Research designed to reduce or eliminate fishmeal (FM) in trout feeds, for reasons that have changed over time, has been conducted for over a century. Reducing the dependency on FM remains one of the most urgent issues facing the industry. Feed represents the most expensive operational cost of fed aquaculture, and is responsible for ecosystem disturbance following nutrient discharges. Rainbow trout, the second most farmed salmonid globally, can be raised completely without FM or fish oil (FO), with its growth and efficiency not differing from trout fed FM-based feeds. However, ingredient choice and nutrient supplementation strongly influence physiological responses, efficiency, and long-term outcomes. As land animal proteins are increasingly used in place of FM, both with and void of dietary FO, their distinct biological effects warrant focused evaluation. Although numerous studies have synthesized findings across various alternative protein categories including those with insect proteins and animal by-products, this literature is widely disseminated and sometimes difficult to access. The present contribution focuses on terrestrial/aerial animal proteins that have been used to totally replace FM in rainbow trout feeds. Attention is given to their effects on physiological control processes that may influence production efficiency. Areas worthy of future study are identified and include long-term performance and health dynamics, the refinement of nutritional and formulation strategies, and the broader evaluation of biological interactions and system-level outcomes.

Post-smolt Atlantic salmon were fed control (C), plant protein- (PP), and animal protein (AP)-based diets over a 90-day period. At trial start, the outline shape variation in the salmon body was recorded using two-dimensional Cartesian coordinates of a combination of 12 landmarks (LM) and three semi-landmarks from each of the 48 fish. The identical landmarks were then assessed at trial end for the differing dietary treatments. These datasets were used to determine whether diet exerted a measurable effect on body shape to enable authentication of fishmeal/fish oil-free status. Most differences in shape at trial end were visualized at the base of the dorsal and pelvic fins and caudal peduncle. The greatest shape variation between PP and AP groups was found at the base of the pectoral and pelvic fins. While PP and AP groups were more similar in shape than control fish, the recorded differences were not significant enough to verify dietary origins. The number of animals employed and the length of the trial period were likely insufficient to distinguish alterations in body shape with any certainty. Future trials should employ larger numbers of animals and be of longer length to verify whether PP-based feeds cause changes in body shape.

The influence of feeding Atlantic salmon for 90 days on diets that excluded fishmeal (FM) and fish oil (FO) was examined for influence on various quality traits. In addition, the effect of adding krill meal (KM; 0%, 2.5%, and 5%), as a putative feed palatant was also examined. Total replacement of FM/FO had a limited effect on production characteristics, affecting percentage yields of headed and gutted control fish and their standard length (p < 0.05). Variances between dietary groups were observed for pigmentation, and plant protein-based KM-free-fed fish returned deeper hues across their belly, NQC (Norwegian Quality Cut), and back portions (p < 0.03). No differences were measured for relative fin condition. δ13C and δ15N concentrations were lower and higher, respectively (p < 0.05) for fish fed the FM/FO-based diet. δ13C:δ15N likewise differed between treatments with FM/FO-fed salmon expressing higher ratios. Fillet mechanical characteristics varied with fish fed on animal protein-based diets, without KM expressing higher springiness and resilience (p < 0.05). Fish fed plant-based diets were generally preferred by younger taste testers. The results from this trial illustrate that FM/FO can be completely removed from salmon diets without problematic effects on quality and palatability attributes.

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of krill meal (KM) inclusion at various levels (0%, 2.5%, 5%) in plant-based and animal-based feeds, that were fishmeal (FM) and fish oil (FO) free, on Atlantic salmon growth. A FM/FO feed containing 0% KM was the control. Using a 2 × 3 factorial approach, diets were randomly assigned to one of 28 0.5 m3 flow-through tanks (n = 4 tanks per diet) initially stocked with 60 fish (148.4 ± 12.9 g; 23.6 ± 0.8 cm; condition factor (K) = 1.16 ± 0.08) each. Salmon were fed for 90 days using automatic feeders ad libitum. On day 45, stocking densities were reduced to 45 fish per tank by the random removal of 15 individuals to remove any potential of density affecting growth through the trial end. Water temperature, oxygen saturation, pH, and salinity throughout the trial were 11.8 °C, 103.5%, 7.38, and 32.0 g L−1, respectively. Fish fed plant-based feed without KM were lighter (p < 0.05) than all other groups at day 45 and 90, but those fed a plant-based feed with KM had comparable growth and feed intake compared to that of fish fed the control diet. Irrespective of the presence of KM, animal-based feeds achieved comparable weight growth (p > 0.05) to the control and 5% KM plant-based groups, with KM increasing feed intake (p < 0.05). Between day 45 and 90, feed conversion ratios increased in all groups except the control and 0% KM plant-based group, while specific growth rates (SGRs) decreased for all except the 0% KM plant-based diet. Between-group differences (p < 0.05) were also noted for the thermal growth coefficient. No differences were recorded in visceral or intestinal weight, and whole-body lipid levels were identical, proportional for all groups. Although differences (p < 0.05) were apparent in the concentrations of individual fillet fatty acids between groups, a 75 g serving size of any treatment would be sufficient to exceed daily intake recommendations for EPA + DHA. This trial determined that benefit, in terms of feed intake and growth performance, was gained when KM was added to plant-based feeds. However, no such advantage was observed when KM was used with animal-based feeds.

Optimal concentrations of three anesthetics for use with juvenile cobia (Rachycentron canadum) were determined using time-to-recovery and hematological datasets. Buffered MS-222, clove oil and 2-phenoxyethanol (2-PE) were examined. Juvenile cobia were exposed to three concentrations of each anesthetic at 24 °C. Based on time to recovery, optimal doses for MS-222 was determined as 120-mg L−1, that for 2-PE, 0.4-mL L−1 and, for clove oil, 5-mL L−1. The hematological response of cobia to anesthesia included quantification of whole blood pH, pCO2, pO2, and Ca2+, K+, Na+, Cl−, hematocrit and glucose. Irrespective of anesthetic employed, cobia expressed metabolic acidosis, with changes in blood pH (p < 0.001) being matched by increases (p < 0.001) in pCO2. Anesthesia tended to increase blood Na+, hematocrit, pO2, Ca2+, and K+ although differential responses between anesthetics were recorded, suggesting different modes of action. A combination of recovery and hematological data indicated that when anesthesia is necessary, MS-222 represents the sedative of choice.

Due to the precarious status of global fisheries the aquaculture sector has come under pressure to move away from its addiction to fishmeal (FM) and fish oil (FO) as feed ingredients, toward more sustainable alternatives. This chapter provides a brief overview of animal, microbial and plant-based feedstuffs that have been examined as FM/FO substitutes. Other than classic rendered meat products, attention is given to insect meals and issues surrounding their safety. Single celled products, including fungi and yeasts, bacteria, and microalgae are examined as sources of protein, lipid, pigments and enzymes. Plant-based proteins and lipid sources are also examined. Feed additives such as exogenous enzymes (phytases, lipases, proteases and carbohydrases) are evaluated as potential aquafeed ingredients as too are pigments, chemoattractants and palatants. Discussion is provided on pre-, pro- and synbiotics. Examples of the application of these various ingredients are considered with reference to over 50 species of cultivated organism.