Epilepsy is a common neurological condition that presents unique challenges for adolescents. Executive functioning (EF) deficits contribute to suboptimal academic, social, and quality of life outcomes, yet interventions addressing EF in pediatric epilepsy are lacking. One promising intervention is Epilepsy Journey (EJ), a comprehensive e-health, multi-component problem-solving intervention that incorporates self-guided learning modules and telehealth sessions facilitated by a therapist. This paper describes the methodology, advisory board feedback, changes to the original protocol/intervention, and current progress of a multi-site Phase 3 randomized control trial (RCT; EJ 2.0) to improve EF behaviors. Prior to the RCT, an advisory board comprised of six adolescents, two caregivers, two teachers, and two healthcare providers offered feedback on recruitment/retention, measurement selection, and intervention components. For the RCT, adolescents (age 13-17 years) who meet eligibility criteria for EJ 2.0 are randomized into four groups: EJ modules only, EJ telehealth only, EJ modules with telehealth, or a usual epilepsy care group. Participants in each of the three treatment arms learn about and problem-solve aims related to positive thinking, problem-solving, working memory, organization, inhibition, initiation, task/self-monitoring, emotion regulation, and sleep/stress. The goal is to randomize 232 participants across three sites. The EJ 2.0 study has been strengthened through advisory board feedback, and subsequent protocol changes were critical in the successful launch and execution of the trial to-date. Despite a brief funding gap, the study team has made significant progress in early recruitment.

Importance Fibromyalgia is characterized by chronic widespread pain that is often exacerbated by movement that interferes with daily activities. Development of effective treatments for movement-evoked pain is essential for improving function for individuals with fibromyalgia. Objective To evaluate whether the addition of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) to outpatient physical therapy improves fibromyalgia-associated movement-evoked pain. Design, Setting, and Participants The Fibromyalgia TENS in Physical Therapy (FM-TIPS) study was a cluster-randomized clinical trial of participants with fibromyalgia at 28 outpatient PT clinics from 6 health care systems. Between February 1, 2021, and September 31, 2024, 958 participants were screened, 459 participants enrolled, and 384 completed baseline data collection, with final data collected in March 2025. Intervention Clinics were randomized to PT plus TENS (PT-TENS) and PT-only groups. Data were captured on days 1, 30, 60 (primary end point, randomized phase), 90, and 180. Participants in the PT-only group received TENS after day 60 (extension phase). TENS was applied to the upper and lower back with instructions to use 2 hours daily with parameters of modulating frequency of 2 to 125 Hz for 100 to 180 microseconds at a strong but comfortable intensity. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a change in movement-evoked pain (scale of 0-10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating worst pain imaginable) from baseline to day 60 rated during a 5-times sit-and-stand task using a linear mixed-effects model. In addition, patient-reported improvement based on the Patient Global Impression of Change score and patient-reported adverse events were assessed. Results A total of 384 FM-TIPS participants (mean [SD] age, 53 [15] years; 351 [91%] female) completed baseline data collection (modified intention-to-treat), with 191 individuals in PT-TENS group and 193 in PT-only group. Movement-evoked pain at day 60 during TENS treatment was significantly lower in the PT-TENS group compared with the PT-only group (group mean difference, −1.2; 95 CI, −1.6 to −0.7; d = 0.46). A dose-response effect for TENS was observed, with more participants in the PT-TENS group reporting improvement on the Patient Global Impression of Change (120 [72%] vs 86 [51%], P = .001) and a 30% or greater reduction in movement-evoked pain in responder analysis (66 of 161 [41%] vs 22 of 169 [13%]; P < .001). At day 180, 217 respondents (81%) found TENS helpful and 147 (55%) used TENS daily. There were no serious adverse events, and 109 of 358 (30%) experienced minor adverse events during the entire 6 months of the study. Conclusions and Relevance In this cluster randomized clinical trial of TENS in fibromyalgia, TENS meaningfully reduced movement-evoked pain and remained effective for 6 months. This study’s results suggest that TENS is a safe, inexpensive, and readily available treatment for fibromyalgia. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04683042

