Biopsy site infection in the setting of osteosarcoma is a potentially devastating complication. We present the case of a 16-year-old adolescent girl with a distal femur osteosarcoma who developed an open biopsy site ulceration and infection after initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This was treated with careful local excision of the ulcerated biopsy site and systemic antibiotic therapy throughout the duration of her chemotherapy course. She subsequently underwent wide resection of the tumor en bloc with a generous ellipse around the biopsy scar and reconstruction with cemented knee megaprosthesis. No recurrence of either infection or malignancy was observed. This case represents the successful treatment of a biopsy site ulceration and infection in a patient with osteosarcoma and may merit adoption in future instances of this complication.

1. INTRODUCTION The utility of robotics in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. This systematic literature review with a meta-analysis was performed to determine if robotics/computer assisted (RAS/CAS) TKA improved patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared to conventional TKA. 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature search was performed for all studies comparing outcomes between Conventional and RAS/CAS TKA. Included studies directly compared RAS/CAS TKA and conventional TKA post-operative PROMs. Outcome measures included 2011 KSS, KSS, HSS, WOMAC, and OKS. Articles that did not directly compare RAS/CAS and conventional TKA and articles with Minors criteria <12 were excluded. 3. RESULTS Final analysis was performed on 22 studies which included 4009 TKAs with average follow-up of 52.9 months. 17 studies were evaluated for KSS scores, and moderate statistical heterogeneity was detected (τ 2 = 0.018; χ 2 = 28.29, df=16, p=0.03, I 2 =43). RAS/CAS TKA was favored over conventional TKA with a higher KSS score (SMD = 0.10; 95% CI: 0.0-0.21). 6 studies were evaluated for HSS scores and no statistical heterogeneity was detected (τ 2 = 0; χ 2 = 4.90, df=5, p=0.43, I 2 =0%), however RAS/CAS TKA was favored over conventional TKA with a higher HSS knee score (SMD = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.17-0.45). 4. CONCLUSIONS This review shows that RAS/CAS TKA demonstrates promise in improving PROMs post-operatively compared to conventional TKA. However, it remains unclear how much these improvements translate to clinical impact. Continued analysis is warranted to further elucidate the impact of RAS/CAS on TKA.

The impact of fulfillment of patient expectations throughout recovery on satisfaction in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not well understood. Utilizing a standardized TKA method with a robotically assisted (RA) platform, we investigated the impact of expectation fulfillment at 3-month (M) and 6-M on 1-year (Y) and 2-Y satisfaction. We hypothesize that early fulfillment of patient expectations is associated with improved midterm patient satisfaction. We also compare improvements in outcomes with RA-TKA to those of a recent large national TKA cohort study to determine whether RA-TKA meets or exceeds the current standard of care. One hundred six patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent robotic-assisted TKA by a single surgeon using the OMNIBotics system. Patients completed KOOS and New Knee Society Score (KSS) preoperatively and at 3M, 6M, 1Y, and 2Y postoperatively. Expectation fulfillment was subdivided into patients who were below or above the average expectation score pre-operatively, or fulfillment of expectation score at 3M and 6M post TKA. The satisfaction of each group was then compared at 1Y and 2Y post TKA. Study cohort outcomes were compared to contemporary literature from the Function and Outcomes Research for Comparative Effectiveness in Total Joint Replacement (FORCE–TJR) database. Patients with greater than average KSS expectation fulfillment at 3M reported significantly higher KSS satisfaction scores at 1Y (34.9 ± 5.3 vs 30.6 ± 6.7, p = 0.0012), and patients with greater than average 6M expectation fulfillment reported improved satisfaction at 1Y (33.9 ± 5.9 vs 31.1 ± 6.7, p = 0.0330) and 2Y (35.2 ± 4.8 vs 32.4 ± 6.8, p = 0.0323). When compared to the FORCE-TJR database, no significant differences in post-operative KOOS outcomes were observed except for Sports and Recreation, for which the RAS group demonstrated higher scores (65.5 ± 30.0 vs 53.0 ± 27.1 p < 0.0001); however, the study cohort reported significantly greater improvements in KOOS Pain, Symptoms, Sports and Recreation, and Quality of Life at multiple time points up to 2 years post TKA. High early-expectation fulfillment was associated with improved satisfaction at 1Y and 2Y, indicating the importance of managing patient-specific post-operative care to ensure patients reach their pre-operative goals. Greater improvements in all KOOS sub-scores and in absolute Sports and Recreation at 1Y and 2Y were observed in this robotic-assisted cohort compared to a large contemporary database, indicating that RAS meets or exceeds current standard of care benchmarks for patient-reported outcomes.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common pathology affecting the knee joint. Twenty percent of the cartilaginous tumors of bone are in the distal femur. This presents a challenge for treating patients with knee OA who also have ipsilateral distal femur cartilage tumors. We propose a classification system for knee OA with ipsilateral cartilaginous tumor and a treatment approach to address this issue. Intramedullary guides are avoided when performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in these patients so as not to further contaminate the femur with tumor cells. A non-image-based stereotactic surgical system is favored at our institution to achieve this goal. Seven patients underwent classification and treatment with TKA utilizing this approach. Average final follow-up was 15.3 months. Component align-ment averaged 89.2 degrees and all patients had 0 degrees of extension with an average flexion to 107.5 degrees. There were no postoperative complications and no radiographic evidence of component complication, tumor recurrence, or tumor expansion. Few studies have reported on the treatment of knee OA with concurrent cartilaginous tumor of the distal femur. All patients treated with the proposed approach had their OA successfully treated without complication related to their cartilaginous tumor or TKA components. This case series presents a novel classification and treatment algorithm to potentially guide arthroplasty surgeons in approach -ing these often-concurrent occurring pathologies.

