In July 2015, personnel in the Alaska Division of Public Health's Section of Epidemiology became aware of an increase in the number of patients being treated in Anchorage hospital emergency departments for adverse reactions associated with use of synthetic cannabinoids (SCs). SCs are a chemically diverse class of designer drugs that bind to the same cannabinoid receptors as tetrahydrocannabinol, the main psychoactive component of cannabis. A public health investigation was initiated to describe clinical outcomes, characterize the outbreak, and identify SC chemicals circulating in Anchorage. During July 15, 2015-March 15, 2016, a total of 1,351 ambulance transports to Anchorage emergency departments for adverse SC reactions were identified. A review of charts obtained from two Anchorage hospitals determined that among 167 emergency department visits for adverse SC reactions during July 15-September 30, 2015, 11 (6.6%) involved a patient who required endotracheal intubation, 17 (10.2%) involved a patient who was admitted to the intensive care unit, and 66 (39.5%) involved a patient classified as being homeless. Testing of 25 product and paraphernalia samples collected from patients at one hospital identified 11 different SC chemicals. Educational outreach campaigns focused on the considerable health risks of using SCs need to complement judicial and law enforcement actions to reduce SC use.

Background: Minimizing the chest compression pause associated with application of a mechanical CPR device is a key component of optimal integration into the overall resuscitation process. As part of a multi-agency implementation project, Anchorage Fire Department deployed LUCAS CPR devices on BLS and ALS fire apparatus for initiation early in resuscitation efforts. A 2012 report identified the pause interval for device application as a key opportunity for quality improvement (QI). In early 2013 we began a QI initiative to reduce device application time interval and optimize the overall CPR process. To assess QI initiative effectiveness, we compared key CPR process metrics from before to during and after its implementation.Methods: We included all cases of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during 2012 and 2013 in which a mechanical CPR device was used and the defibrillator electronic record was available. Continuous ECG and impedance data were analyzed to measure chest compression fraction, duration of the pause from last manual to first mechanical compression, and duration of the longest overall pause in the resuscitation effort.Results: Compared to cases from 2012 (n = 61), median duration of the pause prior to first mechanical compression for cases from 2013 (n = 71) decreased from 21(15, 31) to 7 (4, 12) s (p < 0.001), while median chest compression fraction increased from 0.90 (0.88, 0.93) to 0.95 (0.93, 0.96)(p < 0.001). Median duration of the longest pause decreased from 25 (20, 35) to 13 (10, 20) s (p < 0.001), while the proportion of cases where the longest pause was for mechanical CPR application decreased from 74% to 31% (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Our QI initiative substantially reduced the duration of the pause prior to first mechanical compression. Combined with the simultaneous significant increase in compression fraction and significant decrease in duration of the longest pause, this finding strongly suggests a large improvement in mechanical CPR device application efficiency within an overall high-performance CPR process. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Background: Minimizing the chest compression pause associated with application of a mechanical CPR (mCPR) device is a key component of optimal integration of mCPR into the overall resuscitation process. As part of a multi-agency implementation project, Anchorage Fire Department deployed LUCAS mCPR devices on BLS and ALS vehicles for initiation early in resuscitation efforts. A 2012 report from that project identified the pause interval for mCPR device application as a key opportunity for quality improvement (QI). In early 2013 we began a QI initiative to reduce device application time and optimize the overall CPR process, which included education on the importance of minimizing pauses, training on techniques for efficient device application, and a requirement for two manual CPR cycles prior to initiation of mCPR. To assess QI initiative effectiveness, we compared key CPR process metrics from before to during and after its implementation. Methods: We included all cases of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during 2012 and 2013 in which mCPR was used and the defibrillator electronic record was available. Continuous ECG and impedance data were analyzed to measure chest compression fraction, duration of the pause from last manual to first mechanical compression, and duration of the longest overall pause in the resuscitation effort. Results: Compared to cases from 2012 (n=61), median (25th, 75th percentile) duration of the pause prior to first mCPR compression for cases from 2013 (n=71) decreased from 21 (15, 31) to 7 (4, 12) seconds (p<0.001), while median chest compression fraction increased from 0.90 (0.88, 0.93) to 0.95 (0.93, 0.96) (p<0.001). Median duration of the longest pause decreased from 25 (20, 35) to 13 (10, 20) seconds (p<0.001), while the proportion of cases where the longest pause was for mCPR device application decreased from 74% to 32% (p<0.001). Conclusions: Our QI initiative substantially reduced the duration of the pause prior to first mCPR compression. Combined with the simultaneous significant increase in compression fraction and significant decrease in duration of the longest pause, this finding strongly suggests a large improvement in mCPR device application efficiency within an overall high-performance CPR process.