Sustained pathologic myocardial hypertrophy can result in heart failure(HF); a significant health issue affecting a large section of the population worldwide. In HF there is a marked elevation in circulating levels of the peptide urotensin II(UII) but it is unclear whether this is a result of hypertrophy or whether the high levels contribute to the development of hypertrophy. The aim of this study is to investigate a role of UII and its receptor UT in the development of cardiac hypertrophy and the signalling molecules involved. Ventricular myocytes isolated from adult rat hearts were treated with 200nM UII for 48hours and hypertrophy was quantified from measurements of length/width (L/W) ratio. UII resulted in a change in L/W ratio from 4.53±0.10 to 3.99±0.06; (p<0.0001) after 48hours. The response is reversed by the UT-antagonist SB657510 (1μM). UT receptor activation by UII resulted in the activation of ERK1/2, p38 and CaMKII signalling pathways measured by Western blotting; these are involved in the induction of hypertrophy. JNK was not involved. Moreover, ERK1/2, P38 and CaMKII inhibitors completely blocked UII-induced hypertrophy. Sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+-leak was investigated in isolated myocytes. There was no significant increase in SR Ca2+-leak. Our results suggest that activation of MAPK and CaMKII signalling pathways are involved in the hypertrophic response to UII. Collectively our data suggest that increased circulating UII may contribute to the development of left ventricular hypertrophy and pharmacological inhibition of the UII/UT receptor system may prove beneficial in reducing adverse remodeling and alleviating contractile dysfunction in heart disease.

A preclinical study in animals has further characterised a new ‘arousal’ agent. Danavorexton (TAK-925) is an agonist for orexin receptor 2 where it promotes recovery from inhalational and i.v. anaesthesia and opioid sedation. Although danavorexton reverses opioid sedation, it does not compromise analgesia. This could be a useful addition to the postoperative drug cupboard.

BACKGROUND:Vascular adhesion protein 1 (VAP-1) has been implicated in a wide range of clinical conditions. Moreover, serum levels are associated with disease prediction and progression in several clinical studies. There is a paucity of data on VAP-1 and pregnancy. Given the emerging role of VAP-1 in pregnancy, the aim of this study was to examine sVAP-1 as an early biomarker of pregnancy complications, especially hypertension during pregnancy. The objectives of the study are to associate sVAP-1 levels with other pregnancy complications, patient demographics and blood tests performed throughout pregnancy.METHODS:We conducted a pilot study in a cohort of pregnant women (gestational week lower than 20 at the time of recruitment) attending their first antenatal ultrasound scan at the Leicester Royal Infirmary (LRI, UK). Data were both prospectively generated (from blood sample analysis) and retrospectively collected (from hospital records).RESULTS:From July and October 2021, a total of 91 participants were enrolled. Using ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), we found reduced serum levels of sVAP-1 in pregnant women with either pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) (310 ng/mL) or GDM (366.73 ng/mL) as compared to controls (427.44 ng/mL and 428.34 ng/mL, respectively). No significant difference was found between women with FGR compared to controls (424.32 ng/mL vs 424.52 ng/mL), and patients with any pregnancy complications compared to healthy pregnancies (421.28 ng/mL vs 428.34 ng/mL).CONCLUSION:Further studies are needed to establish whether or not sVAP-1 might be considered as an early, non-invasive, and affordable biomarker to screen women who will develop PIH or GDM. Our data will aid sample size calculations for such larger studies.

Background and PurposeIn animal models of sepsis, increased activation of the Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) receptor NOP is associated with mortality and NOP antagonists improved survival. We have explored the role of the N/OFQ-NOP system in freshly isolated volunteer human B- and T-cells incubated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and peptidoglycan G (PepG) as a model of in vitro sepsis. Experimental ApproachB- and T-cell NOP expression was measured using the NOP fluorescent probe N/OFQ(ATTO594), N/OFQ content was measured using immunofluorescence, N/OFQ release was tracked using a CHOhNOPG alpha iq5 biosensor assay and NOP function was measured using transwell migration and cytokine/chemokine release using a 25-plex assay format. Cells were challenged with LPS/PepG. Key ResultsCD19-positive B-cells bound N/OFQ(ATTO594); they also contain N/OFQ. Stimulation with CXCL13/IL-4 increased N/OFQ release. N/OFQ trended to reduced migration to CXCL13/IL-4. Surface NOP expression was unaffected by LPS/PepG, but this treatment increased GM-CSF release in an N/OFQ sensitive manner. CD3-positive T-cells did not bind N/OFQ(ATTO594); they did contain N/OFQ. Stimulation with CXCL12/IL-6 increased N/OFQ release. When incubated with LPS/PepG, NOP surface expression was induced leading to N/OFQ(ATTO594) binding. In LPS/PepG-treated cells, N/OFQ reduced migration to CXCL12/IL-6. LPS/PepG increased GM-CSF release in an N/OFQ sensitive manner. Conclusions and ImplicationsWe suggest both a constitutive and sepsis-inducible N/OFQ-NOP receptor autocrine regulation of B- and T-cell function, respectively. These NOP receptors variably inhibit migration and reduce GM-CSF release. These data provide mechanistic insights to the detrimental role for increased N/OFQ signalling in sepsis and suggest a potential role for NOP antagonists as treatments.

