some locations measuring more than 60 in. (150 cm) of rain over a 5-day period. The WSR-88D radar (KHGX) maintained operations for the entirety of the event. Rain gauge data from the Harris County Flood Warning System (HCFWS) was used for validation with the full radar dataset to retrieve daily and event-total precipitation estimates for the period 25-29 August 2017. The KHGX precipitation estimates were then compared with the HCFWS gauges. Three different hybrid polarimetric rainfall retrievals were used, along with attenuation-based retrieval that employs the radar-observed differential propagation. An advantage of using a attenuation-based retrieval is its immunity to partial beam blockage and calibration errors in reflectivity and differential reflectivity. All of the retrievals are susceptible to changes in the observed drop size distribution (DSD). No in situ DSD data were available over the study area, so changes in the DSD were interpreted by examining the observed radar data. We examined the parameter space of two key values in the attenuation retrieval to test the sensitivity of the rain retrieval. Selecting a value of alpha = 0.015 and beta = 0.600 provided the best overall results, relative to the gauges, but more work needs to be done to develop an automated technique to account for changes in the ambient DSD.

12th International Precipitation Conference; June 19, 2019 - June 21, 2019; Irvine, CA; United States

A critical component of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Mission validation strategy involves use of dual-polarimetric (DP) ground-based radar (GR) products. Both operational and research DP radars across the U.S. and several international locations are used with coincident GPM dual-frequency precipitation radar (DPR) data in a significant expansion of the original TRMM-based “validation network architecture” (VN; Schwaller and Morris, 2011, J.Tech.). The VN radar databases consist of millions of geometrically matched DPR and GR precipitation volumes. Not only does it serve as a tool for validation of satellite-based precipitation retrieval algorithms and GR calibration but also a valuable resource for precipitation science and for complimenting future convective precipitation-related satellite missions.

Researchers now have the benefit of an unprecedented suite of space- and ground-based sensors that provide multidimensional and multiparameter precipitation information. Motivated by NASA’s Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission and ground validation objectives, the System for Integrating Multiplatform Data to Build the Atmospheric Column (SIMBA) has been developed as a unique multisensor precipitation data fusion tool to unify field observations recorded in a variety of formats and coordinate systems into a common reference frame. Through platform-specific modules, SIMBA processes data from native coordinates and resolutions only to the extent required to set them into a user-defined three-dimensional grid. At present, the system supports several ground-based scanning research radars, NWS NEXRAD radars, profiling Micro Rain Radars (MRRs), multiple disdrometers and rain gauges, soundings, the GPM Microwave Imager and Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar on board the Core Observatory satellite, and Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor system quantitative precipitation estimates. SIMBA generates a new atmospheric column data product that contains a concomitant set of all available data from the supported platforms within the user-specified grid defining the column area in the versatile netCDF format. Key parameters for each data source are preserved as attributes. SIMBA provides a streamlined framework for initial research tasks, facilitating more efficient precipitation science. We demonstrate the utility of SIMBA for investigations, such as assessing spatial precipitation variability at subpixel scales and appraising satellite sensor algorithm representation of vertical precipitation structure for GPM Core Observatory overpass cases collected in the NASA Wallops Precipitation Science Research Facility and the GPM Olympic Mountain Experiment (OLYMPEX) ground validation field campaign in Washington State.

GPM DSD retrievals exhibit inconsistencies between GV, DPR and Combined algorithm retrievals. Development of positive bias in convective Dm rain DSD noted, and strongest in KuPR retrieval. Associated epsilons are too low and result in markedly reduced convective rain rates (a current issue in the retrievals). Source may be NUBF. Issues with the large end of the DSD not withstanding, on the small end of the DSD, combined MPS and 2DVD measurements fit with generalized gamma functions exhibit strong potential for representing the entire spectrum of the DSD and subsequently the whole rain rate spectrum.