We consider a region containing several hospitals collaborating to treat patients during an infectious outbreak. Collaboration occurs through the dynamic allocation of hospital bed capacity to infectious patients and by assigning infectious patients to specific hospitals. Scaling up capacity for infectious patients means that beds are removed from regular care, which can only be done simultaneously for all beds in a room. Moreover, as opening rooms for infectious patients takes some lead time, we have to decide on preparing to open rooms for infectious patients ahead of time. We apply a stochastic direct lookahead approach. Each day, we make decisions on room allocation and patient assignment based on the solutions of two stochastic programs with scenarios using short-time forecasts of the number of infectious hospitalizations in the region and the bed occupancy in each collaborating hospital. We aim to balance costs for bed shortages and unutilized beds for infectious patients and opening and closing rooms. We demonstrate that a stochastic lookahead is superior to a deterministic one. We furthermore compare our solution approach with two heuristic strategies in a simulation study based on historical COVID-19 data of a region with three hospitals in the Netherlands. In one strategy, hospitals decide on their capacity allocation individually. In another strategy, we assume a pandemic unit, where one hospital is designated to take all regional infectious patients until full. The numerical results show that our stochastic direct lookahead approach considerably outperforms these heuristics.

Allograft-prosthetic composites (APC) are used to reconstruct large periarticular defects following tumour resection, with potential advantages especially restoration of bone stock and ligamentous reattachment. While short- and mid-term outcomes have been reported on extensively, long-term clinical results remain limited. This study evaluated the incidence of mechanical and non-mechanical complications, risk factors for complications, and the cumulative incidence of reconstruction failure following APC reconstruction for extremity tumours with a minimum follow-up of ten years. We retrospectively reviewed 64 APC with at least ten years follow-up in our centre. Predominant diagnoses were osteosarcoma (40

Background:Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) surrounding an endoprosthesis after reconstruction of a lower extremity following tumor resection is a common complication, and the treatment of these infections is challenging and often requires multiple surgical interventions or even implant removal. Because there has been limited evidence to support treatment strategies and understanding of the epidemiology of the causative microorganisms, we analyzed the effectiveness of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), risk factors for the failure of DAIR, and causative microorganisms in patients with a PJI surrounding a lower-extremity endoprosthesis after tumor resection. Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary referral center for orthopaedic oncology. All patients treated between 2000 and 2018 for PJI surrounding a lower-extremity endoprosthesis after tumor resection were included. Treatment outcomes and risk factors for failure were analyzed in patients primarily treated with DAIR. Causative microorganisms were recorded. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years. Results:Of the 337 patients who underwent endoprosthetic reconstruction of a lower extremity after tumor resection, 67 patients (20%) developed a PJI surrounding the endoprosthesis. Of those patients, 55 were primarily treated with DAIR. The functional cure rate of DAIR was 65% (36 of 55). A median of 2 debridements per patient was needed. Chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 3.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.0 to 9.3]) and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of >50 mm/hr at diagnosis (OR, 4.5 [95% CI, 1.3 to 15.4]) were associated with treatment failure. Nineteen patients (28%) had a polymicrobial infection. Conclusions:Although sequential procedures are often needed, DAIR has acceptable clinical outcomes and should be considered, dependent on expected survival and the risk factors for treatment failure noted in this study. Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Children and young adults needing surgery for a primary malignant bone tumour around the knee face a difficult, life changing decision. This study describes the level of shared decision making (SDM) experienced and preferred by these patients, parents and physicians in surgical consultations, and its relation to experienced decisional conflict and decisional regret. Methods: Multicentre, cross-sectional cohort study. All patients who underwent surgery for a primary bone tumour around the knee in the Dutch designated orthopaedic oncological centres between 2012 and 2015, and their parents, were invited to complete the SDM-patient-Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9), Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) and Control Preferences Scale (CPS). Physicians completed the SDM- physician-Questionnaire (SDM-Q-Doc) and CPS. Results: Twenty-four patients >16 years with twenty-two parents, and ten parents of patients between 5 and 16 years old, completed the questionnaires. Patients’ median SDM-Q-9 score was 60 (8.9–97.8), parents’ 77.8 (8.9–100) and physicians’ 82.2 (66.7–97.8). The SDM-Q-9 scores of patients (rs=−0.753, p < 0.01) and parents (rs=−0.850, p < 0.01) correlated with their DCS scores. DCS scores were correlated with decisional regret in patients (rs=0.701 p < 0.01) and parents (rs=0.405, p < 0.05). Fourteen patients (78%), twenty-eight parents (96%) and twenty-three physicians (92%) preferred a shared relationship in decision making on type of surgery. Conclusions: Patients, parents and physicians agree on sharing responsibility choosing a surgical option. Patients and parents who reported more involvement in the decision-making process experienced less decisional conflict; less decisional conflict was associated with less decisional regret. These findings show the importance of SDM in these life changing surgeries.

