RATIONALE:Follow-up of pre-licensure trial participants potentially informs a vaccine's long-term safety profile. DESIGN:This prospective study enrolled participants from the first clinical trials of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, many of whom subsequently received COVID-19 vaccines in the UK vaccination programme. Serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were captured. AESI selection was based on Brighton Collaboration definitions. RESULTS:Between September 2021 and April 2022, 4470 participants enrolled (58% female, median age 50 years); 3845/4470 (86.0%) completed the study. Median follow-up was 11.77 months; total follow-up was 48,116 person-months. There were 174 SAEs and 71 AESIs (33 events recorded as both) in 195 participants, including 5 deaths. Immunology data were available for a small subset of participants; total IgG against trimeric SARS-CoV-2 spike protein tended to increase during the study. CONCLUSIONS:Although no emergent safety signals were detected, continued post-marketing surveillance remains imperative, particularly for neurological disorders. EUDRACT NUMBER:2021-003382-36.

INTRODUCTION:The mechanisms generating immunity involved in nasal vaccination for children are likely to differ significantly from both adult immunity and animal models. A deeper understanding is necessary for the development of future paediatric mucosal vaccines. Live-attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIVs) are licensed mucosal vaccines which confer protection in children against severe influenza. Beyond individual protection, mucosal vaccines can also limit transmission and colonisation, offering broader public health benefits than parenteral vaccination. We describe a protocol for an exploratory, observational study assessing systemic and mucosal responses to LAIV in healthy children. METHODS AND ANALYSIS:40 healthy participants aged 2-5 years inclusively will be recruited from the community. Researchers will conduct study visits in the participants' homes and administer a single dose of their routine, yearly LAIV and collect blood, nasal cells, nasal fluid and saliva at baseline and at day 28 post-LAIV. They will have additional nasal fluid and saliva samples conducted by caregivers on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 14 and 21. They will complete a daily symptom report to detect symptoms due to vaccination as well as additional upper respiratory illnesses. Samples will be analysed to detect viral load for influenza virus strains included in LAIV, coinfection and colonisation by other pathogens, as well as assess the mucosal and systemic immune response to vaccination. This study aims to advance understanding of mucosal immunity mechanisms in children following live-attenuated influenza vaccination. This knowledge could help inform the development of future mucosal vaccines for children, potentially increasing both effectiveness, ease of delivery and tolerability in this vulnerable population. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:This protocol has been reviewed by the sponsor, collaborators and external peer reviewers. Ethical approval for this study has been obtained from the South Central - Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee (REC ref 24/SC/0251). Informed parental consent will be obtained prior to any study intervention. The results will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at international conferences. STUDY REGISTRATION:ISRCTN87260269 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN87260269).