Importance:Fibromyalgia is characterized by chronic widespread pain that is often exacerbated by movement that interferes with daily activities. Development of effective treatments for movement-evoked pain is essential for improving function for individuals with fibromyalgia. Objective:To evaluate whether the addition of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) to outpatient physical therapy improves fibromyalgia-associated movement-evoked pain. Design, Setting, and Participants:The Fibromyalgia TENS in Physical Therapy (FM-TIPS) study was a cluster-randomized clinical trial of participants with fibromyalgia at 28 outpatient PT clinics from 6 health care systems. Between February 1, 2021, and September 31, 2024, 958 participants were screened, 459 participants enrolled, and 384 completed baseline data collection, with final data collected in March 2025. Intervention:Clinics were randomized to PT plus TENS (PT-TENS) and PT-only groups. Data were captured on days 1, 30, 60 (primary end point, randomized phase), 90, and 180. Participants in the PT-only group received TENS after day 60 (extension phase). TENS was applied to the upper and lower back with instructions to use 2 hours daily with parameters of modulating frequency of 2 to 125 Hz for 100 to 180 microseconds at a strong but comfortable intensity. Main Outcomes and Measures:The primary outcome was a change in movement-evoked pain (scale of 0-10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating worst pain imaginable) from baseline to day 60 rated during a 5-times sit-and-stand task using a linear mixed-effects model. In addition, patient-reported improvement based on the Patient Global Impression of Change score and patient-reported adverse events were assessed. Results:A total of 384 FM-TIPS participants (mean [SD] age, 53 [15] years; 351 [91%] female) completed baseline data collection (modified intention-to-treat), with 191 individuals in PT-TENS group and 193 in PT-only group. Movement-evoked pain at day 60 during TENS treatment was significantly lower in the PT-TENS group compared with the PT-only group (group mean difference, -1.2; 95 CI, -1.6 to -0.7; d = 0.46). A dose-response effect for TENS was observed, with more participants in the PT-TENS group reporting improvement on the Patient Global Impression of Change (120 [72%] vs 86 [51%], P = .001) and a 30% or greater reduction in movement-evoked pain in responder analysis (66 of 161 [41%] vs 22 of 169 [13%]; P < .001). At day 180, 217 respondents (81%) found TENS helpful and 147 (55%) used TENS daily. There were no serious adverse events, and 109 of 358 (30%) experienced minor adverse events during the entire 6 months of the study. Conclusions and Relevance:In this cluster randomized clinical trial of TENS in fibromyalgia, TENS meaningfully reduced movement-evoked pain and remained effective for 6 months. This study's results suggest that TENS is a safe, inexpensive, and readily available treatment for fibromyalgia. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04683042.

Background and Objectives:The lack of approved therapies for N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis has contributed to substantial variability in treatment. Inebilizumab is a humanized anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody that can be administered intravenously. Inebilizumab may be an efficacious treatment for patients with NMDAR encephalitis, with the potential to achieve early robust and sustained suppression CD19+ plasmablasts, some plasma cells, and NMDAR autoantibodies, with the potential to improve short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with NMDAR encephalitis. Methods:The ExTINGUISH trial is a multisite, phase 2B, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of inebilizumab 300 mg for the acute treatment of participants with moderate-to-severe NMDAR encephalitis. ExTINGUISH will randomize 116 patients across the United States and Europe. Participants will receive standard first-line immunotherapies (intravenous steroids and intravenous immunoglobulins and/or plasma exchange) before randomization (1:1). In addition, cyclophosphamide rescue therapy will be offered to participants with persistent moderate-to-severe disease 6 weeks after randomization. Primary outcomes will be measured 16 weeks from randomization using the change in the adapted ExTINGUISH modified Rankin scale and accepted safety measures in 32 weeks. Secondary outcomes will be measured up to 96 weeks and include comprehensive neuropsychological tests, bedside cognitive screening tools, and quality-of-life/functional indices. Clinical data will be combined with blood and CSF biomarkers of immune activation to inform putative biologic contributors to outcomes (exploratory outcomes). Study operations are supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-supported Network for Excellence in Neuroscience Clinical Trial (NeuroNEXT) infrastructure. Discussion:The ExTINGUISH trial will determine the safety and efficacy of inebilizumab as a treatment of NMDAR encephalitis while evaluating the utility of clinical, cognitive, and quality-of-life outcome measures and supporting standardized collection and measurement of biofluid biomarkers. These innovations will inform development of future treatments and trials for patients with NMDAR encephalitis and other types of autoimmune encephalitis. The ExTINGUISH trial opened to enrollment of adult patients (older than 18 years) in 2022 and pediatric patients (older than 12 years) in 2024; enrollment is ongoing.