This paper proposes an iterative simulation optimisation approach to maximise the number of in-person consultations in the blueprint schedule of a clinic facing same-day multi-appointment patient trajectories and restrictions on the number of patients simultaneously allowed in the waiting area, taking into account the combined effects of early arrival times (patients arriving early from home), bridging times (minimum time required between appointments) and waiting times (due to randomness in patient arrivals and provider punctuality). Our approach combines an Integer Linear Program (ILP) that maximises the number of in-person consultations considering the effect of average early arrival and bridging times and a Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) model to include the effect of waiting times due to randomness. We iteratively adapt our parameters in the ILP until the MCS model returns a 95% confidence interval of the number of patients in the waiting area that does not exceed its capacity. Our results reveal the impact of early arrival, bridging and waiting times on the number of in-person appointments that may be included in a blueprint schedule. Our results further show that careful design of the blueprint schedule allows our case study clinics to organise a vast majority of their appointments in-person.

This paper introduces mathematical models that support dynamic fair balancing of COVID-19 patients over hospitals in a region and across regions. Patient flow is captured in an infinite server queueing network. The dynamic fair balancing model within a region is a load balancing model incorporating a forecast of the bed occupancy, while across regions, it is a stochastic program taking into account sce-narios of the future bed surpluses or shortages. Our dynamic fair balancing models yield decision rules for patient allocation to hospitals within the region and reallocation across regions based on safety levels and forecast bed surplus or bed shortage for each hospital or region. Input for the model is an accurate real-time forecast of the number of COVID-19 patients hospitalised in the ward and the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the hospitals based on the predicted inflow of patients, their Length of Stay and patient transfer probabilities among ward and ICU. The required data is obtained from the hospitals' data warehouses and regional infection data as recorded in the Netherlands. The algorithm is evaluated in Dutch regions for allocation of COVID-19 patients to hospitals within the region and reallocation across regions using data from the second COVID-19 peak.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

BackgroundDistancing measures enforced by the COVID-19 pandemic impose a restriction on the number of patients simultaneously present in hospital waiting areas.ObjectiveEvaluate waiting area occupancy of an intervention that designs clinic blueprint schedules, in which all appointments of the pre-COVID-19 case mix are scheduled either digitally or in person under COVID-19 distancing measures, whereby the number of in-person appointments is maximised.MethodsPreintervention analysis and prospective assessment of intervention outcomes were used to evaluate the outcomes on waiting area occupancy and number of in-person consultations (postintervention only) using descriptive statistics, for two settings in the Rheumatology Clinic of Sint Maartenskliniek (SMK) and Medical Oncology & Haematology Outpatient Clinic of University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU). Retrospective data from October 2019 to February 2020 were used to evaluate the pre-COVID-19 blueprint schedules. An iterative optimisation and simulation approach was followed, based on integer linear programming and Monte Carlo simulation, which iteratively optimised and evaluated blueprint schedules until the 95% CI of the number of patients in the waiting area did not exceed available capacity.ResultsUnder pre-COVID-19 blueprint schedules, waiting areas would be overcrowded by up to 22 (SMK) and 11 (UMCU) patients, given the COVID-19 distancing measures. The postintervention blueprint scheduled all appointments without overcrowding the waiting areas, of which 88% and 87% were in person and 12% and 13% were digitally (SMK and UMCU, respectively).ConclusionsThe intervention was effective in two case studies with different waiting area characteristics and a varying number of interdependent patient trajectory stages. The intervention is generically applicable to a wide range of healthcare services that schedule a (series of) appointment(s) for their patients. Care providers can use the intervention to evaluate overcrowding of waiting area(s) and design optimal blueprint schedules to continue a maximum number of in-person appointments under pandemic distancing measures.