Stony Brook University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA Abstract: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common pathology affecting the knee joint. Twenty percent of the cartilaginous tumors of bone are in the distal femur. This presents a challenge for treating patients with knee OA who also have ipsilateral distal femur cartilage tumors. We propose a classification system for knee OA with ipsilateral cartilaginous tumor and a treatment approach to address this issue. Intramedullary guides are avoided when performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in these patients so as not to further contaminate the femur with tumor cells. A non-image-based stereotactic surgical system is favored at our institution to achieve this goal. Seven patients underwent classification and treatment with TKA utilizing this approach. Average final follow-up was 15.3 months. Component alignment averaged 89.2° and all patients had 0° of extension with an average flexion to 107.5°. There were no postoperative complications and no radiographic evidence of component complication, tumor recurrence, or tumor expansion. Few studies have reported on the treatment of knee OA with concurrent cartilaginous tumor of the distal femur. All patients treated with the proposed approach had their OA successfully treated without complication related to their cartilaginous tumor or TKA components. This case series presents a novel classification and treatment algorithm to potentially guide arthroplasty surgeons in approaching these often-concurrent occurring pathologies.

Background Diabetes mellitus has been associated with significant perioperative complications in joint arthroplasty. In addition, many patients are unaware of their dysglycemic status, and the prevalence of undiagnosed dysglycemia in joint arthroplasty patients is unknown. Methods Several years ago, we began routine hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level screening in all our patients planning to undergo elective total hip and total knee arthroplasties. We retrospectively reviewed the HbA1c levels in our initial 663 patients. Results Forty-eight percent of these patients were found to be nondiabetic; 19% percent had a previous history of some level of dysglycemia. Most significantly, over one third, 33.6% of these patients were previously undiagnosed dysglycemic patients; 31% were diagnosed as prediabetic and 2.6% as diabetic. Conclusion Owing to the high prevalence of prediabetic patients who go on to develop diabetes and to the high correlation of poor glucose control with perioperative complications, we feel that it is imperative to identify this large number of previously undiagnosed dysglycemic patients. We recommend the routine screening of all patients planning to undergo major orthopedic procedures. Likewise, we recommend that identified patients be referred for diabetic counseling. We also recommend that patients with markedly elevated HbA1c levels have their elective surgery postponed until better glycemic control can be achieved.