Implementation of damage control surgery and the open abdomen technique has showed improved survival in trauma and acute general surgery emergencies. However, this technique has also created new challenges in the management of patients with a significant abdominal wall defect. One of the main challenges lies in optimizing resting energy expenditure (REE). Thus, under-feeding or over-feeding remains problematic due to uncertainties regarding the prediction of energy needs at different disease states as well as individual variations. Early studies were conducted to explain the responses of injury and its influence on caloric and protein requirements. These studies showed that nutrition support after trauma should be dynamically adjusted according to metabolic responses. This is because the trauma itself can induce a series of dynamic metabolic responses with different characteristics in three stages: the ebb phase, flow phase, and recovery phase.

# Outcomes and opportunities for improvement in self-inflicted blunt and penetrating trauma {#article-title-2} Self-inflicted trauma (SIT) is a public health issue ranking 4th as leading cause of death and disability in young adults. Retrospective descriptive analysis of patients admitted to a

Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an accepted standard for locally advanced esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. However, the dysphagia frequently associated with this condition may interfere with patient tolerance of this treatment. In many centers, invasive tube feeding, placed either endoscopically, radiographically, or surgically, is used to address this issue, but it can cause significant morbidity. We sought to determine if an approach of goal-directed dietary counseling and appropriately timed neoadjuvant chemotherapy could obviate the need for invasive tube feeding. Methods Patients with locally advanced (cT3 or N+) esophageal and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant TCF [Taxotere, cisplatin 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)], ECF (epirubicin, cisplatin, 5-FU), or FLOT (docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-FU) at the McGill University Health Center from March 2007 to September 2012 were identified from a prospective database. All received individualized goal-directed dietary counseling, were monitored for signs/symptoms of malnutrition with serial (baseline/presurgery) body mass index, albumin, and completed serial symptom scores (dysphagia), and quality-of-life questionnaires (Functional Assessment in Cancer Therapy with the esophageal subset, FACT-E). We assessed the response of dysphagia and nutritional status to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the need for invasive tube feeding. Results Of 130 patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 78 had severe dysphagia (defined as dysphagia score ≥2 on a 5-point Likert scale), most of whom received TCF (91 %). Overall dysphagia scores improved in 75 (96 %) of 78 patients from a dysphagia score of 3-0, most of which improved after the first cycle of therapy. This was associated with an increase in quality of life (FACT-E scores 117 ± 23 to 140 ± 20). With maintenance of weight (70 ± 22 to 69 ± 24 kg), body mass index (24.5 ± 8 to 23.9 ± 7 kg/m 2 ), and serum albumin (40 ± 5 to 37 ± 4 g/L). Only one patient required a stent, and none required jejunostomy or gastrostomy. Conclusions Appropriately timed neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a highly effective regimen rapidly restores normal swallowing, maintains nutritional status, and obviates the need for invasive tube feeding in patients with significant dysphagia from esophageal adenocarcinoma.

The Canadian Surgery Forum Steering Committee acknowledges and thanks the following organizations for their support of the 2015 Forum: # 02 The usefulness and costs of routine contrast studies after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for detecting staple line leaks {#article-title-2} Although

9613 Background: The dysphagia commonly associated with esophageal cancer often interferes with patient tolerance of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Surgical or endoscopic invasive tube feeding (ITF - gastroscopy/jejunostomy/stent) is a commonly employed strategy to maintain nutritional support however it can cause significant morbidity in its own right. We sought to determine if a strategy of careful dietary counseling and appropriately-timed neoadjuvant chemotherapy can obviate the need for ITF. Methods: Pts undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (TAX/CDDP/5FU Q3 weeks x3) for esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma at a single institution from 3/07–7/08 were identified from a prospective database. All received dietary counseling and were closely monitored for signs/ symptoms of malnutrition with serial (baseline, after 1st cycle, pre-surgery) Body Mass Index (BMI), albumin, dysphagia scores (0 best - 4 worse), and quality of life (FACT-E). We assessed the response of dysphagia and nutritional status to neoadjuvant treatment and the need for ITF. Data presented as median (range) or mean (±SD), paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed ranks test determined significance. Results: 25 pts received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and significant dysphagia (score 2–4) was found in 14. Dysphagia scores improved in all 14 (all results in Table 1 ), and 10/13 improved after the first cycle. No patient required ITF. QoL as assessed by the FACT-E improved in 13/14 patients. A small decrease in BMI was noted, however serum albumin did not significantly decrease. Conclusions: Appropriately timed neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a highly effective regimen rapidly restores normal swallowing, maintains nutritional status, and obviates the need for ITF in patients with significant dysphagia from esophageal adenocarcinoma. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.