Mazabraud’s syndrome (MZB) is a rare condition in which fibrous dysplasia of bone/the McCune-Albright syndrome (FD/MAS) co-exists with intramuscular myxomas. Both FD and the myxomas harbor the GNAS-mutation. Recent studies have shown that extraskeletal, GNAS-related features are associated with a more severe phenotype of FD/MAS. However, patients with MZB are often only seen by orthopedic surgeons. We therefore evaluated MZB patients seen in tertiary referral centers from the Netherlands (LUMC), USA (National Institutes of Health) and France (INSERM UMR 1033 (Lyos), Hôpital Edouard Herriot). All FD/MAS patients known in these centers with an additional diagnosis of a myxoma were included. Demographic information and data on disease extent and extraskeletal manifestations of FD/MAS such as precocious puberty (PP) or café-au-lait patches (CAL) were retrieved from patient’s medical records. Thirty MZB patients were included: 20 women (67%) and 10 men (33%). Patients received a diagnosis of MZB (median 42 years, range 16–19) significantly later than the diagnosis of FD/MAS (median 30 years, range 0–60), p < 0.01. Twenty-six patients were diagnosed with polyostotic disease (87%). In 97% the myxoma was located near the skeletal FD lesion. The combination of MZB and MAS was made in 13 patients in whom PP (n = 7), CAL (n = 7), GH-excess (n = 3) and hyperthyroidism (n = 3) were present. Other extraskeletal features were (multinodular) goiter (n = 2) and thyroid cysts (n = 1). Furthermore, in this cohort of patients with MZB several (pre-)malignant tumors were observed; ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in 3 patients (10%), breast cancer in 1 patient (3.3%), intra pancreatic mucinous neoplasms in 3 patients (10%) and liver adenomas in 2 patients (6.6%). A total of 47% of patients with MZB had an additional extraskeletal feature such as an endocrinopathy. In MZB, 87% of patients suffer from polyostotic FD, 43% of patients have extraskeletal GNAS-features such as an hyperfunctioning endocrinopathy and 30% (pre-)malignant tumors. We therefore advocate that MZB patients should undergo a complete screening and long-term follow-up for extent of bone disease, but also extraskeletal GNAS features of FD/MAS.

Background Extra-abdominal desmoid tumor fibromatosis (DTF) is a rare, locally aggressive soft tissue tumour. The best treatment modality for this patient cohort is still object of debate. Questions/purpose This paper aimed to (1) to compare the outcomes of DTF after different treatment modalities, (2) to assess prognostic factors for recurrence following surgical excision, and (3) to assess prognostic factors for progression during observation. Methods This was a retrospective multicenter study under the patronage of the European Musculoskeletal Oncology Society (EMSOS). All seven centres involved were tertiary referral centres for soft tissue tumours. Baseline demographic data was collected for all patients as well as data on the diagnosis, tumour characteristics, clinical features, treatment modalities and whether they had any predisposing factors for DTF. Results Three hundred eighty-eight patients (240 female, 140 male) with a mean age of 37.6 (±18.8 SD, range: 3–85) were included in the study. Two hundred fifty-seven patients (66%) underwent surgical excision of ADF, 70 patients (18%) were observed without therapy, the residual patients had different conservative treatments. There were no significant differences in terms of tumour recurrence or progression between the different treatment groups. After surgical excision, younger age, recurrent disease and larger tumour size were risk factors for recurrence, while tumours around the shoulder girdle and painful lesions were at risk of progression in the observational group. Conclusion Local recurrence rate after surgery was similar to progression rates under observation. Hence, observation in DTF seems to be justified, considering surgery in case of dimensional progression in 2 consecutive controls (3 and 6 months) and in painful lesions, with particular attention to lesions around the shoulder girdle.