BACKGROUND:Light therapy (LT) in Parkinson's disease improves sleep. Specific LT parameters require further study, including optimal frequency. OBJECTIVES:We aimed to determine if once- or twice-daily bright white light therapy (BWLT) improves sleep. Secondary aims compared once-weekly BWLT to twice-daily dim red light therapy (DRLT) as controls, estimated effects on fatigue, and adherence. METHODS:A 16-week, randomized, phase 2, sham-controlled, dose-selection trial to select the superior BWLT frequency based on change in Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-2 (PDSS-2), participant burden, and safety. Participants were randomized to 8 weeks of twice-daily BWLT, once-daily BWLT, once-weekly BWLT, or twice-daily DRLT. An improvement of ≥1.7 points in 8-week change of PDSS-2 by daily BWLT relative to either control warranted advancing to a phase 3 trial. RESULTS:A total of 150 participants were randomized (mean [SD], 67 [8.6] years; 57 [38%] female; PDSS-2 17.1 [6.7]). Mean 8-week change from baseline in PDSS-2 score improved (twice-daily BWLT -2.6 [95% CI: -4.4, -0.7]; once-daily BWLT -1.5 [-3.3, 0.3]; once-weekly BWLT -0.4 [-2.2, 1.4]; twice-daily DRLT -1.8 [-3.6, 0.1]) but did not meet criteria for advancing. Mean 8-week change from baseline in Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) score improved (twice-daily BWLT -6.4 [-9.8, -3.0]; once-daily BWLT -2.2 [-5.5, 1.1]; once-weekly BWLT -0.5 [-3.9, 2.8]; and twice-daily DRLT -3.8 [-7.3, -0.4]). Mean adherence to LT was 63%-86%. CONCLUSIONS:ENLITE-PD did not meet the criteria for advancing daily LT to a phase 3 trial. LT was safe and well-tolerated with good adherence. Once-weekly BWLT was a non-inferior control compared with twice-daily DRLT. © 2025 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Chronic pain affects more than 50 million Americans. Treatments remain inadequate, in large part, because thepathophysiological mechanisms underlying the development of chronic pain remain poorly understood. Painbiomarkers could potentially identify and measure biological pathways and phenotypical expressions that arealtered by pain, provide insight into biological treatment targets, and help identify at-risk patients who might benefit from early intervention. Biomarkers are used to diagnose, track, and treat other diseases, but no validated clinicalbiomarkers exist yet for chronic pain. To address this problem, the National Institutes of Health Common Fundlaunched the Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures (A2CPS) program to evaluate candidate biomarkers, develop theminto biosignatures, and discover novel biomarkers for chronification of pain after surgery. This article discussescandidate biomarkers identified by A2CPS for evaluation, including genomic, proteomic, metabolomic, lipidomic,neuroimaging, psychophysical, psychological, and behavioral measures. Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures will providethe most comprehensive investigation of biomarkers for the transition to chronic postsurgical pain undertaken todate. Data and analytic resources generated by A2CPS will be shared with the scientific community in hopes thatother investigators will extract valuable insights beyond A2CPS’s initial findings. This article will review the identifiedbiomarkers and rationale for including them, the current state of the science on biomarkers of the transition fromacute to chronic pain, gaps in the literature, and how A2CPS will address these gaps.

BACKGROUND FXLEARN, the first-ever large multisite trial of effects of disease-targeted pharmacotherapy on learning, was designed to explore a paradigm for measuring effects of mechanism-targeted treatment in fragile X syndrome (FXS). In FXLEARN, the effects of metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 (mGluR5) negative allosteric modulator (NAM) AFQ056 on language learning were evaluated in 3- to 6-year-old children with FXS, expected to have more learning plasticity than adults, for whom prior trials of mGluR5 NAMs have failed. METHODS After a 4-month single-blind placebo lead-in, participants were randomized 1:1 to AFQ056 or placebo, with 2 months of dose optimization to the maximum tolerated dose, then 6 months of treatment during which a language-learning intervention was implemented for both groups. The primary outcome was a centrally scored videotaped communication measure, the Weighted Communication Scale (WCS). Secondary outcomes were objective performance-based and parent-reported cognitive and language measures. RESULTS FXLEARN enrolled 110 participants, randomized 99, and had 91 who completed the placebo-controlled period. Although both groups made language progress and there were no safety issues, the change in WCS score during the placebo-controlled period was not significantly different between the AFQ056 and placebo-treated groups, nor were there any significant between-group differences in change in any secondary measures. CONCLUSION Despite the large body of evidence supporting use of mGluR5 NAMs in animal models of FXS, this study suggests that this mechanism of action does not translate into benefit for the human FXS population and that better strategies are needed to determine which mechanisms will translate from preclinical models to humans in genetic neurodevelopmental disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClincalTrials.gov NCT02920892. FUNDING SOURCES NeuroNEXT network NIH grants U01NS096767, U24NS107200, U24NS107209, U01NS077323, U24NS107183, U24NS107168, U24NS107128, U24NS107199, U24NS107198, U24NS107166, U10NS077368, U01NS077366, U24NS107205, U01NS077179, and U01NS077352; NIH grant P50HD103526; and Novartis IIT grant AFQ056X2201T for provision of AFQ056.

