Patients with haematologic malignancies represent one of the most common groups referred for fertility preservation before gonadotoxic oncological treatment. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of haematologic cancer on ovarian reserve and response to ovarian stimulation compared with healthy controls. A total of eight observative studies were included in the fi nal quantitative analysis. Despite a younger age (mean difference -4.17, 95% CI -6.20 to -2.14; P < 0.0001), patients with haematologic malignancy had lower serum anti-Mu llerian hormone levels compared with the control group (MD -1.04, 95% CI -1.80 to -0.29; P = 0.007). The marginally higher total recombinant FSH dose (MD 632.32, 95% CI -187.60 to 1452.24; P = 0.13) and signi fi cantly lower peak oestradiol serum level (MD -994.05, 95% CI -1962.09 to -26.02; P = 0.04) were demonstrated in the study group compared with the healthy controls. A similar number of retrieved oocytes were achieved in both groups (MD 0.20, 95% CI -0.80 to 1.20; P = 0.69). In conclusion, haematologic malignancies may detrimentally affect ovarian function manifesting in decreased AMH serum levels despite a younger age compared with healthy controls. This effect can be overcome by the application of relevant IVF protocols and stimulation doses to achieve an adequate oocyte yield.
To investigate the impact of war situation on physical functioning, mental health status, and disease manifestations among endometriosis patients. Questionnaire-based study analyzing physical and psychosocial well-being. The study includes 50 endometriosis patients at Sheba Medical Center who completed a detailed questionnaire before and after the onset of the October 7, 2023, War in Israel. Significant deterioration in physical and mental health after the onset of war (pain score 6 vs 7; p < 0.001). Although having a first-degree relative affected by the war was associated with health deterioration (OR, 5.44; p = 0.02), similar pattern of health status aggregation was observed also in a subgroup of 19 women without family involvement, suggesting the general war situation as a likely cause. Starting new anti-anxiety or antidepressant medications and psychological therapy had a protective effect (OR, 0.21; p = 0.05). War situation exacerbates endometriosis symptoms, highlighting the importance of early psychological interventions to mitigate negative impacts.
Objectives: To assess the benefit of surgical management of patients with endometriosis infiltrating pelvic nerves in terms of pain, analgesic consumption, and quality of life (QOL). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study In an Endometriosis referral center at a tertiary care university affiliated medical center. Patients diagnosed with endometriosis that underwent laparoscopic neurolysis for chronic pain were included. Patients rated their pain before and after surgery and differentiated between chronic pain and acute crises. Patients were requested to maintain a record of analgesic consumption and to evaluate their quality-of-life (QOL). Results: Of the 21 patients in our study 15 (71.5 %) had obturator nerve involvement, 2 (9.5 %) had pudendal nerve involvement and 4 (19 %) had other pelvic nerve involvement. Median postoperative follow - up was of 8 months. All but 2 patients (9.6 %) had significant chronic pain improvement with a mean decrease of VAS of 3.05 (+/- 2.5). Analgesic habits changed postoperatively with a significant decrease of 66 % of patients' daily consumption of any analgesics. Surgery improved QOL in 12 cases (57.1 %) and two patients (9.6 %) completely recovered with a high QOL. Conclusion: Neurolysis and excision of endometriosis of pelvic nerves could results in significant improvement of quality of life.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of parity (primipara vs multipara) on the histopathology of the placenta in singleton live births following in vitro fertilization. We conducted a retrospective cohort study evaluating data of all IVF resulted live births from one university affiliated hospital during 2009–2017. All patients had the placenta sent for pathological evaluation. Exclusion criteria were history of miscarriage or elective termination of pregnancy, abnormal uterine cavity findings, previous uterine surgery, in vitro maturation cycles, gestational carrier cycles, oocyte recipient cycles, preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles, and multiple pregnancies. The outcomes measured included anatomical, inflammation, vascular malperfusion, and villous maturation placental features. A multivariate analysis was conducted to adjust the results for factors potentially associated with placental pathology features. A total of 395 live births were included in the final analysis and were allocated to the study groups according to parity: primipara (n = 273) and multipara (n = 122). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, multiparity was found to be significantly associated with delayed villous maturation (OR 4.9; 95