In 2023, the British Journal of Anaesthesia commemorates its first century of publishing innovations in anaesthesia, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine. In honour of this special anniversary we outline a number of exciting initiatives to occur over the course of the year to commemorate this important milestone, and to highlight the many contributions that the British Journal of Anaesthesia has made to patient care, medical research, and medical education in our first 100 years.

Opioids are a mainstay in acute pain management and produce their effects and side effects (e.g., tolerance, opioid-use disorder and immune suppression) by interaction with opioid receptors. I will discuss opioid pharmacology in some controversial areas of enquiry of anaesthetic relevance. The main opioid target is the µ (mu,MOP) receptor but other members of the opioid receptor family, δ (delta; DOP) and κ (kappa; KOP) opioid receptors also produce analgesic actions. These are naloxone-sensitive. There is important clinical development relating to the Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ (NOP) receptor, an opioid receptor that is not naloxone-sensitive. Better understanding of the drivers for opioid effects and side effects may facilitate separation of side effects and production of safer drugs. Opioids bind to the receptor orthosteric site to produce their effects and can engage monomer or homo-, heterodimer receptors. Some ligands can drive one intracellular pathway over another. This is the basis of biased agonism (or functional selectivity). Opioid actions at the orthosteric site can be modulated allosterically and positive allosteric modulators that enhance opioid action are in development. As well as targeting ligand-receptor interaction and transduction, modulating receptor expression and hence function is also tractable. There is evidence for epigenetic associations with different types of pain and also substance misuse. As long as the opioid narrative is defined by the 'opioid crisis' the drive to remove them could gather pace. This will deny use where they are effective, and access to morphine for pain relief in low income countries.

The British Journal of Anaesthesia organisation is a registered charity comprised of two interlinked missions: provision of impactful publications and funding the generation and dissemination of research to the wider anaesthetic community. This centenary editorial highlights our charitable activity that covers funding of research infrastructure, meeting support and funding of a diverse portfolio of international research grants.

Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) is the endogenous opioid agonist for the N/OFQ receptor or NOP. This receptor system is involved in pain processing but also has a role in immune regulation. Indeed, polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) express mRNA for N/OFQ precursor and are a potential source for circulating N/OFQ. Current measurements are based on ELISA and RIA techniques. In this study we have designed a bioassay to measure N/OFQ release from single PMNs. Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells transfected with the human (h) NOP receptor and Gαiq5 chimera force receptor coupling in biosensor cells to increase intracellular Ca2+; this can be measured with FLUO-4 dye. If isolated PMNs from healthy human volunteers are layered next to CHOhNOPGαiq5 biosensor cells then stimulated with the chemoattractant N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP) we hypothesise that released N/OFQ will activate the biosensor. PMNs also release ATP and CHO cells express purinergic receptors coupled to elevated Ca2+. In a system where these receptors (P2Y1, P2Y2 and P2X7) are blocked with high concentrations of PPADS and oATP, PMN stimulation with fMLP increases Ca2+ in PMNs then shortly afterwards the biosensor cells. Our data therfore reports detection of single cell N/OFQ release from immune cells. This was absent when cells were preincubated with the selective NOP antagonist; SB-612111. Collectively this is the first description of single cell N/OFQ release. We will deploy this assay with further purified individual cell types and use this to further study the role of the N/OFQ-NOP system in disease; in particular sepsis where there is strong evidence for increased levels of N/OFQ worsening outcome.

