BackgroundThe immune system is known to be involved in the microenvironment of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Immune ratios such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) may reflect the functional status of the immune system in these patients and the involvement of circulating immune cells in cancer progression.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective-prospective, observational multicenter analysis to investigate the association between inflammatory indexes (NLR, PLR, MLR, and SII), clinical characteristics and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic TNBC in the first-line setting.ResultsData from 114 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of metastatic TNBC were evaluated. At a median follow-up of 28 months, median PFS in the overall patient population was 8.6 months (95% CI 6.5–9.6), while median OS was 17.7 months (95% CI 13.7–23.9). All high inflammation-based scores evaluated at the diagnosis of metastatic disease were significantly associated with lower PFS, particularly high NLR (≥3), high MLR (≥0.34), high PLR (≥210), and high SII (≥836) (p <0.0001, p <0.0001, p = 0.0002, p <0.0001, respectively). Similarly, all indexes appeared to be significantly associated with lower OS, particularly NLR (≥3), SII (≥836), PLR (≥210), and MLR (≥0.34) (p <0.0001, p = 0.001, p = 0.002, and p = 0.0006, respectively). In multivariable analysis for predictors of OS, the number of metastatic sites, NLR, SII, and MLR remained significant.ConclusionsNLR, PLR, SII, and MLR are associated with PFS and OS in metastatic TNBC. Although our results require validation in larger prospective studies and contemporary cohorts treated with chemoimmunotherapy and novel agents, inflammatory ratios may represent feasible prognostic biomarkers in metastatic TNBC.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improved survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet many patients do not respond to treatment. The identification of markers for ICI response remains an unmet clinical need. This study hypothesizes that host genetics influences the response to ICI, contributing to the variability in efficacy among individuals.Methods We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in patients with NSCLC on ICI monotherapy with nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab, to identify germline variants associated with objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) at 24 months after the start of ICI therapy. Genomic DNA was genotyped using Axiom Precision Medicine Research Arrays. Raw data were processed with Axiom Analysis Suite, and quality checked with PLINK software. Imputation to the whole genome was done on the Michigan Imputation Server. Association analyses were performed for ORR (logistic regression with PLINK2 software) and survival (Cox proportional hazards model, with GenAbel package in R environment), with appropriate covariates. Variants were annotated for functional significance using SNPnexus and FUMA. Post-GWAS analyses, including colocalization, were performed to explore the function of the identified variants. Their possible role as expression quantitative trait loci was investigated in different databases (GTEx, eQTLGen, TCGA).Results No genome-wide significant associations were found for ORR or PFS, while a locus on chromosome 2 (lead variant: rs111648355) showed near genome-wide significance (p value=6.3×10⁻⁸) for OS. Patients with minor alleles of these variants exhibited significantly worse OS (HR=5.1, 95% CI: 2.9 to 9.2). Functional annotation linked these variants to regulatory effects on genes including MSH2, MSH6, PPP1R21, FBXO11, and STON1. These genes play a role in mismatch repair, endosomal trafficking, or major histocompatibility complex class II regulation, and might influence the response to immunotherapy.Conclusions This study identifies an association between a genomic locus on chromosome 2 and OS in patients with NSCLC treated with ICI. Although these results need validation in larger cohorts and functional studies to elucidate the underlying mechanisms, they highlight the potential of germline variants as predictive biomarkers of response to ICI.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4-6i) according to HER2 status (low/zero), and endocrine resistance/sensitivity, as well as the efficacy of second-line treatments, in a large real-world cohort. Methods: The GIM14/BIOMETA study (NCT02284581) is a retrospective/prospective study of the Gruppo Italiano Mammella evaluating treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We retrieved data on patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative MBC receiving first-line CDK 4/6i. Results: Among 3832 patients enrolled in the GIM14-BIOMETA study, 701 were eligible. At a median follow-up of 24.80 months, no significant differences were found between HER2-zero and HER2-low subgroups in terms of first-line time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) (26.16 months [IQR 12.84-NR] vs. 27.60 months [IQR 12.12-64.44], p = 0.972) or overall survival (OS) (mOS>60 months for both groups, p = 0.398). Median TTD was 33.24 months (IQR 16.32-NR) for the endocrine sensitive subgroup, 19.92 months (IQR 8.88-51.24) for the secondary endocrine resistant subgroup and 17.40 months (IQR 7.44-24.72) for the primary endocrine resistant subset, respectively (p < 0.001). Among 239 patients receiving second-line treatment, no significant difference (p = 0.188) was found in terms of second-line TTD between those treated with capecitabine (6.11 months, IQR 2.96-11.47), taxane-based chemotherapy (5.06 months, IQR 2.99-9.99), everolimus plus exemestane (5.39 months, IQR 2.53-9.03) or fulvestrant (6.44 months, IQR 3.38-NR). Conclusions: Endocrine therapy plus CDK 4/6i represents an effective treatment, regardless of HER2 status (low/zero). Second-line agents did not differ significantly in terms of TTD. Endocrine resistant cancers exhibit poor response to CDK 4/6i.

