4193 Background: Perioperative chemotherapy (CTX) in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (rPDAC) is still not considered standard of care and data are limited. NEONAX examined gemcitabine (Gem)/nab-paclitaxel (nab-P), in the perioperative or adjuvant therapy of resectable PDAC (NCCN criteria). Methods: NEONAX is a prospective, randomized phase II trial with two independent arms (127 patients, 22 German centers) and randomization 1:1 to perioperative (2 pre- and 4 postoperative cycles, po-arm A) or adjuvant (6 cycles, ad-arm B) of gem (1000mg/m2 BSA, d1, 8, 15) and nab-P (125mg/m2 BSA, d1, 8, 15), q4w. Results: As we previously reported were R0- and N0-resection rates high (po-R0 88%, ad-R0 67%, po-N0 33%, ad-N0 29%) in the ITT-population (all randomized pts.). The primary endpoint DFS rate of 55% @ 18 months in the mITT population (defined as R0/R1 resected pts. that either started perioperative (A) or adjuvant (B) CTX), was not reached in both arms (arm A: 32%, arm B 41%). Whereas 91.5% of pts. in po-arm A started and 84.7% completed neoadjuvant CTX, only 42.4% of pts. in ad-arm B started and 25% completed adj. CTX, so the CTX dose intensity was higher in the po-arm A. (Seufferlein et al., Ann Onc 2023) Here we report long-time 5-year outcomes according to PFS and OS and present a preplanned subgroup analysis of potential prognostic factors. The mOS in the ITT population (all randomized pts.) was 25.5 mo. in the po-arm and 16.8 mo. in the ad- arm. This corresponds to an mDFS of 11.4 mo. in the po-arm and 5.1 mo. in the ad-arm, respectively. The mOS in the mITT population (all randomized pts. that started po-ctx (po-arm) or started ad-ctx (ad-arm)) was 27.9 mo. in the po-arm and 26.8 mo. in the ad-arm. This corresponds to an mDFS of 14.1 mo. in the po-arm and 16.1 mo. in the ad-arm, respectively. In the preplanned analysis of subgroup factors impacting outcome, the benefit of po-treatment was independent of tumor size, N-status and baseline Ca19-9 level. This benefit was not visible in the mITT population where only patients in the ad-arm were included who had started adjuvant treatment postoperatively. Conclusions: These 5 year data confirm the outcome of patients receiving gem/nab in the po-setting in the ITT population. DFS and OS effect were numerically better compared to the ad-arm although the trial was not powered for direct comparison of the arms. This difference disappeared in the mITT population when patients received more CTX in the ad arm. We conclude that the difference between ITT and mITT is likely because more CTX could administered in the po-arm when the ITT population was considered and may constitute one of the major effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable PDAC, particularly when a high rate of patients as in our multicenter trial could get neoadjuvant, but not adjuvant treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT02047513 .

PURPOSE First-line therapy options in advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are based on the ABC-02 trial regimen (gemcitabine/cisplatin [G/C]). The NIFE trial examined nanoliposomal irinotecan/fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI/FU/LV) as alternative first-line therapy in advanced CCA. METHODS NIFE is a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter phase II study that aimed at detecting efficacy comparable with the standard treatment. Patients with advanced CCA were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive nal-IRI/FU/LV (arm A) or G/C (arm B). Stratification parameters were intrahepatic versus extrahepatic CCA, sex, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG; 0/1). Arm A was designed as a Simon's optimal two-stage design and arm B served as a randomized control group. The primary goal was to exclude an inferior progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months of only 40%, while assuming a rate of 60% on G/C population. RESULTS Between 2018 and 2020, overall 91 patients were randomly assigned to receive nal-IRI/FU/LV (n = 49) or G/C (n = 42). The NIFE trial formally met its primary end point with a 4-month PFS rate of 51% in patients receiving nal-IRI/FU/LV. The median PFS was 6 months (2.4-9.6) in arm A and 6.9 months (2.5-7.9) in arm B. Median overall survival (OS) was 15.9 months (10.6-20.3) in arm A and 13.6 months (6.5-17.7) in arm B. The exploratory comparison of study arms suggested a numerical but statistically not significant advantage for nal-IRI/FU/LV (hazard ratio for PFS, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.53 to 1.38] and for OS, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.58 to 1.50]). Analysis for stratification parameters revealed no differences for sex and ECOG, but for tumor localization. The objective response rate was 24.5% with nal-IRI/FU/LV and 11.9% with G/C. No unexpected toxicities occurred. AEs related to nal-IRI/FU/LV were mainly GI and to G/C hematologic. CONCLUSION Treatment of advanced CCA with nal-IRI/FU/LV demonstrated efficacy in first-line therapy without new safety findings and merits further validation.

