We sought to describe and quantify the association between HIV service organization availability, HIV burden, and HIV awareness and prevention in the 57 priority jurisdictions selected as part of the U.S. Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative. On average, jurisdictions with more per capita organizations had more people living with HIV, more individuals aware of their positive status, and more individuals prescribed PrEP (b = 0.3; 95% CI [0.2, 0.5] for each additional case per 1,000 people in the first metric, and b = 0.3; 95% CI [0.2, 0.4] and b = 0.1; 95% CI [< 0.1, 0.1], respectively, for each percentage point change in the second two metrics), accounting for jurisdiction size. Several jurisdictions were outliers in the modeled associations and may reflect comparatively better, or worse, performance than similar jurisdictions. This information can assist in evaluating resource allocation and determining whether availability translates to accessibility.

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent the standard for preventing stroke and systemic embolization (SSE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). There is limited information for patients ≥ 80 years. We report a retrospective analysis of AF patients ≥ 80 years prescribed either a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved reduced (n = 514) or full dose (n = 199) DOAC (Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, or Apixaban) between January 1st, 2011 (first DOAC commercially available) and May 31st, 2017. The following multivariable differences in baseline characteristics were identified: patients prescribed a reduced dose DOAC were older (p < 0.001), had worse renal function (p = 0.001), were more often prescribed aspirin (p = 0.004) or aspirin and clopidogrel (p < 0.001), and more often had new-onset AF (p = 0.001). SSE and central nervous system (CNS) bleed rates were low and not different (1.02 vs 0 %/yr and 1.45 vs 0.44 %/yr) for the reduced and full dose groups, respectively. For non-CNS bleeds, rates were 10.89 vs 4.15 %/yr (p < 0.001, univariable) for the reduced and full doses, respectively. The mortality rate was 6.24 vs 1.75 %/yr (p = 0.001, univariable) for the reduced and full doses. Unlike the non-CNS bleed rate, mortality rate differences remained significant when adjusted for baseline characteristics. Thus, DOACs in patients ≥ 80 with AF effectively reduce SSE with a low risk of CNS bleeding, independent of DOAC dose. The higher non-CNS bleed rate and not the mortality rate is explained by the higher risk baseline characteristics in the reduced DOAC dose group. Further investigation of the etiology of non-CNS bleeds and mortality is warranted.

It is incumbent upon all researchers who use the electronic health record (EHR), including data scientists, to understand the quality of such data.EHR data may be subject to measurement error or misclassification that have the potential to bias results, unless one applies the available computational techniques specifically created for this problem.In this article, we begin with a discussion of data-quality issues in the EHR focusing on health outcomes.We review the concepts of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and demonstrate how the imperfect classification of a dichotomous outcome variable can bias an analysis, both in terms of prevalence of the outcome, and relative risk of the outcome under one treatment regime (aka exposure) compared to another.This is then followed by a description of a generalizable approach to probabilistic (quantitative) bias analysis using a combination of regression estimation of the parameters that relate the true and observed data and application of these estimates to adjust the prevalence and relative risk that may have existed if there was no misclassification.We describe bias analysis that accounts for both random and systematic errors and highlight its limitations.We then motivate a case study with the goal of validating the accuracy of a health outcome, chronic infection with hepatitis C virus, derived from a diagnostic code in the EHR.Finally, we demonstrate our approaches on the case study and conclude by summarizing the literature on outcome misclassification and quantitative bias analysis.

BACKGROUND:Although children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) commonly present with restricted passive range of motion (PROM) and contractures, knowledge about the child's characteristics that increase the risk of development of restricted PROM is limited. Identifying children who are more likely to develop contractures is important for early detection and the provision of appropriate medical management. This study aims to identify the most commonly restricted PROM of children with spastic CP and (2) to examine the combined effect of a child's age, gender, gross motor functional classification level and CP subtype on the development of restricted PROM in children with spastic CP.METHODS:The PROM of 233 children diagnosed with CP was extracted from the national registry of CP in Jordan (CPUP-Jordan) in addition to information about children's age, gender, level of Gross Motor Function Classification System-Expanded and Revised (GMFCS-E&R) and subtype of CP. The mean age of the participants was 3.73 years (SD = 3.14), 57.5% were males and 80.3% had bilateral spastic CP. Point biserial correlations were calculated between the PROM and the child's variables. Multiple binary logistic regressions were conducted to identify the predictors of PROM.RESULTS:Hip abduction was the most common restricted PROM (57.9%), whereas the hip extension was the least (2.1%). Children with older ages demonstrated more restrictions in knee extension and ankle dorsiflexion; males demonstrated more restriction in hip abduction than females; children with lower GMFCS-E&R levels had more restrictions in hip internal rotation but fewer restrictions in hip abduction and ankle dorsiflexion; and children with bilateral spastic CP had more restrictions in hip abduction than children with unilateral spastic CP.CONCLUSIONS:PROM of the hip, knee and ankle joints of children with spastic CP was predicted by different sets of child characteristics. Implications for health professionals and follow-up registries of children with CP are provided.

