To evaluate the activity and tolerance of gemcitabine in combination with docetaxel and capecitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Purpose To evaluate the activity and tolerance of vinorelbine (VRL) in combination with gemcitabine (GEM) in pre-treated patients with refractory ovarian cancer.Patients and methods Seventeen patients with ovarian cancer who had disease progression after a carboplatin and taxane front-line regimen were treated with VRL 30 mg/m(2) IV over 10 min followed by GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) IV over 30 min on days 1 and 15 of each 28 days cycle. Chemotherapy was given in a initial prospective plan of six cycles, unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity was seen, giving more cycles as consolidation therapy in the case of CR, PR or SD. The median age of patients was 67 years old, and the performance status (WHO) was 1 for 13 and 2 for 4 patients. The treatment was second-line for 11 (65%) and > third-line for 6 (35%) patients.Results One complete and one partial response were observed (ORR:11%). Stable disease was seen in 4 (24%) patients and progressive disease in 11 (65%). The median time to tumor progression was 4 months (range 2-11), and the median survival has not yet been reached. Myelotoxicity was rare. Grade 1 neutropenia was observed just in one patient and grade 2/3 anemia in four patients (24%). Thrombocytopenia was absent. Non-hematologic toxicity was also predictable and easily manageable.Conclusion The vinorelbine plus gemcitabine combination at the present doses and schedule is a safe but ineffective regimen, and therefore, is not recommended as second-line and beyond treatment in patients with refractory ovarian cancer.

Objective: In the present phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a docetaxel-oxaliplatin-capecitabine combination as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients and Methods: A total of 27 patients (18 males) with histologically confirmed inoperable gastric adenocarcinoma were recruited. Docetaxel was given (50 mg/m2 i.v.) on day 1 followed by oxaliplatin (75 mg/m2 i.v.) also on day 1. Capecitabine (2,750 mg/m2) was given orally as two daily divided doses from days 1 to 7. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. All patients had measurable disease and 18 of them had a performance status (WHO) of 0. Results: A total of 240 treatment cycles were administered. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. Four patients who discontinued treatment early (having received only 3 chemotherapy cycles) were included as non-responders in an intention-to-treat response analysis. Complete response, partial response, stable disease and progressive disease were observed in 4 (15%), 12 (44%), 3 (11%) and 8 (30%) patients, respectively. The observed response rate was 59%, and the disease control rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease) was 70%. At the time of analysis, 6 patients were still alive and the median survival was 18.0 months. The most common grade III/IV toxicities observed were neutropenia (5%), diarrhea (2%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (2%) and neurotoxicity (1%). All other toxicities were mostly of grade I/II and easily manageable. Conclusion: The combination of docetaxel, oxaliplatin and capecitabine in the described mode of administration represents a relatively active and well-tolerated regimen in patients with advanced gastric cancer and warrants further evaluation.