The ATR-CHK1 pathway plays a fundamental role in the DNA damage response and is therefore an attractive target in cancer therapy. The antitumorous effect of ATR inhibitors is at least partly caused by synthetic lethality between ATR and various DNA repair genes. In previous studies, we have identified members of the B-family DNA polymerases as potential lethal partner for ATR, i.e. POLD1 and PRIM1. In this study, we validated and characterized the synthetic lethality between ATR and POLA1.First, we applied a model of ATR-deficient DLD-1 human colorectal cancer cells to confirm synthetic lethality by using chemical POLA1 inhibition. Analyzing cell cycle and apoptotic markers via FACS and Western blotting, we were able to show that apoptosis and S phase arrest contributed to the increased sensitivity of ATR-deficient cancer cells towards POLA1 inhibitors. Importantly, siRNA-mediated POLA1 depletion in ATR-deficient cells caused similar effects in regard to impaired cell viability and cumulation of apoptotic markers, thus excluding toxic effects of chemical POLA1 inhibition. Conversely, we demonstrated that siRNA-mediated POLA1 depletion sensitized several cancer cell lines towards chemical inhibition of ATR and its main effector kinase CHK1.In conclusion, the synthetic lethality between ATR/CHK1 and POLA1 might represent a novel and promising approach for individualized cancer therapy: First, alterations of POLA1 could serve as a screening parameter for increased sensitivity towards ATR and CHK1 inhibitors. Second, alterations in the ATR-CHK1 pathway might predict in increased sensitivity towards POLA1 inhibitors.

Supplementary File 1 from Identifying Allelic Loss and Homozygous Deletions in Pancreatic Cancer without Matched Normals Using High-Density Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Arrays

Supplementary File 5 from Identifying Allelic Loss and Homozygous Deletions in Pancreatic Cancer without Matched Normals Using High-Density Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Arrays

Supplementary File 3 from Identifying Allelic Loss and Homozygous Deletions in Pancreatic Cancer without Matched Normals Using High-Density Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Arrays

Supplementary File 4 from Identifying Allelic Loss and Homozygous Deletions in Pancreatic Cancer without Matched Normals Using High-Density Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Arrays

Supplementary Table 1, Figures 1-4 from Knock-in of Mutant K-<i>ras</i> in Nontumorigenic Human Epithelial Cells as a New Model for Studying K-<i>ras</i>–Mediated Transformation

Supplementary Table 2, 4 and 3 cont. from Identifying Allelic Loss and Homozygous Deletions in Pancreatic Cancer without Matched Normals Using High-Density Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Arrays

Supplementary Figure Legends 1-4 from Knock-in of Mutant K-<i>ras</i> in Nontumorigenic Human Epithelial Cells as a New Model for Studying K-<i>ras</i>–Mediated Transformation

Supplementary File 2 from Identifying Allelic Loss and Homozygous Deletions in Pancreatic Cancer without Matched Normals Using High-Density Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Arrays