Abstract Background Plasmodium vivax malaria relapses are a major source of morbidity and onward transmission of infection. The underlying mechanisms are poorly understood and current therapies sub-optimal. We examined the safety and feasibility of a controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) model for relapsing P. vivax . Methods We conducted an open-label, proof-of-concept, CHMI study of relapsing P. vivax . Healthy, malaria-naïve, Duffy-positive adults aged 18–45 years with extensive CYP2D6 metaboliser phenotype and normal blood glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) levels were recruited in Oxford, UK. Mosquito-bite CHMI was performed in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, using Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes infected with PvW1, a clonal isolate of P. vivax from Thailand. All follow-up visits were conducted in Oxford, UK. Primary P. vivax infections (qPCR > 500 genome copies/mL) were treated with artemether-lumefantrine (80mg/480mg at 8, 24, 36, 48 and 60 hours). From Day 28 following CHMI, participants attended a fortnightly clinic for clinical review and qPCR blood sampling, with additional assessments performed for any reported symptoms. P. vivax relapse infections (qPCR > 500 genome copies/mL) were treated with artemether-lumefantrine as per primary infection. Definitive anti-malarial treatment with atovaquone-proguanil (1000mg/400mg once daily for three days) and primaquine (0·5 mg/kg/day for 14 days) was administered six months following CHMI, regardless of parasitaemia or symptoms. The primary objective was to assess the safety, feasibility and frequency of relapsing P. vivax after CHMI. Remote follow-up (5 years) is ongoing. The study is registered with ISRCTN registry ( ISRCTN48625883 ). Findings 20 participants were screened for eligibility from 21 January 2025. Five participants (median age 22 years) underwent CHMI (five infected mosquitoes per participant) on 15 April 2025. All participants developed primary P. vivax infection and experienced at least one relapse infection. Two participants experienced a second relapse. Overall incidence rate was 3·6 relapse infections per person-year. Solicited adverse events were mild or moderate and there were no serious adverse events. Definitive anti-malarial treatment was administered to all participants. One participant experienced primaquine-induced methaemoglobinaemia, resolving with early discontinuation of treatment (total dose 5·3 mg/kg). To date, more than six months after primaquine treatment, no further relapses have been recorded. Interpretation CHMI of relapsing P. vivax is safe and feasible, allowing exploration of the mechanisms underlying relapse infections and providing a platform for future anti-relapse efficacy studies. Funding European Union Horizon Europe programme and UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) via OptiViVax consortium; UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre: Oxford; and UK Medical Research Council. Research in Context Evidence before this study Relapse infections account for the majority of cases of Plasmodium vivax malaria. There are no licensed vaccines for P. vivax and current anti-relapse hypnozoiticidal therapies (primaquine and tafenoquine) have restrictive contraindications, side effects and variable efficacy. A controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) model for relapsing P. vivax , using a well-characterised clonal isolate of P. vivax administered by mosquito bite, would present an opportunity to improve understanding of hypnozoite immuno-biology and provide a platform for efficacy studies of novel anti-relapse interventions. We searched PubMed on 23 April 2026 for research articles using the terms (“P. vivax” OR “Plasmodium vivax” OR “vivax”) AND (“malaria challenge” OR “Controlled Human Malaria Infection” OR “CHMI” OR “sporozoite challenge”). No date or language filters were applied. The search identified seven published CHMI studies in which P. vivax was administered by mosquito bite. All these studies utilised mosquitoes infected from a source patient(s) with naturally-acquired infection, thereby limiting interstudy comparison and creating logistical challenges for reproducibility. Only one study reported relapse infections which occurred following primaquine treatment in two participants with poor and intermediate CYP2D6 metaboliser phenotype respectively. In addition to this PubMed search, historical records were identified which described the deliberate infection of humans with P. vivax i) in experiments conducted in the early 20 th Century, and ii) as part of malariotherapy for the treatment of “general paralysis of the insane” (neurosyphilis). Although some of these records used well-characterised strains of P. vivax (e.g. Madagascar strain) and included relapse infections, these pre-dated modern molecular and serological laboratory techniques. Having previously generated a cryopreserved inoculum of P. vivax -infected red blood cells (PvW1) with high-quality genome assembly, we set out to administer this clonal isolate in a CHMI study by mosquito bite, and characterise P. vivax relapse infections over a six-month period prior to the administration of primaquine treatment. Added value of this study This study reports the administration of PvW1 by mosquito bite to five healthy adult participants in the UK. All participants developed primary P. vivax infection and experienced at least one relapse infection in a six-month follow-up period. Two participants experienced a second relapse infection prior to the administration of definitive anti-malarial treatment with atovaquone-proguanil and primaquine. Solicited adverse events (foreseeable symptoms of malaria) were mild or moderate. Long-term remote follow-up is ongoing. However, to date, more than six months after primaquine treatment, no further relapse infections have been recorded. To our knowledge, this is the first CHMI study in the modern era to administer a well-characterised clonal isolate of P. vivax by mosquito bite. We demonstrate that a CHMI model for relapsing P. vivax is safe and feasible. Implications of all the available evidence The World Health Organisation (WHO) Technical Brief on the Control and Elimination of Plasmodium vivax Malaria calls for better understanding of the biology and epidemiology of P. vivax, and the development of new interventions and strategies. Specifically, it highlights a need for improved knowledge of the underlying mechanisms of P. vivax relapse infections; a single-dose hypnozoiticidal treatment that can be used for all population groups without significant side effects; and development of P. vivax vaccines. CHMI studies allow the study of host-pathogen interactions in detail and accelerate the development of vaccines and therapeutic drugs by providing evidence of efficacy early in clinical development. This proof-of-concept study presents an opportunity to explore the mechanisms behind hypnozoite formation and activation in humans, and provides a novel clinical platform for future drug and vaccine efficacy studies.

