Given the ecological importance of reef-building corals (Scleractinia), it is perhaps surprising that the molecular mechanisms underlying many of the morphological and metabolic changes during their development remain unclear. In part, this is due to the lack of a comprehensive transcriptomic dataset for any coral. A second challenge in the analysis of such non-model developmental datasets is that the volume of data often complicates its interpretation. To overcome these limitations, we profiled gene expression in Acropora millepora across 26 life stages from unfertilised eggs to juvenile polyps and developed an interactive online tool based on the R-application Shiny to simultaneously visualise changes in the expression of large numbers of genes. As expected, major transcriptomic changes (transitions) occurred during gastrulation and the acquisition of competence. Surprisingly, however, settlement triggered by using an extract of the natural inducing crustose coralline alga did not immediately lead to major changes in gene expression, but a major transition involving many genes was observed 3–6 h after settlement induction. We hope that providing access to this extensive developmental transcriptome dataset and software to facilitate its analysis will expedite a better understanding of the changes that occur during coral development. The online tool is available at https://amil-deview.mmb.group.

ABSTRACT Acropora spp . are the dominant reef-builders of the Indo-Pacific but are also amongst the most stress-sensitive corals. For these reasons, Acropora spp. have become the most studied of corals, two species ( A. digitifera and A. millepora ) often essentially serving as the basis for understanding molecular responses and processes across the sub-order Refertina and corals in general. The early development of these species has been well-characterised in terms of morphology and gene expression but as yet we have a limited understanding of how transcription is regulated during development. In “higher” animals (bilaterians) microRNAs (miRNAs) are critical regulators of gene expression but until now their involvement in coral development has not been investigated. Building on the existing developmental data for Acropora spp ., we catalogued microRNAs (miRNAs) expressed during the early development of Acropora digitifera and profiled their expression in 21 stages from unfertilised eggs to 24h after treatment with a natural settlement cue (CCA chips). 157 miRNAs were recognised, many of which (∼60%) were novel. These fell into three distinct groups, corresponding to three distinct developmental phases: (1) those present in eggs through to gastrulation (2) a larvally expressed group and (3) those expressed following settlement induction. Exposure of competent larvae to a natural settlement inducer resulted in major changes in the miRNA profile within 10 minutes, indicating that miRNAs may be particularly important in mediating the larva/polyp transition but are also likely to play important regulatory roles throughout early coral development in addition to possible roles in disease resistance.

A dynamic mucous layer containing numerous micro-organisms covers the surface of corals and has multiple functions including both removal of sediment and "food gathering."1 It is likely to also act as the primary barrier to infection; various proteins and compounds with antimicrobial activity have been identified in coral mucus, though these are thought to be largely or exclusively of microbial origin. As in Hydra,2 anti-microbial peptides (AMPs) are likely to play major roles in regulating the microbiomes of corals.3,4 Some eukaryotes employ a complementary but less obvious approach to manipulate their associated microbiome by interfering with quorum signaling, effectively preventing bacteria from coordinating gene expression across a population. Our investigation of immunity in the reef-building coral Acropora millepora,5 however, led to the discovery of a coral gene referred to here as AmNtNH1 that can inactivate a range of acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs), common bacterial quorum signaling molecules, and is induced on immune challenge of adult corals and expressed during the larval settlement process. Closely related proteins are widely distributed within the Scleractinia (hard corals) and some other cnidarians, with multiple paralogs in Acropora, but their closest relatives are bacterial, implying that these are products of one or more lateral gene transfer events post-dating the cnidarian-bilaterian divergence. The deployment by corals of genes used by bacteria to compete with other bacteria reflects a mechanism of microbiome manipulation previously unknown in Metazoa but that may apply more generally.

Considerable attention has recently been focused on the potential involvement of DNA methylation in regulating gene expression in cnidarians. Much of this work has been centered on corals, in the context of changes in methylation perhaps facilitating adaptation to higher seawater temperatures and other stressful conditions. Although first proposed more than 30 years ago, the possibility that DNA methylation systems function in protecting animal genomes against the harmful effects of transposon activity has largely been ignored since that time. Here, we show that transposons are specifically targeted by the DNA methylation system in cnidarians, and that the youngest transposons (i.e., those most likely to be active) are most highly methylated. Transposons in longer and highly active genes were preferentially methylated and, as transposons aged, methylation levels declined, reducing the potentially harmful side effects of CpG methylation. In Cnidaria and a range of other invertebrates, correlation between the overall extent of methylation and transposon content was strongly supported. Present transposon burden is the dominant factor in determining overall level of genomic methylation in a range of animals that diverged in or before the early Cambrian, suggesting that genome defense represents the ancestral role of CpG methylation.