Importance:Cryptogenic sensory peripheral neuropathy (CSPN) is highly prevalent and often disabling due to neuropathic pain. Metabolic syndrome and its components increase neuropathy risk. Diet and exercise have shown promise but are limited by poor adherence. Objective:To determine whether topiramate can slow decline in intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) and/or neuropathy-specific quality of life measured using the Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (NQOL-DN) scale. Design, Setting, and Participants:Topiramate as a Disease-Modifying Therapy for CSPN (TopCSPN) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial conducted between February 2018 and October 2021. TopCSPN was performed at 20 sites in the National Institutes of Health-funded Network for Excellence in Neurosciences Clinical Trials (NeuroNEXT). Individuals with CSPN and metabolic syndrome aged 18 to 80 years were screened and randomly assigned by body mass index (<30 vs ≥30), which is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Patients were excluded if they had poorly controlled diabetes, prior topiramate treatment, recurrent nephrolithiasis, type 1 diabetes, use of insulin within 3 months before screening, history of foot ulceration, planned bariatric surgery, history of alcohol or drug overuse in the 2 years before screening, family history of a hereditary neuropathy, or an alternative neuropathy cause. Interventions:Participants received topiramate or matched placebo titrated to a maximum-tolerated dose of 100 mg per day. Main Outcomes and Measures:IENFD and NQOL-DN score were co-primary outcome measures. A positive study was defined as efficacy in both or efficacy in one and noninferiority in the other. Results:A total of 211 individuals were screened, and 132 were randomly assigned to treatment groups: 66 in the topiramate group and 66 in the placebo group. Age and sex were similar between groups (topiramate: mean [SD] age, 61 (10) years; 38 male [58%]; placebo: mean [SD] age, 62 (11) years; 44 male [67%]). The difference in change in IENFD and NQOL-DN score was noninferior but not superior in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (IENFD, 0.21 fibers/mm per year; 95% CI, -0.43 to ∞ fibers/mm per year and NQOL-DN score, -1.52 points per year; 95% CI, -∞ to 1.19 points per year). A per-protocol analysis excluding noncompliant participants based on serum topiramate levels and those with major protocol deviations demonstrated superiority in NQOL-DN score (-3.69 points per year; 95% CI, -∞ to -0.73 points per year). Patients treated with topiramate had a mean (SD) annual change in IENFD of 0.56 fibers/mm per year relative to placebo (95% CI, -0.21 to ∞ fibers/mm per year). Although IENFD was stable in the topiramate group compared with a decline consistent with expected natural history, this difference did not demonstrate superiority. Conclusion and Relevance:Topiramate did not slow IENFD decline or affect NQOL-DN score in the primary ITT analysis. Some participants were intolerant of topiramate. NQOL-DN score was superior among those compliant based on serum levels and without major protocol deviations. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02878798.

