Previous reports focusing on the high prevalence of voice disorders in teachers have suggested that vocal loading might be the main causal factor. The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of voice disorders in a sample of primary school teachers and evaluate possible cofactors. Our sample was composed of 157 teachers (155 females, mean age 46 years). Participants were asked to complete two self-administrated questionnaires: one with clinical data, and the second an Italian validated translation of VHI (voice handicap index). On the same day they also underwent a laryngostroboscopic exam and logopedic evaluation. The results were compared with those of a control group composed of accompanying individuals. Teachers presented a higher rate of abnormalities at laryngostroboscopic examination than the control group (51.6% vs. 16%, respectively). Among these, 7.1% presented nodules. In our sample, vocal fold disorders were not correlated with years of teaching, smoking, coffee consumption, or levels of anxiety. Our findings are in agreement with previous reports on the prevalence of pathologic disorders among teachers; nonetheless, the prevalence of nodules was lower than in previous investigations, and voice loading was not correlated with laryngostroboscopic findings. Current Italian law does not include any guidance regarding voice education and screening in subjects with high vocal loading. Our work stresses the need for such legislation.

Oral Diseases (2011) 17, 217–220Background and Objectives: Statherin is a salivary protein involved in the formation of enamel pellicle and in regulation of calcium homeostasis. Diabetes and other pathologies affect both salivary flow and protein secretion by salivary glands, causing increased susceptibility to mucosal infections, tooth demineralization, and caries. The purpose of this study was to compare the statherin expression in submandibular glands of healthy and diabetic subjects.Materials and Methods: Fragments of submandibular glands obtained from diabetic and non diabetic patients were fixed, dehydrated, embedded in Epon Resin and processed for the immunogold histochemistry. The results were statistically evaluated.Results: Specific statherin labeling was demonstrated in secretory granules of acinar cells in both diabetic and normal samples. The staining was much more intense in the latter compared to those of diabetics. The labeling density was quantified by evaluating the number and spatial distribution of gold particles within the granules. The number of gold particles was significantly lower in glands from diabetics than in control glands.Conclusions: The results obtained suggest that a reduced statherin secretion by salivary glands might be partly responsible for a less effective protection of the oral tissues, resulting in an higher incidence of caries and oral infections associated with diabetes.

In order to increase current knowledge regarding statherin secretion into the oral cavity, ultrastructural localization of this peptide was investigated in human salivary glands by using a post-embedding immunogold staining technique. Statherin reactivity was found inside the granules of serous cells of parotid and submandibular glands. In parotid granules immunostaining was preferentially present in the less electron-dense region, whereas in submandibular serous granules the reactivity was uniform and the dense core always stained. By contrast, none or weak reactivity was observed in serous cells of major sublingual glands. These findings reveal for the first time the subcellular localization of statherin by electron transmission microscopy and confirm that of the three major types of salivary glands, the parotid and submandibular glands are the greatest source of salivary statherin. Moreover, they suggest that more than one packaging mechanism may be involved in the storage of statherin within serous granules of salivary glands.

The case is described of a Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease, in a 22-year-old female, onset of which was characterised by rapidly evolving lateral neck lymphadenopathy. Since clinico-radiological findings suggested a lymphoproliferative disease, it was mandatory, in order to establish the diagnosis and programme a suitable treatment protocol, to collect a lymph node biopsy specimen. The histological pattern was characteristic of Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease necrotizing lymphadenitis. Bearing in mind the difficulties encountered in the diagnosis of Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease, due not only to lack of a characteristic clinical pattern but also to the generic and aspecific findings emerging from radiological evaluation, the Authors stress the important role of histological examination in establishing the nature of the disease. In their opinion, onset of a rapidly evolving lateral neck lymphadenopathy, in a young patient, in the absence of well-defined disorders possibly responsible for the condition, and in order to establish a correct diagnostic approach, should induce the ENT specialist to take into consideration the possible presence of Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease, even if this is to be considered a rare finding.