Background The identification of treatment selection biomarkers for advanced triple negative breast cancer (aTNBC) patients remains an unmet need. The immune system is known to be involved in the microenvironment of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Immune ratios like the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), the monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) may reflect the immune system functional status in these patients and the involvement of circulating immune cells in cancer progression. In particular MLR showed to predict overall survival (OS) in aTNBC and to contribute to migration of circulating tumor cells [1]. Methods A retrospective-prospective, observational multicenter study from the GIM-14 experience was performed to investigate the association between inflammatory indexes (NLR, MLR, PLR and SII), as measured at baseline and at progression, and clinical and survival aspects in patients with aTNBC in first line setting. The optimal cutoff values between low and high expression of inflammatory indexes were established on the basis of cut-off values determined in a previously conducted study in order to validate them[1], and was used to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Time-to-event variables (PFS; OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method, while Cox regression model was used to estimate HRs and their 95% CI. Results 105 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of aTNBC were fully evaluated for the final analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 55 years (33-86). Of them, 80 patients received a neo/adjuvant treatment after diagnosis. At first progression the majority of patients (n= 97) received chemotherapy, while only 8 patients were treated with chemo-immunotherapy due to the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in the immunohistochemical analyses. At a median follow-up of 54 months, median PFS in the whole patients population was 13 months (95% CI 9,4-16,5), while median OS was 17.3 OS (95% CI 13-22,2). All high inflammation based scores evaluated at diagnosis of metastatic disease were significantly associated with lower PFS, in particular high NLR (≥3) and high MLR (≥0.34) (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.011, respectively). Similarly, all high indexes appeared significantly associated with a lower OS, especially NLR (>3), SII (≥836) and MLR (≥0.34) (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0005, p=001 respectively). In particular also NLR and SII evaluated at disease progression after first line treatment were significantly associated with a worse OS (p=0.0006 and p=0.001 respectively). In multivariable analysis for predictors of overall survival, the number of metastatic sites, NLR, SII and MLR remained significant (p< 0.0001, p=0.006, p=0.005 respectively). Conclusions NLR, SII and MLR are predictors of OS in aTNBC. Although our results need validation with larger studies, we suggest that inflammatory ratios could be used as feasible biomarkers of prognosis and treatment efficacy in aTNBC. Further research about HER-2 low categorized patients will be updated and presented at the final meeting. 1. De Giorgi U, Mego M, Scarpi E, Giordano A, Giuliano M, Valero V, Alvarez RH, Ueno NT, Cristofanilli M, Reuben JM. Association between circulating tumor cells and peripheral blood monocytes in metastatic breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019 Aug 14;11:1758835919866065. doi: 10.1177/1758835919866065. PMID: 31452692; PMCID: PMC6696837. Citation Format: Caterina Gianni, Michela Palleschi, Emanuela Scarpi, Filippo Merloni, Eva Blondeaux, Fabio Puglisi, Elena Collovà, Palma Pugliese, Francesco Cognetti, Irene Giannubilo, Tommaso Ruelle, Claudia Bighin, Lucia Del Mastro, Ugo De Giorgi. Inflammatory indexes as prognostic biomarkers in advanced triple negative breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-19.

We demonstrated the non-inferiority of a dexamethasone (DEX)-sparing (single-dose) regimen with NEPA, a netupitant/palonosetron fixed combination, for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) caused by cisplatin. This pre-planned exploratory analysis assessed the effect of the DEX-sparing regimen on a patient’s food intake. Chemotherapy-naïve patients undergoing cisplatin (≥ 70 mg/m 2 ) were given NEPA and DEX (12 mg) on day 1 and randomized to receive either no further DEX (DEX1), or oral DEX (4 mg BID) on days 2–4 (DEX4). Patient-reported endpoint maintenance of usual daily food intake was assessed during the 5-days post-chemotherapy. The relationship between usual daily food intake and CINV control, pre-chemotherapy self-rated food intake and BMI-adjusted weight loss (WL) were evaluated. One-hundred fifty-two patients (76/group) were assessable. The proportion of patients reporting maintenance of usual daily food intake was similar in both groups: 69.7% (95% CI, 58.6–78.9) for DEX1 vs. 72.4% (95% CI, 61.4–81.2) for DEX4. Only CINV control was significantly associated with maintenance of usual daily food intake ( P ≤ 0.001) during the overall phase. The DEX-sparing regimen does not adversely affect patient-reported daily food intake post-chemotherapy. The current analysis adds further insights into antiemetic efficacy of DEX sparing beyond day 1 in the challenging setting of cisplatin. Trial registration : The parent study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04201769).

