OBJECTIVES:Our objective was to determine whether antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) were used according to the European AIDS Clinical Society (EACS) guidelines for people with HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) between 30 November 2014 and 31 December 2019 in the pan-European EuroSIDA study.METHODS:At each publication date of the EACS guidelines, plus 3 and 6 months, we calculated the number of people receiving DAAs with potential and actual ARV contraindications ('red shading' in the EACS guidelines). We used logistic regression to investigate factors associated with using contraindicated ARVs.RESULTS:Among 1406 people starting DAAs, the median age was 51 years, 75% were male, 57% reported injected drug use as an HIV risk, and 76% were from western Europe. Of 1624 treatment episodes, 609 (37.5%) occurred while the patient was receiving ARVs with potential contraindications; among them, 38 (6.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.3-8.2) involved a contraindicated ARV (18 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors), 16 involved protease inhibitors, and four involved integrase strand transfer inhibitors. The adjusted odds of receiving a contraindicated ARV were higher (3.25; 95% CI 1.40-7.57) among participants from east/central east Europe (vs. south) and lower (0.22; 95% CI 0.08-0.65) for 2015-2018 guidelines (vs. 2014). In total, 29 of the 32 (90.6%) patients receiving a contraindicated ARV and 441 of the 461 (95.7%) with potential ARV contraindications experienced a sustained virological response ≥12 weeks after stopping treatment (SVR12; p = 0.55).CONCLUSION:In this large heterogenous European cohort, more than one-third of people with HIV/HCV coinfection received DAAs with potential ARV contraindications, but few received a contraindicated ARV. Use of contraindicated ARVs declined over time, corresponding to the increased availability of ARV therapy regimens without interactions with DAA across Europe. Participants who received a contraindicated DAA and ARV combination still had a high rate of SVR12.

In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, health care providers have had to rapidly change how they deliver care to patients. We discuss how we are delivering a virtual HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) service during this time; challenges faced; challenges expected and goals for the coming months.

We describe the successful use of isavuconazole for treatment of an HIV-positive patient with cryptococcal meningitis following induction therapy with liposomal amphotericin B and flucytosine. Because the Cryptococcus neoformans isolate from cerebrospinal fluid had a borderline minimum inhibitory concentration of 8 mg/L, initial consolidation therapy was given with a daily dose of fluconazole 1200 mg based on area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration modelling data. Toxicity, and the radiological emergence of a cryptococcoma in the setting of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, prompted a therapeutic switch to isavuconazole. Subsequent imaging after 19 weeks of isavuconazole shows a significant reduction in cryptococcoma size from 11 mm to complete resolution. The patient remains well after 210 days of therapy with a view to completion of treatment after 1 year.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare demyelinating disease of the white matter central nervous system occurring in immunocompromised patients particularly those with T cell deficiency such as in HIV, haematological and solid organ malignancies and those taking immunomodulatory medications. PML is caused by JC virus however in rare cases BK virus has been isolated in the cerebral spinal fluid of patients presenting with PML. In this case we describe a 49 year old man who presented to the emergency department with a 2 week history of progressive right sided weakness and dysarthria. His background history included HIV diagnosed in 2005, he had not engaged with care in the past 2 years and had not been taking anti-retroviral therapy (ART). Other past medical history included untreated hepatitis C. His CD4 count was 90 (11%) cells/mm3 on admission and his HIV viral load VL) was 141,000 copies/ml. Magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) showed a hypointense lesion on T1, hyperintense on T2 and FLAIR without diffusion restriction and without mass effect. A lumbar puncture was performed which confirmed JC virus was positive (PCR <50 copies/ml) and also revealed BK virus was positive (PCR 46,511 copies/ml). The patient was commenced on tenofovir alafenamide fumarate/emtricitabine/darunavir/cobicistat in combination with dolutegravir 50mg twice daily. On day 40 post commencement of ART the patient was readmitted with worsening of his right arm weakness and dysarthria. A repeat MRI was performed which showed the hyperdense lesion on T2 and FLAIR appeared slightly larger with some slight enhancement with gadolinium contrast but no other features suggesting PML immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). The CD4 count had increased to 141(17%) and HIV VL had decreased to 85 copies/ml. A clinical diagnosis of PML IRIS was made and the patient was commenced on prednisolone 30mg BD which lead to an initial improvement in symptoms. Interestingly in this case, both JC virus and BK virus were detected in the CSF of this patient with the level of JC virus being too low to quantify. BK virus was not detectable on peripheral serum sampling suggesting that BK virus is replicating in the CNS independent of other body sites. There have been 5 case reports in the literature of BK virus as the cause of PML. Testing for BK virus should be considered in patients presenting with signs and symptoms of PML and encephalitis particularly when no other cause is found.