Background: Due to its specific physical characteristics, proton irradiation is especially suited for irradiation of chordomas and chondrosarcoma in the axial skeleton. Robust plan optimization renders the proton beam therapy more predictable upon individual setup errors. Reported experience with the planning and delivery of robustly optimized plans in chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the mobile spine and sacrum, is limited. In this study, we report on the clinical use of robustly optimized, intensity modulated proton beam therapy in these patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patient, treatment and acute toxicity data of all patients with chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the mobile spine and sacrum, treated between 1 April 2019 and 1 April 2020 at our institute. Anatomy changes during treatment were evaluated by weekly cone-beam CTs (CBCT), supplemented by scheduled control-CTs or ad-hoc control-CTs. Acute toxicity was scored weekly during treatment and at 3 months after therapy according to CTCAE 4.0. Results: 17 chordoma and 3 chondrosarcoma patients were included. Coverage of the high dose clinical target volume was 99.8% (range 56.1-100%) in the nominal and 80.9% (range 14.3-99.6%) in the voxel-wise minimum dose distribution. Treatment plan adaptation was needed in 5 out of 22 (22.7%) plans. Reasons for plan adaptation were either reduced tumor coverage or increased dose to the OAR. Conclusions: Robustly optimized intensity modulated proton beam therapy for chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the mobile spine is feasible. Plan adaptations due to anatomical changes were required in approximately 23 percent of treatment courses. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

This paper presents a mathematical model that provides a real-time forecast of the number of COVID-19 patients admitted to the ward and the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of a hospital based on the predicted inflow of patients, their Length of Stay (LoS) in both the ward and the ICU as well as transfer of patients between the ward and the ICU. The data required for this forecast is obtained directly from the hospital’s data warehouse. The resulting algorithm is tested on data from the first COVID-19 peak in the Netherlands, showing that the forecast is very accurate. The forecast may be visualised in real-time in the hospital’s control centre and is used in several Dutch hospitals during the second COVID-19 peak.

