HIV-1 integrase (IN) is targeted by two classes of antivirals: integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), which bind to the active site within the catalytic core domain (CCD), and allosteric integrase inhibitors (ALLINIs), which bind at the CCD dimer interface. ALLINIs were initially designed to disrupt interactions with the cellular cofactor LEDGF/p75, but it has become clear that ALLINIs primarily act by promoting formation of aberrant integrase polymers. The ALLINIs achieve this by stabilizing ectopic intermolecular interactions between the CCD dimer and the integrase carboxy-terminal domain (CTD), which disrupts viral maturation. Previously, we determined the structure of full-length HIV-1 IN bound to the ALLINI GSK1264 at 4.4 Å resolution, revealing its polymerization mechanism. More recently, we reported the X-ray crystal structure of a minimal ternary complex between CCD, CTD, and the ALLINI BI-224436 at a higher resolution. In this study, we improve the original 4.4 Å structure using this higher-resolution information and report two new structures of full-length HIV-1 IN harboring escape mutations in the CCD (Trp131Cys) or CTD (Asn222Lys) bound with the prototype ALLINI BI-D at 4.5 Å. These structures reveal perturbations to the tertiary organization associated with escape substitutions, which correlate with their reduced ability to form ectopic ALLINI-induced polymers in vitro. These findings suggest a general structural mechanism of ALLINI resistance and provide insights for the design of improved ALLINIs.
This file contains legends for figures supplied as supplementary data. Immunoblot evaluations of EGFR and phospho-EGFR in GIST cell lines and non-small cell lung cancer cell lines (A549 and PC-9). Actin stain is a loading control. Coordinated inhibition of IR and KIT has additive effect on cell viability in imatinib-resistant GIST430, as compared to either intervention alone, but not in imatinib-sensitive GIST882.
This file contains immunoblot evaluations of phospho-EGFR and EGFR expression in GIST cell lines to support Figure 1A.
Supplementary Tables. Table S1. In Vitro Kinase IC50 Values (nM) for Native and Mutant Recombinant KIT. Table S2. Summary of Ba/F3 KIT Cell Lines Generated in this Study. Table S3. Summary of IC50 Viability Values in Ba/F3 KIT Cells. Table S4. Summary of KIT Driven Ba/F3 In Vivo Studies.
Supplementary Figures. Figure S1. Chemical structures of imatinib, sunitinib, regorafenib and ponatinib. Figure S2. Expression and activation of KIT in engineered Ba/F3 cells. Figure S3. Ponatinib inhibits the phosphorylation of exon 11primary activating, and secondary resistant mutant forms of KIT. Figure S4. Secondary mutants reduce ponatinib potency in Ex9 ins and V560D cell lines. Figure S5. Illustration of the optimal fit of ponatinib to KIT. Figure S6. Impact of compound treatment on KIT signaling in GIST-derived cell lines.
PDF - 42K, List of genes with strongest differential expression in GISTT1 with scrambled control versus DOG1-knockdown in cell lines.
HIV integrase (IN) inserts viral DNA into the host genome and is the target of the strand transfer inhibitors (STIs), a class of small molecules currently in clinical use. Another potent class of antivirals is the allosteric inhibitors of integrase, or ALLINIs. ALLINIs promote IN aggregation by stabilizing an interaction between the catalytic core domain (CCD) and carboxy -terminal domain (CTD) that undermines viral particle formation in late replication. Ongoing challenges with inhibitor potency, toxicity, and viral resistance motivate research to understand their mechanism. Here, we report a 2.93 Å X-ray crystal structure of the minimal ternary complex between CCD, CTD, and the ALLINI BI-224436. This structure reveals an asymmetric ternary complex with a prominent network of π-mediated interactions that suggest specific avenues for future ALLINI development and optimization.