Abstract Chronic pain affects more than 50 million Americans. Treatments remain inadequate, in large part, because the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the development of chronic pain remain poorly understood. Pain biomarkers could potentially identify and measure biological pathways and phenotypical expressions that are altered by pain, provide insight into biological treatment targets, and help identify at-risk patients who might benefit from early intervention. Biomarkers are used to diagnose, track, and treat other diseases, but no validated clinical biomarkers exist yet for chronic pain. To address this problem, the National Institutes of Health Common Fund launched the Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures (A2CPS) program to evaluate candidate biomarkers, develop them into biosignatures, and discover novel biomarkers for chronification of pain after surgery. This article discusses candidate biomarkers identified by A2CPS for evaluation, including genomic, proteomic, metabolomic, lipidomic, neuroimaging, psychophysical, psychological, and behavioral measures. Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures will provide the most comprehensive investigation of biomarkers for the transition to chronic postsurgical pain undertaken to date. Data and analytic resources generatedby A2CPS will be shared with the scientific community in hopes that other investigators will extract valuable insights beyond A2CPS's initial findings. This article will review the identified biomarkers and rationale for including them, the current state of the science on biomarkers of the transition from acute to chronic pain, gaps in the literature, and how A2CPS will address these gaps.

FM and control groups.Together, these results provide novel evidence of the relationship between altered brain reward systems and dysregulated attentional processing in chronic pain, especially in patients with fibromyalgia, and suggest a potential impact of opioid use on this relationship.K99/R00 DA040154, R01 DA055850.

Introduction:During the COVID-19 pandemic, research organizations accelerated adoption of technologies that enable remote participation. Now, there's a pressing need to evaluate current decentralization practices and develop appropriate research, education, and operations infrastructure. The purpose of this study was to examine current adoption of decentralization technologies in a sample of clinical research studies conducted by academic research organizations (AROs).Methods:The setting was three data coordinating centers in the U.S. These centers initiated coordination of 44 clinical research studies during or after 2020, with national recruitment and enrollment, and entailing coordination between one and one hundred sites. We determined the decentralization technologies used in these studies.Results:We obtained data for 44/44 (100%) trials coordinated by the three centers. Three technologies have been adopted across nearly all studies (98-100%): eIRB, eSource, and Clinical Trial Management Systems. Commonly used technologies included e-Signature (32/44, 73%), Online Payments Portals (26/44, 59%), ePROs (23/44, 53%), Interactive Response Technology (22/44, 50%), Telemedicine (19/44, 43%), and eConsent (18/44, 41%). Wearables (7/44,16%) and Online Recruitment Portals (5/44,11%) were less common. Rarely utilized technologies included Direct-to-Patient Portals (1/44, 2%) and Home Health Nurse Portals (1/44, 2%).Conclusions:All studies incorporated some type of decentralization technology, with more extensive adoption than found in previous research. However, adoption may be strongly influenced by institution-specific IT and informatics infrastructure and support. There are inherent needs, responsibilities, and challenges when incorporating decentralization technology into a research study, and AROs must ensure that infrastructure and informatics staff are adequate.

OBJECTIVE:To examine group differences in self-reported migraine days among youth who completed the Childhood and Adolescent Migraine Prevention (CHAMP) trial prior to its closure and explore the relationship between self-reported and "nosology-derived" (i.e., International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition [ICHD-3]) migraine days. BACKGROUND:The CHAMP trial compared amitriptyline and topiramate to placebo for migraine prevention in youth and proposed to analyze change in migraine days as a secondary outcome. There is considerable variability in the field regarding what constitutes a "migraine day," how this is determined and reported in trials, and how consistent these measures are with diagnostic nosology. METHODS:CHAMP trial completers (N = 175) were randomized to receive amitriptyline (n = 77), topiramate (n = 63), or placebo (n = 35). Participants maintained daily headache diaries where they reported each day with headache and if they considered that headache to be a migraine. For each headache day, participants completed a symptom record and reported about symptoms such as pain location(s) and presence of nausea/vomiting or photophobia and phonophobia. We examined group differences in self-reported migraine days at trial completion (summed from trial weeks 20-24) compared to baseline. We also used an algorithm to determine whether participants' symptom reports met ICHD-3 criteria for migraine without aura, and examined the association between self-reported and "nosology-derived" migraine days. RESULTS:Results showed no significant differences between groups in self-reported migraine days over the course of the trial. Self-reported and "nosology-derived" migraine days during the baseline and treatment phases were strongly associated (r's = 0.73 and 0.83, respectively; p's < 0.001). CONCLUSION:Regardless of treatment, CHAMP trial completers showed clinically important reductions in self-reported migraine days over the course of the trial (about 3.8 days less). The strong association between self-reported and "nosology-derived" migraine days suggests youth with migraine can recognize a day with migraine and reliably report their headache features and symptoms. Greater rigor and transparency in the calculation and reporting of migraine days in trials is needed.