Background Local treatment of pelvic Ewing’s sarcoma may be challenging, and intergroup studies have focused on improving systemic treatments rather than prospectively evaluating aspects of local tumor control. The Euro-EWING99 trial provided a substantial number of patients with localized pelvic tumors treated with the same chemotherapy protocol. Because local control included surgical resection, radiation therapy, or a combination of both, we wanted to investigate local control and survival with respect to the local modality in this study cohort. Questions/purposes (1) Do patients with localized sacral tumors have a lower risk of local recurrence and higher survival compared with patients with localized tumors of the innominate bones? (2) Is the local treatment modality associated with local control and survival in patients with sacral and nonsacral tumors? (3) Which local tumor- and treatment-related factors, such as response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, institution where the biopsy was performed, and surgical complications, are associated with local recurrence and patient survival in nonsacral tumors? (4) Which factors, such as persistent extraosseous tumor growth after chemotherapy or extent of bony resection, are independently associated with overall survival in patients with bone tumors undergoing surgical treatment? Methods Between 1998 and 2009, 1411 patients with previously untreated, histologically confirmed Ewing’s sarcoma were registered in the German Society for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology Ewing’s sarcoma database and treated in the Euro-EWING99 trial. In all, 24% (339 of 1411) of these patients presented with a pelvic primary sarcoma, 47% (159 of 339) of which had macroscopic metastases at diagnosis and were excluded from this analysis. The data from the remaining 180 patients were reviewed retrospectively, based on follow-up data as of July 2016. The median (range) follow-up was 54 months (5 to 191) for all patients and 84 months (11 to 191) for surviving patients. The study endpoints were overall survival, local recurrence and event-free survival probability, which were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) with their respective 95% CIs were estimated in a multivariate Cox regression model. Results Sacral tumors were associated with a reduced probability of local recurrence (12% [95% CI 1 to 22] versus 28% [95% CI 20 to 36] at 5 years, p = 0.032), a higher event-free survival probability (66% [95% CI 51 to 81] versus 50% [95% CI 41 to 58] at 5 years, p = 0.026) and a higher overall survival probability (72% [95% CI 57 to 87] versus 56% [95% CI 47 to 64] at 5 years, p = 0.025) compared with nonsacral tumors. With the numbers available, we found no differences between patients with sacral tumors who underwent definitive radiotherapy and those who underwent combined surgery and radiotherapy in terms of local recurrence (17% [95% CI 0 to 34] versus 0% [95% CI 0 to 20] at 5 years, p = 0.125) and overall survival probability (73% [95% CI 52 to 94] versus 78% [95% CI 56 to 99] at 5 years, p = 0.764). In nonsacral tumors, combined local treatment was associated with a lower local recurrence probability (14% [95% CI 5 to 23] versus 33% [95% CI 19 to 47] at 5 years, p = 0.015) and a higher overall survival probability (72% [95% CI 61 to 83] versus 47% [95% CI 33 to 62] at 5 years, p = 0.024) compared with surgery alone. Even in a subgroup of patients with wide surgical margins and a good histologic response to induction treatment, the combined local treatment was associated with a higher overall survival probability (87% [95% CI 74 to 100] versus 51% [95% CI 33 to 69] at 5 years, p = 0.009), compared with surgery alone. A poor histologic response to induction chemotherapy in nonsacral tumors (39% [95% CI 19 to 59] versus 64% [95% CI 52 to 76] at 5 years, p = 0.014) and the development of surgical complications after tumor resection (35% [95% CI 11 to 59] versus 68% [95% CI 58 to 78] at 5 years, p = 0.004) were associated with a lower overall survival probability in nonsacral tumors, while a tumor biopsy performed at the same institution where the tumor resection was performed was associated with lower local recurrence probability (14% [95% CI 4 to 24] versus 32% [95% CI 16 to 48] at 5 years, p = 0.035), respectively. In patients with bone tumors who underwent surgical treatment, we found that after controlling for tumor localization in the pelvis, tumor volume, and surgical margin status, patients who did not undergo complete (defined as a Type I/II resection for iliac bone tumors, a Type II/III resection for pubic bone and ischium tumors and a Type I/II/III resection for tumors involving the acetabulum, according to the Enneking classification) removal of the affected bone (HR 5.04 [95% CI 2.07 to 12.24]; p < 0.001), patients with a poor histologic response to induction chemotherapy (HR 3.72 [95% CI 1.51 to 9.21]; p = 0.004), and patients who did not receive additional radiotherapy (HR 4.34 [95% CI 1.71 to 11.05]; p = 0.002) had a higher risk of death. The analysis suggested that the same might be the case in patients with a persistent extraosseous tumor extension after induction chemotherapy (HR 4.61 [95% CI 1.03 to 20.67]; p = 0.046), although the wide CIs pointing at a possible sparse-data bias precluded any definitive conclusions. Conclusion Patients with sacral Ewing’s sarcoma appear to have a lower probability for local recurrence and a higher overall survival probability compared with patients with tumors of the innominate bones. Our results seem to support a recent recommendation of the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group to locally treat most sacral Ewing’s sarcomas with definitive radiotherapy. Combined surgical resection and radiotherapy appear to be associated with a higher overall survival probability in nonsacral tumors compared with surgery alone, even in patients with a wide resection and a good histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Complete removal of the involved bone, as defined above, in patients with nonsacral tumors may be associated with a decreased likelihood of local recurrence and improved overall survival. Persistent extraosseous tumor growth after induction treatment in patients with nonsacral bone tumors undergoing surgical treatment might be an important indicator of poorer overall survival probability, but the possibility of sparse-data bias in our cohort means that this factor should first be validated in future studies. Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

Purpose of review Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is an intermediate, locally aggressive primary bone tumour. In addition to local therapy, new drugs became available for this disease. Denosumab, a receptor activator of nuclear factor κ-B-ligand inhibitor, was introduced as systemic targeted therapy for advanced or inoperable and metastatic GCTB. Also, the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid has activity in GCTB by directly targeting the neoplastic stromal cells. Recent findings In a small RCT, bisphosphonates were successful in controlling tumour growth and a higher apoptotic index of tumour cells was seen after zoledronic acid versus controls. Although bisphosphonate-loaded bone cement has not been studied to a large extent, it does not seem harmful and may constitute a logical local adjuvant. From the largest clinical trial to date, the risk-to-benefit ratio for denosumab in patients with advanced GCTB remains favourable, also in facilitating less morbid surgery. Concerns have arisen that recurrence rates would be higher than after conventional treatment, ranging from 20 to 100% in a systematic review, although this may be because of bias. H3F3A (G34W) driver mutations are helpful in the differentiation between GCTB and other giant cell-containing malignancies. H3.3-G34W proved sufficient to drive tumourigenesis. The cumulative incidence of malignancy in GCTB is estimated at 4%, of which primary malignancy 1.6% and secondary malignancy 2.4%, the latter mainly after radiation. To date, a potential causal relationship between denosumab and pulmonary metastases has not been confirmed; if they do not behave indolently, it would be advised to reassess diagnosis and consider malignancy. Summary Denosumab remains a highly effective treatment option for patients with advanced GCTB. A short duration of 2–4 months neoadjuvant denosumab is advised to facilitate less morbid surgery and prevent incomplete curettage by macroscopic tumour alterations. Reduced dose intensity is being studied to reduce long term side-effects. Further research on bisphosphonates and other targets including H3.3-G34W remains warranted.