The purpose of the study was to assess response rate, clinical outcome, organ/function preservation and toxicity in head and neck cancer patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and, when necessary, limited surgery. The study was a phase II non-randomized trial. Induction chemotherapy consisted of 6 weekly doses of carboplatin at AUC of 2 and docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) (1 h) followed by 5 cycles of docetaxel 25 mg/m(2)/day 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) c.i. days 1-5, hydroxyurea 500 mg orally every 12 h for 11 and concomitant twice daily radiation therapy at 150 cGy/fraction given every other week per 5 cycles (TFHX), for a total radiation dose of 75 Gy. 13 cis-retinoic acid was administered for chemoprevention and systematic prophylaxis of mucositis with systemic amifostine and local GM-CSF was administered to all patients during TFHX. Conservative surgical resection was reserved to patients with no optimal response (PR > or =70%), whereas radical surgery was performed as salvage treatment. Thirteen patients (mean age 54.9 years, range 44-62; 12/13 site oropharynx, all stage IV) were enrolled: 31% of patients had ECOG performance status (PS) 0 and 69% had PS 1. Response to induction chemotherapy was analyzed in 12 patients: 2/12 (16.7%) achieved a partial response (PR) for an overall response (ORR) of 16.7%, 10/12 (83.3%) achieved stable disease (SD). TFHX was administered to 7 patients: 2 patients (28.6%) had complete remission (CR), 1 patient (14.3%) had PR for an ORR of 42.9%, 3 patients (42.8%) had SD and 1 patient (14.3%) had PD. At the completion of TFHX, 1 patient underwent local therapy. The toxicity was mild and consisted in: grade 3/4 neutropenia (7.7%), anemia (23.1%), diarrhea (15.4%), mucositis (7.7%), neurotoxicity (7.7%) during induction chemotherapy. During TFHX only 42.8% of grade 3/4 mucositis was observed. All patients spared organ/function. In conclusion, this regimen has been found feasible for its acceptable toxicity, particularly mucositis. However, the overall response rate and the data on survival were not satisfactory.

The purpose of the study was to assess response rate, clinical outcome, organ/function preservation and toxicity in head and neck cancer patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and, when necessary, limited surgery. The study design was a phase II non-randomized trial in hospitalized patients setting. The treatment plan consisted of 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), l-leucovorin and interferon alpha2b (PFL-IFN) followed by 7 cycles of 5-FU, hydroxyurea and concomitant radiation for 5 days (FHX) for a total radiation dose of 70 Gy. 13 Cis-retinoic acid was added to treatment regimen for chemoprevention and a systematic prophylaxis of mucositis was administered to all patients during FHX. Conservative surgical resection was reserved to patients with no optimal response (PR > or =70%), whereas radical surgery was performed as salvage treatment. Twenty-six patients were treated at one institution: more than 90% had stage IV disease and only 19.2% had laryngeal cancer. Eighty-one percent of patients had performance status 0 and 23.1% of patients had >5% weight loss at the start of treatment. Nineteen patients were analyzed for response to PFL-IFN: 3/19 (15.8%) patients achieved a CR and 7/19 (36.8%) achieved a PR for an ORR of 52.6%. FHX was administered on protocol to 12 patients: 6 patients (50%) had CR, 1 patient (8.3%) had PR for an ORR of 58.3%, 2 patients (16.7%) had SD and 3 patients (25%) had PD. At the completion of FHX, no patient underwent local therapy according to treatment plan. At a median follow-up time of 13.5 months (range 1-28+) at June 2001, among 26 patients enrolled 12 (46.1%) were still alive and 9 (75%) of them were progression-free. The median duration of response was 9 months (range 0-25+), the median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (range 0-28+), the median overall survival time was 9 months (range 1-22). The toxicity was significant and consisted mainly of mucositis and, to a lesser extent, neutropenia/thrombocytopenia. In the present study, the low serum levels of leptin and the high serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines in advanced stage cancer patients were confirmed. In conclusion, this sequential induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy program has been found moderately active and significantly toxic; moreover, the long overall treatment duration must be taken into consideration. For these reasons, this regimen could not be recommended for a phase III randomized study.