Over the last 2 million years, Acropora (the staghorn or elkhorn corals) has become the dominant genus of reef-building corals throughout the Indo-Pacific. Like other coral genera, Acropora taxonomy is presently undergoing comprehensive revision as a consequence of large-scale sequencing projects, which will substantially alter our understanding of the diversity and biogeography of the group. Acropora spp. are among the most stress sensitive of corals, and as a consequence, population declines are occurring worldwide, most significantly due to global warming. Despite diverse adult colony morphology, all members of the genus are similar at the tissue and polyp level and follow common reproductive and developmental programs. Some progress has recently been made in development of gene knockdown/knockout methods despite the long generation times of corals and need to rely on natural spawning events. Since 2018, the number of Acropora genome sequences available has increased dramatically, although taxonomic uncertainties complicate their evolutionary interpretation. Areas of particularly active research include settlement and the control of metamorphosis; metabolic interactions with both bacterial and eukaryotic symbionts, particularly Symbiodinaceae, and their gain and loss; and how best to restore reefs destroyed by storms and coral bleaching.

Reef-building corals live in a mutualistic relationship with photosynthetic algae (family Symbiodiniaceae) that usually provide most of the energy required by the coral host. This relationship is sensitive to temperature stress; as little as a 1°C increase often leads to collapse of the association. This sensitivity has led to interest in the potential of more stress tolerant algae to supplement or substitute for the normal Symbiodiniaceae mutualists. In this respect, the apicomplexan-like microalga Chromera is of particular interest due to its greater temperature tolerance. We generated a de novo transcriptome for a Chromera strain isolated from a GBR coral ("GBR Chromera") and compared to those of the reference strain of Chromera ("Sydney Chromera"), and to those of Symbiodiniaceae (Fugacium kawagutii, Cladocopium goreaui and Breviolum minutum), as well as the apicomplexan parasite, Plasmodium falciparum. In contrast to the high sequence divergence among representatives of different genera within the family Symbiodiniaceae, the two Chromera strains featured low sequence divergence at orthologous genes, implying that they are likely to be conspecifics. Although KEGG categories provide few criteria by which true coral mutualists might be identified, they do supply a molecular rationalization that explains the ecological dominance of Cladocopium spp. amongst Indo-Pacific reef corals. The presence of HSP20 genes may contribute to the high thermal tolerance of Chromera. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

A candidate antimicrobial peptide (AmAMP1) was identified by searching the whole genome sequence of Acropora millepora for short (<125AA) cysteine-rich predicted proteins with an N-terminal signal peptide but lacking clear homologs in the SwissProt database. It resembled but was not closely related to damicornin, the only other known AMP from a coral, and was shown to be active against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. These proteins define a family of AMPs present in corals and their close relatives, the Corallimorpharia, and are synthesised as preproproteins in which the C-terminal mature peptide contains a conserved arrangement of six cysteine residues. Consistent with the idea of a common origin for AMPs and toxins, this Cys motif is shared between the coral AMPs and the Shk neurotoxins of sea anemones. AmAMP1 is expressed at late stages of coral development, in ectodermal cells that resemble the "ganglion neurons" of Hydra, in which it has recently been demonstrated that a distinct AMP known as NDA-1 is expressed.

Despite the ecological significance of the mutualistic relationship between Symbiodiniaceae and reef‐building corals, the molecular interactions during establishment of this relationship are not well understood. This is particularly true of the transcriptional changes that occur in the symbiont. In the current study, a dual RNA‐sequencing approach was used to better understand transcriptional changes on both sides of the coral–symbiont interaction during the colonization of Acropora tenuis by a compatible Symbiodiniaceae strain (Cladocopium goreaui; ITS2 type C1). Comparison of transcript levels of the in hospite symbiont 3, 12, 48 and 72 hr after exposure to those of the same strain in culture revealed that extensive and generalized down‐regulation of symbiont gene expression occurred during the infection process. Included in this “symbiosis‐derived transcriptional repression” were a range of stress response and immune‐related genes. In contrast, a suite of symbiont genes implicated in metabolism was upregulated in the symbiotic state. The coral data support the hypothesis that immune‐suppression and arrest of phagosome maturation play important roles during the establishment of compatible symbioses, and additionally imply the involvement of some SCRiP family members in the colonization process. Consistent with previous ecological studies, the transcriptomic data suggest that active translocation of metabolites to the host may begin early in the colonization process, and thus that the mutualistic relationship can be established at the larval stage. This dual RNA‐sequencing study provides insights into the transcriptomic remodelling that occurs in C. goreaui during transition to a symbiotic lifestyle and the novel coral genes implicated in symbiosis.