ImportanceIn spite of the effectiveness of endocrine therapy plus cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors as the first-line treatment for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2 [formerly HER2/neu])-negative (ER+/ERBB2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), patients eventually develop resistance, and eventually most will receive chemotherapy. The METEORA-II trial compared a metronomic all-oral treatment with intravenous (IV) chemotherapy.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of the oral vinorelbine plus cyclophosphamide plus capecitabine (VEX) regimen vs weekly IV paclitaxel among patients with ER+/ERBB2− MBC who are candidates for chemotherapy.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis phase 2 randomized clinical trial including 140 women 18 years and older (randomized 1:1) with ER+/ERBB2− MBC was carried out from September 13, 2017, to January 14, 2021 at 15 centers in Italy. Eligible patients could have received 1 prior line of chemotherapy for MBC and/or 2 lines of endocrine therapy (including CDK4/6 inhibitors).InterventionsIn 4-week cycles, patients received either metronomic oral VEX or weekly IV paclitaxel.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was investigator-assessed time to treatment failure (TTF) defined as the interval between the date of randomization to the end of treatment (because of disease progression or lack of tolerability or because further trial treatment was declined). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease control rate (complete or partial response or stable disease lasting for at least 24 weeks).ResultsIn total, 133 patients received either VEX (n = 70) or paclitaxel (n = 63) in 4-weekly cycles. The median age was 61 (range, 30-80) years. The VEX treatment significantly prolonged TTF vs paclitaxel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.88; P = .008), median TTF was 8.3 (95% CI, 5.6-11.1) months for VEX vs 5.7 (95% CI, 4.1-6.1) months for paclitaxel, and the 12-month TTF was 34.3% for VEX vs 8.6% for paclitaxel. The median PFS was 11.1 (95% CI, 8.3-13.8) months vs 6.9 (95% CI, 5.4-10.1) months favoring VEX (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.96, P = .03). The 12-month PFS was 43.5% for VEX vs 21.9% for paclitaxel. No difference in OS was found. The TF event for 55.6% of patients was progression of disease; for 23% it was AEs. More patients assigned to VEX had at least 1 grade 3 or 4 targeted adverse event (VEX, 42.9%; 95% CI, 31.1%-55.3% vs paclitaxel, 28.6%; 95% CI, 17.9%-41.3%), but essentially no alopecia.Conclusion and RelevanceThis randomized clinical trial found significantly prolonged TTF and PFS for oral VEX but no improvement in OS compared with intravenous paclitaxel, despite increased but still manageable toxic effects. The VEX regimen may provide more prolonged disease control than weekly paclitaxel for ER+/ERBB2− MBC.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02954055

IMPORTANCE In spite of the effectiveness of endocrine therapy plus cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors as the first-line treatment for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2 [formerly HER2/neu])-negative (ER+/ERBB2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), patients eventually develop resistance, and eventually most will receive chemotherapy. The METEORA-II trial compared ametronomic all-oral treatment with intravenous (IV) chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of the oral vinorelbine plus cyclophosphamide plus capecitabine (VEX) regimen vs weekly IV paclitaxel among patients with ER+/ERBB2- MBC who are candidates for chemotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This phase 2 randomized clinical trial including 140 women 18 years and older (randomized 1:1) with ER+/ERBB2- MBC was carried out from September 13, 2017, to January 14, 2021 at 15 centers in Italy. Eligible patients could have received 1 prior line of chemotherapy for MBC and/or 2 lines of endocrine therapy (including CDK4/6 inhibitors). INTERVENTIONS In 4-week cycles, patients received either metronomic oral VEX or weekly IV paclitaxel. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was investigator-assessed time to treatment failure (TTF) defined as the interval between the date of randomization to the end of treatment (because of disease progression or lack of tolerability or because further trial treatment was declined). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease control rate (complete or partial response or stable disease lasting for at least 24 weeks). RESULTS In total, 133 patients received either VEX (n = 70) or paclitaxel (n = 63) in 4-weekly cycles. The median age was 61 (range, 30-80) years. The VEX treatment significantly prolonged TTF vs paclitaxel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.88; P =.008), median TTF was 8.3 (95% CI, 5.6-11.1) months for VEX vs 5.7 (95% CI, 4.1-6.1) months for paclitaxel, and the 12-month TTF was 34.3% for VEX vs 8.6% for paclitaxel. The median PFS was 11.1 (95% CI, 8.3-13.8) months vs 6.9 (95% CI, 5.4-10.1) months favoring VEX (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.96, P =.03). The 12-month PFS was 43.5% for VEX vs 21.9% for paclitaxel. No difference in OS was found. The TF event for 55.6% of patients was progression of disease; for 23% it was AEs. More patients assigned to VEX had at least 1 grade 3 or 4 targeted adverse event (VEX, 42.9%; 95% CI, 31.1%-55.3% vs paclitaxel, 28.6%; 95% CI, 17.9%-41.3%), but essentially no alopecia. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE This randomized clinical trial found significantly prolonged TTF and PFS for oral VEX but no improvement in OS compared with intravenous paclitaxel, despite increased but still manageable toxic effects. The VEX regimen may provide more prolonged disease control than weekly paclitaxel for ER+/ERBB2- MBC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02954055

