Image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) using kilovoltage cone-beam CT (CBCT) has become an indispensable tool to ensure the geometric accuracy of radiotherapy treatment delivery. Although significant technical advances have been made in reducing imaging dose, the repeated imaging procedures can still accumulate significant dose to healthy tissues. Despite the widespread use, we still lack clear guidance for optimisation and widely accepted frameworks for evaluating the quality and suitability of CBCT imaging protocols. To address this gap, the 2022 European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) Physics Workshop focused on image-quality and imaging-dose optimisation for IGRT using CBCT. This publication represents a review and an expert consensus of the 2022 ESTRO Physics Workshop IGRT working group. Here we aim to provide practical advice for optimising and maintaining CBCT imaging protocols to meet the needs of local procedures and patient populations. The review includes summaries of the current status of CBCT use and optimisation for IGRT in adults and paediatrics, an overview of currently available guidelines, and finally practical guidance on optimising and implementing CBCT imaging protocols for local IGRT treatments and patient populations.

Background and purpose:Multi-leaf collimators (MLCs) with tilted leaf sides have a complex transmission behaviour that is not easily matched by radiotherapy treatment planning systems (TPSs). We sought to develop an MLC model that can accurately match test fields and clinically relevant plans at different centres.Materials and methods:Two new MLC models were developed and evaluated within a research version of a commercial TPS. Prototype I used adjusted-constant transmissions and Prototype II used variable transmissions at the tongue-and-groove and leaf-tip regions. Three different centres evaluated these prototypes for a tilted MLC and compared them with their initial MLC model using test fields and patient-specific quality-assurance measurements of clinically relevant plans. For the latter, gamma passing rates (GPR) at 2 %/2mm were recorded.Results:For the prototypes the same set of MLC parameters could be used at all centres, with only a slight adjustment of the offset parameter. For centres A and C, average GPR were >95 % and within 0.5 % GPR difference between the standard, and prototype models. In center B, prototypes I and II improved the agreement in clinically relevant plans, with an increase in GPR of 2.3 % ± 0.8 % and 3.0 ± 0.8 %, respectively.Conclusions:The prototype MLC models were either similar or superior to the initial MLC model, and simpler to configure because fewer trade-offs were required. Prototype I performed comparably to the more sophisticated Prototype II and its configuration can be easily standardized, which can be useful to reduce variability and improve safety in clinical practice.

Background and purpose: This work reports on the results of a survey performed on the use of computed tomography (CT) imaging for motion management, surface guidance devices, and their quality assurance (QA). Additionally, it details the collected user insights regarding professional needs in CT for radiotherapy. The purpose of the survey is to understand current practice, professional needs and future directions in the field of fan-beam CT in radiation therapy (RT). Materials and methods: An online institutional survey was conducted between 1-Sep-2022 and 10-Oct-2022 among medical physics experts at Belgian and Dutch radiotherapy institutions, to assess the current status, challenges, and future directions of motion management and surface image-guided radiotherapy. The survey consisted of a maximum of 143 questions, with the exact number depending on participants’ responses. Results: The response rate was 66 % (31/47). Respiratory management was reported as standard practice in all but one institution; surface imaging during CT-simulation was reported in ten institutions. QA procedures are applied with varying frequencies and methodologies, primarily with commercial anatomy-like phantoms. Surface guidance users report employing commercial static and dynamic phantoms. Four main subjects are considered clinically important by the respondents: surface guidance, CT protocol optimisation, implementing gated imaging (4DCT, breath-hold), and a tattoo-less workflow. Conclusions: The survey highlights the scattered pattern of QA procedures for respiratory motion management, indicating the need for well-defined, unambiguous, and practicable guidelines. Surface guidance is considered one of the most important techniques that should be implemented in the clinical radiotherapy simulation workflow.

