Ixekizumab (IXE), an IL-17 A inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and favorable data have emerged from real-world evidence studies on psoriasis as well. However, real-world data specific to PsA remain limited. This study aims to assess IXE effectiveness in reducing disease activity in patients with PsA and determine its drug retention rate (DRR) over 24 months. The secondary aim is to identify factors potentially affecting long-term persistence on therapy. A retrospective observational study was conducted. Consecutive adult patients meeting the CASPAR criteria for PsA and treated with IXE for ≥ 3 months were included. Patients were evaluated at regular intervals on a routine clinical basis for disease activity and quality of life assessment. 132 patients (78 females, 54 males; mean age 59.1 ± 11.9 years) were included. At baseline, the median (IQR) Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) was 16.2 (7.7), and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain was 6.5 (3.0). In patients with axial involvement, the median (IQR) Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score – C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP) was 3.4 (1.3), and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) was 5.0 (1.5). IXE treatment was associated with statistically significant reductions in DAPSA (p < 0.001), ASDAS-CRP (p < 0.001), BASDAI (p < 0.001), VAS-pain (p < 0.001), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (p < 0.001), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.014), and CRP (p = 0.004) over 24 months. At 24 months, remission and low disease activity, according to DAPSA thresholds, were achieved by 46.7% and 93.3% of patients, respectively, while Very Low Disease Activity and Minimal Disease Activity criteria were met by 16.0% and 34.0%, respectively. IXE DRR was 82.1%, 76.3%, and 73.3% at 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively, with lower values in female patients (p = 0.036). No differences were observed in IXE DRR when stratifying the cohort by axial involvement (p = 0.84), prior exposure to biologics or tsDMARDs (p = 0.68), or body mass index (BMI) categories (p = 0.48). In conclusion, IXE enabled rapid and sustained disease control in patients with PsA across multiple disease domains. The high DRR supports its long-term use, regardless of prior biologic exposure or BMI. Gender differences in IXE treatment response may warrant further exploration.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and drug retention rate of secukinumab (SCK) in axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) within a multicentric real-life cohort. Methods: Data from patients with ax-SpA treated with SCK at five Italian centers were collected retrospectively, excluding those with a diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis. Evaluations were conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Assessments included C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), BASDAI, and ASDAS-CRP. Results: Seventy-one ax-SpA patients (57.7% female, mean age: 53.86 ± 12.67 years) were enrolled. Baseline mean BASDAI was 6.2 ± 1.4 and ASDAS-CRP was 2.9 ± 1.3. Significant improvements in BASDAI and ASDAS-CRP were observed over time, with BASDAI reducing to 3.5 ± 1.9 (p < 0.0001) and ASDAS-CRP to 1.7 ± 0.9 (p < 0.0001) at 24 months. The follow-up duration averaged 20.46 ± 13.46 months. By the end of follow-up, 29.5% of patients discontinued SCK. The two-year retention rate was 72%. Dropout risk was higher in patients with fibromyalgia (HR: 2.896, p = 0.026). No significant retention differences were found based on sex, age, enthesitis, radiographic disease, combination with cDMARDs, SCK dosage, or previous bDMARD exposure. Lower ASDAS-CRP at the study’s end was noted in patients without fibromyalgia (1.4 vs. 2.5, p < 0.001). Conclusions: SCK showed rapid and lasting effectiveness for ax-SpA with a favorable retention rate, though fibromyalgia may reduce treatment persistence.

Background: According to recent data, the age of patients could represent an important risk factor for MACE (major cardiovascular events), cancer, and VTE (venous thromboembolism) during treatment with JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. We decided to analyze the population involved in the ReLiFiRa study by identifying two groups of patients: 65 years or more and less than 65 years of age, evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of 200 mg of Filgotinib daily. Methods: Of the 120 ReLiFiRa patients, 54 were younger than 65 years old and 66 patients were 65 years old or older. The data of efficacy and tolerability of treatment with FIL 200 mg daily for 6 months were evaluated. Results: After six months of treatment, FIL was effective in both age groups. In both groups, the median values of steroid DAS28, CDAI, ERS, PCR, tender joints, swollen joints, VAS, HAQ, PGA patients, and PGA physicians were reduced with a statistically significant difference comparing these values with the baseline values. The difference in age did not impact the effectiveness of the drug. The lipid profile data also did not demonstrate significant differences between the two age groups; however, the comparison between younger vs. older patients’ populations regarding the total cholesterol/HDL ratio and LDL/HDL ratio shows a statistically significant difference: total cholesterol/HDL 3.4 (2.12–3.66) vs. 3.64 (3.36–4.13) p = 0.0004, LDL/HDL 1.9 (0.98–2.25) vs. 2.41 (2.04–2.73) p = 0.0002. There are no differences regarding the atherogenic index (LDL-C/HDL-C) and coronary risk index (TC/HDL-C) compared to baseline. Conclusions: After six months of treatment with FIL, the older population group showed a higher level of LDL and a lower level of HDL compared to younger patients. The atherogenic index and coronary risk index are higher in patients aged ≥ 65 years, but interestingly, there were no differences when comparing the 6-month data to baseline values. This condition highlights the impact of typical risk factors that act independently of treatment with Filgotinib.