The purpose of the study was to assess response rate, clinical outcome, organ/function preservation and toxicity in head and neck cancer patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and, when necessary, limited surgery. The study design was a phase II non-randomized trial in hospitalized patients setting. The treatment plan consisted of 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin and interferon alpha2b (PFL-IFN) followed by 7 cycles of 5-FU, hydroxyurea and concomitant radiation for 5 days (FHX) for a total radiation dose of 70 Gy. Surgical resection was performed, when necessary, with the intent to spare organ/function. Seventeen patients were treated at one institution. Three patients had stage III and 14 patients stage IV disease. Twelve patients were analyzed for response to PFL-IFN: 2/12 (16.7%) patients achieved a CR and 10/12 (83.3%) achieved a PR for an ORR of 100%. FHX was administered on protocol to 10 patients: 4 patients (40%) had CR, 3 (30%) had PR >/=70% for an ORR of 70%, 1 patient (10%) had SD and 2 patients (20%) had PD. As for local therapy, of the 8 eligible patients who completed chemoradiotherapy, the 3 patients with CR were submitted to random biopsies, results of which were histologically negative, 3 patients with PR >/=70% underwent conservative organ-preserving surgery, and 1 patient with PR >70% refused surgery, whereas the patient with SD underwent salvage surgery, preserving voice. Thus, organ preservation was achieved in all 8 patients at the completion of all therapy: 4 patients had no surgical procedure and 4 patients only conservative surgery. Overall, after completion of all therapy, 5/8 (62.5%) patients were rendered disease-free. The median overall survival time was 23 months, the median duration of response was 6 months and the median time to progression was 9 months. Both induction chemotherapy and concomitant chemoradiotherapy resulted in significant toxicity, which consisted mainly of mucositis and thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, PFL-IFN was very active, producing high ORRs and, followed by FHX, resulted in high overall survival rates permitting an optimal organ preservation, at the cost of a severe toxicity.

We planned to conduct a trial of induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy with the goal of organ-function preservation in advanced head and neck cancer patients with the response rate and local control of disease as primary endpoints and the assessment of toxicity as secondary endpoint. The overall treatment plan consisted of 3 cycles, each q. 28 days, of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, 5-FU, leucovorin and interferon alpha2b (PFL-IFN), followed by response evaluation and local therapy with concomitant chemoradiotherapy with 5-FU, hydroxyurea and concomitant radiotherapy (FHX). The evaluation of clinical response was performed during the 2nd week after the 3rd cycle of induction chemotherapy and FHX was initiated 28 days after the 3rd cycle of induction chemotherapy. Hydroxyurea was administered orally at doses of 1 g every 12 h x 11, 5-FU was administered on days 1 through 5 at 800 mg/m2/d for 5 days. Daily fraction of radiotherapy were administered at 2.0 Gy on days 1 through 5. FHX cycles were repeated every 14 days until completion of radiotherapy. Total radiotherapy doses consisted of 70 Gy. Seventeen patients (mean age 56.53 years, range 40-73, male/female 15/2, site: oral cavity 6, 35.29%; oropharynx 3, 17.6%; hypopharynx 3, 17.65%; larynx 2, 11.76%; paranasal sinuses 2, 11.76%; salivary glands 1, 5.88%; ECOG PS 0/1: 10/7, stage: III/IV 3/14) were enrolled from January 1998 to August 1998. All 17 patients initiated induction chemotherapy on this protocol. Twelve patients were analyzed for response (5 patients were not evaluable): 2/12 (16.7%) patients achieved a CR and 10/12 (83.3%) achieved a PR for an ORR of 100%. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy was administered on protocol to 10 patients: 4 patients (40%) had CR, 3 patients (30%) had PR >/=70% for an ORR of 70%, 1 patient (10%) had SD and 2 patients (20%) had PD. As for local therapy, according to treatment plan, of the 8 eligible patients who completed chemoradiotherapy, the 4 patients with CR were submitted to random biopsies, which resulted histologically negative, the 3 patients with PR >/=70% underwent conservative organ-preserving surgery, the patient with SD underwent salvage surgery, preserving voice. Thus, organ-preservation was achieved in all 8 patients at the completion of all therapy: 4 patients had no surgical procedure and 3 patients only conservative surgery. Overall, after completion of all therapy, 6/8 (75%) patients were rendered disease-free. Both induction chemotherapy and concomitant chemoradiotherapy resulted in significant toxicity, which consisted mainly of mucositis and thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, in the present study we have achieved a good clinical response and an optimal organ preservation, at the cost of a severe toxicity.