The major effect of allosteric HIV integrase (IN) inhibitors (ALLINIs) is observed during virion maturation, where ALLINI treatment interrupts IN-RNA interactions via drug-induced IN aggregation, leading to the formation of aberrant virions. To understand the structural changes that accompany drug-induced aggregation, we determined the soft matter properties of ALLINI-induced IN aggregates. Using small-angle neutron scattering, SEM, and rheology, we have discovered that the higher-order aggregates induced by ALLINIs have the characteristics of weak three-dimensional gels with a fractal-like character. Their formation is inhibited by the host factor LEDGF/p75, as well as ex vivo resistance substitutions. Mutagenesis and biophysical analyses reveal that homomeric carboxy-terminal domain interactions are required to achieve the branched-polymer nature of the ALLINI-induced aggregates. These studies provide key insight into the mechanisms of ALLINI action and resistance in the context of the crowded virion environment where ALLINIs exert their effect.
Background Antiretroviral therapy (ART) can mitigate the morbidity and mortality caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Successful development of ART can be accelerated by accurate structural and biochemical data on targets and their responses to inhibitors. One important ART target, HIV integrase (IN), has historically been studied in vitro in a modified form adapted to bacterial overexpression, with a methionine or a longer fusion protein sequence at the N-terminus. In contrast, IN present in viral particles is produced by proteolytic cleavage of the Pol polyprotein, which leaves a phenylalanine at the N-terminus (IN 1F). Inspection of available structures suggested that added residues on the N-terminus might disrupt proper protein folding and formation of multimeric complexes. Results We purified HIV-1 IN 1F 1–212 and solved its structure at 2.4 Å resolution, which showed extension of an N-terminal helix compared to the published structure of IN 1–212 . Full-length IN 1F showed increased in vitro catalytic activity in assays of coupled joining of the two viral DNA ends compared to two IN variants containing additional N-terminal residues. IN 1F was also altered in its sensitivity to inhibitors, showing decreased sensitivity to the strand-transfer inhibitor raltegravir and increased sensitivity to allosteric integrase inhibitors. In solution, IN 1F exists as monomers and dimers, in contrast to other IN preparations which exist as higher-order oligomers. Conclusions The structural, biochemical, and biophysical characterization of IN 1F reveals the conformation of the native HIV-1 IN N-terminus and accompanying unique biochemical and biophysical properties. IN 1F thus represents an improved reagent for use in integration reactions in vitro and the development of antiretroviral agents.
The additional information of this manuscript originally stated that the authors declare no competing interests. This statement was incorrect, and should instead have stated the following:M.C.H. has the following competing interests to declare: Equity interest at Molecular MD; Consulting at Molecular MD, Blueprint Medicines, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals; Expert Testimony at Novartis; Licensed patent with royalty payments at Novartis. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare.The authors apologise for any convenience this may have caused.
Oncogenic KIT or PDGFRA tyrosine kinase mutations are compelling therapeutic targets in most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), and the KIT inhibitor, imatinib, is therefore standard of care for patients with metastatic GIST. However, some GISTs lose expression of KIT oncoproteins, and therefore become KIT-independent and are consequently resistant to KIT-inhibitor drugs. We identified distinctive biologic features in KIT-independent, imatinib-resistant GISTs as a step towards identifying drug targets in these poorly understood tumors. We developed isogenic GIST lines in which the parental forms were KIT oncoprotein-dependent, whereas sublines had loss of KIT oncoprotein expression, accompanied by markedly downregulated expression of the GIST biomarker, protein kinase C-theta (PRKCQ). Biologic mechanisms unique to KIT-independent GISTs were identified by transcriptome sequencing, qRT-PCR, immunoblotting, protein interaction studies, knockdown and expression assays, and dual-luciferase assays. Transcriptome sequencing showed that cyclin D1 expression was extremely low in two of three parental KIT-dependent GIST lines, whereas cyclin D1 expression was high in each of the KIT-independent GIST sublines. Cyclin D1 inhibition in KIT-independent GISTs had anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects, associated with Rb activation and p27 upregulation. PRKCQ, but not KIT, was a negative regulator of cyclin D1 expression, whereas JUN and Hippo pathway effectors YAP and TAZ were positive regulators of cyclin D1 expression. PRKCQ, JUN, and the Hippo pathway coordinately regulate GIST cyclin D1 expression. These findings highlight the roles of PRKCQ, JUN, Hippo, and cyclin D1 as oncogenic mediators in GISTs that have converted, during TKI-therapy, to a KIT-independent state. Inhibitors of these pathways could be effective therapeutically for these now untreatable tumors.