There is a controversial narrative in the anaesthetic literature suggesting that anaesthetic technique (including opioids) may be detrimental to survival after tumour resection. The initial observations were retrospective. Several prospective studies are ongoing; one in breast cancer has reported no adverse outcome. The evidence for an effect of opioids stems from three pieces of information: (1) opioids depress the immune system, (2) opioids potentially promote angiogenesis, and (3) opioids potentially support tumour growth. Although the evidence for (2)/(3) is unclear, combinations of these effects are beneficial to tumours and potentially promote metastatic reseeding. Accepted wisdom suggests that opioid effects are driven by opioid receptor activation but the presence of opioid receptors on immune cells for example is unlikely. Immune cells, vascular endothelium and a range of tumour cells express Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) receptors (for Gram-negative bacterial wall components), and there is growing evidence for opioids interacting with this alternative receptor; and for some there is paradoxical naloxone sensitivity. Is the focus on opioid receptors and cancer the wrong target? TLR4 receptor activation produces immune activation, stimulates angiogenesis, and supports tumour survival. We know that some opioids are more immune suppressive than others (there is no such comparative information for angiogenesis and tumour survival); this may correlate with TLR4 activation. If there are clusters of opioids that have more opioid than TLR4 profiles and vice versa, this may influence outcome. If this is the case, then evidence-based advice could be given for perioperative use in the oncology–anaesthesia setting.

Opioids targeting mu;μ (MOP) receptors produce analgesia in the peri-operative period and palliative care. They also produce side effects including respiratory depression, tolerance/dependence and addiction. The N/OFQ opioid receptor (NOP) also produces analgesia but is devoid of the major MOP side effects. Evidence exists for MOP-NOP interaction and mixed MOP-NOP ligands produce analgesia with reduced side effects. We have generated a HEK MOP/NOP human expression system and used bivalent MOP-NOP and fluorescent ligands to (i) probe for receptor interaction and (ii) consequences of that interaction. We used HEK MOP/NOP cells and two bivalent ligands; Dermorphin-N/OFQ (MOP agonist-NOP agonist; DeNO) and Dermorphin-UFP101 (MOP agonist-NOP antagonist; De101). We have determined receptor binding profiles, GTPγ[ 35 S] binding, cAMP formation and ERK1/2 activation. We have also probed MOP and NOP receptor interactions in HEK cells and hippocampal neurones using the novel MOP fluorescent ligand, Dermorphin ATTO488 and the NOP fluorescent ligand N/OFQ ATTO594 . In HEK MOP/NOP MOP ligands displaced NOP binding and NOP ligands displaced MOP binding. Using fluorescent probes in HEK MOP/NOP cells we demonstrated MOP-NOP probe overlap and a FRET signal indicating co-localisation. MOP-NOP were also co-localised in hippocampal tissue. In GTPγ[ 35 S] and cAMP assays NOP stimulation shifted the response to MOP rightwards. At ERK1/2 the response to bivalent ligands generally peaked later. We provide evidence for MOP-NOP interaction in recombinant and native tissue. NOP activation reduces responsiveness of MOP activation; this was shown with conventional and bivalent ligands.

Background: Opioid receptors are naloxone-sensitive (MOP [mu: mu], DOP [delta: 8], and KOP [kappa: K]) and naloxoneinsensitive Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) peptide receptor (NOP). Clinically, most opioid analgesics target MOP. Angiogenesis is the formation of new blood vessels and involves endothelial cell activation, proliferation, and migration. The effect of opioids on this process is controversial with no data for NOP receptor ligands. Methods: We used patient-derived human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) treated with media from the Michigan Cancer Foundation-7 (MCF-7) breast cancer cells or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; 10 ng ml-1) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF; 10 ng ml-1) as angiogenic stimuli. We have measured (i) NOP/MOP messenger RNA, (ii) receptor protein using N/OFQATTO594 and DermorphinATTO488 as fluorescent probes for NOP and MOP, and (iii) NOP/MOP function in a wound healing assay (crude measure of migration that occurs during angiogenesis). Results: HUVEC lines from 32 patients were used. Using all 32 lines, mRNA for NOP but not MOP was detected. This was unaffected by media from MCF-7 cells or VEGF/FGF. There was no binding of either N/OFQATTO594(NOP) or DermorphinATTO488(MOP) in the absence or presence of angiogenic stimuli (six lines tested). In the absence of MOP mRNA, this was expected. Whilst MCF-7 conditioned medium (not VEGF/FGF) reduced wound healing per se (14 lines tested), there was no effect of N/OFQ (NOP ligand) or morphine (MOP ligand). Conclusions: Media from MCF-7 breast cancer cells or VEGF/FGF as angiogenic stimuli did not influence NOP translation into receptor protein. MOP was absent. In the absence of constitutive or inducible MOP/NOP, there was no effect on wound healing as a measure of angiogenesis.