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the outcome of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) in patients with endometriosis with and without ovarian endometrioma. DESIGN:A retrospective cohort study. SETTING:A single university-affiliated tertiary center. PATIENT(S):A total of 116 patients with endometriosis hospitalized because of PID between the years 2011-2021. Fifty-nine patients with an ovarian endometrioma component were compared with 57 patients with endometriosis without endometrioma. INTERVENTION(S):None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S):The primary outcome was severe PID defined as the need for surgical intervention or drainage. Secondary outcomes included tubo-ovarian abscess, number of hospitalization days, a positive cervical bacterial culture or urine sexually trasmitted disease polymerase chain reaction (STD PCR) test, and readmission because of partially treated or relapsing PID. RESULT(S):PID in patients with endometrioma was found less likely to respond to antibiotic treatment with increased risk for surgical intervention or drainage compared with endometriosis patients without endometrioma (adjusted odds ratio, 3.5; confidence interval, 1.25-9.87). On admission, patients with endometrioma were older (26.5 vs. 31.0) and less likely to have an intrauterine device (19.3% vs. 5.1%) compared with patients without endometrioma. The rate of the tubo-ovarian abscess (52.5% vs. 19.3%) was significantly higher in patients with endometrioma. Readmission rate, positive bacterial culture, and hospitalization duration were higher in the endometrioma group; however, they did not reach statistical significance. Recent oocyte retrieval and patient's age were not associated with an increased risk of severe PID. CONCLUSION(S):Endometrioma patients with PID are less likely to respond to antibiotic treatment and present a higher risk for surgical intervention.
RESEARCH QUESTION:What is the outcome of fertility-preservation treatments in women with endometrioma, especially those with endometrioma larger than 4 cm? DESIGN:Retrospective cohort study. Women with definitive diagnosis of ovarian endometriosis (by histology or ultrasound), who underwent fertility-preservation treatment in two IVF units between 2016 and 2021, were included. As some women cryopreserved oocytes and other embryos, the primary outcome was the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved. RESULTS:Seventy-one women with ovarian endometriosis (OMA) underwent 138 fertility-preservation cycles. The median age of patients was 31 years. Forty out of 71 (56%) women underwent at least one surgery for OMA before fertility-preservation treatment. Multivariate analysis of each patient's first cycle was used. Women who underwent OMA surgery before fertility-preservation treatment had a 51.7% reduction (95% CI 26.1 to 68.5, P = 0.001) in the number of MII oocytes compared with women with OMA who did not undergo surgery. Among a subgroup who did not undergo surgery, those with an endometrioma larger than 4 cm had similar anti-Müllerian hormone concentration (2.6 ng/ml versus 2.1 ng/ml), number of oocytes retrieved (9 versus 9) and number of MII oocytes (7.6 versus seven 7) compared with women with an endometrioma of 4 cm or less. CONCLUSIONS:Discussing fertility-preservation treatment options with patients with OMA is recommended, especially if surgery is planned.
Endometriosis is a gynaecological disease in which cell tissue that lines inside of the uterine cavity (the endometrium) flourishes outside of the uterus. This leads to inflammation in the surrounding tissue and causes the main symptoms of endometriosis: chronic pain, digestive problems, fertility complications, and fatigue. This paper describes a group intervention for women suffering from endometriosis, which was conducted at a hospital Center for Endometriosis. Using a narrative therapy approach, we designed and implemented a group-work process focused on addressing the quality of life (QoL) and well-being of women with endometriosis. Intervention design: 23 patients from the Center for Endometriosis, Sheba Medical Center, were anonymously surveyed to ensure that the group work would address the needs of potential participants. The results of the survey indicated that the group intervention should focus on participants’ QoL and well-being, addressing low self-perception, feelings of loneliness and lack of control over their condition, and the effects of coping with chronic pain on their daily lives. In order to achieve these goals, a series of interim targets were set, for example, the creation of a sense of belonging among group members, participants’ awareness of unique outcomes in their narratives, identification of strengths and capabilities. Our group intervention protocol was based on a model for group work with women who have experienced sexual assault. The model was adapted and tailored to the experiences of women with endometriosis. Participants noted significantly reduced feelings of loneliness. They gained an enhanced ability to cope with the disease and identified strengths and skills that helped increase their sense of control over their condition. Consequently, they noticed a change in their self-perception and their perception of their condition. Based on the encouraging results, we recommend conducting similar group interventions for endometriosis patients as an additional tool for improving their quality of life and well-being.