Oncogenic KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinase (TK) mutations are compelling therapeutic targets in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), and the KIT/PDGFRA kinase inhibitor, imatinib, is the standard of care for patients with metastatic GIST. However, approximately 10% of KIT-positive GIST metastases lose KIT expression at the time of clinical progression during imatinib therapy. In the present report, we performed TK-activation screens, using phosphotyrosine-TK double immunoaffinity purification and mass spectrometry, in GIST in vitro models lacking KIT expression. These studies demonstrated tyrosine-phosphorylated EGFR, AXL, and EPHA2 in four of six KIT-negative GIST lines (GIST62, GIST522, GIST54, GIST226, GIST48B, and GIST430B), and tyrosine-phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in each of the six KIT-negative lines. AXL expression was strong in KIT-negative or -weak clinical GIST samples that were obtained from progressing metastases during imatinib therapy. AXL knockdown inhibited viability in three KIT-negative GIST cell lines (GIST62, GIST54, and GIST522), but not in an AXL-negative, KIT-positive GIST control cell line (GIST430). AXL inhibition by R428, a specific AXL kinase inhibitor, reduced viability in AXL-activated GIST54. AXL knockdown in GIST62, GIST522, and GIST54 was accompanied by an increase in p21, p27, and p53 expression. By contrast, gefitinib-mediated EGFR inhibition, PF562271-mediated FAK inactivation, and shRNA-mediated knockdowns of EPHA2 and FAK had no effect on viability or colony formation of the KIT-negative GISTs. These findings highlight the potential relevance of AXL/p53 signaling as a therapeutic target in a subset of GISTs that have lost KIT oncoprotein expression.
From the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania. 1Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics 242 Anatomy-Chemistry Building Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6059 U.S.A. 2Department of Microbiology 3610 Hamilton Walk Philadelphia, PA 19104-6076 U.S.A. 3Department of Bioengineering and Departments of Physiology and Physics and Institute for Medicine and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
Abstract Oncogenic KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) mutations are compelling therapeutic targets in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and treatment with the KIT/PDGFRA inhibitor imatinib is the standard of care for patients with metastatic GIST. Most GISTs eventually acquire imatinib resistance due to secondary mutations in the KIT kinase domain, but it is unclear whether these genomic resistance mechanisms require other cellular adaptations to create a clinically meaningful imatinib-resistant state. Using phospho-RTK and immunoblot assays, we demonstrate activation of KIT and insulin receptor (IR) in imatinib-resistant GIST cell lines (GIST430 and GIST48) and biopsies with acquisition of KIT secondary mutations, but not in imatinib-sensitive GIST cells (GIST882 and GIST-T1). Treatment with linsitinib, a specific IR inhibitor, inhibited IR and downstream intermediates AKT, MAPK, and S6 in GIST430 and GIST48, but not in GIST882, exerting minimal effect on KIT phosphorylation in these cell lines. Additive effects showing increased apoptosis, antiproliferative effects, cell-cycle arrest, and decreased pAKT and pS6 expression, tumor growth, migration, and invasiveness were observed in imatinib-resistant GIST cells with IR activation after coordinated inhibition of IR and KIT by linsitinib (or IR shRNA) and imatinib, respectively, compared with either intervention alone. IGF2 overexpression was responsible for IR activation in imatinib-resistant GIST cells, whereas IR activation did not result from IR amplification, IR mutation, or KIT phosphorylation. Our findings suggest that combinatorial inhibition of IR and KIT warrants clinical evaluation as a novel therapeutic strategy in imatinib-resistant GISTs. Cancer Res; 77(18); 5107–17. ©2017 AACR.
