School districts globally implement comprehensive and expensive strategies to offer safe bus transportation to and from school. However, these technologies are unfeasible to schools with limited financial resources, thereby leaving students at risk of serious injury. This study focuses on five major obstacles to safe school transportation: 1) forgetting students on the bus unattended; 2) students' abnormal behavior; 3) overcrowding; 4) abnormal driver behavior; and 5) the risk of a bus running over children after they have disembarked. This paper developed an intelligent system using the Internet of Things, including rule- based and mathematical solutions to overcome the five transportation safety issues in student buses mentioned above, and to enhance student safety, using a bracelet system, short- and longRFID sensors, and a processing unit to monitor the bus and its surrounding area. Therefore, in this paper, the proposed solution is superior to previous works in the same field. It is distinguished by its comprehensiveness and reasonable cost, making it affordable and easy to both install and maintain.

Tracing the backbone is a critical step in protein model building, as incorrect tracing leads to poor protein models. Here, a neural network trained to identify unfavourable fragments and remove them from the model-building process in order to improve backbone tracing is presented. Moreover, a decision tree was trained to select an optimal threshold to eliminate unfavourable fragments. The neural network was tested on experimental phasing data sets from the Joint Center for Structural Genomics (JCSG), recently deposited experimental phasing data sets (from 2015 to 2021) and molecular-replacement data sets. The experimental results show that using the neural network in the Buccaneer protein-model-building software can produce significantly more complete protein models than those built using Buccaneer alone. In particular, Buccaneer with the neural network built protein models with a completeness that was at least 5% higher for 25% and 50% of the original and truncated resolution JCSG experimental phasing data sets, respectively, for 28% of the recently collected experimental phasing data sets and for 43% of the molecular-replacement data sets.

Proteins are macromolecules that perform essential biological functions which depend on their three-dimensional structure. Determining this structure involves complex laboratory and computational work. For the computational work, multiple software pipelines have been developed to build models of the protein structure from crystallographic data. Each of these pipelines performs differently depending on the characteristics of the electron-density map received as input. Identifying the best pipeline to use for a protein structure is difficult, as the pipeline performance differs significantly from one protein structure to another. As such, researchers often select pipelines that do not produce the best possible protein models from the available data. Here, a software tool is introduced which predicts key quality measures of the protein structures that a range of pipelines would generate if supplied with a given crystallographic data set. These measures are crystallographic quality-of-fit indicators based on included and withheld observations, and structure completeness. Extensive experiments carried out using over 2500 data sets show that the tool yields accurate predictions for both experimental phasing data sets (at resolutions between 1.2 and 4.0 Å) and molecular-replacement data sets (at resolutions between 1.0 and 3.5 Å). The tool can therefore provide a recommendation to the user concerning the pipelines that should be run in order to proceed most efficiently to a depositable model.

For the last two decades, researchers have worked independently to automate protein model building, and four widely used software pipelines have been developed for this purpose: ARP/wARP, Buccaneer, Phenix AutoBuild and SHELXE. Here, the usefulness of combining these pipelines to improve the built protein structures by running them in pairwise combinations is examined. The results show that integrating these pipelines can lead to significant improvements in structure completeness and Rfree. In particular, running Phenix AutoBuild after Buccaneer improved structure completeness for 29% and 75% of the data sets that were examined at the original resolution and at a simulated lower resolution, respectively, compared with running Phenix AutoBuild on its own. In contrast, Phenix AutoBuild alone produced better structure completeness than the two pipelines combined for only 7% and 3% of these data sets.

A comparison of four protein model-building pipelines (ARP/wARP, Buccaneer, PHENIX AutoBuild and SHELXE) was performed using data sets from 202 experimentally phased cases, both with the data as observed and truncated to simulate lower resolutions. All pipelines were run using default parameters. Additionally, an ARP/wARP run was completed using models from Buccaneer. All pipelines achieved nearly complete protein structures and low Rwork/Rfree at resolutions between 1.2 and 1.9 Å, with PHENIX AutoBuild and ARP/wARP producing slightly lower R factors. At lower resolutions, Buccaneer leads to significantly more complete models.