BACKGROUND The effectiveness of second-line palliative chemotherapy in patients with recurrent/metastatic osteosarcoma is not well defined. Several small studies (6-19 patients) have reported on ifosfamide as second-line treatment. In this study we report our single-center experience with second-line ifosfamide monotherapy in patients treated for recurrent/metastatic osteosarcoma. METHODS A chart review was conducted of all patients with osteosarcoma treated with ifosfamide from 1978 until 2017. Until 1997 a 5 g/m2 regimen was used, and from 1997 onwards a 9 g/m2 regimen was used. Overall survival (OS) from start of ifosfamide was the primary endpoint. Progression-free survival (PFS) from start of treatment was also studied. To assess difference in survival between groups the log rank test was applied. To investigate the effect of ifosfamide dose and World Health Organization performance status (PS) a Cox proportional hazard regression model was estimated. RESULTS Sixty-two patients were selected with recurrent/metastatic osteosarcoma treated with second-line ifosfamide monotherapy (dose of 5 g/m2, n = 26; 9 g/m2, n = 36). OS was significantly better in univariate analysis for 9 g/m2 compared with 5 g/m2 (10.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.3-12.6] vs. 6.7 months [95% CI, 5.9-7.6], respectively) and for PS (median OS PS 0, 13.0 months [95% CI, 2.3-23.8]; PS 1, 8.2 months [95% CI, 5.4-11.1]; PS ≥2, 6.2 months [95% CI, 2.2-10.3]; and unknown PS, 5.4 months [95% CI, 2.2-8.5]). In multivariate analysis only PS showed a significant difference. No difference in PFS was found between 5 and 9 g/m2 ifosfamide treatment or PS. CONCLUSION This study suggests that ifosfamide is an effective second-line treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic osteosarcoma. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Ifosfamide monotherapy is commonly used as second-line treatment in osteosarcoma, although large series to support this are lacking. This retrospective study reports overall and progression-free survival for regimens with 5 g/m2 and with 9 g/m2. This study was unable to show a significant difference in survival between 5 and 9 g/m2 but showed an important impact of World Health Organization performance status on overall survival. This study sets a standard and reference for comparison with the multiple phase II studies under development.

Background and purpose: Patients with advanced cancer may develop painful bone metastases, potentially resulting in pathological fractures. Adequate fracture risk assessment is of key importance to prevent fracturing and maintain mobility. This study aims to validate the clinical reliability of axial cortical involvement with a 30 mm threshold on conventional radiographs to assess fracture risk in femoral bone metastases. Materials and methods: All patients with bone metastases who received radiotherapy for pain included in two multicentre prospective studies were selected. Conventional radiographs obtained at a maximum of two months prior to radiotherapy were collected. Three experts independently measured lesions and scored radiographic characteristics. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Results: Hundred patients were included with a median follow-up of 23.0 months (95%CI: 10.6-35.5). Two fractures occurred in lesions with axial cortical involvement <30 mm, and 12 in lesions >= 30 mm. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of axial cortical involvement for predicting femoral fractures were 86%, 50%, 20% and 96%, respectively. Patients with lesions >= 30 mm had a 5.3 times higher fracture risk than patients with smaller lesions. Conclusion: Our validation study confirmed the use of 30 mm axial cortical involvement to assess fracture risk in femoral bone metastases. Until a more accurate and practically feasible method has been developed, this clinical parameter remains an easy method to assess femoral fracture risk to aid patients and clinicians to choose the optimal individual treatment modality. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Aim: This study was interested in extremity leiomyosarcoma with focus on clinical outcome after surgery with or without adjuvant therapy. Patients and Methods: A retrospective case series of all patients with leiomyosarcoma, surgically treated between 2000 and 2015 and a minimum follow-up of 2 years, was drawn from institutional databases in Belgium and the Netherlands. Postoperative complications were reported with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the Henderson classification. Results: Seventy-five patients were operated on, of whom 47 underwent (neo)adjuvant therapy. Infection was observed in 11 patients, seven associated with (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy. Dermatological complaints were observed in 26 patients, 10 associated with (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy. Overall survival was 60%. Local recurrence occurred in 11 (15%) patients. Conclusion: This study describes favourable clinical outcome following (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy. In the future, larger databases on leiomyosarcoma should enhance the power of these findings and define the benefits of adjuvant therapy in leiomyosarcoma.

