•Studies on how increased formal educational level in mid-life affects mortality is lacking.•We found that women who increased their educational level in mid-life had a reduced risk of mortality.•In men, mortality was reduced only for those who increased their education from a low level.

MethodsTwelve vignettes describing scenarios that raise concerns about standards of physicians were designed by the UK's General Medical Council covering a range of disciplinary and professional issues, based on a conceptual framework that included a combination of clinical, criminal and administrative matters.The vignettes were sent to medical regulatory bodies of nine European countries who indicated hypothetically what action they would normally take.The data were cross-analysed by theme and severity of action.Findings Responses varied greatly across participating countries.All regulators are involved where patients are at risk or where a criminal offence is committed within a clinical setting, with severe, often punitive and permanent, actions being enforced.Non-criminal medical issues were generally handled by the employer, suggesting delineation between a doctor's accountability for professional standards which are generally overseen by the regulatory bodies, and their accountability as a medical employee where their competency and ability to practice is regulated by the employer.Some countries employed punitive actions more frequently, often covering a broader scope of activity which extended beyond professional standards.Conversely other regulatory bodies had narrower scopes of authority, often referring the matter to another regulatory authority or taking no action at all. ConclusionsAlthough almost all participating regulatory bodies oversee health care quality and safety, there is little consistency across Europe in how events questioning competency and qualities of medical professionals are handled.With increased professional and patient mobility, this has significant implications regarding patient safety and quality of care in light of the lack of regional standardisation. Key messagesWith the rise in professional mobility, variation in the regulation of doctors by medical authorities can jeopardise quality of care and patient safety across Europe.There is great variation and no standardisation in the management of medical and professional malpractice by regulatory bodies of different European countries.

BACKGROUND It has been suggested that low socio-economic position (SEP) during childhood and adolescence predicts risk of adult type 2 diabetes. We investigated the associations between type 2 diabetes and childhood SEP (fathers' occupational position), participants' education and adult SEP (participants' occupational position). To determine possible independent associations between early SEP (fathers' occupational position and participants' education) and disease, we adjusted for adult SEP and factors present in adult life associated with type 2 diabetes. METHODS This cross-sectional study comprised 3128 men and 4821 women aged 35-56 years. All subjects have gone through a health examination and answered a questionnaire on lifestyle factors. At the health centre, an oral glucose tolerance test was administered and identified 55 men and 52 women with previously undiagnosed type 2 diabetes. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated in multiple logistic regression analyses. RESULTS The age-adjusted RRs of type 2 diabetes if having a father with middle occupational position were 2.3 [Confidence interval (CI:1.0-5.1) for women and, 2.0 (CI:0.7-5.6) for men]. Moreover, low education was associated with type 2 diabetes in women, RR = 2.5 (CI:1.2-4.9). Low occupational position in adulthood was associated with type 2 diabetes in women, RR = 2.7 (CI:1.3-5.9) and men, RR = 2.9 (CI:1.5-5.7). The associations between early SEP and type 2 diabetes disappeared after adjustment for adult SEP and factors associated with type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSION The association between type 2 diabetes and low SEP during childhood and adolescence in middle-aged Swedish subjects disappeared after adjustment for adult SEP and adult risk factors of diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS:We investigated associations between abnormal glucose regulation and family history of diabetes, separately and in combination with lifestyle risk factors.SUBJECTS AND METHODS:This cross-sectional study comprised 3,128 men and 4,821 women, aged 35-56 years, half with a family history of diabetes. Oral glucose tolerance testing identified subjects with previously undiagnosed prediabetes (IFG, IGT) and type 2 diabetes. Information on lifestyle factors was obtained by questionnaire. Biological interaction was measured with the synergy index.RESULTS:A family history of diabetes conferred a higher odds ratio (OR) for type 2 diabetes in men (OR=3.1, 95% CI 1.7-5.6) than in women (OR=1.7, 95% CI 1.0-3.0), and the synergy index was 2.8 (95% CI 0.9-9.0), suggesting interaction between a family history of diabetes and sex. For prediabetes and diabetes combined, the synergy index was 1.7 (1.0-2.8). Exposure to only one lifestyle risk factor (obesity, physical inactivity, smoking or low sense of coherence [a psychosocial index]) increased the risk to a similar extent in men and women. Combined exposure to a family history of diabetes and lifestyle-related risk factors had a greater effect on type 2 diabetes than any of these factors alone, especially in men. However, analysis of interaction between a family history of diabetes and the lifestyle factors did not indicate any interaction for diabetes, but did indicate interaction for a family history of diabetes and obesity in women with prediabetes.CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION:Our data suggest a more pronounced effect of a family history of diabetes on the risk of type 2 diabetes in men than in women. While both a family history of diabetes and lifestyle risk factors had effects on type 2 diabetes, irrespective of sex, these effects did not appear to interact.