The aims of the present open, randomized, single-blind (patient), single institution, phase II study were: i) to compare the therapeutic effectiveness and toxicity of two dosages and schedules of ifosfamide (IFO) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) mainly in the neo-adjuvant setting of patients (pts) with locally advanced (stage III-IV) head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) (primary endpoint); ii) to assess the quality of life (QL) of pts included in the study before and after treatment (secondary endpoint). From July 1996 to June 1997, 28 pts, all males (mean age 56.79 years, range 37-72), hospitalized in the Department of Medical Oncology, University of Cagliari, were enrolled in the study. Twenty pts (M/F 20/0, mean age 53.6, range 37-71 years; stage III 1 pt, stage IV 19 pts) were evaluable for response and all 28 pts enrolled were evaluable for toxicity. Arm A: IFO 2.2 g/m2 i.v. as a 4 h infusion on days 1-5, Mesna 600 mg i.v. as push injection at 0 h, 4 h, 8 h on days 1-5, CDDP 20 mg i.v. as a 60 min infusion on days 1-5. The regimen was repeated every 28 days for 2 cycles. Fifteen pts (11 of whom were evaluable) were enrolled in this Arm. Arm B: IFO 1.5 g/m2 i.v. as a 4 h infusion on days 1-5, Mesna 600 mg i.v. as push injection at 0 h, 4 h, 8 h on days 1-5, CDDP 20 mg i.v. as a 60 min infusion on days 1-5. The regimen was repeated every 28 days for 3 cycles. Thirteen pts (9 of whom were evaluable) were enrolled in this Arm. The two Arms were well-balanced for sex, age, site of primary, ECOG PS and clinical stage. After completion of 2 (Arm A) or 3 (Arm B) cycles of chemotherapy, the pts were assessed for response. All evaluable pts received treatment as planned. Six pts (54.5%) of Arm A and 4 pts (44.5%) of Arm B had partial response (PR) with an overall response rate (ORR) of 54.5% and 44.5%, respectively: it is worth noting that all (100%) pts who had PR in Arm B achieved a high-grade PR, i.e. >/=70%, whereas only one pt (16.7%) who had PR in Arm A achieved a high-grade PR. Three pts (27.3%) in Arm A and 2 pts (22.2%) in Arm B had stable disease (SD); 2 pts (18.2%) in Arm A and 3 pts (33.3%) in Arm B had progressive disease (PD). The actual dose intensity was over 80% of the projected dose intensity for both drugs and for both Arms. Over a total of 59 cycles administered, the total number of episodes of toxicity was 24 for Arm A and 17 for Arm B. Three pts out of 28 evaluable for toxicity (10.8%) died for Grade 5 hematological toxicity: all pts were included in Arm A. In Arm A, 2 pts (13.3%) experienced hematological Grade 3 toxicity and 2 pts (13.3%) hematological Grade 4 toxicity. In Arm B no pt experienced Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity. No Grade 3-4 toxicity of any other type was found in either Arm. The QL evaluation, using the Cella's FACT-G scale supplemented with disease-specific scale (FACT-H&N scale), did not show significant beneficial effect of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy treatment.

A phase II randomized controlled trial was carried out to evaluate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of Schizophyllan (SPG) used in combination with standard chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Several immunological parameters were considered to assess the immunoregulatory activity of SPG in the: same patients. The clinical and immunological evaluations were performed both before and at the end of the study (4 months later). All patients received standard chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma according to one of the following treatment regimens: 1) cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v, day 1, 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2) i.v. continuous infusion days 1 to 5; 2) cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) i.v, day 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) i.v. over 4 h days 2 to 5, vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2) i.v. days 2 and 8. Antineoplastic regimens were repeated every 28 days x 4 cycles for approximately 4 months. SPG was administered weekly at a single dose of 40 mg intramuscularly for 4 months in addition to standard chemotherapy. Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study, 22 of whom were evaluable. Thirteen patients were assigned to Arm A (treatment with SPG associated with chemotherapy, regimen 1 or 2) and 9 patients to Arm B (treatment with chemotherapy, regimen 1 or 2, alone). The overall response rate was not significantly different between the two Arms (92.3% in Arm A vs. 100% in Arm B), although a higher number of complete responses (CR) (3 = 23.1%) was registered in Arm A. Overall, the SPG treatment does not seem to have induced significant changes of the immunological parameters of our patients: this may be due to both the advanced cancer stage and the effect of chemotherapy, which are both well known causes of immunodepression. The significant differences between the two Arms were only: the CD8(+) lymphocytes were decreased in the patients treated with SPG and increased in controls; serum levels of IL-1 alpha was lower in patients treated with SPG than in the control group; the production in culture of IL-1 alpha was higher in Arm A than in Arm B and IL-6 was higher in Arm B than in Arm A. Treatment with SPG was proven safe and was well-toleratedby all patients.