SummaryThe role of condomless anal intercourse (CAI) as a driver for the epidemic of hepatitis C in MSM is still debated. Timely access to direct‐acting antivirals (DAA) could represent an essential strategy to tackle this. Case notes of MSM diagnosed with acute hepatitis C (AHC) between July 2016 and June 2017 in a sexual health clinic in London were included. Behavioural data on sexual practices and STI monitoring in the 6 months prior to AHC diagnosis were collected. DAA routes of access and timing from AHC diagnosis to start of treatment were analysed. A total of 60 individuals were enrolled (median age 39 years, IQR = 33‐46, 62% HIV co‐infected, 72% genotype 1a). CAI was reported by 97%, drug use prior to or during sex by 73%; 46% was diagnosed with a rectal STI and 29% with syphilis. About 37% did not report any HCV risk factors other than condomless anal sex. About 36% had a new rectal STI in the 6 months following AHC. About 82% accessed DAA treatment and median time from AHC to DAA start was 278 days for those following the NHS standard of care route, 132 days for those accessing DAA via participation in trials and 114 for those who had self‐sourced DAA online (P < 0.0011). SVR12 was achieved in 100% of the patients who received DAA treatment.In conclusion, CAI is a significant risk factor for HCV acquisition in MSM, irrespective of their HIV status. Rapid and wider access to treatment with DAA could represent a powerful strategy to reduce onward transmission and risk of reinfection in MSM.

Screening and treatment of sexually transmissible infections, including HIV, are free in the UK nations; pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) became free in England in October 2017 through the PrEP Impact trial. Doctor-led PrEP clinics started at 56 Dean Street in September 2015, with the drug purchased privately at full price. The service was expanded to other staff to support initiation and monitoring of increasing numbers of attendees purchasing PrEP from online pharmacies. Nonetheless, when the clinic was given a target of 1700 for the PrEP Impact trial, it was clear this could not be achieved in a timely manner through 56 Dean Street alone. To prepare for the trial, all staff with HIV testing competencies were trained in good clinical practice and trial-specific procedures, and a patient group directive was approved to facilitate nurse prescribing and dispensing. Electronic pro formas to capture eligibility for starting or continuing PrEP were adapted for the Dean Street Express clinic, with some information collected directly from service users using touch screens. These interventions, together with an update to the 2016 information leaflet developed by the community, enabled enrolment and follow-up of 1700 participants in 4 months. PrEP advice and monitoring were easily accommodated in the 56 Dean Street sexual health service, but did require additional training and approval for nurse prescribing and dispensing drug in order to achieve the target, which still fell short of the demand.