694 Background: Perioperative chemotherapy (CTX) in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (rPDAC) is still not considered SoC and data regarding efficacy but also quality of life (QoL) are limited. NEONAX is a prospective, randomized phase II trial in patients with rPDAC with two independent experimental arms examining perioperative (2 pre- and 4 postoperative cycles, arm A) or adjuvant (6 cycles, arm B) of Gem (1000mg/m2) and nab-P (125mg/m2) on days 1,8,15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint DFS at 18 mo. as well as DFS, OS and safety have already been reported. Here we present the QoL data of the NEONAX trial. Methods: QoL was evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-PAN26 and HADS-D questionnaires at baseline, at the beginning of each CTX cycle (neoadj. and adj. in arm A, only adj. in arm B), after neoadj. treatment in arm A as well as prior and post resection and after 6 cycles of CTX. Results: Global health status score (GHS-score) (QLQ-C30) showed no difference between baseline (t1) and the timepoint after 6 cycles of CTX (t2) in the perioperative arm A (66.7/100 at both timepoints). Here patients experienced the lowest GHS-score pre- and postoperatively (50/100 in both cases). Adjuvant arm B showed a deterioration in the GHS-score of 12.5 points from timepoint 1 to 2 (62.5/100 to 50.0/100). Here the lowest GHS-score was observed within 4 weeks post-surgery (41.7/100). Physical function score (QLQ-C30) was decreased by 6.7 points (86.7/100 to 80/100) in perioperative arm A and by 26.7 points (86.7/100 to 60/100) in arm B between both timepoints. Role function (QLQ-C30) was reduced by 16.7 points (83.3/100 to 66.7/100) in arm A and by 33.3 points (83.3/100 to 50/100) in arm B between both timepoints. In the remaining subscales of the used questionnaires the two arms of the trial showed comparable median scores over the whole study period. The number of submitted questionnaires at each timepoint varied but was at large comparable in both arms. Conclusions: QoL was largely preserved in the perioperative as well as the adjuvant arm of the NEONAX trial. GHS-score was lower pre-and postoperatively in arm A. The lowest GHS-score was observed postoperatively in the adjuvant arm B. QoL was restored at the end of the treatment period in the perioperative arm A and remained slightly reduced in arm B suggesting that QoL is not substantially impaired by perioperative treatment in rPDAC. Clinical trial information: NCT02047513 . [Table: see text]

Supplementary Figure 1 from Targeted Deletion of MKK4 in Cancer Cells: A Detrimental Phenotype Manifests as Decreased Experimental Metastasis and Suggests a Counterweight to the Evolution of Tumor-Suppressor Loss

BACKGROUND:Data on perioperative chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (rPDAC) are limited. NEONAX examined perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in rPDAC (National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria). PATIENTS AND METHODS:NEONAX is a prospective, randomized phase II trial with two independent experimental arms. One hundred twenty-seven rPDAC patients in 22 German centers were randomized 1 : 1 to perioperative (two pre-operative and four post-operative cycles, arm A) or adjuvant (six cycles, arm B) gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. RESULTS:The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) at 18 months in the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population [R0/R1-resected patients who started neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) (A) or adjuvant CTX (B)]. The pre-defined DFS rate of 55% at 18 months was not reached in both arms [A: 33.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.5% to 48.1%), B: 41.4% (95% CI 20.7% to 62.0%)]. Ninety percent of patients in arm A completed neoadjuvant treatment, and 42% of patients in arm B started adjuvant chemotherapy. R0 resection rate was 88% (arm A) and 67% (arm B), respectively. Median overall survival (mOS) (ITT population) as a secondary endpoint was 25.5 months (95% CI 19.7-29.7 months) in arm A and 16.7 months (95% CI 11.6-22.2 months) in the upfront surgery arm. This difference corresponds to a median DFS (mDFS) (ITT) of 11.5 months (95% CI 8.8-14.5 months) in arm A and 5.9 months (95% CI 3.6-11.5 months) in arm B. Treatment was safe and well tolerable in both arms. CONCLUSIONS:The primary endpoint, DFS rate of 55% at 18 months (mITT population), was not reached in either arm of the trial and numerically favored the upfront surgery arm B. mOS (ITT population), a secondary endpoint, numerically favored the neoadjuvant arm A [25.5 months (95% CI 19.7-29.7months); arm B 16.7 months (95% CI 11.6-22.2 months)]. There was a difference in chemotherapy exposure with 90% of patients in arm A completing pre-operative chemotherapy and 58% of patients starting adjuvant chemotherapy in arm B. Neoadjuvant/perioperative treatment is a novel option for patients with resectable PDAC. However, the optimal treatment regimen has yet to be defined. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02047513) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT 2013-005559-34).