It is now recognised that the biology of almost any organism cannot be fully understood without recognising the existence and potential functional importance of associated microbes. Arguably, the emergence of this holistic viewpoint may never have occurred without the development of a crucial molecular technique, 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing, which allowed microbial communities to be easily profiled across a broad range of contexts. A diverse array of molecular techniques are now used to profile microbial communities, infer their evolutionary histories, visualise them in host tissues, and measure their molecular activity. In this review, we examine each of these categories of measurement and inference with a focus on the questions they make tractable, and the degree to which their capabilities and limitations shape our view of the holobiont.

Reef-building corals live in a mutualistic relationship with photosynthetic algae (family Symbiodiniaceae) that usually provide most of the energy required by the coral host. This relationship is sensitive to temperature stress; as little as a 1°C increase often leading to collapse of the association. This sensitivity has led to interest in the potential of more stress tolerant algae to supplement or substitute for the normal Symbiodiniaceae mutualists. In this respect, the apicomplexan-like microalga is of particular interest due to its greater temperature tolerance. We generated a transcriptome for a strain isolated from a GBR coral () and compared to those of the reference strain of (“Sydney ”), and to those of Symbiodiniaceae (), as well as the apicomplexan parasite, . By contrast with the Symbiodiniaceae, the two strains had a high level of sequence similarity evident by very low levels of divergence in orthologous genes. Although KEGG categories provide few criteria by which true coral mutualists might be identified, they do supply a molecular rationalization for the ubiquitous association of strains with Indo-Pacific reef corals. The presence of HSP20 genes may underlie the higher thermal tolerance of .

Despite the ecological significance of the mutualistic relationship between Symbiodiniaceae and reef-building corals, the molecular machinery underpinning the establishment of this relationship is not well understood. This is especially true of the symbiont side, as previous attempts to understand the interaction between coral larvae and Symbiodiniaceae have focused nearly exclusively on the host. In the current study, Acropora tenuis planula larvae were exposed to a compatible strain of Symbiodiniaceae ( Cladocopium ) and the transcriptomic landscape of the symbiont profiled at 3, 12, 48 and 72 h post-exposure using RNA-Seq. The transcriptomic response of Cladocopium to the symbiotic state was complex, the most obvious feature being an extensive and generalised downregulation of gene expression. Included in this “symbiosis-derived transcriptional repression” were a range of stress response and immune-related genes. In contrast, genes implicated in metabolism were upregulated in the symbiotic state. Consistent with previous ecological studies, this transcriptomic response of Cladocopium implied that active translocation of metabolites to the host occurred, and thus that the mutualistic relationship can be established at the larval stage. This study provides novel insights into the transcriptomic remodelling that occurs in Symbiodiniaceae, with important implications for understanding the establishment of symbiosis between corals and their dinoflagellate partners.

Corals and the reef ecosystems that they support are in global decline due to increasing anthropogenic pressures such as climate change(1). However, effective reef conservation strategies are hampered by a limited mechanistic understanding of coral biology and the functional roles of the diverse microbial communities that underpin coral health(2,3). Here,we present an integrated genomic characterization of the coral species Porites lutea and its microbial partners. High-quality genomes were recovered from P. lutea, as well as a metagenome-assembled Cladocopium C15 (the dinoflagellate symbiont) and 52 bacterial and archaeal populations. Comparative genomic analysis revealed that many of the bacterial and archaeal genomes encode motifs that may be involved in maintaining association with the coral host and in supplying fixed carbon, B-vitamins and amino acids to their eukaryotic partners. Furthermore, mechanisms for ammonia, urea, nitrate, dimethylsulfonio-propionate and taurine transformation were identified that interlink members of the holobiont and may be important for nutrient acquisition and retention in oligotrophic waters. Our findings demonstrate the critical and diverse roles that microorganisms play within the coral holobiont and underscore the need to consider all of the components of the holobiont if we are to effectively inform reef conservation strategies.

[Excerpt] Reef-building corals are iconic animals that are in global decline as a consequence of increasing anthropogenic pressure, but the development of strategies to ensure their conservation is constrained by our limited understanding of the molecular bases of many aspects of coral biology. Some coral genera are particularly sensitive to stress and, among these, Acropora is of particular significance because this is the dominant genus of reef-building corals in the Indo-Pacific. These factors have led to members of this genus often being the subjects of investigation into coral responses to various physical and biological stressors. Fittingly, the first coral genome to be sequenced was Acropora digitifera; the availability of this whole-genome sequence (Shinzato et al. 2011) allowed substantial progress in several areas of coral biology, including the molecular underpinnings of symbiosis and calcification (Hamada et al. 2013; Ramos-Silva et al. 2013). Here we report the whole-genome sequence of a second Acropora species, A. millepora, which has been the most extensively studied Acropora species at the molecular level (reviewed in Miller et al. 2011) by virtue of its wide distribution (Carpenter et al. 2008; Madin et al. 2016) and the ease with which it can be identified in what is a highly speciose genus.