Background: We aimed at investigating the antiviral activity and the pharmacokinetics of the dual antiretroviral (ARV) combination of rilpivirine plus darunavir/ritonavir 25/800/100 mg once-daily in naïve HIV-1-infected individuals (NHII) with different baseline viral loads. Settings: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics study in ARV-naïve HIV-infected individuals. Methods: The primary endpoint was the number of NHII with HIV-RNA < 40 copies/mL at week 48. Secondary endpoints included rilpivirine/darunavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics, HIV-RNA decay, and changes in ECG QT interval. Results: Thirty-six individuals were enrolled, 18 with a baseline viral load < 100,000 copies/mL (group A) and 18 with a baseline viral load > 100,000 copies/mL (group B). All but 1 (HIV-RNA = 63 copies/mL) subjects achieved viral load < 50 copies/mL by week 36, and all at week 48. Median (range) HIV-RNA reduction (Log10 copies/mL) was 1.3 (0.6–1.9) over the first week, with no differences between groups A and B. Geometric mean and 95%CI rilpivirine Cmax, Ctrough, AUC were 183 (165–239), 114 (104–109) ng/mL, 2966 (2704–3820) ng h/mL. No QTcF interval changes were recorded. Conclusions: rilpivirine/darunavir/ritonavir could be efficacious, with limited short-term toxicity in ARV-naïve patients. Although rilpivirine was co-administered with ritonavir, its exposure was within ranges measured during phase III trials.

This guideline is an update of the guideline published in 2008 and, like its previous version, provides guidance for best practice in the diagnosis, management and prevention of viral hepatitis types A, B and C (HAV, HBV and HCV). It is primarily intended for use in UK Genitourinary Medicine (GUM)/Sexual Health settings, but can be applied or adapted for use in other settings where sexually transmitted infection (STI) assessments are undertaken, such as in integrated STI/contraception sexual health services and other specifically commissioned services, including general practice. This guideline is for use by all healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses and health advisers) and for use when dealing with patients who are attending with symptoms that may be attributed to an STI, with concern about STIs, or are requesting screening for STIs. It will also be useful to managers and commissioners of sexual health services in understanding service needs. The purpose of the guideline is to help improve the sexual health of individuals attending sexual health clinics by encouraging high standards of care. The guideline offers recommendations on best practice regarding viral hepatitis for both men and women, including adolescents. The guideline is predominantly based on what a broad range of clinicians believe constitutes reasonable practice, based on best evidence. Evidence is sometimes cited from non-UK sexual health settings and from other settings outside sexual health care where necessary. The recommendations/evidence are graded using the GRADE system (Appendix).

Acute hepatitis C infection is recognized in HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM), but the risk in HIV-negative MSM remains unclear. We evaluated a population of MSM with acute hepatitis C. From January 2010 to May 2014, all cases of HCV antibody positive HIV-negative MSM were identified. European AIDS Network criteria were applied to determine acute infection, and 44 individuals fulfilled the criteria for acute hepatitis C. Ten were RNA negative at baseline and classed as prior spontaneous clearance. 15 (34.1%) had a previously negative HCV antibody within 1 year. 11 (25.0%) had significant elevation in ALT levels, and 18 (40.9%) were clinically diagnosed from risk exposure and history. Median age was 37 years (range 24-75). 41 (93.2%) individuals reported unprotected anal sex, 36 with (87.8%) both insertive and receptive intercourse, 4 (9.8%) with receptive intercourse, 1 (2.4%) with insertive intercourse, and no data were recorded for 3 (7.3%) patients. Individuals had an average of 7.3 reported (median 2, range 1-100) partners. 12 (27.3%) engaged in group sex, 11 (25.0%) practised fisting, 11 (25.0%) admitted using drugs during sexual activity, 16 (36.4%) reported nasal, and 9 (20.5%) reported injection drug use. 14 (31.8)% had unprotected sex whilst under the influence of recreational drugs. 29 individuals were aware of a partner's status. 2 (4.5%) individuals had sexual contact with a known HCV monoinfected partner, 13 (29.5%) with a HIV monoinfected partner and 6 (13.6%) with a HCV/HIV coinfected partner. 9 (20.5%) reported a partner/partners with no known infection. No data were available in 14 (31.8%) individuals. 13 (29.5%) individuals had a coexisting STI at the time of acute HCV diagnosis. 8 (18.2%) received HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) within the 6 months prior to the HCV diagnosis (2 were participants in a HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis trial). 15 (34.1%) individuals achieved spontaneous clearance of HCV, and 11 patients received HCV treatment. Similar to the ongoing epidemic of acute HCV infection in HIV+ MSM, HIV-negative MSM remain at risk.