We designed an open, non-randomized, phase II clinical study to assess as the first endpoint the feasibility of sparing surgery and of preserving organ/function by using neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) laryngeal cancer patients, and, as the second endpoint, the clinical response to this treatment approach and its duration. 32 patients with primary laryngeal cancer (stage III-IV) were enrolled in the study and were assigned to either the classical Al-Sarrafs regimen (20 patients) or to a regimen consisting of cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) on days 2-5 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 8 (12 patients). The patients were divided into 2 groups: A) those requiring total laryngectomy (TL) and B) those not requiring TL, i.e. patients eligible for conservative for conservative surgery. The 32 patients were all evaluable for response to NAC and 31 were evaluable for The complete remission rate was 50% (16/32) and the partial remission rate was 46.9% (15/32) with an overall response rate of 96.9%. The median follow-up duration was 20.2 months. Overall, 23 patients required TL (group A) and 8 patients a conservative laryngectomy (group B). 7/23 (30.5%) patients of group A did not undergo surgery (score 4) and 6/23 (26%) achieved a partial larynx preservation (3/23 score 3, 1/23 score 2, 2/23 score 1), while 10/23 (43.5%) received the previously planned TL (score 0). 5/8 (62.5%) patients of group B did not undergo surgery, whereas 3/8 (37.5%) received the previously planned surgery (score 0). Therefore, 12/31 patients (38.7%) completely avoided surgery and 6/31 (19.4%) achieved a reduction in the extent of planned surgical resection, that is 18/31 patients (58.1%) achieved a reduction in the extent of previously planned surgery attributable to NAG. Moreover, 3/31 patients underwent the previously planned conservative surgery consisting of H-SGL/HG. Altogether 21/31 (67.7%) patients preserved function. The most relevant contributions offered by our study are represented by i) a scale aimed at measuring as precisely as possible the reduction of surgical resection made possible by NAC compared to surgery planned before NAC and ii) by an attempt to support the results with an assessment of patients treatment outcome. Although the scale provided by us is an arbitrary one, it must be emphasized that our goal was to address the issue of quality of life in cancer patients by a more precise quantification of organ/function preservation.

BACKGROUND A single-institution, prospective, randomized, open controlled trial was carried out on head and neck cancer patients to compare granisetron (GRA), ondansetron (OND), and tropisetron (TRO) in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute nausea and vomiting. All patients were chemotherapy-naïve and treated with cisplatin on Day 1 (80 to 100 mg/m2). METHODS One hundred seventeen patients were treated for a total of 463 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and randomized to receive 24 mg of OND intravenously (i.v.), 3 mg of GRA i.v., or 5 mg of TRO i.v. for the control of acute nausea and emesis. RESULTS In the GRA group, complete response (CR) was obtained in 119 of 165 cycles (72.1%), major response (MR) in 32 cycles (19.4%), minor response (MiR) in 5 cycles (3%), and a failure (F) in 9 cycles (5.5%). In the OND group, CR was obtained in 110 of 150 cycles (73.3%), MR in 31 cycles (20.7%), MiR in 2 cycles (1.3%), and F in 7 cycles (4.7%). In the TRO group, CR was obtained in 100 of 148 cycles (67.6%), MR in 26 cycles (17.6%), MiR in 15 cycles (10.1%), and F in 7 cycles (4.7%). Major efficacy (CR + MR) was obtained in 151 of 165 cycles (91.5%) for GRA, in 141 of 150 cycles (94.0%) for OND, and in 126 of 148 cycles (85.2%) for TRO. The difference in major efficacy between OND and TRO was statistically significant. When comparing MiR, both GRA and OND were more effective than TRO. No other significant differences were observed among the three antiemetic agents. CONCLUSIONS Although our results were achieved in an open trial, they show that GRA and OND are equally effective antiemetic agents in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute nausea and vomiting. TRO provides almost the same protection but is not as effective as OND for major efficacy. All three antiemetics can be administered safely to patients undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin at doses of 80 mg/m2 or more. Cancer 1996;77:941-8.