BACKGROUND:Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are major causes of respiratory infections globally. Viral and bacterial co-infections are commonly observed in respiratory infections and there is evidence that these pathogens interact synergistically to evade host responses and lead to more severe disease. Notably, RSV seasonal outbreaks are associated with increased hospitalization and a subsequent peak in invasive pneumococcal disease cases, particularly in pediatric populations. Here, we summarize a protocol for a controlled human infection model aiming to evaluate pathogen interaction dynamics and immune responses in a combined pneumococcus and RSV model. The primary objective is to determine whether primary RSV challenge increases the risk of secondary pneumococcal colonization. METHODS:This is an open-label, multi-center, randomized controlled human co-infection study, inclusive of a pilot phase. Individuals will be randomized to primary inoculation with either pneumococcus (serotype 6B) or RSV (subtype RSV-A) intra-nasally on day 0 followed by a reciprocal challenge on day 7. During pilot phase A up to 10 participants will be monitored in an in-patient facility for 7-10 days following RSV-A challenge. If there are no safety concerns, we will then progress to an outpatient phase where participants will self-isolate at home. Clinical samples to be taken from participants include nasal swabs and washes for pathogen detection; and nasal cells, nasal lining fluid, and blood samples to examine mucosal and systemic immune responses. DISCUSSION:This work will lead to important scientific knowledge on the interaction and dynamics between pneumococcus and RSV. This knowledge could help inform pneumococcal and RSV vaccination strategies, particularly for groups at risk of developing severe pneumococcal and RSV disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION:The study is registered on ISRCTN (The UKs Clinical Study Registry). DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12036902.

Objectives Evaluation of the safety and humoral immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 as a fourth dose booster in individuals who have had two initial doses of the vaccine and a third dose of BNT162b2. Methods COV009 is a safety follow-up study of volunteers enroled in the pivotal pre-licensure ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. In this sub-study, 149 eligible participants were given a fourth dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Primary outcomes were reactogenicity, safety, and humoral immunogenicity. Anti-spike IgG and pseudo-neutralising antibody against multiple variants were measured from pre-first dose to 28 days post-second and post-fourth dose (third dose samples were unavailable). Results A fourth dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 had an acceptable safety profile with no vaccine-related serious adverse events. Humoral responses against various SARS CoV-2 variants post-fourth dose were significantly increased compared with the responses after the second dose (7- to 9-fold increase for anti-spike IgG responses across variants, all p<0.05). Those with lower antibody levels prior to the 4th dose had stronger responses to a 4th dose booster. Seropositivity by anti-nucleocapsid, or higher antibody responses pre-fourth dose correlated with lower infection risks six months thereafter (OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.50). Conclusions The ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 fourth dose is well tolerated and boosts humoral immunity; this was evident as an increased humoral response across multiple variants of concern. These data support its use as a booster dose against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Capsular group B meningococcus (MenB) remains an important cause of disease globally, and additional vaccines against MenB would aid in reducing the incidence of infection. Previous work has demonstrated that a MenB adenoviral-vectored vaccine, ChAdOx1 MenB.1, elicited high serum bactericidal responses in preclinical models after a single dose, supporting further clinical development of this vaccine. Here, we report the results of a trial designed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 MenB.1 in healthy adults aged 18 to 50. In this phase 1/2a, single-center trial, participants received one or two doses of ChAdOx1 MenB.1 at days 0 and 180. One dose of ChAdOx1 MenB.1 was also given at day 180 to some individuals primed with one dose of 4CMenB at day 0. Participants recorded their symptoms in an electronic diary after vaccination, and safety blood readouts were monitored. Serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) assays were performed against a panel of MenB target strains. ChAdOx1 MenB.1 was well tolerated with no safety concerns and elicited protective SBA titers against a MenB strain expressing a homologous factor H-binding protein (fHbp) variant in 100% of participants after two doses. However, cross-reactivity analysis indicated a low SBA response to strains expressing heterologous fHbp, suggesting that a multivalent vaccine may be needed. In sum, ChAdOx1 MenB.1 is immunogenic in humans, and addition of another fHbp variant or of another antigen in this platform could provide an approach to extend protection against endemic MenB disease.