e13064 Background: The introduction in the clinical practice of CDK4 / 6 inhibitors, in combination with endocrine therapy, has been a breakthrough in the therapeutic scenario of hormone receptor+ve/Human Epidermal growth Factor 2–ve (HR+/HER2–) MBC pts. However, despite the outstanding results in terms of OS and quality of life achieved up to now, it is important to consider that the highly selected population of clinical trials doesn’t always accurately predict the clinical impact of therapies in the general population, hence having real world data is an essential tool to guide physicians in daily clinical practice. Methods: In this observational, multicentre, prospective study, we evaluated the safety profile and the incidence of dose reductions, temporary interruptions and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events, in a real–world cohort of Italian pre or postmenopausal HR+/HER2– MBC pts who received a first line combination of ribociclib and letrozole. Results: A total of 78 MBC patients were included in the analysis. The median duration of treatment was 17 (1–61) months. At the time of ribociclib initiation, 13 (16.7%) pts already presented an altered transaminase value whereas liver metastases were present in 17 pts (21.8%). Ten (12.8%) pts experienced hepatic toxicity while on treatment. The median number of cycles for liver toxicity was 3 (1–18). The most common hepatic event was transaminase level increase in 7 (8.8%) pts. Such event occurred more frequently in the group of pts with normal baseline liver function. Hepatic toxicity was grade 1 in 3 (3.8%) pts, grade 2 in 3 (3.8%) pts, grade 3 in 3 (3.8%) pts and grade 4 in 1 (1.3%) pt. Dose reduction due to hepatic toxicity occurred in 3 (3.8%) pts, in particular one of them needed dose reduction from 600 mg to 400 mg, one from 600 mg to 200 mg whereas treatment discontinuation was applied in the last patient. Median time of treatment interruption due to hepatotoxicity was 29 (14–45) days and 3 (3.8 %) pts discontinued ribociclib due to adverse events. No deaths due to liver failure have been reported. Conclusions: Hermione–8 trial support a manageable safety profile of the combination ribociclib and letrozole in MBC patients treated in a real–world clinical setting, confirming toxicity profile in line with the results presented in the MONALEESA clinical trials. Dose reductions, temporary interruptions and discontinuation of treatment due to adverse events have been limited and seems comparable to the results from MONALEESA trials. [Table: see text]

Background Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is an incurable disease and its treatment focuses on prolonging patients’ (pts) overall survival (OS) and improving their quality of life. Eribulin is a microtubule inhibitor that increases OS in pre-treated MBC pts. The most common adverse events (AEs) are asthenia, neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy (PN). Methods PAINTER is a single arm, phase IV study, aimed at evaluating the tolerability of eribulin in MBC pts. Secondary objectives were the description of treatment efficacy and safety, the assessment of the incidence and severity of PN and its association with genetic polymorphisms. Genomic DNA was isolated from blood samples and 15 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped by Taqman specific assays. The association between PN and SNPs were evaluated by Fisher exact test. Results Starting from May 2014 until June 2018 180 pts were enrolled in this study by 20 Italian centers. 170 of these pts could be evaluated for efficacy and toxicity and 159 for polymorphisms analysis. The median age of pts was 60 years old and the biological subtypes were luminal type (64.7%), Her2 positive (18.3%) and triple negative (17%). Pts were pretreated with a median of 5 lines for MBC. The median follow up of this study was 15.4 months with a median number of 4.5 cycles administered (minimum–maximum 1–23). The median overall survival was 12 months. 48.8% of pts experienced a dose reduction, mainly for neutropenia (23.9%) and liver toxicity (12%). 65 pts (38.2%) reported at least one severe toxicity. Neutropenia and neurotoxicity were the most frequent severe AEs (15.3% and 14.7%, respectively); other reported toxicities were osteo-muscular, abdominal or tumor site pain (19.4%), liver toxicity (6.6%), pulmonary toxicity (6.5%) and dermatological toxicity (3.6%). Among the 15 evaluated SNPs, an association with PN was found for rs2233335 and rs7214723. Conclusions Eribulin is a well-tolerated treatment option in MBC. Schedule and dosage modifications were common, but toxicity rarely led to treatment discontinuation. SNPs rs2233335 (G/T and T/T) in the NDRG1 gene and rs7214723 (CC and CT) in the CAMKK1 gene were associated with PN. These findings, if validated, could allow a tailored treatment with eribulin in cancer patients. Trial registration : ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02864030.