4133 Background: Perioperative chemotherapy (CTX) in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still not considered standard of care and data are limited. The NEONAX trial examined gemcitabine (Gem) plus nab-paclitaxel (nab-P), in the perioperative or adjuvant therapy of resectable PDAC (NCCN criteria). Methods: NEONAX is a prospective, randomized phase II trial with two independent experimental arms. 127 resectable PDAC patients in 22 German centers were randomized 1:1 to perioperative (2 pre- and 4 postoperative cycles, arm A) or adjuvant (6 cycles, arm B) of Gem (1000mg/m2) and nab-P (125mg/m2) on days 1,8,15 of a 28-day cycle. Results: We previously reported the primary endpoint disease free survival (DFS) at 18 mo. in the modified intention-to-treat (ITT)-population (defined as R0/R1 resected pts. that either started neoadjuvant (A) or adjuvant (B) CTX. The pre-defined DFS rate of 55% at 18 mo. was not reached in both arms (A: 32.2%, B: 41.4%). Here we present the final results of the secondary endpoints median overall survival (mOS), pN0-resection rate, perioperative morbidity/mortality and safety in the ITT-population. Most common grade ≥3 treatment emergent adverse events in the safety population were neutropenia (arm A 21.1%, arm B 12.3%), fatigue (arm A 8.8%, arm B 5.3%) and anemia (arm A 10.5%, arm B 1.8%). The most frequent post-/perioperative complications of all grades in pts. undergoing resection were infections (arm A: 24.4%, arm B: 8.8%), pancreatic fistulas (arm A: 14.6%; arm B: 13.3%) and bleedings (arm A: 9.7%; arm B: 6.7%). Perioperative mortality was 2.4% in the neoadjuvant and 6.7% in the upfront surgery setting. The median number of resected lymph nodes was comparable in both arms (A: n = 21, B: n = 26). The pN0-resection rate was 33.3% in the neoadjuvant/perioperative arm A and 29.5% in the upfront surgery arm B. R0 resection rates were 87.8% in arm A and 67.4% in arm B, respectively. Median OS as a key secondary endpoint in the ITT population was 25.2 mo. in arm A and 16.7 mo. for upfront surgery, a difference of 8.5 mo. This difference corresponds to a mDFS of 11.5 mo. in arm A and 5.9 mo. in arm B. 91.5% of pts. in arm A started and 84.7% completed neoadjuvant CTX but only 42.4% of pts. in arm B started adjuvant CTX. Conclusions: Perioperative treatment with Gem/nab-P was well tolerated and showed an encouraging mOS of 25.2 mo., this is well in the range of the data in SWOG 1505 (23.6 mo.) or PREOPANC (15.7 mo.). The corresponding mOS in the upfront surgery arm was 16.7 mo. The 8.5 mo. difference may be explained by the fact that many pts. in arm B did not receive adjuvant treatment whereas the vast majority of pts. in arm A completed at least preoperative CTX. Neoadjuvant/perioperative treatment is a promising novel option for pts. with resectable PDAC. The optimal treatment regimen is subject of current clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT02047513.