We developed an in-house RT-qPCR assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 from different sample types. Novel primer and probe sets were designed to amplify 2 regions of the nucleocapsid (N) gene. Two dual-target multiplex assays were then evaluated for performance in detection of SARS-CoV-2 in known samples. An assay combining one novel primer pair for N (N6), a published region for the envelope protein (E) and an extraction control target (MS2), was found to have good efficiency and a low limit of detection, and to be sensitive and specific for SARS-CoV-2 in a sample set of known positive and negative clinical samples. Assay performance was maintained for the main variants of concern (Alpha, Delta, Gamma and Omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA4, JN.1). The assay was used to test for SARS-CoV-2 in throat swab samples collected in schools from teenagers in the UK as part of an observational study of two Meningococcal B Vaccines in Jan-March 2020. The low prevalence of positives identified (0.44-0.47% in two weeks of March 2020) suggests that there was minimal circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in UK schools prior to the first lockdown. The N6/E/MS2 assay has since been used to detect SARS-CoV-2 in samples from multiple studies. Continual monitoring will ensure that performance of this novel multiplex assay is maintained as novel sub-variants emerge. ### Competing Interest Statement AF was lead or co-investigator of several trials of COVID19 vaccines including the following: Oxford-AstraZeneca, Valneva, Sanofi-GSK. He also was lead or co-investigator on epidemiological studies of SARS CoV2 infection funding by the UK Government and Pfizer. All related research funding was paid to his employer. AF also undertakes paid consultancy for several vaccine manufacturers and developers, although only work for Sanofi relates to COVID19 ### Funding Statement This work was funded in part by University of Bristol Emergency funding awarded to AF and Langford Vets Ltd research funds awarded to PL and CH. AF, ADD, BMA & AH acknowledge funding towards this work from Elizabeth Blackwell Institute, funded in part by the Wellcome Trust [Grant number 204813/Z/16/Z] with additional support from Bristol Alumni and Friends (DARO). We also acknowledge funding via a 2020/21 COVID 19 Research Award Funded by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) for the testing of the Be On The Team (BOTT) OPS STGG samples. 'Be on the TEAM', 'Evaluating the effect of 'MenB' vaccination on meningococcal carriage', PR-R18- 0117- 21001 (BOTT) was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme. We also acknowledge Meningitis Now funding which enabled the storage and curation of throat swab samples from the Be on the Team study, and The NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and the Rockinghorse charity, Brighton (RH20-13) who co-funded the SARS-CoV-2 qPCR analysis of the samples. ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: Bristol (Immunity & Infection) Biobank Management Committee of University of Bristol gave ethical approval for the Biobank samples under use application U0042. The NHS Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for the use of the Be on The Team samples (UKMenCar4 reference 14/SC/1163, Be on the TEAM reference 18/SC/0055). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

BACKGROUND:Paediatric COVID-19 vaccination programmes were initiated in response to the coronavirus pandemic declared by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2020. Ten COVID-19 vaccines received WHO Emergency Use Listing, however, only five were approved for use in children. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) was approved in adults in a two-dose regimen. We previously reported interim findings of a phase 2 study of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in children with immunogenicity, comparable with adults. Final results after 12 month follow-up are reported. METHODS:Single-blind, randomised controlled trial across four UK centres, recruiting 261 children and adolescents (aged 6-17 years). Participants received either two doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or Bexsero vaccine (controls). The primary outcome was safety (adverse events for 28 days following vaccination and serious adverse events throughout), and secondary outcome was immunogenicity (measured by SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot)). FINDINGS:Five serious adverse events and four adverse events of special interest were reported. None were related to study vaccinations, and there were no deaths. Geometric mean titres (GMTs) from an anti-spike (Wuhan) ELISA in participants aged 6-11 years were 1 EU/ml (95% CI 1-2) at baseline versus 796 EU (95% CI 161-3948, n =4) at D364. In participants aged 12-17 years, GMTs were 1 EU/ml (95% CI 1-2, n=3) at baseline versus 1432 EU/ml (95% CI 2337-6083; n=6) at D364 (2 dose regimen at 112-day interval), compared to 3 EU/ml (95% CI 0-62) at baseline versus 392 EU/ml (95% CI 24, 6493; n=3) at D364 (2 dose regimen at a 28-day interval). INTERPRETATION:A two-dose regimen of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was immunogenic and safe in the trial population. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. Immune responses persisted to 12 months in participants who did not experience breakthrough infection, This trial was registered with ISRCTN, trial number 15638344. FUNDING:The study was funded by the Department of Health and Social Care, through the National Institute for Health Research, and AstraZeneca.