Background and purpose: 4D Computed Tomography (4DCT) technology captures the location and movement of tumors and nearby organs at risk over time. In this study, a multi-institutional multi-vendor 4DCT audit was initiated to assess the accuracy of current imaging protocols. Materials and methods: Twelve centers, including thirteen scanners performed a 4DCT acquisition of a dynamic thorax phantom using the institution's own protocol with the in-house breathing monitoring system. Five regular and three irregular breathing patterns were used. Image acquisition and reconstruction were followed by automated image analysis with our in-house developed 4DCT QA program (QAMotion). CT number accuracy, volume deviation, amplitude deviation, and spatial integrity were assessed per pattern using both the segmented volumes and line profiles. Results: Regular breathing curves showed relatively accurate results across all institutions, with mean volume and CT number deviations and median amplitude deviation below 2%, 5 HU and 2 mm, respectively. Results obtained for irregular patterns showed more variation across the institutions. Volume and CT number deviations co-occurred with a blurring of the sphere, interpolation, or double-structure artifacts that were confirmed through the line profiles. For some of the irregular patterns, amplitude deviations up to 6 mm were observed. Maximum Intensity Projection (MaxIP) correctly captured the applied motion amplitude with deviations across all institutions within 2 mm except for double amplitude pattern. Conclusions: All centers invited to participate in the audit responded positively, highlighting the need for a comprehensive yet easy-to-execute 4DCT quality assurance program. The largest variances between the results from one institution to another confirmed that a standardized 4DCT audit is warranted.

This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive, reproducible and automatic 4DCT Quality Assurance (QA) workflow (QAMotion) that evaluates image accuracy across various regular and irregular breathing patterns. Volume and amplitude deviations, CT number accuracy, and spatial integrity were used as evaluation metrics. For repeatability tests, tolerances were respected with a mean CT number deviation < 10 HU, volume deviation < 2% and diameter and amplitude deviation < 2 mm except for irregular amplitude curves for which an amplitude deviation up to 6 mm was measured. QAMotion was able to flag image artefacts for our clinical 4DCT system.

Background and purpose: To obtain an understanding of current practice, professional needs and future directions in the field of fan-beam CT in RT, a survey was conducted. This work presents the collected information regarding the use of CT imaging for dose calculation and structure delineation. Materials and methods: An online institutional survey was distributed to medical physics experts employed at Belgian and Dutch radiotherapy institutions to assess the status, challenges, and future directions of QA practices for fan-beam CT. A maximum of 143 questions covered topics such as CT scanner availability, CT scanner specifications, QA protocols, treatment simulation workflow, and radiotherapy dose calculation. Answer forms were collected between 1-Sep-2022 and 10-Oct-2022. Results: A 66 % response rate was achieved, yielding data on a total of 58 CT scanners. For MV photon therapy, all single-energy CT scans are reconstructed in Hounsfield Units for delineation or dose calculation, and a direct- or stoichiometric method was used to convert CT numbers for dose calculation. Limited use of dual-energy CT is reported for photon (N = 3) and proton dose calculations (N = 1). For brachytherapy, most institutions adopt water-based dose calculation, while approximately 26 % of the institutions take tissue heterogeneity into account. Commissioning and regular QA include eleven tasks, which are performed by two or more professions (29/31) with varying frequencies. Conclusions: Dual usage of a planning CT limits protocol optimization for both tissue characterization and delineation. DECT has been implemented only gradually. A variation of QA testing frequencies and tests are reported.

Robust fine tuning of multi-leaf collimator (MLC) Treatment Planning System (TPS) modeling parameters is crucial for creating an optimal beam model, particularly with the ever-increasing accuracy required for advancing techniques. Challenges arise from balancing the trade-off between multiple parameters and therefore the quality of tuning depends on the experience of the physicist and the procedures used. This is in part due to limitations of the MLC modeling within the TPS. As a result, the actual values used have been shown to vary widely between centers. We present and evaluate two different MLC transmission maps to improve the modeling of the Elekta Agility MLC in the RayStation TPS. The model prototypes were developed with discrete and continuous MLC transmission maps assigned to the tongue-and-groove and leaf tip regions. The prototypes aimed to replicate the average doses for synchronous and asynchronous sweeping gap fields, measured using a Farmer chamber in a solid water phantom. This study investigated the impact of these improvements using test fields and a wide variety of measured clinical plans in three different centers. The models achieved good accuracy and the improvements facilitated the standardization of the configuration and commissioning processes and extended the range of validity of TPS dose calculations in wide variety of treatment plans and measuring systems. The simpler MLC prototype with discrete transmission maps performed similarly to the more sophisticated one both in tests and clinical plans and constitutes a good option for routine clinical practice. The need for trade-offs were reduced and the models were successfully configured using a common set of parameters across the three centers, which is useful for reducing the workload and the risks associated with the configuration process, thus improving the accuracy and safety of radiotherapy treatments.