BACKGROUND Osteofibrous dysplasia-like adamantinoma (OFD-AD) and classic adamantinoma (AD) are rare, neoplastic diseases with only limited data supporting current treatment protocols. We believe that our retrospective multicenter cohort study is the largest analysis of patients with adamantinoma to date. The primary purpose of this study was to describe the disease characteristics and evaluate the oncological outcomes. The secondary purpose was to identify risk factors for local recurrence after surgical treatment and propose treatment guidelines. METHODS Three hundred and eighteen confirmed cases of OFD-AD and AD for which primary treatment was carried out between 1985 and 2015 were submitted by 22 tertiary bone tumor centers. Proposed clinical risk factors for local recurrence such as size, type, and margins were analyzed using univariable and multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Of the 318 cases, 128 were OFD-AD and 190 were AD. The mean age at diagnosis was 17 years (median, 14.5 years) for OFD-AD and 32 years (median, 28 years) for AD; 53% of the patients were female. The mean tumor size in the OFD-AD and AD groups combined was 7.8 cm, measured histologically. Sixteen percent of the patients sustained a pathological fracture prior to treatment. Local recurrence was recorded in 22% of the OFD-AD cases and 24% of the AD cases. None of the recurrences in the OFD-AD group progressed to AD. Metastatic disease was found in 18% of the AD cases and fatal disease, in 11% of the AD cases. No metastatic or fatal disease was reported in the OFD-AD group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that uncontaminated resection margins (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.164, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.092 to 0.290, p < 0.001), pathological fracture (HR = 1.968, 95% CI = 1.076 to 3.600, p = 0.028), and sex (female versus male: HR = 0.535, 95% CI = 0.300 to 0.952, p = 0.033) impacted the risk of local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS OFD-AD and AD are parts of a disease spectrum but should be regarded as different entities. Our results support reclassification of OFD-AD into the intermediate locally aggressive category, based on the local recurrence rate of 22% and absence of metastases. In our study, metastatic disease was restricted to the AD group (an 18% rate). We advocate wide resection with uncontaminated margins including bone and involved periosteum for both OFD-AD and AD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Malignant transformation of fibrous dysplasia lesions has been reported in patients with fibrous dysplasia/McCune-Albright syndrome (FD/MAS). Recently, we have observed an increased risk for breast cancer. In this study, the prevalence of skeletal and extraskeletal malignancies in patients with FD/MAS in the Netherlands was assessed by analyzing data from our cohort of FD/MAS patients, the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA), and the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). We extracted data on sex, age at diagnosis of FD/MAS, type of FD/MAS, type of malignancy, and age at diagnosis of malignancy and histology of bone and malignant tissue when available, including GNAS-mutation analysis from patients’ medical records. Standardized Morbidity Ratios (SMRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Twelve malignancies were identified in the LUMC FD/MAS cohort and 100 in the PALGA cohort. In this cohort, SMR was increased for osteosarcoma (19.7, 95% CI 3.5–48.9), cervical cancer (4.93, 95%CI 1.7–8.2), thyroid cancer (3.71, 95% CI 1.1–7.8), prostate cancer (3.08, 95% CI 1.8–4.6), and melanoma (2.01, 95%CI 1.2–3.1). SMRs for pancreatic cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma could not be calculated due to low numbers. The small number of malignancies identified in our FD/MAS cohort precluded the calculation of SMRs for our cohort specifically. Our findings show that patients with FD/MAS appear to have an increased risk for osteosarcoma, cervical, thyroid, and prostate cancer and melanoma. However, these data should be interpreted with caution, as true incidence rates of the identified malignancies may be influenced by the inclusion of only patients with histologically confirmed FD/MAS. The etiology of this increased risk for malignancies still needs to be elucidated.