We examine the effect of the Fermi–Dirac or Bose–Einstein symmetry of the particles on the one-particle densities. We study space–time resolved densities of particle–hole pairs produced by an external time-dependent field acting on non-interacting non-relativistic particles and show that the densities are not affected by Fermi–Dirac or Bose–Einstein statistics: they are determined only by the initial state of the multi-particle system. This finding contrasts with the usual explanations, based on the Pauli principle, put forward to explain the marked differences between relativistic fermions and bosons in investigations of pair production in Klein tunnelling contexts. We extend our model to relativistic particles and argue that the different behaviour in the one particle densities originates from the quasi-Hermitian Klein–Gordon scalar product.

The Uncertainty Principle forbids one to determine which of the two paths a quantum system has travelled, unless interference between the alternatives had been destroyed by a measuring device, e.g., by a pointer. One can try to weaken the coupling between the device and the system in order to avoid the veto. We demonstrate, however, that a weak pointer is at the same time an inaccurate one, and the information about the path taken by the system in each individual trial is inevitably lost. We show also that a similar problem occurs if a classical system is monitored by an inaccurate quantum meter. In both cases, one can still determine some characteristic of the corresponding statistical ensemble, a relation between path probabilities in the classical case, and a relation between the probability amplitudes if a quantum system is involved.

Reactive angular distributions of the benchmark F + H 2(v i = 0) → FH(v f = 3) + H reaction show unusual propensity toward small scattering angles, a subject of a long debate in the literature. We use Regge trajectories to quantify the resonance contributions to state-to-state differential cross sections. Conversion to complex energy poles allows us to attribute the effect almost exclusively to a transition state resonance, long known to exist in the F + H 2 system and its isotopic variant F + HD. For our detailed analysis of angular scattering we employ the package DCS_Regge, recently developed for the purpose [Akhmatskaya E.; Sokolovski D.Comput. Phys. Commun.2022, 277, 108370].

Reactive angular distributions of the benchmark F + H 2(v i = 0) -> FH(v f = 3) + H reaction show unusual propensity toward small scattering angles, a subject of a long debate in the literature. We use Regge trajectories to quantify the resonance contributions to state-to-state differential cross sections. Conversion to complex energy poles allows us to attribute the effect almost exclusively to a transition state resonance, long known to exist in the F + H 2 system and its isotopic variant F + HD. For our detailed analysis of angular scattering we employ the package DCS_Regge, recently developed for the purpose [

We propose detecting the moment an atom emits a photon by means of a nearly classical macroscopic clock and discuss its viability. It is shown that what happens in such a measurement depends on the relation between the clock’s accuracy and the width of the energy range available to the photon. Implications of the analysis for the long standing Schrödinger’s cat problem are reported.

The analytical continuation of classical equations of motion to complex times suggests that a tunneling particle spends in the barrier an imaginary duration i | T | . Does this mean that it takes a finite time to tunnel, or should tunneling be seen as an instantaneous process? It is well known that examination of the adiabatic limit in a small additional AC field points towards |T | being the time it takes to traverse the barrier. However, this is only half the story. We probe the transmitted particle's history, and find that it remembers very little of the field's past behavior, as if the transit time were close to zero. The ensuing contradiction suggests that the question is ill posed, and we explain why.

Reactive angular distributions of the benchmark F + H2(vi = 0) -> F H(vf = 3) + H reaction show unusual propensity towards small scattering angles, a subject of a long debate in the literature. We use Regge trajectories to quantify the resonance contributions to state-to-state differential cross sections. Conversion to complex energy poles allows us to attribute the effect almost exclusively to a transition state resonance, long known to exist in the F +H2 system and its isotopic variant F +HD. For our detailed analysis of angular scattering we employ the package DCS Regge, recently developed for the purpose [Comp. Phys. Comm., 2022, 277, 108370.]

Eisenbud–Wigner–Smith delay and the Larmor time give different estimates for the duration of a quantum scattering event. The difference is most pronounced in the case where the de Broglie wavelength is large compared to the size of the scatterer. We use the methods of quantum measurement theory to analyse both approaches and to decide which one of them, if any, describes the duration a particle spends in the region that contains the scattering potential. The cases of transmission, reflection, and three-dimensional elastic scattering are discussed in some detail.