Abstract Background The non-inferiority of dexamethasone (DEX) on day 1, with or without low-dose DEX on days 2 and 3, combined with oral NEPA (netupitant/palonosetron), compared with the guideline-consistent use of DEX was demonstrated in cisplatin. Here, we complete the analysis by assessing the impact of emesis on daily lives of patients receiving DEX-sparing regimens using the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE). Methods Chemotherapy-naïve patients undergoing cisplatin (≥70 mg/m2), were given NEPA and DEX (12 mg) on day 1 and randomized to receive either 1) no further DEX (DEX1), 2) oral DEX (4 mg daily) on days 2–3 (DEX3), or 3) DEX (4 mg twice daily) on days 2–4 (DEX4; control). Patients completed the FLIE questionnaire on day 6 of cycle 1. Endpoints included the FLIE nausea domain, vomiting domain, and overall combined domain scores, as well as the proportion of patients with no impact on daily life (NIDL; overall score > 108). This was a protocol-planned analysis. Results In the DEX1 group, no significant differences were observed in the FLIE nausea score (48.9 [±1.8; SE] vs. 53.7 [±1.5]), vomiting score (56.6 [±1.4] vs. 58.7 [±0.8]) and overall score (105.6 [±2.8] vs.112.4 [±1.9]) versus DEX4 control; similar results were observed in the DEX3 group for nausea score (49.6 [±1.7]), vomiting score (58.2 [±1]) and overall score (107.8 [±2.4]) versus control. There were no significant between-group differences in the proportion of patients reporting NIDL. Conclusion Reducing DEX, when administered with NEPA, does not seem to adversely impact the daily functioning in patients undergoing cisplatin. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04201769 . Registration date: 17/12/2019 - Retrospectively registered.

Background: The CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) has proven to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Few data are available regarding the efficacy of such a regimen outside the clinical trials. Patients and methods: This is a multicentre prospective real-world experience aimed at verifying the outcome of palbociclib plus ET in an unselected population of MBC patients. The primary aim was the clinical benefit rate (CBR); secondary aims were the median PFS, overall survival (OS) and safety. Patients received palbociclib plus letrozole 2.5 mg (cohort A) or fulvestrant 500 mg (cohort B). Results: In total, 191 patients (92 in cohort A, 99 in cohort B) were enrolled and treated, and 182 were evaluable for the analysis. Median age was 62 years (range 47–79); 54% had visceral involvement; 28% of patients had previously performed one treatment line (including chemotherapy and ET), 22.6% two lines and 15.9% three. An overall response rate of 34.6% was observed with 11 (6.0%) complete responses and 52 (28.6%) partial responses. Stable disease was achieved by 78 patients (42.9%) with an overall CBR of 59.8%. At a median follow-up of 24 months (range 6–32), median PFS was 13 months without significant differences between the cohorts. When analysed according to treatment line, PFS values were significantly prolonged when palbociclib-based therapy was administered as first-line treatment (14.0 months), to decrease progressively in second and subsequent lines (11.7 and 6.7 months, respectively). Median OS was 25 months, ranging from 28.0 months in 1st line to 18.0 and 13.0 months in 2nd and subsequent lines, respectively. Conclusions: Our data indicate that palbociclib plus ET is active and safe in HR+/HER2− MBC, also suggesting a better performance of the combinations in earlier treatment lines.