Background Pneumococcal carriage in healthy adults and its relationship to invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) is not well understood.Methods Nasal wash samples from adults without close contact with young children (Liverpool, UK), 2011-2019, were cultured, and culture-negative samples tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Pneumococcal carriage in adults 18-44 years was compared with carriage among pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-vaccinated children aged 13-48 months (nasopharyngeal swabs, Thames Valley, UK) and national IPD data, 2014-2019. Age group-specific serotype invasiveness was calculated and used with national IPD data to estimate carriage serotype distributions for >= 65 years.Results Overall, 98 isolates (97 carriers) were identified (3 solely by PCR) from 1631 >= 18 years adults (standardized carriage prevalence 6.4%). Despite different carriage and IPD serotype distributions between adults and children, serotype invasiveness was highly correlated (R = 0.9). Serotypes 3, 37, and 8 represented a higher proportion of adult carriage than expected. Predicted carriage serotype distributions for >= 65 years aligned closest with the young adult carriage serotype distribution.Conclusions Nasal wash technique is highly sensitive. For some serotypes carried by adults aged >= 65 years, other adults may be an important reservoir for transmission. Age groups such as older children should also be considered.

The effect of the Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine on the immunogenicity of separately administered serogroup C meningococcal vaccine and other vaccinations was examined in 28 infants randomized to receive BCG at age ≤7 days, at 3 months or after study completion. Immunogenicity of the serogroup C meningococcal vaccine and other routine vaccines might be improved when BCG is administered in early infancy.

AbstractBackgroundMonitoring changes in pharyngeal carriage of pneumococcus in children following 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) introduction in the United Kingdom in 2010 informs understanding of patterns of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) incidence.MethodsNasopharyngeal swabs from healthy children vaccinated with PCV13 according to schedule (2, 4, and 12 months) were cultured and serotyped. Results for children aged 13–48 months were compared between 2014–2015 and 2017–2019 and with children aged 6–12 months (2017–2020). Blood was obtained from a subset of children for pneumococcal serotype-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG).ResultsTotal pneumococcal carriage at 13–48 months was 47.9% (473/988) in 2014–2015 and 51.8% (412/795) in 2017–2019 (P = .10); at age 6–12 months this value was 44.6% (274/615). In 2017–2019, 2.9% (95% confidence interval, 1.8%–4.3%) of children aged 13–48 months carried PCV13 serotypes (mainly 3 [1.5%] and 19A [0.8%]) and >20% carried the additional 20-valent PCV (PCV20) serotypes. Similar proportions of children had IgG ≥0.35 IU/mL for each serotype in 2014–2015 and 2017–2019. Serotype 7C carriage increased significantly (P < .01) between 2014–2015 and 2017–2019. Carriage of PCV20 serotypes 8 and 12F, both major causes of IPD, was rare.ConclusionsIntroduction of PCV20, if licensed for children, could significantly change the composition of pneumococcal serotypes carried in the pharynx of UK children.Clinical Trials RegistrationNCT03102840.

SARS-CoV-2 infections in children are generally asymptomatic or mild and rarely progress to severe disease and hospitalization. Why this is so remains unclear. Here we explore the potential for protection due to pre-existing cross-reactive seasonal coronavirus antibodies and compare the rate of antibody decline for nucleocapsid and spike protein in serum and oral fluid against SARS-CoV-2 within the pediatric population. No differences in seasonal coronaviruses antibody concentrations were found at baseline between cases and controls, suggesting no protective effect from pre-existing immunity against seasonal coronaviruses. Antibodies against seasonal betacoronaviruses were boosted in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. In serum, anti-nucleocapsid antibodies fell below the threshold of positivity more quickly than anti-spike protein antibodies. These findings add to our understanding of protection against infection with SARS-CoV-2 within the pediatric population, which is important when considering pediatric SARS-CoV-2 immunization policies.