OBJECTIVE We investigated to what extent socioeconomic differences in type 2 diabetes risk could be explained by established risk factors (obesity, physical inactivity, smoking, and heredity) and psychosocial factors (low decision latitude at work and low sense of coherence). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This cross-sectional study comprised 3,128 healthy Swedish men and 4,821 women, aged 35-56 years, living in the Stockholm area. An oral glucose tolerance test identified 55 men and 52 women with type 2 diabetes. The relative contribution of established and psychosocial factors to socioeconomic differences in diabetes risk was assessed by comparing analyses with adjustment for different sets of these factors. RESULTS The relative risks (RRs) for type 2 diabetes in middle and low socioeconomic groups in men were 2.4 (95% CI 1.0-5.3) and 2.9 (1.5-5.7), respectively, and in women 3.2 (1.5-6.6) and 2.7 (1.3-5.9), respectively. In men, the RRs decreased to 1.9 (0.8-4.4) and 2.1 (1.0-4.2) after adjustment for established risk factors; no further change was found when psychosocial factors were included. In women, the RRs changed to 2.4 (1.1-5.2) and 1.6 (0.7-3.8) by including established risk factors and to 2.3 (1.0-5.1) and 1.9 (0.8-4.3) by inclusion of psychosocial factors. After adjustment for both established and psychosocial factors, the RRs were 1.4 (0.6-3.6) and 1.0 (0.4-2.5), respectively. CONCLUSIONS In men, the excess risk of type 2 diabetes was partly explained by established risk factors (36-42%), whereas psychosocial factors had no effect. In women, most of the socioeconomic differences in type 2 diabetes were explained by simultaneous adjustment for established risk factors and psychosocial factors (81-100%).

Objective-The risk of type 2 diabetes is suggested to be increased for individuals exposed to stress. We analyzed the association of work stress by high demands, low decision latitude, and job strain (combination of high demands and low decision latitude) with type 2 diabetes. We also studied low sense of coherence (SOC) (a factor for successful coping with stressors) in association with type 2 diabetes. Finally, we investigated the combination of SOC and demands or SOC and decision latitude in association with the disease.Research Design and Methods-This cross-sectional study recruited 4,821 healthy Swedish women (aged 35-56 years) residing in five municipalities in the Stockholm area. An oral glucose tolerance test identified 52 women with type 2 diabetes. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs were estimated in a logistic multiple regression analysis.Results-No association was found between high demands and type 2 diabetes (RR 1.1 [CI 0.5-2.2]). Low decision latitude was associated with type 2 diabetes with a RR of 2.2 (1.0-4.8). The RR of type 2 diabetes with low SOC was 3.7 (1.2-11.2). The combination of low SOC and low decision latitude was associated with type 2 diabetes with a RR of 2.6 (1.2-5.7). Homeostasis model assessment revealed an association of 4.2 (1.2-15.0) between low SOC and insulin resistance.Conclusions-This study provided new evidence that stress factors such as low decision latitude at work and low SOC were associated with type 2 diabetes in middle-aged Swedish women.