Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of proteins and RNAs has emerged as the driving force underlying the formation of membrane-less organelles. Such biomolecular condensates have various biological functions and have been linked to disease. One of the best studied proteins undergoing LLPS is Fused in Sarcoma (FUS), a predominantly nuclear RNA-binding protein. Mutations in FUS have been causally linked to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), an adult-onset motor neuron disease, and LLPS followed by aggregation of cytoplasmic FUS has been proposed to be a crucial disease mechanism. In spite of this, it is currently unclear how LLPS impacts the behaviour of FUS in cells, e.g. its interactome. In order to study the consequences of LLPS on FUS and its interaction partners, we developed a method that allows for the purification of phase separated FUS-containing droplets from cell lysates. We observe substantial alterations in the interactome of FUS, depending on its biophysical state. While non-phase separated FUS interacts mainly with its well-known interaction partners involved in pre-mRNA processing, phase-separated FUS predominantly binds to proteins involved in chromatin remodelling and DNA damage repair. Interestingly, factors with function in mitochondria are strongly enriched with phase-separated FUS, providing a potential explanation for early changes in mitochondrial gene expression observed in mouse models of ALS-FUS. In summary, we present a methodology that allows to investigate the interactome of phase-separating proteins and provide evidence that LLPS strongly shapes the FUS interactome with important implications for function and disease.

Stress granules (SGs) are cytoplasmic foci that rapidly form when cells are exposed to stress. They transiently store mRNAs encoding house‐keeping proteins and allow the selective translation of stress‐response proteins (e.g. heat shock proteins). Besides mRNA, SGs contain RNA‐binding proteins, such as T cell internal antigen‐1 and poly(A)‐binding protein 1, which can serve as characteristic SG marker proteins. Recently, some of these SG marker proteins were found to label pathological TAR DNA binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP‐43)‐ or fused in sarcoma (FUS)‐positive cytoplasmic inclusions in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. In addition, protein aggregates in other neurodegenerative diseases (e.g. tau inclusions in Alzheimer's disease) show a co‐localization with T cell internal antigen‐1 as well. Moreover, several RNA‐binding proteins that are commonly found in SGs have been genetically linked to neurodegeneration. This suggests that SGs might play an important role in the pathogenesis of these proteinopathies, either by acting as a seed for pathological inclusions, by mediating translational repression or by trapping essential RNA‐binding proteins, or by a combination of these mechanisms. This minireview gives an overview of the general biology of SGs and highlights the recently identified connection of SGs with TDP‐43, FUS and other proteins involved in neurodegenerative diseases. We propose that pathological inclusions containing RNA‐binding proteins, such as TDP‐43 and FUS, might arise from SGs and discuss how SGs might contribute to neurodegeneration via toxic gain or loss‐of‐function mechanisms.

Cytoplasmic inclusions containing TAR DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP-43) or Fused in sarcoma (FUS) are a hallmark of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and several subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). FUS-positive inclusions in FTLD and ALS patients are consistently co-labeled with stress granule (SG) marker proteins. Whether TDP-43 inclusions contain SG markers is currently still debated. We determined the requirements for SG recruitment of FUS and TDP-43 and found that cytoplasmic mislocalization is a common prerequisite for SG recruitment of FUS and TDP-43. For FUS, the arginine-glycine-glycine zinc finger domain, which is the protein's main RNA binding domain, is most important for SG recruitment, whereas the glycine-rich domain and RNA recognition motif (RRM) domain have a minor contribution and the glutamine-rich domain is dispensable. For TDP-43, both the RRM1 and the C-terminal glycine-rich domain are required for SG localization. ALS-associated point mutations located in the glycine-rich domain of TDP-43 do not affect SG recruitment. Interestingly, a 25-kDa C-terminal fragment of TDP-43, which is enriched in FTLD/ALS cortical inclusions but not spinal cord inclusions, fails to be recruited into SG. Consistently, inclusions in the cortex of FTLD patients, which are enriched for C-terminal fragments, are not co-labeled with the SG marker poly(A)-binding protein 1 (PABP-1), whereas inclusions in spinal cord, which contain full-length TDP-43, are frequently positive for this marker protein.

Fused in sarcoma (FUS) is a nuclear protein that carries a proline‐tyrosine nuclear localization signal (PY‐NLS) and is imported into the nucleus via Transportin (TRN). Defects in nuclear import of FUS have been implicated in neurodegeneration, since mutations in the PY‐NLS of FUS cause amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Moreover, FUS is deposited in the cytosol in a subset of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) patients. Here, we show that arginine methylation modulates nuclear import of FUS via a novel TRN‐binding epitope. Chemical or genetic inhibition of arginine methylation restores TRN‐mediated nuclear import of ALS‐associated FUS mutants. The unmethylated arginine–glycine–glycine domain preceding the PY‐NLS interacts with TRN and arginine methylation in this domain reduces TRN binding. Inclusions in ALS‐FUS patients contain methylated FUS, while inclusions in FTLD‐FUS patients are not methylated. Together with recent findings that FUS co‐aggregates with two related proteins of the FET family and TRN in FTLD‐FUS but not in ALS‐FUS, our study provides evidence that these two diseases may be initiated by distinct pathomechanisms and implicates alterations in arginine methylation in pathogenesis. Defective nuclear import of fused in sarcoma (FUS) is linked to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Arginine methylation of FUS reduces its binding to the nuclear import receptor Transportin leading to cytoplasmic accumulation of methylated FUS in ALS‐FUS patient samples.