AbstractBackgroundThe Agility multileaf collimator (MLC) mounted in Elekta linear accelerators features some unique design characteristics, such as large leaf thickness, eccentric curvature at the leaf tip, and defocused leaf sides (‘tilting'). These characteristics offer several advantages but modeling them in treatment planning systems (TPSs) is challenging.PurposeThe goals of this study were to investigate the challenges faced when modeling the Agility in two commercial TPSs (Monaco and RayStation) and to explore how the implemented MLC models could be improved in the future.MethodsFour linear accelerators equipped with the Agility, located at different centers, were used for the study. Three centers use the RayStation TPS and the other one uses Monaco. For comparison purposes, data from four Varian linear accelerators with the Millennium 120 MLC were also included. Average doses measured with asynchronous sweeping gap tests were used to characterize and compare the characteristics of the Millennium and the Agility MLCs and to assess the MLC model in the TPSs. The FOURL test included in the ExpressQA package, provided by Elekta, was also used to evaluate the tongue‐and‐groove with radiochromic films. Finally, raytracing was used to investigate the impact of the MLC geometry and to understand the results obtained for each MLC.ResultsThe geometry of the Agility produces dosimetric effects associated with the rounded leaf end up to a distance 20 mm away from the leaf tip end measured at the isocenter plane. This affects the tongue‐and‐groove shadowing, which progressively increases along the distance to the tip end. The RayStation and Monaco TPSs did not account for this effect, which made trade‐offs in the MLC parameters necessary and greatly varied the final MLC parameters used by different centers. Raytracing showed that these challenging leaf tip effects were directly related to the MLC geometry and that the characteristics mainly responsible for the large leaf tip effects of the Agility were its tilting design and its small source‐to‐collimator distance.ConclusionsThe MLC models implemented in RayStation and Monaco could not accurately reproduce the leaf tip effects for the Agility. Therefore, trade‐offs are needed and the optimal MLC parameters are dependent on the specific characteristics of treatment plans. Refining the MLC models for the Agility to better approximate the measured leaf tip and tongue‐and‐groove effects would extend the validity of the MLC model, reduce the variability in the MLC parameters used by the community, and facilitate the standardization of the MLC configuration process.

Purpose: To demonstrate the feasibility of characterising MLCs and MLC models implemented in TPSs using a common set of dynamic beams. Materials and methods: A set of tests containing synchronous (SG) and asynchronous sweeping gaps (aSG) was distributed among twenty-five participating centres. Doses were measured with a Farmer-type ion chamber and computed in TPSs, which provided a dosimetric characterisation of the leaf tip, tongue-and-groove, and MLC transmission of each MLC, as well as an assessment of the MLC model in each TPS. Five MLC types and four TPSs were evaluated, covering the most frequent combinations used in radiotherapy departments. Results: Measured differences within each MLC type were minimal, while large differences were found between MLC models implemented in clinical TPSs. This resulted in some concerning discrepancies, especially for the HD120 and Agility MLCs, for which differences between measured and calculated doses for some MLC-TPS combinations exceeded 10%. These large differences were particularly evident for small gap sizes (5 and 10 mm), as well as for larger gaps in the presence of tongue-and-groove effects. A much better agreement was found for the Millennium120 and Halcyon MLCs, differences being within +/- 5% and +/- 2.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The feasibility of using a common set of tests to assess MLC models in TPSs was demonstrated. Measurements within MLC types were very similar, but TPS dose calculations showed large variations. Standardisation of the MLC configuration in TPSs is necessary. The proposed procedure can be readily applied in radiotherapy departments and can be a valuable tool in IMRT and credentialing audits. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Radiotherapy and Oncology 186 (2023) 1-8 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).