Aims: Individualized goals are the foundation for physical therapy services and outcomes. This research describes school-based physical therapists' (PTs) experiences and perceptions of how student goals impact services and outcomes. Methods: Twenty school-based PTs participated in one of five semi-structured focus groups on goal development and use. Therapists were recruited from 113 therapists who participated in a study of school-based physical therapy outcomes. Two researchers conducted thematic analysis of written transcriptions of audio recordings to identify qualitative themes; a third researcher reviewed the analysis. Results: Four themes emerged related to how goals impact services: (1) the nature of services, (2) intervention strategies, (3) teaming, and (4) flexibility of services. Three themes emerged related to how goals impact outcomes: (1) natural linkages among goals, services, and outcomes; (2) goals impact teaming to achieve outcomes; and (3) specifics of the goal matter. Therapists also reported a range of student and environmental factors that impact services and outcomes. Conclusions: Therapists perceive that goals influence services and outcomes in complex ways, especially due to the flexibility and individualization needed in school-based practice. This study helps school-based PTs understand and reflect on how individualized goals influence services and optimize student outcomes.

IntroductionPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective tool to reduce HIV transmission. The primary objective of this study was to assess awareness of PrEP by individuals living with HIV (HIV+) and acceptance of its use for their HIV negative (HIV-) partners.MethodsA cross sectional survey was conducted among individuals living with HIV who received care at an urban HIV clinic between January 2013 and June 2013. The survey examined knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability of PrEP, and perception of transmission risk of HIV. Chi-Square test and Fisher's Exact test were used to compare proportions.ResultsAmong 206 subjects living with HIV, 15.3% (32) had heard of PrEP. Men who have sex with men (MSM) were more likely to be aware of PrEP than all others (p = 0.003). Once educated about PrEP those who believed PrEP would reduce their partner's risk for HIV were more likely to recommend PrEP to their partner (p<0.001) .92% of all respondents said they would be "extremely likely/likely" to discuss PrEP use with their provider. Of 159 subjects whose main partner was HIV-, MSM (p = 0.007), male participants (p = 0.044), and those who were consistently taking meds (p = 0.049) were more likely to be aware of PrEP. Those who perceived they were at risk of transmitting HIV (p<0.001) and those who were consistently taking meds (0.049) were more likely to agree that PrEP could reduce the risk of HIV to their partners.ConclusionThis study illustrates a low awareness of PrEP but once educated the willingness of a cohort of individuals living with HIV to recommend PrEP to their partners. Our findings demonstrate the importance of providers informing their patients living with HIV about PrEP, as these persons are an underutilized link to support the uptake of PrEP by their HIV-partners.

INTRODUCTION:Linkage to care following a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) diagnosis is critical. In the U.S. only 69% of patients are successfully linked to care, which results in delayed receipt of antiretroviral therapy leading to immune system dysfunction and risk of transmission to others.METHODS:We evaluated predictors of failure to link to care at a large urban healthcare center in Philadelphia in order to identify potential intervention targets. We conducted a cohort study between May 2007 and November 2011 at hospital-affiliated outpatient clinics, emergency departments (EDs), and inpatient units.RESULTS:Of 87 patients with a new HIV diagnosis, 63 (72%) were linked to care: 23 (96%) from the outpatient setting and 40 (63%) from the hospital setting (ED or inpatient) (p<0.01). Those who were tested in the hospital-based settings were more likely to be black (p=0.01), homeless (p=0.03), and use alcohol or drugs (p=0.03) than those tested in the outpatient clinics. Patients tested in the ED or inpatient units had a 10.9 fold (p=0.03) higher odds of failure to link compared to those diagnosed in an outpatient clinic. When testing site was controlled, unemployment (OR 12.2;p<0.01) and substance use (OR 6.4;p<0.01) were associated with failure to link.CONCLUSION:Our findings demonstrate the comparative success of linkage to care in outpatient medical clinics versus hospital-based settings. This study both reinforces the importance of routine opt-out HIV testing in outpatient practices, and demonstrates the need to better understand barriers to linkage.

OBJECTIVETo identify demographic and clinical predictors of the resolution of aberrant drug-related behaviors (ADRBs) in a group of patients referred to the Opioid Renewal Clinic (ORC) by their primary care providers (PCPs). ORC is a program supporting PCPs' use of opioids for chronic pain in patients perceived as at risk for opioid abuse or those with demonstrated ADRBs.METHODSA retrospective chart review was conducted for 195 consecutive subjects referred to the ORC from January 17, 2002 to August 27, 2004, for ADRBs. Binary logistic regression was employed to identify independent predictors of aberrant behavior outcome at 1 year.RESULTSOf the 195 referred, 45.6% (N = 89) resolved their ADRB at 1 year. Other outcomes, classified as nonresolution of ADRB, self-discharged or discharged by the ORC for inability to adhere to the opioid treatment agreement (N = 86, 44.1%) and acceptance of referral for addiction treatment (N = 20, 10.2%). A history of cocaine abuse increased the odds of failing the program by five times (odds ratio [OR] = 4.97, P = 0.001). Each additional pain diagnosis reduced the odds of failure by 16% (OR = 0.837, P = 0.008). When compared with singles, married individuals were 62% less likely to fail the ORC program (OR = 0.38, P = 0.028).CONCLUSIONSNearly half of the patients resolved their aberrant behavior within the ORC. Patients with cocaine abuse were at higher risk for failure, suggesting a need for further research into safe and effective ways to manage pain in this complex subset of patients. Aberrant behaviors tended to resolve in patients with multiple pain locations, possibly because of their desire for relief.