Background: This was the first study to investigate the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of heterologous or fractional second dose COVID-19 vaccine regimens in adolescents.Methods: A phase II, single-blind, multi-centre, randomised-controlled trial recruited across seven UK sites from September to November 2021, with follow-up visits to August 2022. Healthy 12-to-16 years olds were randomised (1:1:1) to either 30 & mu;g BNT162b2 (BNT-30), 10 & mu;g BNT162b2 (BNT-10), or NVX-CoV2373 (NVX), 8 weeks after a first 30 & mu;g dose of BNT162b2. The primary outcome was solicited systemic reactions in the week following vaccination. Secondary outcomes included immunogenicity and safety. 'Breakthrough infection' analyses were exploratory.Findings: 148 participants were recruited (median age 14 years old, 62% female, 26% anti-nucleocapsid IgG seropositive pre-second dose); 132 participants received a second dose. Reactions were mostly mild -to moderate, with lower rates in BNT-10 recipients. No vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred. Compared to BNT-30, at 28 days post-second dose anti-spike antibody responses were similar for NVX (adjusted geometric mean ratio [aGMR]) 1.09 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84, 1.42] and lower for BNT-10 (aGMR 0.78 [95% CI: 0.61, 0.99]). For Omicron BA.1 and BA.2, the neutralising antibody titres for BNT-30 at day 28 were similar for BNT-10 (aGMR 1.0 [95% CI: 0.65, 1.54] and 1.02 [95% CI: 0.71, 1.48], respectively), but higher for NVX (aGMR 1.7 [95% CI: 1.07, 2.69] and 1.43 [95% CI: 0.96, 2.12], respectively). Compared to BNT30, cellular immune responses were greatest for NVX (aGMR 1.73 [95% CI: 0.94, 3.18]), and lowest for BNT10 (aGMR 0.65 [95% CI: 0.37, 1.15]) at 14 days post-second dose. Cellular responses were similar across the study arms by day 236 post-second dose. Amongst SARS-CoV-2 infection naive participants, NVX participants had an 89% reduction in risk of self-reported 'breakthrough infection' compared to BNT-30 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.11 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.86]) up until day 132 after second dose. BNT-10 recipients were more likely to have a 'breakthrough infection' compared to BNT-30 (aHR 2.14 [95% CI: 1.02, 4.51]) up to day 132 and day 236 post-second dose. Antibody responses at 132 and 236 days after second dose were similar for all vaccine schedules. Interpretation: Heterologous and fractional dose COVID-19 vaccine schedules in adolescents are safe, well tolerated and immunogenic. The enhanced performance of the heterologous schedule using NVX-CoV2373 against the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant suggests this mRNA prime and protein-subunit boost schedule may provide a greater breadth of protection than the licensed homologous schedule. Funding: National Institute for Health Research and Vaccine Task Force. Trial Registration: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry: 12348322.& COPY; 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

ObjectiveTo understand community seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adolescents. This is vital to understanding the susceptibility of this cohort to COVID-19 and to inform public health policy for disease control such as immunisation.DesignWe conducted a community-based cross-sectional seroprevalence study in participants aged 0–18 years old recruiting from seven regions in England between October 2019 and June 2021 and collecting extensive demographic and symptom data. Serum samples were tested for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins using Roche assays processed at UK Health Security Agency laboratories. Prevalence estimates were calculated for six time periods and were standardised by age group, ethnicity and National Health Service region.ResultsPost-first wave (June–August 2020), the (anti-spike IgG) adjusted seroprevalence was 5.2%, varying from 0.9% (participants 10–14 years old) to 9.5% (participants 5–9 years old). By April–June 2021, this had increased to 19.9%, varying from 13.9% (participants 0–4 years old) to 32.7% (participants 15–18 years old). Minority ethnic groups had higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity than white participants (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.0), after adjusting for sex, age, region, time period, deprivation and urban/rural geography. In children <10 years, there were no symptoms or symptom clusters that reliably predicted seropositivity. Overall, 48% of seropositive participants with complete questionnaire data recalled no symptoms between February 2020 and their study visit.ConclusionsApproximately one-third of participants aged 15–18 years old had evidence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 prior to the introduction of widespread vaccination. These data demonstrate that ethnic background is independently associated with risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children.Trial registration numberNCT04061382.

