One of the most challenging environments for accurate geoid models is in high, rugged mountain areas. Orthometric heights derived from GNSS and a geoid model can easily have errors at the decimeter level. To investigate the effect of geoid model variability on the elevations of peaks in high, rugged mountain areas, this paper is focused on the “Fourteeners” of Colorado, USA (a group of about 60 peaks that are above 14,000 feet = 4267.2 m). Airborne LiDAR data are used to determine geometric (ellipsoidal) heights, which first requires removing a hybrid geoid model, as the LiDAR data is originally provided as orthometric heights. We quantify a significant improvement when using these derived ellipsoidal heights compared with the original orthometric heights: from ± 0.074 to ± 0.054 m (RMSE), an improvement of 28

In the summer of 2017, the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) conducted its third and final Geoid Slope Validation Survey in the rugged terrain of southern Colorado, USA. As in previous surveys, the intent is to acquire the most accurate and precise field observations to determine geoid slopes. In turn, these data can be used to quantify the accuracy of various geoid models as NGS looks ahead to creating a highly accurate gravimetric geoid model for use as a national vertical datum. Long period GPS sessions, spirit leveling, absolute gravity, and deflection of the vertical (DoV) observations were acquired along a 360 km line, ranging from 1900 to 3300 m in elevation, with a station spacing of approximately 1.6 km. Our absolute gravity and DoV datasets are unique in that they were collected at 222 field stations in highly mountainous terrain at an unprecedented observational accuracy of 10 µGal and 0.04″, respectively. Further, by employing tailored refraction corrections to the spirit leveling data, we improved the agreement between heights derived from the DoV and spirit leveling from ± 1.9 to ± 1.3 cm RMS, or by more than 30%, across the line. At all length scales, from 1.6 to 360 km, the agreement is better than 2 cm. Finally, as a description of the validation process, we compare the observations with recent NGS experimental geoid models. We find that typical agreement is at about 3–5 cm, with no single model being best at all length scales. The data from this project are freely available to the community and should serve as test beds for not only geoid modeling comparisons, but also the refinement of numerous field techniques.

We study whether the optical properties of a solid glass retroreflector influence the value of the acceleration of gravity $g$ determined by dropping both solid and open retroreflectors in an absolute ballistic gravimeter. The retroreflectors have equivalent optical centers and are dropped from the same height, at a fixed location, in the same gravimeter while recording time data corresponding to fixed fringe separation intervals of 400 fringes. The data for both types of retroreflectors are processed with commercial software, as well as with independently developed software based on a relativistic treatment of the phase difference between reference beam and test beams, and a realistic treatment of the effect of frequency modulation, with modulation index $\beta \gg 1$, on the interference signal. After applying corrections for polar motion, barometric admittance, tides, and ocean loading we find agreement between the values of $g$ determined with both types of retroreflectors, whether processed with commercial software or with our independently developed software. We suggest two procedures for computing relativistic corrections; the two methods agree to better than .01 $\mu$Gal.

In November 2013 an International Key Comparison, CCM.G-K2, was organized in the Underground Laboratory for Geodynamics in Walferdange. The comparison has assembled 25 participants coming from 19 countries and four different continents. The comparison was divided into two parts: the key comparison that included 10 NMIs or DIs, and the pilot study including all participants. The global result given by the pilot study confirms that all instruments are absolutely coherent to each other. The results obtained for the key comparison confirm a good agreement between the NMI instruments. Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by CCM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

In November 2013 an International Key Comparison, CCM.G-K2, was organized in the Underground Laboratory for Geodynamics in Walferdange. The comparison has assembled 25 participants coming from 19 countries and four different continents. The comparison was divided into two parts: the key comparison that included 10 NMIs or DIs, and the pilot study including all participants. The global result given by the pilot study confirms that all instruments are absolutely coherent to each other. The results obtained for the key comparison confirm a good agreement between the NMI instruments.

The gravitational attraction of the body of a gravity meter upon its own proof mass is sometimes called the self-attraction. The self-attraction is a source of systematic error for absolute measurements of g, the acceleration of an object due to Earth's gravity. While the effect is typically small-of the order of one part per billion of the Earth's gravitational attraction-it is significant at the current level of accuracy of absolute gravity meters. In the past, a self-attraction correction for the FG5 gravity meter has been estimated by considering a rather coarse description of the instrument using simple geometrical shapes (spheres and cylinders). This paper describes a more complete calculation using a CAD-based digitized model of the newest FG5X instrument. We have also included the attraction of the co-moving drag-free chamber as well as the self-attraction of the counterweights used in the FG5X to reduce recoil. The results are also applicable to older style FG5 instruments with a fibre-optic interferometer base. The correction found with this new approach agrees with previous estimates but is now based upon a more complete and accurate model.

We present the results of the third European Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters held in Walferdange, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, in November 2011. Twenty-two gravimeters from both metrological and non-metrological institutes are compared. For the first time, corrections for the laser beam diffraction and the self-attraction of the gravimeters are implemented. The gravity observations are also corrected for geophysical gravity changes that occurred during the comparison using the observations of a superconducting gravimeter. We show that these corrections improve the degree of equivalence between the gravimeters. We present the results for two different combinations of data. In the first one, we use only the observations from the metrological institutes. In the second solution, we include all the data from both metrological and non-metrological institutes. Those solutions are then compared with the official result of the comparison published previously and based on the observations of the metrological institutes and the gravity differences at the different sites as measured by non-metrological institutes. Overall, the absolute gravity meters agree with one another with a standard deviation of 3.1 mu Gal. Finally, the results of this comparison are linked to previous ones. We conclude with some important recommendations for future comparisons.

This paper discusses simultaneous gravity and vertical gravity gradient measurements obtained with a newly designed recoil-compensated dropping chamber adapted to an FG5 absolute gravimeter. The new dropping chamber incorporates counterweights to compensate recoil effects. It has the same physical length as the standard FG5 dropping chamber but the free-fall distance was increased from 20 cm to 25 cm. The new drive train pulls on the centre of the system to reduce unwanted horizontal velocity and rotation of the free-falling test mass. The test-mass material was chosen to reduce possible magnetic eddy-current damping caused by external magnetic field gradients. External lead masses were used to change the gravity and vertical gravity gradient. The measurements agree well with the theoretical gravity field changes derived from the position of the external weights. The experiment clearly demonstrates the efficacy of using an absolute gravity meter to measure both the gravity and the gravity gradient signals caused by variations in the external gravity field. This technique shows promise for passive gravity-monitoring applications.