Background Immune and vascular ageing are proposed risk factors for giant cell arteritis (GCA). Data on the impact of age at diagnosis of GCA on the clinical presentation and course of the disease are scarce. Methods Patients with GCA followed at referral centres within the Italian Society of Rheumatology Vasculitis Study Group were enrolled up to November 2021. Patients were grouped according to age at diagnosis: ≤64, 65–79 and ≥80 years old. Results The study included 1004 patients, mean age 72.1±8.4, female 70.82%. Median follow-up duration was 49 (IQR 23–91) months. Patients in the oldest group (≥80 years) had significantly more cranial symptoms, ischaemic complications and risk for blindness compared with the groups 65–79 and ≤64 years (blindness: 36.98% vs 18.21% vs 6.19%; p<0.0001). Large-vessel-GCA was more frequent in the youngest group (65% of patients). Relapses occurred in 47% of patients. Age did not influence the time to first relapse, nor the number of relapses. Older age was negatively associated with the number of adjunctive immunosuppressants. Patients >65 years old had 2–3 fold increased risk for aortic aneurysm/dissection up to 60 months follow-up. Serious infections, but not other treatment-related complications (hypertension, diabetes, osteoporotic fractures), were significantly associated with older age. Mortality occurred in 5.8% of the population with age >65, cranial and systemic symptoms as independent risk factors. Conclusions The highest risk of ischaemic complications, aneurysm development, serious infections and the possible undertreatment make of GCA a very challenging disease in the oldest patients.

Background: Filgotinib (FIL) is a selective JAK1 inhibitor with an affinity 30-fold higher than JAK2, approved to treat moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in adults with inadequate response or intolerance to one or more disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicentric study in order to evaluate efficacy and safety of FIL 200 mg daily therapy, after 3 and 6 months, in 120 patients affected by RA, managed in Tuscany and Umbria rheumatological centers. The following clinical records were analyzed: demographical data, smoking status, previous presence of comorbidities (Herpes zoster -HZ- infection, venous thromboembolism -VTE-, major adverse cardiovascular events -MACE-, cancer, diabetes, and hypertension), disease duration, presence of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA), rheumatoid factor (RF), number of biological failures, and prior csDMARDs utilized. At baseline, and after 3 (T3) and 6 (T6) months of FIL therapy, we evaluated mean steroid dosage, csDMARDs intake, clinimetric indexes (DAS28, CDAI, HAQ, patient and doctor PGA, VAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and body mass index (BMI). Results: At baseline, the mean disease duration was 9.4 ± 7.5 years; the prevalence of previous HZ infection, VTE, MACE, and cancer was respectively 4.12%, 0%, 7.21%, and 0.83%, respectively. In total, 76.3% of patients failed one or more biologics (one biological failure, 20.6%; two biological failures, 27.8%; three biological failures, 16.5%; four biological failures, 10.3%; five biological failures, 1.1%). After 3 months of FIL therapy, all clinimetric index results significantly improved from baseline, as well as after 6 months. Also, ESR and CRP significatively decreased at T3 and T6. Two cases of HZ were recorded, while no new MACE, VTE, or cancer were recorded during the observation time. Conclusion: Despite the limitations of the retrospective study and of the observational period of only 6 months, real-life data on the treatment of RA patients with FIL demonstrate that this Jak inhibitor therapy is safe in terms of CV, VTE events, and occurrence of cancer, and is also effective in a population identified as “difficult to treat” due to failure of previous b-DMARD therapy.

