Gene activation in early development is highly dependent on precise concentrations of trans-acting factors for the activation of different genes at differing points in the embryo. Thus, not only is the presence or absence of a particular trans-activator or repressor relevant in determining gene activation, but also the concentration of the regulatory protein must be above or below a certain threshold for proper gene regulation. Signaling pathways in somatic cells are thought to represent cascades of on/off switches, mediated most commonly by phosphorylation. Here we demonstrate a quantitative mechanism for regulating the level of a component of the IFN-gamma signaling pathway that in effect represents the differential sensitivities of STAT1, IFN-regulatory factor-1, and class II trans-activator (CIITA) to IFN-gamma. Unlike developmental gene regulation, in which specificity of gene activation is a function of regulatory protein concentrations, specificity of gene activation in the IFN-gamma signaling pathway is regulated by the duration of the activation of the primary IFN-gamma-regulatory protein, STAT1. This result most likely explains previously reported data indicating that a minimum amount of IFN-gamma is required for MHC class II gene activation despite the fact that the level of the IFN-gamma-inducible factor directly required for MHC class II induction, CIITA, directly correlates with the level of MHC class II expression. The induction of a high level of CIITA is dependent on sustained IFN-gamma signaling. The possible implications of this result for tumorigenesis are discussed.
Melanoma cells commonly express MHC class II molecules constitutively. This is a rare, or possibly unique, phenotype for a nonprofessional antigen-presenting cell, where MHC class II expression ordinarily occurs only after IFN-gamma treatment. Despite the fact that constitutive expression of MHC class II on melanoma cells has been observed for decades and that the regulation of the MHC class II genes is well understood for many different cell types, there is no data regarding the basis for constitutive MHC class II expression in melanoma cells. Here we report that MHC class II expression in melanoma cells can be traced to constitutive expression of the class II transactivator protein (CIITA), which mediates both IFN-gamma-inducible and -constitutive MHC class II expression in all other cell types. In addition, we determined that constitutive CIITA expression is the result of the activation of both the B cell-specific CIITA promoter III and the IFN-gamma-inducible CIITA promoter IV, the latter of which previously has never been known to function as a constitutive promoter in any cell type. The recently described B cell-related ARE-1 activity is important for promoter III activation in the melanoma cells. Constitutive promoter IV activation involves the IFN regulatory factor element (IRF-E), which binds members of the IRF family of proteins, although the major, IFN-gamma inducible member of this family, IRF-1, is not constitutively expressed in these cells. In cells with constitutively active promoter IV, the promoter IV IRF-E is most likely activated by IRF-2. The relevance of these results to the pathway of melanoma development is discussed.
Interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) is a transcriptional activator of genes induced by a variety of cytokines and growth factors. Defects in IRF-1 occur frequently in human cancers and may contribute to tumorigenesis. The IRF family of transcription factors share invariant tryptophan residues that have been proposed to function by orienting the DNA contacting residues of IRF-1 with the DNA core sequence of the IRF element. Here we describe a point mutation in IRF-1 that converts the tryptophan at codon 11 to arginine (W11R). The IRF-1 (W11R) mutation abolishes IRF-1 DNA binding and transactivating activities demonstrating the critical role of this invariant tryptophan in IRF-1 function.
Tumor cell lines with a defective retinoblastoma gene are unable to transcribe the HLA class II genes in response to IFN-gamma treatment, and reconstitution of functional Rb rescues IFN-gamma-induced class II gene expression. However, the molecular mechanism of Rb rescue of the class II genes is unknown. We have examined the effect of Rb expression on the activation of the promoter for HLA-DRA, the prototype class II gene. Oct-1, a POU domain transcription factor, was identified as a repressor of HLA-DRA promoter activity in the Rb-defective cells. Rb expression led to phosphorylation of Oct-1, thus relieving its repressive effect. Oct-1 has also been shown to repress interleukin 8 promoter activity. Consistent with reduced levels of Oct-1 DNA binding activity in the Rb-transformed cell lines, interleukin 8 expression is higher in these cell lines.