The allosteric inhibitors of integrase (termed ALLINIs) interfere with HIV replication by binding to the viral-encoded integrase (IN) protein. Surprisingly, ALLINIs interfere not with DNA integration but with viral particle assembly late during HIV replication. To investigate the ALLINI inhibitory mechanism, we crystallized full-length HIV-1 IN bound to the ALLINI GSK1264 and determined the structure of the complex at 4.4 Å resolution. The structure shows GSK1264 buried between the IN C-terminal domain (CTD) and the catalytic core domain. In the crystal lattice, the interacting domains are contributed by two different dimers so that IN forms an open polymer mediated by inhibitor-bridged contacts; the N-terminal domains do not participate and are structurally disordered. Engineered amino acid substitutions at the inhibitor interface blocked ALLINI-induced multimerization. HIV escape mutants with reduced sensitivity to ALLINIs commonly altered amino acids at or near the inhibitor-bound interface, and these substitutions also diminished IN multimerization. We propose that ALLINIs inhibit particle assembly by stimulating inappropriate polymerization of IN via interactions between the catalytic core domain and the CTD and that understanding the interface involved offers new routes to inhibitor optimization.
The MDM2-p53 pathway has a prominent oncogenic function in the pathogenesis of various cancers. Nutlin-3, a small-molecule antagonist of MDM2-p53 interaction, inhibits proliferation in cancer cells with wild-type p53. Herein, we evaluate the expression of MDM2, both the full length and a splicing variant MDM2-A, and the sensitivity of Nutlin-3 in different cancer cell lines. Included are seven cell lines with wild-type p53 (four mesothelioma, one breast cancer, one chondrosarcoma, and one leiomyosarcoma), two liposarcoma cell lines harboring MDM2 amplification and wildtype p53, and one mesothelioma cell line harboring a p53 point mutation. Nutlin-3 treatment increased expression of cyclin D1, MDM2, and p53 in cell lines with wildtype p53. Additive effects were observed in cells containing wild-type p53 through coordinated attack on MDM2-p53 binding and cyclin D1 by lentivirual shRNA knockdown or small molecule inhibition, as demonstrated by immunoblots and cell viability analyses. Further results demonstrate that MDM2 binds to cyclin D1, and that an increase in cyclin D1 expression after Nutlin-3 treatment is correlated with expression and ubiquitin E3-ligase activity of MDM2. MDM2 and p53 knockdown experiments demonstrated inhibition of cyclin D1 by MDM2 but not p53. These results indicate that combination inhibition of cyclin D1 and MDM2-p53 binding warrants clinical evaluation as a novel therapeutic strategy in cancer cells harboring wild-type p53.
Background: Improved mesothelioma patient survival will require development of novel and more effective pharmacological interventions. TP53 genomic mutations are uncommon in mesothelioma, and recent data indicate that p53 remains functional, and therefore is a potential therapeutic target in these cancers. In addition, the tumour suppressor NF2 is inactivated by genomic mechanisms in more than 80% of mesothelioma, causing upregulation of FAK activity. Because FAK is a negative regulator of p53, NF2 regulation of FAK-p53-MDM2 signalling loops were evaluated.Methods: Interactions of FAK-p53 or NF2-FAK were evaluated by phosphotyrosine-p53 immunoaffinity purification and tandem mass spectrometry, and p53, FAK, and NF2 immunoprecipitations. Activation and/or expression of FAK, p53, and NF2 were also evaluated in mesotheliomas. Effects of combination MDM2 and FAK inhibitors/shRNAs were assessed by measuring mesothelioma cell viability/growth, expression of cell cycle checkpoints, and cell cycle alterations.Results: We observed constitutive activation of FAK, a known negative regulator of p53, in each of 10 mesothelioma cell lines and each of nine mesothelioma surgical specimens, and FAK was associated with p53 in five of five mesothelioma cell lines. In four mesotheliomas with wild-type p53, FAK silencing by RNAi induced expression and phosphorylation of p53. However, FAK regulation of mesothelioma proliferation was not restricted to p53-dependent pathways, as demonstrated by immunoblots after FAK knockdown in JMN1B mesothelioma cells, which have mutant/inactivated p53, compared with four mesothelioma cell lines with nonmutant p53. Additive effects were obtained through a coordinated reactivation of p53, by FAK knockdown/inhibition and MDM2 inhibition, as demonstrated by immunoblots, cell viability, and cell-cycle analyses, showing increased p53 expression, apoptosis, anti-proliferative effects, and cell-cycle arrest, as compared with either intervention alone. Our results also indicate that NF2 regulates the interaction of FAK-p53 and MDM2-p53.Conclusions: These findings highlight novel therapeutic opportunities in mesothelioma.