IntroductionIFN-γ release assays (IGRAs) are one of the referral tests for diagnosing tuberculosis infection (TBI). To improve IGRAs accuracy, several markers have been investigated. Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID), taking biological drugs, have a higher risk to progress to TB-disease compared to the general population. In several guidelines, annual TBI screening is recommended for patients undergoing biological therapy. Aim of this study was to investigate, within the QuantiFERON-TB-Plus (QFT-Plus) platform, if beside IFN-γ, alternative biomarkers help to diagnose TBI-IMID patients.MethodsWe enrolled 146 subjects: 46 with TB disease, 20 HD, 35 with TBI and 45 with TBI and IMID. Thirteen IMID subjects with a QFT-Plus negative result were diagnosed as TBI based on radiological evidence of TBI. We evaluated the IP-10 level in response to TB1 and TB2 peptides of QFT-Plus assay and we compared these results with the standardized assay based on IFN-γ. Multiplex immune assay was performed on plasma from TB1 and TB2 tubes and results were analyzed by a gradient boosting machine (GBM) as learning technique.ResultsTBI-IMID showed a significant decreased IP-10 level in response to TB1 and TB2 stimulation compared to TBI-NO IMID (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0002). The TBI-IMID showed a moderate agreement between the IP-10-based assay and QFT-Plus scores. In TBI-IMID, QFT-Plus showed 70% sensitivity for TBI detection whereas the IP-10-based assay reached 61%. Tests combination increased the sensitivity for TBI diagnosis up to 77%. By a GBM, we explored alternative biomarkers for diagnosing TBI in IMID population reaching 89% sensitivity. In particular, the signature based on IL-2, IP-10, and IL-9 detection was associated with TB status (infection/disease). However, by applying the cut-off identified by ROC analysis, comparing TB and TBI with the HD group, within the IMID population, we did not improve the accuracy for TBI-diagnosis. Similarly, this signature did not improve TBI diagnosis in IMID with radiological evidence of TBI but negative QFT-Plus score.DiscussionTo develop alternative strategies for TBI immune-diagnosis, future studies are needed to evaluate the memory response of TBI defined by radiological tools. These results may help in tuberculosis management of patients taking lifelong immune-suppressive drugs.

Data on the risk of adverse events (AEs) and disease flares in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) after the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine are scarce. The aim of this multicenter, prospective study is to analyze the clinical and immunological safety of BNT162b2 vaccine in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients followed-up from the first vaccine cycle to the third dose. The vaccine showed an overall good safety profile with no patient reporting serious AEs, and a low percentage of total AEs at both doses (40/78 (51.3%) and 13/47 (27.7%) patients after the second and third dose, respectively (p < 0.002). Flares were observed in 10.3% of patients after the end of the vaccination cycle and 12.8% after the third dose. Being vaccinated for influenza was inversely associated with the onset of AEs after the second dose, at both univariable (p = 0.013) and multivariable analysis (p = 0.027). This result could allow identification of a predictive factor of vaccine tolerance, if confirmed in larger patient populations. A higher disease activity at baseline was not associated with a higher incidence of AEs or disease flares. Effectiveness was excellent after the second dose, with only 1/78 (1.3%) mild breakthrough infection (BI) and worsened after the third dose, with 9/47 (19.2%) BI (p < 0.002), as a probable expression of the higher capacity of the Omicron variants to escape vaccine recognition.

BackgroundPsoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal disease involving several articular and extra-articular structures. Despite the important progresses recently made in all of the aspects of this disease, its management is still burdened by unresolved issues. The aim of this exercise was to provide a set of statements that may be helpful for the management of PsA.MethodsA group of 38 Italian rheumatologists with recognized expertise in PsA selected and addressed the following four topics: "early PsA," "axial-PsA," "extra-articular manifestations and comorbidities," "therapeutic goals." Relevant articles from the literature (2016-2022) were selected by the experts based on a PubMed search. A number of statements for each topic were elaborated.ResultsNinety-four articles were selected and evaluated, 68 out of the 1,114 yielded by the literature search and 26 added by the Authors. Each of the four topic was subdivided in themes as follows: transition from psoriasis to PsA, imaging vs. CASPAR criteria in early diagnosis, early treatment for "early PsA"; axial-PsA vs. axialspondyloarthritis, diagnosis, clinical evaluation, treatment, standard radiography vs. magnetic resonance imaging for "axial PsA"; influence of inflammatory bowel disease on the therapeutic choice, cardiovascular comorbidity, bone damage, risk of infection for "comorbidities and extra-articular manifestations"; target and tools, treat-to-target strategy, role of imaging for "therapeutic goals." The final document consisted of 49 statements.DiscussionThe final product of this exercise is a set of statements concerning the main issues of PsA management offering an expert opinion for some unmet needs of this complex disease.