The aim of the present paper is to bring clarity, through simplicity, to the important and long-standing problem: does a resonance contribute to the forward-angle scattering of the F + H2 reaction? We reduce the problem to its essentials and present a well-defined, yet rigorous and unambiguous, investigation of structure in the differential cross sections (DCSs) of the following three state-to-state reactions at a translational energy of 62.09 meV: F + H2(vi = 0, ji = 0, mi = 0) → FH(vf = 3, jf = 0, 1, 2, mf = 0) + H, where vi, ji, mi and vf, jf, mf are the initial and final vibrational, rotational and helicity quantum numbers respectively. Firstly, we carry out quantum-scattering calculations for the Fu-Xu-Zhang potential energy surface, obtaining accurate numerical scattering matrix elements for indistinguishable H2. The calculations use a time-independent method, with hyperspherical coordinates and an enhanced Numerov method. Secondly, the following theoretical techniques are employed to analyse structures in the DCSs: (a) full and Nearside-Farside (NF) partial wave series (PWS) and local angular momentum theory, including resummations of the full PWS up to second order. (b) The recently introduced "CoroGlo" test, which lets us distinguish between glory and corona scattering at forward angles for a Legendre PWS. (c) Six asymptotic (semiclassical) forward-angle glory theories and three asymptotic farside rainbow theories, valid for rainbows at sideward-scattering angles. (d) Complex angular momentum (CAM) theories of forward and backward scattering, with the Regge pole positions and residues computed by Thiele rational interpolation. Thirdly, our conclusions for the three PWS DCSs are: (a) the forward-angle peaks arise from glory scattering. (b) A broad (hidden) farside rainbow is present at sideward angles. (c) A single Regge pole contributes to the DCS across the whole angular range, being most prominent at forward angles. This proves that a resonance contributes to the DCSs for the three transitions. (d) The diffraction oscillations in the DCSs arise from NF interference, in particular, interference between the Regge pole and direct subamplitudes.

Feynman famously recommended accepting the basic principles of quantum mechanics without trying to guess the machinery behind the law. One of the corollaries of the Uncertainty Principle is that the knowledge of probability amplitudes does not allow one to make meaningful statements about the past of an unobserved quantum system. A particular type of reasoning, based on weak values, appears to do just that. Has Feynman been proven wrong by the more recent developments? Most likely not. Quanta 2023; 12: 180–189.

Quantum mechanics, in its orthodox version, imposes severe limits on what can be known, or even said, about the condition of a quantum system between two observations. A relatively new approach, based on so-called "weak measurements", suggests that such forbidden knowledge can be gained by studying the system's response to an inaccurate weakly perturbing measuring device. It goes further to propose revising the whole concept of physics variables, and offers various examples of counterintuitive quantum behaviour. Both views go to the very heart of quantum theory, and yet are rarely compared directly. A new technique must either transcend the orthodox limits, or just prove that these limits are indeed necessary. We study both possibilities, and find for the orthodoxy.

We propose detecting the moment an atom emits a photon by means of a nearly classical macroscopic clock and discuss its viability. It is shown that what happens in such a measurement depends on the relation between the clock's accuracy and the width of the energy range available to the photon. Implications of the analysis for the long standing Schroedinger's cat problem are reported.

Probabilities of the outcomes of consecutive quantum measurements can be obtained by construction probability amplitudes, thus implying the unitary evolution of the measured system, broken each time a measurement is made. In practice, the experimenter needs to know all past outcomes at the end of the experiment, and that requires the presence of probes carrying the corresponding records. With this in mind, we consider two different ways to extend the description of a quantum system beyond what is actually measured and recorded. One is to look for quantities whose values can be ascertained without altering the existing probabilities. Such "elements of reality" can be found, yet they suffer from the same drawback as their EPR counterparts. The probes designed to measure non-commuting operators frustrate each other if set up to work jointly, so no simultaneous values of such quantities can be established consistently. The other possibility is to investigate the system's response to weekly coupled probes. Such weak probes are shown either to reduce to a small fraction the number of cases where the corresponding values are still accurately measured, or lead only to the evaluation of the system's probability amplitudes, or their combinations. It is difficult, we conclude, to see in quantum mechanics anything other than a formalism for predicting the likelihoods of the recorded outcomes of actually performed observations.