Abstract The MDM2-p53 pathway plays a prominent role in various cancer pathogenesis. Nutlin-3, a small-molecule antagonist of MDM2, inhibits proliferation in cancer cells with wild-type p53 by blocking the interaction of MDM2 and p53. However, different cancer cells differ greatly sensitivity of Nutlin-3 because of MDM2 amplification and/or p53 mutation status. Herein, we evaluate the sensitivity of Nutlin-3 in different cancer cell lines including four mesothelioma cell lines, one breast cancer line, and one leiomyosarcoma cell line with nonmutant p53 expression, two liposarcoma cell lines harboring MDM2 amplification and wild-type p53, and one control mesothelioma cell line JMN1B harboring p53 point mutation. Unexpectedly, Nutlin-3 treatment induced cyclin D1 expression accompanied with inhibition of MDM2-p53 interaction in nonmutant cancer cell lines. Additive effects were obtained through a coordinated attack on MDM2-p53 interaction and cyclin D1, as demonstrated by immunoblots, cell viability and cell cycle analyses, showing that lentiviral mediated cyclin D1 knockdown or drug inhibition, and block of MDM2-p53 interaction, in cancer cell lines containing wild-type p53, induced greater anti-proliferative effects, compared to either intervention alone. Further results demonstrated that upregulation of cyclin D1 after Nutlin-3 treatment to some extent was dependent on expression and ubiquitin E3-ligase activity of MDM2. These compelling anti-proliferative responses indicate that combination inhibition of cyclin D1 and MDM2-p53 interaction warrants clinical evaluation as a novel therapeutic strategy in cancer cells harboring wild-type p53. Citation Format: Wenbin Ou, Weicai Chen, Jiaqing Zhu, Grant Eilers, Xuhui Li, Peipei Yang, Hailong Li, Fanguo Meng, Jonathan Fletcher. Downregulation of cyclin D1 sensitizes cancer cells to MDM2 antagonist Nutlin-3. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2707. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2707
Basic Violet 14, Direct Red 28 and Acid Red 26 are classified as carcinogenic dyes in the European textile ecology standard, despite insufficient toxicity data. In this study, the toxicity of these dyes was assessed in a zebrafish model, and the underlying toxic mechanisms were investigated. Basic Violet 14 and Direct Red 28 showed acute toxicity with a LC 50 value at 60.63 and 476.84 µg ml –1 , respectively, whereas the LC 50 of Acid Red 26 was between 2500 and 2800 µg ml –1 . Treatment with Basic Violet 14, Direct Red 28 and Acid Red 26 resulted in common developmental abnormalities including delayed yolk sac absorption and swimming bladder deflation. Hepatotoxicity was observed in zebrafish treated with Basic Violet 14, and cardiovascular toxicity was found in zebrafish treated with Acid Red 26 at concentrations higher than 2500 µg ml –1 . Basic Violet 14 also caused significant up‐regulation of GCLC gene expression in a dose‐dependent manner whereas Acid Red 26 induced significant up‐regulation of NKX2.5 and down‐regulation of GATA4 at a high concentration in a dose‐dependent manner. These results suggest that Basic Violet 14, Direct Red 28 and Acid Red 26 induce developmental and organ‐specific toxicity, and oxidative stress may play a role in the hepatotoxicity of Basic Violet 14, the suppressed GATA4 expression may have a relation to the cardiovascular toxicity of Acid Red 26. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.