Cytoplasmic inclusions containing TDP-43 or FUS are a hallmark of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). FUS-positive inclusions in FTLD and ALS patients are consistently co-labeled with stress granule (SG) marker proteins, and TDP-43 has been found in SGs under various experimental conditions, suggesting that SGs are involved in the formation of TDP-43 and FUS inclusion. To determine the domains required for SG recruitment, we expressed deletion constructs of TDP-43 and FUS in Hela cells, exposed cells to heat stress and quantitatively analyzed the proteins localization in stress granules using confocal microscopy and Image J. For FUS, all three RNA binding domains (glycine-rich, RRM and zink finger domain) but not the prion-like glutamine-rich domain contributed to SG recruitment, suggesting that FUS is recruited into SGs by virtue of its RNA binding capacity. In contrast, RNA binding does not seem to be sufficient for SG recruitment of TDP-43, since both the RNA binding domain (RRM1) and the C-terminal glycine-rich domain were required for localization of TDP-43 in SGs. fALS-associated point mutations located in the glycine-rich domain of TDP-43 did not affect SG recruitment. Interestingly, a 25 kDa C-terminal fragment (CTF) of TDP-43, which is a biochemical hallmark of FTLD/ALS brains, failed to be recruited into SGs. TDP-43 and FUS have a differential requirement for stress granule recruitment: Whereas both proteins require their RNA binding domains, TDP-43 in addition requires its C-terminal glycine-rich region. Our data furthermore suggest that inclusions containing full length TDP-43 are positive for SG marker proteins, whereas inclusions consisting mostly of CTFs do not co-label with markers of SGs.

Accumulation of the DNA/RNA binding protein fused in sarcoma as cytoplasmic inclusions in neurons and glial cells is the pathological hallmark of all patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with mutations in FUS as well as in several subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration, which are not associated with FUS mutations. The mechanisms leading to inclusion formation and fused in sarcoma-associated neurodegeneration are only poorly understood. Because fused in sarcoma belongs to a family of proteins known as FET, which also includes Ewing's sarcoma and TATA-binding protein-associated factor 15, we investigated the potential involvement of these other FET protein family members in the pathogenesis of fused in sarcoma proteinopathies. Immunohistochemical analysis of FET proteins revealed a striking difference among the various conditions, with pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with FUS mutations being labelled exclusively for fused in sarcoma, whereas fused in sarcoma-positive inclusions in subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration also consistently immunostained for TATA-binding protein-associated factor 15 and variably for Ewing's sarcoma. Immunoblot analysis of proteins extracted from post-mortem tissue of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with fused in sarcoma pathology demonstrated a relative shift of all FET proteins towards insoluble protein fractions, while genetic analysis of the TATA-binding protein-associated factor 15 and Ewing's sarcoma gene did not identify any pathogenic variants. Cell culture experiments replicated the findings of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with FUS mutations by confirming the absence of TATA-binding protein-associated factor 15 and Ewing's sarcoma alterations upon expression of mutant fused in sarcoma. In contrast, all endogenous FET proteins were recruited into cytoplasmic stress granules upon general inhibition of Transportin-mediated nuclear import, mimicking the findings in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with fused in sarcoma pathology. These results allow a separation of fused in sarcoma proteinopathies caused by FUS mutations from those without a known genetic cause based on neuropathological features. More importantly, our data imply different pathological processes underlying inclusion formation and cell death between both conditions; the pathogenesis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with FUS mutations appears to be more restricted to dysfunction of fused in sarcoma, while a more global and complex dysregulation of all FET proteins is involved in the subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with fused in sarcoma pathology.

Mutations in fused in sarcoma (FUS) are a cause of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (fALS). Patients carrying point mutations in the C‐terminus of FUS show neuronal cytoplasmic FUS‐positive inclusions, whereas in healthy controls, FUS is predominantly nuclear. Cytoplasmic FUS inclusions have also been identified in a subset of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD‐FUS). We show that a non‐classical PY nuclear localization signal (NLS) in the C‐terminus of FUS is necessary for nuclear import. The majority of fALS‐associated mutations occur within the NLS and impair nuclear import to a degree that correlates with the age of disease onset. This presents the first case of disease‐causing mutations within a PY‐NLS. Nuclear import of FUS is dependent on Transportin, and interference with this transport pathway leads to cytoplasmic redistribution and recruitment of FUS into stress granules. Moreover, proteins known to be stress granule markers co‐deposit with inclusions in fALS and FTLD‐FUS patients, implicating stress granule formation in the pathogenesis of these diseases. We propose that two pathological hits, namely nuclear import defects and cellular stress, are involved in the pathogenesis of FUS‐opathies. The majority of familial ALS (fALS)‐associated mutations occurs within the nuclear localization signal (NLS) and impairs nuclear import. Nuclear import of FUS depends on Transportin and interference with this pathway leads to cytoplasmic redistribution and recruitment of FUS into stress granules.