Recently, mixed opioid/NOP agonists came to the spotlight for their favorable functional profiles and promising outcomes in clinical trials as novel analgesics. This study reports on two novel chimeric peptides incorporating the fragment Tyr-c[D-Lys-Phe-Phe]Asp-NH2 (RP-170), a cyclic peptide with high affinity for µ and κ opioid receptors (or MOP and KOP, respectively), conjugated with the peptide Ac-RYYRIK-NH2, a known ligand of the nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor (NOP), yielding RP-170-RYYRIK-NH2 (KW-495) and RP-170-Gly3-RYYRIK-NH2 (KW-496). In vitro, the chimeric KW-496 gained affinity for KOP, hence becoming a dual KOP/MOP agonist, while KW-495 behaved as a mixed MOP/NOP agonist with low nM affinity. Hence, KW-495 was selected for further in vivo experiments. Intrathecal administration of this peptide in mice elicited antinociceptive effects in the hot-plate test; this action was sensitive to both the universal opioid receptor antagonist naloxone and the selective NOP antagonist SB-612111. The rotarod test revealed that KW-495 administration did not alter the mice motor coordination performance. Computational studies have been conducted on the two chimeras to investigate the structural determinants at the basis of the experimental activities, including any role of the Gly3 spacer.

Opioid receptors are divided into the three classical types: MOP(μ:mu), DOP(δ:delta) and KOP(κ:kappa) that are naloxone-sensitive and an additional naloxone-insensitive nociceptin/orphanin FQ(N/OFQ) peptide receptor(NOP). Studies to determine opioid receptor location and turnover variably rely on; (i) measuring receptor mRNA, (ii) genetically tagging receptors, (iii) labelling receptors with radioligands, (iv) use of antibodies in immunohistochemistry/Western Blotting or (v) measuring receptor function coupled with the use of selective antagonists. All have their drawbacks with significant issues relating to mRNA not necessarily predicting protein, poor antibody selectivity and utility of radiolabels in low expression systems. In this minireview we discuss use of fluorescently labelled opioid receptor ligands. To maintain the pharmacological properties of the corresponding parent ligand fluorescently labelled ligands must take into account fluorophore (brightness and propensity to bleach), linker length and chemistry, and site to which the linker (and hence probe) will be attached. Use of donor and acceptor fluorophores with spectral overlap facilitates use in FRET type assays to determine proximity of ligand or tagged receptor pairs. There is a wide range of probes of agonist and antagonist nature for all four opioid receptor types; caution is needed with agonist probes due to the possibility for internalization. We have produced two novel ATTO based probes; DermorphinATTO488 (MOP) and N/OFQATTO594 (NOP). These probes label MOP and NOP in a range of preparations and using N/OFQATTO594 we demonstrate internalization and ligand-receptor interaction by FRET. Fluorescent opioid probes offer potential methodological advantages over more traditional use of antibodies and radiolabels.

This article reviews the basics of drug–receptor interactions: affinity, potency and efficacy. We provide a fresh focus on drug efficacy for current and future therapeutics using opioids as examples. Shifts in drug design have led to some new and noteworthy pharmacology concepts including inverse and biased agonism. In addition, the old concept of selectivity is being reconsidered. The design of novel opioids, for example is moving away from developing highly selective ligands for a single opioid receptor towards drugs targeting multiple opioid receptor sites (i.e.