BACKGROUND:To reduce the overall exposure to dexamethasone (DEX) in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy, we evaluated the noninferiority of DEX on day 1, with or without low-dose DEX on days 2 and 3, combined with an oral fixed-dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron (NEPA), compared with the guideline-consistent use of 4-day DEX. PATIENTS AND METHODS:In this open-label, multicenter study, chemotherapy-naïve patients undergoing high-dose cisplatin (≥70 mg/m2 ), were given NEPA and DEX (12 mg) on day 1 and randomized (1:1:1 ratio) to receive either (a) no further DEX (DEX1), (b) oral DEX (4 mg daily) on days 2-3 (DEX3), or (c) DEX (4 mg twice daily) on days 2-4 (DEX4). The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR: no emesis and no rescue medication) during the 5-day overall phase. The noninferiority margin was set at -15% difference (DEX1 or DEX3 minus DEX4). Secondary efficacy endpoints included complete protection (CP: CR and none or mild nausea). RESULTS:Two-hundred twenty-eight patients, 76 in each arm, were assessable. Noninferiority was met for both DEX-sparing regimens and the reference arm, with overall phase CR rates of 76.3% in each of the DEX1 and DEX3 arms and 75.0% in the DEX4 arm (95% confidence interval, -12.3% to 15% for each comparison). During the overall phase, CP rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSION:A simplified regimen of NEPA plus single-dose DEX offers comparable chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting prevention throughout 5 days post-chemotherapy with the advantage of sparing patients additional doses of DEX in the high-emetic-risk setting of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:Dexamethasone (DEX) has traditionally played an integral role in the management of chemotherapy-induced emesis. Although generally considered safe, even short-term DEX use is associated with various side effects, and some evidence suggests that concurrent steroids may reduce the efficacy of immunotherapies. This study demonstrates comparable antiemetic control during the 5 days post-chemotherapy with a simplified regimen of netupitant/palonosetron plus single-dose DEX versus the standard 4-day DEX reference treatment in high-dose cisplatin. This represents a clinically relevant achievement as it not only simplifies antiemetic prophylaxis but also offers an opportunity to appropriately use in patients where caution with corticosteroid use is advised.

INTRODUCTION:Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a life-threatening disease, and although some data suggest a trend in survival improvement, it has not yet been unequivocally demonstrated. This study aimed to evaluate the overall survival (OS) of MBC patients, assessing its correlation with prognostic factors.PATIENTS AND METHODS:COSMO (Checking Overall Survival in a MBC Observational study) is an Italian longitudinal retrospective multicenter study that enrolled patients with MBC diagnosed between 2000 and 2008. The primary objective was to detect a temporal difference in OS; the secondary objective was to identify prognostic factors as causal factors of the temporal variation in OS.RESULTS:A total of 3721 of 3930 patients from 31 centers were distributed in 3 periods: 886 (23.8%), 1302 (35.0%), and 1533 (41.2%) in 2000-2002, 2003-2005, and 2006-2008, respectively. With a median follow-up of 9.3 years, median OS was 2.8 years (95% confidence interval, 2.6-2.9). No difference in OS was found in the 3 cohorts (P for trend = .563). The worst prognosis was observed for patients with triple-negative MBC (OS, 1.5 years) and for those with central nervous system metastases (1.7 years); the best prognosis was observed in those with bone metastases or nonvisceral disease (3.4 and 3.2 years, respectively) and in patients with a disease-free interval, defined as the time between resection of the primary malignancy and diagnosis of MBC, of > 2 years (3 years).CONCLUSIONS:The COSMO study found improvement in OS between 2000 and 2008. Molecular subtype remained the strongest prognostic factor, and the role of other prognostic factors was confirmed, in particular disease-free interval, site of metastasis, and age.

The association of Trastuzumab (T) and Pertuzumab (P) plus taxane is the standard first line therapy for HER2 positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts). Results from CLEOPATRA have underlined huge advantage both in PFS and OS in pts treated with T+P and docetaxel (D) over T and D. In order to describe the applicability of CLEOPATRA results in real world pts, we performed a multicenter, retrospective-prospective, observational study, in HER-2+ MBC pts. We analyzed the outcome of all HER-2+ MBC pts treated with P+T and taxanes as first line therapy since the availability of P in Italy, at 18 general and university hospitals. Up to March 2019, 347 pts were recorded. 5 were excluded due to incomplete data. Data on 342 pts are presented. Main pts characteristics were: median (m) age 55 y (19-80), m ECOG PS 0 (0-2). 170 pts (49.7%) had metastatic disease at presentation. HR+ 230 pts (67%); 96/172 pts (56%) received neo/adjuvant CT + T and 119/129 HR+ pts (92%) received adjuvant ET. Visceral involvement was present in 216 pts (63%). Most common metastatic sites:bone 185 pts (54%), liver 138 pts (40%), lung 108 pts (38%), soft tissues 244 pts (71%); 14 pts (4%) had CNS involvement. 205 pts (60%) and 136 pts (40%) received D and paclitaxel (Pa) respectively. 1 pt received vinorelbine. M number of CT cycles was 6 for both drugs (D range 1-14; Pa range 1-24). 148 pts (43%) are on maintenance, 177 pts (52%) received ET concomitantly with P+T maintenance. ORR is 77% (CR and PR in 79 and 184 pts respectively), PD in 22 pts. With 194 events recorded (57%), M PFS is 26.9 months (95% CI 20 – 33.8). In 96 pts previously exposed to adjuvant T, with 65 events (68%), m PFS is 20.7 months (95% CI 15.6 - 25.8). Any grade leucopenia and neutropenia were recorded in 24% and 26% of pts respectively; febrile neutropenia in 11 pts. 30 pts developed cardiac toxicity leading to discontinuation of P+T maintenance in 14 pts. Any grade non-hematological toxicities: diarrhea 162 pts (47%), asthenia 212 pts (62%), peripheral neuropathy 133 pts (39%). Our results support the activity and safety of the combination of CT (D or Pa) plus P and T in real world HER2+ MBC pts. The advantage is also evident in pts previously exposed to adjuvant T. No new concerns about toxicity. Final results on OS will be presented.