We study non-relativistic propagation of Gaussian wave packets in one-dimensional Eckart potential, a barrier, or a well. In the picture used, the transmitted wave packet results from interference between the copies of the freely propagating state with different spatial shifts (delays), x', induced by the scattering potential. The Uncertainty Principle precludes relating the particle's final position to the delay experienced in the potential, except in the classical limit. Beyond this limit, even defining an effective range of the delay is shown to be an impracticable task, owing to the oscillatory nature of the corresponding amplitude distribution. Our examples include the classically allowed case, semiclassical tunnelling, delays induced in the presence of a virtual state, and scattering by a low barrier. The properties of the amplitude distribution of the delays, and its pole representation are studied in detail.

Recent developments in elementary quantum mechanics have seen a number of extraordinary claims regarding quantum behaviour, and even questioning internal consistency of the theory. These are, we argue, different disguises of what Feynman described as quantum theory's “only mystery”.

Wigner's friend scenarios involve an Observer, or Observers, measuring a Friend, or Friends, who themselves make quantum measurements. In recent discussions, it has been suggested that quantum mechanics may not always be able to provide a consistent account of a situation involving two Observers and two Friends. We investigate this problem by invoking the basic rules of quantum mechanics as outlined by Feynman in the well-known "Feynman Lectures on Physics". We show here that these "Feynman rules" constrain the a priori assumptions which can be made in generalised Wigner's friend scenarios, because the existence of the probabilities of interest ultimately depends on the availability of physical evidence (material records) of the system's past. With these constraints obeyed, a non-ambiguous and consistent account of all measurement outcomes is obtained for all agents, taking part in various Wigner's Friend scenarios.

We investigate wavepacket dynamics across supercritical barriers for the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations. Our treatment is based on a multiple scattering expansion (MSE). For spin-0 particles, the MSE diverges, rendering invalid the use of the usual connection formulas for the scattering basis functions. In a time-dependent formulation, the divergent character of the MSE naturally accounts for charge creation at the barrier boundaries. In the Dirac case, the MSE converges and no charge is created. We show that this time-dependent charge behavior dynamics can adequately explain the Klein paradox in a first quantized setting. We further compare our semi-analytical wavepacket approach to exact finite-difference solutions of the relativistic wave equations.

A controversy surrounding the "tunnelling time problem" stems from the seeming inability of quantum mechanics to provide, in the usual way, a definition of the duration a particle is supposed to spend in a given region of space. For this reason, the problem is often approached from an "operational" angle. Typically, one tries to mimic, in a quantum case, an experiment which yields the desired result for a classical particle. One such approach is based on the use of a Larmor clock. We show that the difficulty with applying a non-perturbing Larmor clock in order to "time" a classically forbidden transition arises from the quantum Uncertainty Principle. We also demonstrate that for this reason a Larmor time (in fact, any Larmor time) cannot be interpreted as a physical time interval. We provide a theoretical description of the quantities measured by the clock.

It is argued that Feynman’s rules for evaluating probabilities, combined with von Neumann’s principle of psycho-physical parallelism, help avoid inconsistencies, often associated with quantum theory. The former allows one to assign probabilities to entire sequences of hypothetical Observers’ experiences, without mentioning the problem of wave function collapse. The latter limits the Observer’s (e.g., Wigner’s friend’s) participation in a measurement to the changes produced in material objects, thus leaving his/her consciousness outside the picture.

We analyse a little known aspect of the Klein paradox. A Klein-Gordon boson appears to be able to cross a supercritical rectangular barrier without being reflected, while spending there a negative amount of time. The transmission mechanism is demonstrably acausal, yet an attempt to construct the corresponding causal solution of the Klein-Gordon equation fails. We relate the causal solution to a divergent multiple-reflections series, and show that the problem is remedied for a smooth barrier, where pair production at the energy equal to a half of the barrier's height is enhanced yet remains finite.