We designed an open, non-randomized clinical study to assess as the first endpoint the feasibility of sparing surgery and of preserving organ/function by using neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAG) in oral cavity and oropharynx cancer patients, and, as the second endpoint, the clinical response to this treatment approach and its duration. Moreover, an attempt was made to scale the extent of surgery by means of an Arbitrary Scale assigning different percentages to the different extents of surgical resection. Twenty-five patients with primary oral cavity and oropharynx cancer (stage III-TV) were enrolled in the study and were assigned to either the classical Al-Sarrafs regimen (1) (n=15) or to a regimen (2) consisting of cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) on days 2-5 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 8 (n=10). The 25 patients were all evaluable for response to NAC and 20 of them were evaluable for organ preservation. The overall response (OR) rate was 86.6% (13/15 patients) for regimen 1 (cisplatin + 5-FU) and 80% (8/10 patients) for regimen 2 (cisplatin + 5-FU + vinorelbine). The median follow-up duration was 20.6 months. 5/20 (25%) patients completely avoided surgery, 5/20 (25%) patients had a reduced extent of surgical resection, while: 10/20 (50%) patients received the previously planned surgical resection. Altogether, 10/20 (50%) patients treated with NAC either avoided or achieved a reduction in the previously planned surgical resection. Moreover, organ function was evaluated to support the assessment of treatment outcome in our patients. For this purpose we selected the Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients: as expected, no significant impairment was detected in the area of comprehensibility of speech, but we were rather surprised that no significant impairment was found in the two areas of eating in public and normalcy of diet. NAG-associated toxicity was moderate and similar in the two chemotherapy regimens. The most relevant contributions offered by our study are represented by i) a Scale aimed at measuring as precisely as possible the reduction of surgical resection made possible by NAC compared to surgery planned before NAC and ii) an attempt to support the results with an assessment of treatment outcome.

Substantial preclinical rationale predicts that c.i. chemotherapy will provide superior antitumor activity compared to conventional single bolus or intermittent bolus infusion chemotherapy. Specifically the therapeutic index of 5-FU is improved by the use of c.i. versus bolus infusion, primarily through a decrease in the severity of acute toxicity. On the basis of the above reported rationale, we carried out an open phase III study comparing two neoadjuvant chemotherapic regimens (cisplatin+5-fluorouracil vs cisplatin+5-fluorouracil+vinorelbine) in advanced head and neck cancer. Our study shows that cisplatin+5-fluorouracil is superior to cisplatin+5-fluorouracil+vinorelbine and suggests that this is probably due to the effect of 5-fluorouracil administered in c.i. as in Regimen A.

Fourty-eight patients entered the study, 37 of whom were evaluable, who underwent a nonrandomized combined modality approach plus a randomized immunotherapy treatment assigning the patients to one of the three arms: 1) thymostimulin, 2) beta IFN, 3) thymostimulin + beta IFN. The patients enrollment started in May 1991 and was closed in February 1993: the final evaluation was in February 1994. An immunological evaluation was made for all patients enrolled. The immunological assessment confirms some previous reports, such as the defective proliferative response of PBMC, the high serum level and the low production in culture of soluble IL 2 receptor (s IL 2 R), the low serum level and the low production of IL 2, and moreover shows new data. It is noteworthy that the significant increases--especially for cytokines and s IL 2 R, except for IL 1 alpha which has decreased, both for serum levels and for culture production--are induced by treatment with beta IFN (or with thymostimulin + beta IFN), suggesting that beta IFn is the immunologically effective moiety.

Recently, a combined modality therapy, usually chemotherapy (Neo-Adjuvant chemotherapy) followed by radiation therapy has been tested as an approach to sparing major surgery in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. Current choices for such patients include 1) a complete surgical resection with either preoperative or postoperative radiation therapy, 2) a Neo-Adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and postoperative radiation therapy, or 3) a Neo-Adjuvant chemotherapy plus radiation therapy, and surgery if disease recurs [1].