Vaccination has been a game changer in our efforts to address the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the disease might still represent a clinical crisis for several more years, in part because of the inevitable emergence of variants capable of evading the pre-existing immunity. Drugs affecting viral spread will help curtail transmission, but therapeutics are needed to treat the more severe cases requiring hospitalization. A deep analysis of the evolving immune landscape of COVID-19 suggests that understanding the molecular bases of the distinct clinical stages is paramount if we are to limit the burden of inflammation, which can lead to death in frail individuals, according to age, sex and comorbidities. Different phases can be defined using immune biomarkers and need specific therapeutic approaches, tailored to the underlying immune contexture.

Using AI, we identified baricitinib as having antiviral and anticytokine efficacy. We now show a 71% (95% CI 0.15 to 0.58) mortality benefit in 83 patients with moderate-severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia with few drug-induced adverse events, including a large elderly cohort (median age, 81 years). An additional 48 cases with mild-moderate pneumonia recovered uneventfully. Using organotypic 3D cultures of primary human liver cells, we demonstrate that interferon-α2 increases ACE2 expression and SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in parenchymal cells by greater than fivefold. RNA-seq reveals gene response signatures associated with platelet activation, fully inhibited by baricitinib. Using viral load quantifications and superresolution microscopy, we found that baricitinib exerts activity rapidly through the inhibition of host proteins (numb-associated kinases), uniquely among antivirals. This reveals mechanistic actions of a Janus kinase-1/2 inhibitor targeting viral entry, replication, and the cytokine storm and is associated with beneficial outcomes including in severely ill elderly patients, data that incentivize further randomized controlled trials.

•The different screening methodology to capture cases of SARS-CoV-2 infections in patients with rheumatic diseases may result in a variation in the incidence of COVID-19 compared to the general population.•Study confirms the role of corticosteroids in increasing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with chronic rheumatic diseases (RA, AS, PsA) rather than in while connective tissue diseases.•Patients with chronic rheumatic diseases require careful surveillance through serological tests and confirmations with RT-PCR.

The clinical course of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is characterized by an initial stage with mild symptoms of the upper respiratory tract. During this stage, the viral load of severe acute ...

OBJECTIVE:Baricitinib seems a promising therapy for COVID-19. To fully-investigate its effects, we in-vitro evaluated the impact of baricitinib on the SARS-CoV-2-specific-response using the whole-blood platform. METHODS:We evaluated baricitinib effect on the IFN-γ-release and on a panel of soluble factors by multiplex-technology after stimulating whole-blood from 39 COVID-19 patients with SARS-CoV-2 antigens. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B (SEB) antigen was used as a positive control. RESULTS:In-vitro exogenous addition of baricitinib significantly decreased IFN-γ response to spike- (median: 0.21, IQR: 0.01-1; spike+baricitinib 1000 nM median: 0.05, IQR: 0-0.18; p < 0.0001) and to the remainder-antigens (median: 0.08 IQR: 0-0.55; remainder-antigens+baricitinib 1000 nM median: 0.03, IQR: 0-0.14; p = 0.0013). Moreover, baricitinib significantly decreased SEB-induced response (median: 12.52, IQR: 9.7-15.2; SEB+baricitinib 1000 nM median: 8, IQR: 1.44-12.16; p < 0.0001). Baricitinib did modulate other soluble factors besides IFN-γ, significantly decreasing the spike-specific-response mediated by IL-17, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-13, IL-1ra, IL-10, GM-CSF, FGF, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1β (p ≤ 0.0156). The baricitinib-decreased SARS-CoV-2-specific-response was observed mainly in mild/moderate COVID-19 and in those with lymphocyte count ≥1 × 103/µl. CONCLUSIONS:Exogenous addition of baricitinib decreases the in-vitro SARS-CoV-2-specific response in COVID-19 patients using a whole-blood platform. These results are the first to show the effects of this therapy on the immune-specific viral response.

Objectives: To characterize the effect of upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (UPA15) on enthesitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis from the SELECT-PsA Phase 3 trials. Methods: Patients with an inadequate response/intolerance to >= 1 non-biologic DMARD (SELECT-PsA 1) or >= 1 biologic DMARD (SELECT-PsA 2) received UPA15, adalimumab 40 mg every other week or placebo (weeks 0-24) switched to UPA15 (week 24 onward). The Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) and Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) index were used to assess improvement in enthesitis, enthesitis resolution, maintenance of enthesitis resolution, and protection from enthesitis development through week 56. Results: Data from 639 patients receiving UPA15 and 635 patients receiving placebo (including 317 patients who switched from placebo to UPA15) were analysed. UPA15 led to higher rates of enthesitis resolution vs placebo at week 24 (LEI: 59.8% vs 38.0%; SPARCC index: 50.6% vs 31.5%, respectively) and greater improvements in the LEI (-1.7 vs -1.0) and SPARCC index (-3.4 vs -1.9); improvements were maintained through week 56. Improvements were observed after 12 weeks of UPA15 treatment. Over 90% of patients without enthesitis (LEI = 0) at baseline receiving UPA15 were enthesitis-free at week 56, and UPA15 prevented recurrence of enthesitis at week 56 in > 80% of patients with enthesitis at baseline who achieved resolution (LEI = 0) at week 24. Conclusions: UPA15 is associated with a comprehensive improvement in enthesitis, with improvements observed after 12 weeks of treatment. Additionally, treatment with UPA15 was associated with maintaining an enthesitis-free state after resolution and protection against new-onset enthesitis.

