PURPOSE:The purpose of this study was to determine the dietary, anthropometric, blood-lipid, and performance patterns of university-level American football players attempting to increase body mass during 8 wk of training.METHODS:Three-day diet records, body composition (DEXA scan), blood lipids, and performance measures were collected in redshirt football players (N = 15, age 18.5 ± 0.6 yr) early season and after 8 wk of in-season training.RESULTS:There was an increase (p < .05) from early-season to postseason testing for reported energy (+45%), carbohydrate (+82%), and protein (+29%) intakes and no change in the intake of fat. Fat intake was 41% of energy at the early-season test and 32% of energy at the postseason test. Increases (p < .05 for all) in performance measures, lean mass (70.5 ± 7.7-71.8 ± 7.7 kg), fat mass (15.9 ± 6.2-17.3 ± 6.8 kg), plasma total cholesterol (193.5 ± 32.4-222.6 ± 40.0 mg/dl), and low-density lipoproteins (LDL; 92.7 ± 32.7-124.5 ± 34.7 mg/dl) were measured. No changes were measured in triglycerides, very-low-density lipoproteins, or high-density lipoproteins.CONCLUSION:Increases in strength, power, speed, total body mass, muscle mass, and fat mass were measured. Cholesterol and LDL levels increased during the study to levels associated with higher risk for cardiovascular disease. It is possible that this is a temporary phenomenon, but it is cause for concern and an indication that dietary education to promote weight gain in a manner less likely to adversely affect the lipid profile is warranted.

Background: A functionally induced, transient low back pain model consisting of exposure to prolonged standing has been used to elucidate baseline neuromuscular differences between previously asymptomatic individuals classified as pain developers and non-pain developers based on their pain response during a standing exposure. Previous findings have included differences in frontal plane lumbopelvic control and altered movement strategies that are present prior to pain development. Control strategies during sagittal plane movement have not been previously investigated in this sample. The purpose of this research was to investigate neuromuscular control differences during the extension phase from trunk flexion between pain developers and non-pain developers.Methods: Continuous electromyography and kinematic data were collected during standing trunk flexion and extension on 43 participants (22 male) with an age range of 18-33 years, prior to entering into the prolonged standing exposure. Participants were classified as pain developer/non-pain developer by their pain response (>= 10 mm increase on a 100 mm visual analog scale) during standing. Relative timing and sequencing data between muscle pairs were calculated through cross-correlation analyses, and evaluated by group and gender.Findings: Pain developers demonstrated a 'top-down' muscle recruitment strategy with lumbar extensors activated prior to gluteus maximus, while non-pain developers demonstrated a typical 'bottom-up' muscle recruitment strategy with gluteus maximus activated prior to lumbar extensors.Interpretation: Individuals predisposed to low back pain development during standing exhibited altered neuromuscular strategies prior to pain development. These findings may help to characterize biomechanical movement profiles that could be important for early identification of people at risk for low back pain. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Many athletes believe the utilization of protein supplements will increase their lean body mass while improving their overall performance. Many also believe meeting their established protein requirements through dietary intake alone can be difficult and even impossible without incorporating protein supplementation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if muscle hypertrophy and strength gains differed between athletes consuming protein from dietary sources compared to those consuming protein in an exercise recovery supplement. METHODS: Performance measures (bench press, back squat, hang clean, 10 yard sprint, and vertical jump) and body composition were compared in redshirt football players (age 18.6 ± 0.7 years) who completed an eleven week protocol of weight training followed by either protein in supplement form (S, n=6, 28 grams protein) or protein in foods (NS, n=9, 8-28 grams protein) 3 days/week. Subjects completed 3-day diet records to determine macronutrient intake and had DEXA scans to determine body composition both pre- and post-training. RESULTS: Without inclusion of the post-workout protein intake, both groups had similar protein intakes in their diets. Similar increases (P=0.003) in lean body mass were measured in the S (72.2 ± 6.6 to 73.0 ± 6.3 kg) and NS groups (69.3 ± 8.6 to 70.9 ± 8.8 kg). No significant differences were found between the two groups in performance variables. For example, bench press increased (P=0.01) from 114 ± 15 to 120 ± 16 kg in the S group and from 111 ± 12 to 116 ± 13 kg in the NS group. CONCLUSION: The consumption of protein in the form of a recovery supplement shake did not offer any performance or lean body mass advantages over consumption of protein in the form of food.