BACKGROUND:Heterologous COVID vaccine priming schedules are immunogenic and effective. This report aims to understand the persistence of immune response to the viral vectored, mRNA and protein-based COVID-19 vaccine platforms used in homologous and heterologous priming combinations, which will inform the choice of vaccine platform in future vaccine development. METHODS:Com-COV2 was a single-blinded trial in which adults ≥ 50 years, previously immunised with single dose 'ChAd' (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, AZD1222, Vaxzevria, Astrazeneca) or 'BNT' (BNT162b2, tozinameran, Comirnaty, Pfizer/BioNTech), were randomised 1:1:1 to receive a second dose 8-12 weeks later with either the homologous vaccine, or 'Mod' (mRNA-1273, Spikevax, Moderna) or 'NVX' (NVX-CoV2373, Nuvaxovid, Novavax). Immunological follow-up and the secondary objective of safety monitoring were performed over nine months. Analyses of antibody and cellular assays were performed on an intention-to-treat population without evidence of COVID-19 infection at baseline or for the trial duration. FINDINGS:In April/May 2021, 1072 participants were enrolled at a median of 9.4 weeks after receipt of a single dose of ChAd (N = 540, 45% female) or BNT (N = 532, 39% female) as part of the national vaccination programme. In ChAd-primed participants, ChAd/Mod had the highest anti-spike IgG from day 28 through to 6 months, although the heterologous vs homologous geometric mean ratio (GMR) dropped from 9.7 (95% CI (confidence interval): 8.2, 11.5) at D28 to 6.2 (95% CI: 5.0, 7.7) at D196. The heterologous/homologous GMR for ChAd/NVX similarly dropped from 3.0 (95% CI:2.5,3.5) to 2.4 (95% CI:1.9, 3.0). In BNT-primed participants, decay was similar between heterologous and homologous schedules with BNT/Mod inducing the highest anti-spike IgG for the duration of follow-up. The adjusted GMR (aGMR) for BNT/Mod compared with BNT/BNT increased from 1.36 (95% CI: 1.17, 1.58) at D28 to 1.52 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.90) at D196, whilst for BNT/NVX this aGMR was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.64) at day 28 and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.78) at day 196. Heterologous ChAd-primed schedules produced and maintained the largest T-cell responses until D196. Immunisation with BNT/NVX generated a qualitatively different antibody response to BNT/BNT, with the total IgG significantly lower than BNT/BNT during all follow-up time points, but similar levels of neutralising antibodies. INTERPRETATION:Heterologous ChAd-primed schedules remain more immunogenic over time in comparison to ChAd/ChAd. BNT-primed schedules with a second dose of either mRNA vaccine also remain more immunogenic over time in comparison to BNT/NVX. The emerging data on mixed schedules using the novel vaccine platforms deployed in the COVID-19 pandemic, suggest that heterologous priming schedules might be considered as a viable option sooner in future pandemics. ISRCTN:27841311 EudraCT:2021-001275-16.

Abstract Background People with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) on antiretroviral therapy (ART) with good CD4 T-cell counts make effective immune responses following vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). There are few data on longer term responses and the impact of a booster dose. Methods Adults with HIV were enrolled into a single arm open label study. Two doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 were followed 12 months later by a third heterologous vaccine dose. Participants had undetectable viraemia on ART and CD4 counts >350 cells/µL. Immune responses to the ancestral strain and variants of concern were measured by anti-spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), MesoScale Discovery (MSD) anti-spike platform, ACE-2 inhibition, activation induced marker (AIM) assay, and T-cell proliferation. Findings In total, 54 participants received 2 doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. 43 received a third dose (42 with BNT162b2; 1 with mRNA-1273) 1 year after the first dose. After the third dose, total anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG titers (MSD), ACE-2 inhibition, and IgG ELISA results were significantly higher compared to Day 182 titers (P < .0001 for all 3). SARS-CoV-2 specific CD4+ T-cell responses measured by AIM against SARS-CoV-2 S1 and S2 peptide pools were significantly increased after a third vaccine compared to 6 months after a first dose, with significant increases in proliferative CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 S1 and S2 after boosting. Responses to Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta variants were boosted, although to a lesser extent for Omicron. Conclusions In PWH receiving a third vaccine dose, there were significant increases in B- and T-cell immunity, including to known variants of concern (VOCs).

In January 2020 the UK changed from a 2 + 1 schedule for 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) to a 1 + 1 schedule (doses at 3 and 12 months) based on a randomized immunogenicity trial comparing the two schedules. Carriage prevalence measured at the time of booster and 6 months later in 191 of the 213 study infants was 57 % (109/191) and 60 % (114/190) respectively. There were eight episodes of vaccine-type (VT) or vaccine-related 6C carriage in the 2 + 1 and six in the 1 + 1 group; >= 4-fold rises in serotype-specific IgG in 71 children with paired post-booster and follow up blood sam -ples at 21-33 months of age were found in 20 % (7/35) of the 2 + 1 and 15 % (6/41) of the 1 + 1 group. VTs identified in carriage and inferred from serology were similar comprising 3, 19A and 19F. Dropping a priming dose from the 2 + 1 PCV 13 schedule did not increase VT carriage in the study cohort. Ongoing population level carriage studies will be important to confirm this. Crown Copyright (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

