The demonstration and acceptance of dose response thresholds for genotoxins may have substantial implications for the setting of safe exposure levels. Here we test the hypothesis that direct-acting DNA reactive agents may exhibit thresholded dose responses. We examine the potential mechanisms involved in such thresholded responses, particularly in relation to those of alkylating agents. As alkylating agents are representative model DNA reactive compounds with well characterized activities and DNA targets, they could help shed light on the general mechanisms involved in thresholded dose responses for genotoxins. Presently, thresholds have mainly been described for agents with non-DNA targets. We pay particular attention here to the contribution of DNA repair to genotoxic thresholds. A review of the literature shows that limited threshold data for alkylating agents are currently available, but the contribution of DNA repair in thresholded dose responses is suggested by several studies. The existence of genotoxic thresholds for alkylating agents methylmethanesulfonate is also supported here by data from our laboratory. Overall, it is clear that different endpoints induced by the same alkylator, can possess different dose response characteristics. This may have an impact on the setting of safe exposure levels for such agents. The limited information available concerning the dose response relationships of alkylators can nevertheless lead to the design of experiments to investigate the mechanisms that may be involved in threshold responses. Through using paired alkylators inducing different lesions, repaired by different pathways, insights into the processes involved in genotoxic thresholds may be elucidated. Furthermore, as alkyl-guanine-DNA transferase, base excision repair and mismatch repair appear to contribute to genotoxic thresholds for alkylators, cells deficient in these repair processes may possess altered dose responses compared with wild-type cells and this approach may help understand the contribution of these repair pathways to the production of thresholds for genotoxic effects in general. Finally, genotoxic thresholds are currently being described for acute exposures to single agents in vitro, however, dose response data for chronic exposures to complex mixtures are, as yet, a long way off.

A wide range of assays are now available which enable the effective detection of the mutagenic (the induction of gene and chromosomal changes) and more generally genotoxic (cellular interactions such as DNA lesion formation) activity of individual chemicals and mixtures. However, when genotoxic activity has been detected and human exposure occurs the critical questions relate to the qualitative and quantitative activity of the agent and the parameters such as routes of exposure, target organs and metabolism. Of major importance in hazard and risk estimation is the nature of the dose response relationship of each chemical and their potential interactions in mixtures. In this paper, we illustrate the methods available to produce quantitative and qualitative data in vitro using the micronucleus assay (as a measure of chromosomal structural and numerical mutations) and the HPRT assay (as a measure of induced gene and point mutations) and the current limitations (such as the large numbers of animals required) for obtaining such information in vivo. We recommend that in vivo studies should primarily focus upon confirmatory mechanistic analysis. For individual chemicals, profiles of the base changes induced can be obtained using the HPRT gene mutation assay and comparisons produced both in vitro and in vivo and thus allow identification of mechanistic differences between different modes of exposure.

In the current study we present a view of events leading to chemically induced DNA damage in vitro from both a cytogenetic and molecular aspect, focusing on threshold mediated responses and the biological relevance of DNA damaging events that occur at low and high cellular toxicity levels. Current regulatory mechanisms do not take into account chemicals that cause significant DNA damage only at high toxicity. Our results demonstrate a defined threshold for micronucleus induction after insult with the alkylating agent MMS. Other results define a significant change in gene expression following treatment with chemicals that give rise to structural DNA damage only at high toxicity. Pairs of chemicals with a similar mode of action but differing toxicity levels were chosen, the chemicals that demonstrated structural DNA damage only at high levels of toxicity showed an increase in heat shock protein gene expression whereas the chemicals causing DNA damage events at all levels of toxicity did not induce changes in heat shock gene expression at identical toxicity levels. The data presented indicates that there are a number of situations where the linear dose response model is not appropriate for risk estimation. However, deviation from linear risk models should be dependent upon the availability of appropriate experimental data such as that shown here.

A comprehensive evaluation of the genotoxic potential of chemicals requires the assessment of the ability to induce gene mutations and structural chromosome (clastogenic activity) and numerical chromosome (aneugenic activity) aberrations. Aneuploidy is a major cause of human reproductive failure and an important contributor to cancer and it is therefore important that any increase in its frequency due to chemical exposures should be recognized and controlled. The in vitro binucleate cell micronucleus assay provides a powerful tool to determine the ability of a chemical to induce chromosome damage. The application of an anti-kinetochore antibody to micronuclei allows their classification into kinetochore-positive and kinetochore-negative, indicating their origin by aneugenic or clastogenic mechanisms, respectively. The availability of chromosome-specific centromere probes allows the analysis of the segregation of chromosomes into the daughter nuclei of binucleate cells to evaluate chromosome non-disjunction. Quantitative relationships between the two major causes of aneuploidy, chromosome loss and non-disjunction, can be determined. The mechanisms leading to chromosome loss and non-disjunction can be investigated by the analysis of morphological and structural changes in the cell division apparatus by the application of specific stains and antibodies for various cell division components. We illustrate such analyses by the demonstration of the interaction of the monomer bisphenol-A with the centrosome of the mitotic spindle and the folic acid antagonist pyrimethamine with the centromeres of chromosomes. Both types of modifications lead to the induction of aneuploidy in exposed cells. Our studies also implicate the products of the p53 and XPD genes in the regulation of the fidelity of chromosome segregation at mitosis.