Few data exist on health-related quality of life (QoL) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) receiving first-line chemotherapy (Awad L ZE, Mesbah M Boston, MA. Applying survival data methodology to analyze quality of life data, in Mesbah M, Cole BF, Ting Lee M-L (eds): Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies: Design, Measurements and Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002). The QOLIXANE study is a prospective, noninterventional, multicenter substudy of the Platform for Outcome, Quality of Life and Translational Research on Pancreatic Cancer (PARAGON) registry, which evaluated QoL in patients with mPC receiving first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy in real-life setting. QoL was prospectively measured via EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires at baseline and every month thereafter. Therapy and efficacy parameters were prospectively collected. Main objectives were the rate of patients without deterioration of Global Health Status/QoL (GHS/QoL) at 3 and 6 months. Six hundred patients were enrolled in 95 German study sites. Median progression-free survival was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-6.3). Median overall survival (OS) was 8.9 months (95% CI, 7.9-10.2), while median time to deterioration of GHS/QoL was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-5.6). With a baseline GHS/QoL score of 46 (SD, 22.8), baseline QoL of the patients was severely impaired, in most cases due to loss in role functioning and fatigue. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, 61% and 41% of patients had maintained GHS/QoL after 3 and 6 months, respectively. However, in the QoL response analysis, 35% and 19% of patients had maintained (improved or stable) GHS/QoL after 3 and 6 months, respectively, while 14% and 9% had deteriorated GHS/QoL with the remaining patients being nonevaluable. In the Cox regression analysis, GHS/QoL scores strongly predicted survival with a hazard ratio of 0.86 (P < .0001). Patients with mPC have poor QoL at baseline that deteriorates within a median of 4.7 months. Treatment with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel is associated with maintained QoL in relevant proportions of patients. However, overall, results remain poor, reflecting the aggressive nature of the disease.

Background Biliary tract cancer (BTC) has a high mortality. Primary diagnosis is frequently delayed due to mostly unspecific symptoms, resulting in a high number of advanced cases at the time of diagnosis. Advanced BTCs are in principle chemotherapy sensitive as determined by improved disease control, survival and quality of life (QoL). However, median OS does not exceed 11.7 months with the current standard of care gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Thereby, novel drug formulations like nanoliposomal-irinotecan (nal-IRI) in combination with 5- fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin may have the potential to improve therapeutic outcomes in this disease. Methods NIFE is an interventional, prospective, randomized, controlled, open label, two-sided phase II study. Within the study, 2 × 46 patients with locally advanced, non-resectable or metastatic BTC are to be enrolled by two stage design of Simon. Data analysis will be done unconnected for both arms. Patients are allocated in two arms: Arm A (experimental intervention) nal-IRI mg/m 2 , 46 h infusion)/5-FU (2400 mg/m 2 , 46 h infusion)/leucovorin (400 mg/m 2 , 0.5 h infusion) d1 on 14 day-cycles; Arm B (standard of care) cisplatin (25 mg/m 2 , 1 h infusion)/gemcitabine (1000 mg/m 2 , 0.5 h infusion) d1 and d8 on 21 day-cycles. The randomization (1:1) is stratified for tumor site (intrahepatic vs. extrahepatic biliary tract), disease stage (advanced vs. metastatic), age (≤70 vs. > 70 years), sex (male vs. female) and WHO performance score (ECOG 0 vs. ECOG 1). Primary endpoint of the study is the progression free survival (PFS) rate at 4 months after randomization by an intention-to-treat analysis in each of the groups. Secondary endpoints are the overall PFS rate, the 3-year overall survival rate, the disease control rate after 2 months, safety and patient related outcome with quality of life. The initial assessment of tumor resectability for locally advanced BTCs is planned to be reviewed retrospectively by a central surgical board. Exploratory objectives aim at establishing novel biomarkers and molecular signatures to predict response. The study was initiated January 2018 in Germany. Discussion The NIFE trial evaluates the potential of a nanoliposomal-irinotecan/5-FU/leucovorin combination in the first line therapy of advanced BTCs and additionally offers a unique chance for translational research. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03044587. Registration Date February 7th 2017.