Background NEPA is an oral fixed-dose combination of netupitant, a new highly selective neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, and palonosetron. This study was conducted to evaluate whether the efficacy of NEPA against chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in cycle 1 would be maintained over subsequent chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC). The study also describes the relationship between efficacy on day 1 through 5 (overall period) and control of CINV on day 6 through 21 (very late period) in each cycle. Methods In this multicentre, phase II study, patients received both NEPA and dexamethasone (12 mg intravenously) just before chemotherapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall complete response (CR; no emesis and no rescue medication use) in cycle 1. Sustained efficacy was evaluated during the subsequent cycles by calculating the rate of CR in cycles 2–4 and by assessing the probability of sustained CR over multiple cycles. The impact of both overall CR and risk factors for CINV on the control of very late events (vomiting and moderate-to-severe nausea) were also examined. Results Of the 149 patients enrolled in the study, 139 were evaluable for a total of 552 cycles; 97.8% completed all 4 cycles. The proportion of patients with an overall CR was 70.5% (90% CI, 64.1 to 76.9) in cycle 1, and this was maintained in subsequent cycles. The cumulative percentage of patients with a sustained CR over 4 cycles was 53%. NEPA was well tolerated across cycles. In each cycle, patients with CR experienced a significantly better control of very late CINV events than those who experienced no CR. Among the patients with CR, the only predictor for increased likelihood of developing very late CINV was pre-chemotherapy (anticipatory) nausea (adjusted odds ratio = 0.65–0.50 for no CINV events on cycles 3 and 4). Conclusion The high anti-emetic efficacy seen with the NEPA regimen in the first cycle was maintained over multiple cycles of adjuvant AC for breast cancer. Preliminary evidence also suggests that patients achieving a CR during the overall period gain high protection even against very late CINV events in each chemotherapy cycle. Trial registration This trial was retrospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov identifier ( NCT03862144 ) on 05/Mar/2019.

Currently there are no reliable biomarkers to predict outcome of exemestane treatment. We designed a prospective study to investigate whether constitutive genetic background might affect response to therapy. In a population of 302 advanced breast cancer patients treated with exemestane we showed that a 5-polymorphism-based genetic score could be used to identify patients with different risks of progression and death. Introduction: Approximately 50% of locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated with first-line exemestane do not show objective response and currently there are no reliable biomarkers to predict the outcome of patients using this therapy. The constitutive genetic background might be responsible for differences in the outcome of exemestane-treated patients. We designed a prospective study to investigate the role of germ line polymorphisms as biomarkers of survival. Patients and Methods: Three hundred two locally advanced or MBC patients treated with first-line exemestane were genotyped for 74 germ line polymorphisms in 39 candidate genes involved in drug activity, hormone balance, DNA replication and repair, and cell signaling pathways. Associations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were tested with multivariate Cox regression. Bootstrap resampling was used as an internal assessment of results reproducibility. Results: Cytochrome P450 19A1-rs10046TC/CC, solute carrier organic anion transporter 1B1-rs4149056TT, adenosine triphosphate binding cassette subfamily G member 2-rs2046134GG, fibroblast growth factor receptor-4-rs351855TT, and X-ray repair cross complementing 3-rs861539TT were significantly associated with PFS and then combined into a risk score (0-1, 2, 3, or 4-6 risk points). Patients with the highest risk score (4-6 risk points) compared with ones with the lowest score (0-1 risk points) had a median PFS of 10 months versus 26.3 months (adjusted hazard ratio [AdjHR], 3.12 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.18-4.48]; P < .001) and a median OS of 38.9 months versus 63.0 months (AdjHR, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.22-4.79], P = .012), respectively. Conclusion: In this study we defined a score including 5 polymorphisms to stratify patients for PFS and OS. This score, if validated, might be translated to personalize locally advanced or MBC patient treatment and management. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