Subjects with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID), such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), have an intrinsic higher probability to develop active-tuberculosis (TB) compared to the general population. The risk ranges from 2.0 to 8.9 in RA patients not receiving therapies. According to the WHO, the RA prevalence varies between 0.3% and 1% and is more common in women and in developed countries. Therefore, the identification and treatment of TB infection (TBI) in this fragile population is important to propose the TB preventive therapy. We aimed to study the M. tuberculosis (Mtb) specific T-cell response to find immune biomarkers of Mtb burden or Mtb clearance in patients with different TB status and different risk to develop active-TB disease. We enrolled TBI subjects as example of Mtb-containment, the active-TB as example of a replicating Mtb status, and the TBI-IMID as fragile population. To study the Mtb-specific response in a condition of possible Mtb sterilization, we longitudinally enrolled TBI subjects and active-TB patients before and after TB therapy. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated overnight with Mtb peptides contained in TB1- and TB2-tubes of the Quantiferon-Plus kit. Then, we characterized by cytometry the Mtb-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells. In TBI-IMID, the TB therapy did not affect the ability of CD4 T cells to produce interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-2, their functional status, and their phenotype. The TB therapy determined a contraction of the triple functional CD4 T cells of the TBI subjects and active-TB patients. The CD45RA- CD27+ T cells stood out as a main subset of the Mtb-specific response in all groups. Before the TB-preventive therapy, the TBI subjects had higher proportion of Mtb-specific CD45RA-CD27+CD4+ T cells and the active-TB subjects had higher proportion of Mtb-specific CD45RA-CD27-CD4+ T cells compared to other groups. The TBI-IMID patients showed a phenotype similar to TBI, suggesting that the type of IMID and the IMID therapy did not affect the activation status of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells. Future studies on a larger and better-stratified TBI-IMID population will help to understand the change of the Mtb-specific immune response over time and to identify possible immune biomarkers of Mtb-containment or active replication.

Introduction In 2015, the Italian board for the TAilored BIOlogic therapy (ITABIO) proposed evidence-based decisional statements for first-line tailored biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Taking into account the new licensed drugs, the aim of the present review was to update the previous statements. Areas covered A narrative review of the most recent evidence on the efficacy and safety of old and newly licensed drugs for the treatment of articular and extra-articular RA was performed. In addition, host-related variables potentially driving the therapy choice, such as the infection risk, the cardiovascular risk, the risk of deep vein thrombosis, thromboembolism, pregnancy, and obesity were analyzed. Consequently, several statements for personalized therapy were formulated, thus providing a decisional algorithm useful for proper personalized therapy of RA patients in clinical practice. Expert opinion Several clinical variables related to specific drug and host characteristics may drive the choice toward anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF biologics, or anti-JAKs, thus allowing to personalize the therapy. Consequently, the right therapy for the right patient would ensure a successful therapeutic intervention.

The clinical course of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is characterized by an initial stage with mild symptoms of the upper respiratory tract. During this stage, the viral load of severe acute ...

GCA is usually classified according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 criteria. This set of criteria were designed to distinguish the different types of vasculitides but not to establish a differential diagnosis. Five criteria were finally selected and a patient shall be classified as having GCA if at least 3 of 5 criteria are satisfied. The presence of any 3 or more of the 5 criteria is related with a sensitivity of 93.5% and a specificity of 91.2%. The use and the application of the criteria set is relatively simple. Biopsy is the only invasive procedure. Limitations of temporal artery biopsy lead to develop noninvasive procedures in order to detect GCA like ultrasound, MRI, and PET CT. Due to numerous uncertainties regarding the optimal GCA diagnosis based on temporal artery biopsy, and the advent of modern vascular imaging techniques prompted different societies to develop recommendations for GCA management.