AbstractThe trajectory of immune responses following the primary dose series determines the decline in vaccine effectiveness over time. Here we report on maintenance of immune responses during the year following a two-dose schedule of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AZD1222, in the absence of infection, and also explore the decay of antibody after infection. Total spike-specific IgG antibody titres were lower with two low doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines (two low doses) (P = 0.0006) than with 2 standard doses (the approved dose) or low dose followed by standard dose vaccines regimens. Longer intervals between first and second doses resulted in higher antibody titres (P < 0.0001); however, there was no evidence that the trajectory of antibody decay differed by interval or by vaccine dose, and the decay of IgG antibody titres followed a similar trajectory after a third dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Trends in post-infection samples were similar with an initial rapid decay in responses but good persistence of measurable responses thereafter. Extrapolation of antibody data, following two doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19, demonstrates a slow rate of antibody decay with modelling, suggesting that antibody titres are well maintained for at least 2 years. These data suggest a persistent immune response after two doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 which will likely have a positive impact against serious disease and hospitalization.

Duration of protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection in people living with HIV (PWH) following vaccination is unclear. In a substudy of the phase II/III the COV002 trial (NCT04400838), 54 HIV+ male participants on antiretroviral therapy (undetectable viral loads, CD4+ T cells > 350 cells/μL) received 2 doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) 4–6 weeks apart and were followed for 6 months. Responses to vaccination were determined by serology (IgG ELISA and Meso Scale Discovery [MSD]), neutralization, ACE-2 inhibition, IFN-γ ELISpot, activation-induced marker (AIM) assay and T cell proliferation. We show that, 6 months after vaccination, the majority of measurable immune responses were greater than prevaccination baseline but with evidence of a decline in both humoral and cell-mediated immunity. There was, however, no significant difference compared with a cohort of HIV-uninfected individuals vaccinated with the same regimen. Responses to the variants of concern were detectable, although they were lower than WT. Preexisting cross-reactive T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike were associated with greater postvaccine immunity and correlated with prior exposure to beta coronaviruses. These data support the ongoing policy to vaccinate PWH against SARS-CoV-2, and they underpin the need for long-term monitoring of responses after vaccination.

BackgroundThere are known differences in vaccine reactogenicity and immunogenicity by sex. Females have been shown to report greater reactogenicity and generate higher humoral and cellular immune responses than males following vaccination with several different vaccines. Whether this is also the case for COVID-19 vaccines is currently unknown, as COVID-19 vaccine study data disaggregated by sex are not routinely reported. Therefore, we have assessed the influence of sex on reactogenicity, immunogenicity and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19.MethodsVaccine efficacy was assessed in 15169 volunteers enrolled into single-blind randomised controlled trials of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in Brazil and the UK, with the primary endpoint defined as nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT)-positive symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. All participants were electronically randomised to receive two standard doses of vaccine or the control product. Logistic regression models were fitted to explore the effect of age and sex on reactogenicity, and linear models fitted to log-transformed values for immunogenicity data. Reactogenicity data were taken from self-reported diaries of 788 trial participants. Pseudovirus neutralisation assay data were available from 748 participants and anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG assay data from 1543 participants.Findings7619 participants received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and 7550 received the control. Vaccine efficacy in participants after two doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (4243 females and 3376 males) was 66.1% (95% CI 55.9-73.9%) in males and 59.9% (95% CI 49.8-67.9%) in females; with no evidence of a difference in efficacy between the sexes (vaccine by sex interaction term P=0.3359). A small, statistically significant difference in anti-spike IgG was observed (adjusted GMR 1.14; 95% CI 1.04-1.26), with higher titres in females than males, but there were no statistically significant differences in other immunological endpoints. Whilst the majority of individuals reported at least one systemic reaction following a first dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, females were twice as likely as males to report any systemic reaction after a first dose (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.37-2.77). Measured fever of 38°C or above was reported in 5% of females and 1% of males following first doses. Headache and fatigue were the most commonly reported reactions in both sexes.InterpretationOur results show that there is no evidence of difference in efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in males and females. Greater reactogenicity in females was not associated with any difference in vaccine efficacy.FundingStudies were registered with ISRCTN 90906759 (COV002) and ISRCTN 89951424 (COV003) and follow-up is ongoing. Funding was received from the UK Research and Innovation, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Science, Thames Valley and South Midlands NIHR Clinical Research Network, the Lemann Foundation, Rede D'Or, the Brava and Telles Foundation, the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior, Brazil, and AstraZeneca.