Sepsis is a dysregulated host response to infection that can cause widespread effects on other organs including cardiovascular depression, hypotension and organ failure. The receptor for Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), NOP is expressed on immune cells and these cells can release the peptide. Exogenous N/OFQ can dilate blood vessels and this peptide is increased in animal and human sepsis. We hypothesise that NOP receptors are present on vascular endothelial cells and therefore provide the target for released N/OFQ to cause vasodilation and hence hypotension. Using human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and human vascular smooth muscle cells (HVSMC) freshly prepared from umbilical cords and up to passage 4, we assessed NOP mRNA expression by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), NOP surface receptor expression using a fluorescent NOP selective probe (N/OFQATTO594) and NOP receptor function with N/OFQ stimulated ERK1/2 phosphorylation. As an in vitro sepsis mimic we variably incubated cells with 100ng/ml Lipopolysaccharide and Peptidoglycan G (LPS/PepG). HUVECs express NOP mRNA and this was reduced by ~80% (n = 49) after 24–48 hours treatment with LPS/PepG. Untreated cells do not express surface NOP receptors but when treated with LPS/PepG the reduced mRNA was translated into protein visualised by N/OFQATTO594 binding (n = 49). These NOP receptors in treated cells produced an N/OFQ (1μM) driven increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation (n = 20). One (of 50) HUVEC lines expressed NOP mRNA and receptor protein in the absence of LPS/PepG treatment. In contrast, HVSMC expressed NOP mRNA and surface receptor protein (n = 10) independently of LPS/PepG treatment. These receptors were also coupled to ERK1/2 where N/OFQ (1μM) increased phosphorylation. Collectively these data show that an in vitro sepsis mimic (LPS/PepG) upregulates functional NOP expression in the vascular endothelium. Activation of these endothelial receptors as suggested from in vivo whole animal work may contribute to the hypotensive response seen in sepsis. Moreover, blockade of these receptors might be a useful adjunct in the treatment of sepsis.

Glial cells represent the main constituent of the brain tissues. Their response to infection and inflammation has been a growing research topic. C6 rat glioma cells were treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and peptidoglycan (PEPG) with/without nociceptin/orphanin FQ. We found that treatment with both lipopolysaccharide and peptidoglycan resulted in decreased production of cyclin D1 and cyclin D3, increased production of glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) and increased calcium mobilization. However, when cells treated with nociceptin, all these three effects were reversed. It can be concluded that Nociceptin can modulate cellular and molecular events associated with lipopolysaccharide and peptidoglycan.

Introduction Opioids acting at the MOP (mu:mu) receptor produce analgesia but also side effects. There is debate suggesting opioid receptors produce analgesia via G-protein and side-effects via beta-arrestin-2 pathways. Opioids targeting G-proteins over the arrestins (bias) offer potential therapeutic advantages. Oliceridine is a putative MOP, G-protein biased agonist. Areas Covered Oliceridine is selective for MOP receptors with greater activity at G-proteins over arrestins. A substantial body of evidence now points to a simpler pharmacological descriptor of partial agonist. Preclinical in vivo data indicates a robust antinociceptive response of shorter duration than morphine. Apollo trials (Phase-III RCT-bunionectomy/abdominoplasty) describe good analgesic efficacy that was non-inferior to morphine with good tolerability and side-effect profile. There is evidence for an improved respiratory safety profile. Oliceridine is approved by the FDA. Expert Opinion Oliceridine will be an important addition to the clinical armamentarium for use for the management of acute pain severe enough to require an intravenous opioid analgesic and for whom alternative treatments are inadequate. Respiratory advantage and the possibility of reduced abuse potential are possible advantages over the use of traditional opioids. Based on a number of excellent, highly detailed studies, oliceridine should be described as a partial agonist; this 'label' does not matter.

In recent years, G protein vs. β-arrestin biased agonism at opioid receptors has been proposed as an opportunity to produce antinociception with reduced adverse effects. However, at present this approach is highly debated, a reason why more information about biased ligands is required. While the practical relevance of bias in the case of µ-opioid receptors (MOP) still needs to be validated, it remains important to understand the basis of this bias of MOP (and other GPCRs). Recently, we reported two cyclopeptides with high affinity for MOP, the G protein biased Dmt-c[d-Lys-Phe-pCF3-Phe-Asp]NH2 (F-81), and the β-arrestin 2 biased Dmt-c[d-Lys-Phe-Asp]NH2 (C-33), as determined by calcium mobilization assay and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based assay. The biased character of F-81 and C-33 has been further analyzed in the [35S]GTPγS binding assay in human MOP-expressing cells, and the PathHunter enzyme complementation assay, used to measure β-arrestin 2 recruitment. To investigate the structural features of peptide-MOP complexes, we performed conformational analysis by NMR spectroscopy, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation. These studies predicted that the two ligands form alternative complexes with MOP, engaging specific ligand–receptor contacts. This would induce different displays of the cytosolic side of the seven-helices bundle, in particular by stabilizing different angulations of helix 6, that could favor intracellular coupling to either G protein or β-arrestin.