e12510 Background: Approximately 20% of breast cancers (BC) are HER-2+. Trastuzumab (T) has substantially improved the outcome, both in early and in advanced settings, in HER-2+BC. Pertuzumab (P), combined with T and taxanes, ameliorated progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the phase III CLEOPATRA study. In order to verify the results of the trial in unselected patients (pts), we performed a multicenter, retrospective-prospective, observational study, in HER-2+ metastatic BC (MBC) pts. Methods: We analyze the outcome of all HER-2+ MBC pts treated with P+T and taxanes, as first line therapy since the availability of P in Italy, at 11 general and university hospitals. Results: Up to February 1stdata from 103 HER-2+ MBC pts were recorded. Main pts’ characteristics were: median (M) age 52 y (28-78), m ECOG PS 0 (0-2), ER/PgR positive 68 pts (66%). Most common metastatic sites: liver 51 pts (49.5%), bone 64 pts (62.1%), lung 26 pts (25.2%). Thirty pts (29.1%) had bone and soft tissue disease only; 78 pts (75.7%) had metastatic disease on presentation. m number of metastatic sites was 3 (1-7); 25 pts (24.3%) received neo/adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) + T and 36 pts (34.9%) adjuvant endocrine therapy; 71 pts (69%) and 32 pts (31%) received docetaxel (D) and paclitaxel (P) respectively. m number of CT cycles was 6 for both drugs (D range 3-12; P range 1-18).At the time of the present analysis 12 pts are still on CT and 78 on maintenance; response is available for 91 pts and ORR is 80.2% (22 pts and 51 pts obtained CR and PR respectively), 6 pts experienced PD during CT. Median PFS is 13.9 months (1.5+ - 33.8+).Among hematological toxicities leucopenia (any grade) was recorded in 29 pts (28.1%), g 3 febrile neutropenia in 6 pts (5.8%). No change of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was recorded during CT; 4 pts interrupted maintenance P due to drop in LVEF and 1 due to rash. Onicopathy, nausea, alopecia, rash and arthro-myalgia were the most common non-hematological toxicities. Conclusions: Our preliminary results highlight the activity and the safety of the combination of CT plus P and T in unselected HER2+ MBC patients. The study is ongoing and updated results will be presented.

Metronomic chemotherapy (mCT), a frequent administration of low-dose chemotherapy, allows prolonged treatment duration and minimizes the toxicity of standard-dose chemotherapy. mCT has multiple actions against cancer cells including inhibition of angiogenesis and modulation of the immune system. A number of studies lend support to the clinical efficacy of mCT in advanced breast cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer. However, further evidence is necessary to describe the optimal use of mCT and to identify suitable patients. Oral vinorelbine has emerged as a promising metronomic treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer and is the only orally available microtubule-targeting agent. This paper reviews current evidence on metronomic oral vinorelbine, discusses its management and defines a suitable patient profile on the basis of a workshop of Italian experts.

PURPOSE:Aim of this study was to investigate for the presence of existing prognostic factors in patients with bone metastases (BMs) from RCC since bone represents an unfavorable site of metastasis for renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Data of patients with BMs from RCC were retrospectively collected. Age, sex, ECOG-Performance Status (PS), MSKCC group, tumor histology, presence of concomitant metastases to other sites, time from nephrectomy to bone metastases (TTBM, classified into three groups: <1 year, between 1 and 5 years and >5 years) and time from BMs to skeletal-related event (SRE) were included in the Cox analysis to investigate their prognostic relevance. RESULTS:470 patients were enrolled in this analysis. In 19 patients (4%),bone was the only metastatic site; 277 patients had concomitant metastases in other sites. Median time to BMs was 16 months (range 0 - 44y) with Median OS of 17 months. Number of metastatic sites (including bone, p = 0.01), concomitant metastases, high Fuhrman grade (p < 0.001) and non-clear cell histology (p = 0.013) were significantly associated with poor prognosis. Patients with TTBM >5 years had longer OS (22 months) compared to patients with TTBM <1 year (13 months) or between 1 and 5 years (19 months) from nephrectomy (p < 0.001), no difference was found between these two last groups (p = 0.18). At multivariate analysis, ECOG-PS, MSKCC group and concomitant lung or lymph node metastases were independent predictors of OS in patients with BMs. CONCLUSIONS:Our study suggest that age, ECOG-PS, histology, MSKCC score, TTBM and the presence of concomitant metastases should be considered in order to optimize the management of RCC patients with BMs.