Since the discovery of Chromera velia as a novel coral-associated microalga, this organism has attracted interest because of its unique evolutionary position between the photosynthetic dinoflagellates and the parasitic apicomplexans. The nature of the relationship between Chromera and its coral host is controversial. Is it a mutualism, from which both participants benefit, a parasitic relationship, or a chance association? To better understand the interaction, larvae of the common Indo-Pacific reef-building coral Acropora digitifera were experimentally infected with Chromera, and the impact on the host transcriptome was assessed at 4, 12, and 48 h post-infection using Illumina RNA-Seq technology. The transcriptomic response of the coral to Chromera was complex and implies that host immunity is strongly suppressed, and both phagosome maturation and the apoptotic machinery is modified. These responses differ markedly from those described for infection with a competent strain of the coral mutualist Symbiodinium, instead resembling those of vertebrate hosts to parasites and/or pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Consistent with ecological studies suggesting that the association may be accidental, the transcriptional response of A. digitifera larvae leads us to conclude that Chromera could be a coral parasite, commensal, or accidental bystander, but certainly not a beneficial mutualist.

BackgroundDespite the biological and economic significance of scleractinian reef-building corals, the lack of large molecular datasets for a representative range of species limits understanding of many aspects of their biology. Within the Scleractinia, based on molecular evidence, it is generally recognised that there are two major clades, Complexa and Robusta, but the genomic bases of significant differences between them remain unclear.ResultsDraft genome assemblies and annotations were generated for three coral species: Galaxea fascicularis (Complexa), Fungia sp., and Goniastrea aspera (Robusta). Whilst phylogenetic analyses strongly support a deep split between Complexa and Robusta, synteny analyses reveal a high level of gene order conservation between all corals, but not between corals and sea anemones or between sea anemones. HOX-related gene clusters are, however, well preserved across all of these combinations. Differences between species are apparent in the distribution and numbers of protein domains and an apparent correlation between number of HSP20 proteins and stress tolerance. Uniquely amongst animals, a complete histidine biosynthesis pathway is present in robust corals but not in complex corals or sea anemones. This pathway appears to be ancestral, and its retention in the robust coral lineage has important implications for coral nutrition and symbiosis.ConclusionsThe availability of three new coral genomes enabledrecognition of a de novo histidine biosynthesis pathway in robust corals which is only the second identified biosynthetic difference between corals. These datasets provide a platform for understanding many aspects of coral biology, particularly the interactions of corals with their endosymbionts.

Neuropeptides play critical roles in cnidarian development. However, although they are known to play key roles in settlement and metamorphosis, their temporal and spatial developmental expression has not previously been characterized in any coral. We here describe Acropora millepora LWamide and RFamide and their developmental expression from the time of their first appearance, using in situ hybridization and FMRFamide immunohistochemistry. AmRFamide transcripts first appear in the ectoderm toward the oral end of the planula larva following blastopore closure. This oral bias becomes less apparent as the planula develops. The cell bodies of AmRFamide-expressing cells are centrally located in the ectoderm, with narrow projections to the mesoglea and to the cell surface. As the planula approaches settlement, AmRFamide expression disappears and is undetectable in the newly settled polyp. Expressing cells then gradually reappear as the polyp develops, becoming particularly abundant on the tentacles. AmLWamide transcripts first appear in ectodermal cells of the developing planula, with minimal expression at its two ends. The cell bodies of expressing cells lie just above the mesoglea, in a position distinct from those of AmRFamide-expressing cells, and have a narrow projection extending across the ectoderm to its surface. AmLWamide-expressing cells persist for most of the planula stage, disappearing shortly before settlement, but later than AmRFamide-expressing cells. As is the case with AmRFamide, expressing cells are absent from the polyp immediately after settlement, reappearing later on its oral side. AmLWamide expression lags that of AmRFamide in both its disappearance and reappearance. Antibodies to FMRFamide stain cells in a pattern similar to that of the transcripts, but also cells in areas where there is no expression revealed by in situ hybridization, most notably at the aboral end of the planula and in the adult polyp. Adult polyps have numerous staining cells on the tentacles and oral discs, as well as an immunoreactive nerve ring around the mouth. There are scattered staining cells in the coenosarc between polyps and staining cells are abundant in the mesenterial filaments. The above results are discussed in the context of our knowledge of the behavior of coral planulae at the time of their settlement and metamorphosis. Corals are facing multiple environmental threats, and these results both highlight the need for, and bring us a step closer to, a mechanistic understanding of a process that is critical to their survival.