Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies have revolutionized the treatment of hematological malignancies, achieving high response rates in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. Despite these benefits, CAR-T cell therapies are associated with unique toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), immune cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT), and immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome (IEC-HS), which is characterized by a rare and life-threatening hyperinflammatory response. This paper presents a case of a 56-year-old woman with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) treated with the CAR-T cell therapy, brexucabtagene autoleucel, who had subsequently developed CRS and later IEC-HS. Initial management included tocilizumab, corticosteroids, and anakinra, followed by the compassionate use of emapalumab, an interferon-γ blocker. To provide broader context, we conducted a literature review of CAR-T cell-related toxicities, focusing on IEC-HS and its management with emapalumab. Clinical and laboratory manifestations, such as elevated ferritin levels, cytopenias, and organ dysfunction, underpin the diagnostic criteria for IEC-HS. Vigilant monitoring and tailored therapeutic approaches are required to effectively manage toxicities associated with CAR-T cell therapy, to maximize its benefits and minimize adverse effects. In more severe IEC-HS cases, emapalumab may be used as an effective targeted therapy.

Background: Liver enzyme abnormalities are common in critically ill patients, but the prognostic relevance of graded aminotransferase elevation and its timing remains uncertain. We evaluated whether Liver Enzyme Elevation (LEE) grade at ICU admission provides prognostic information beyond SAPS II in a heterogeneous ICU cohort. Methods: In this single-centre retrospective study, adult patients admitted to a mixed ICU between January 2023 and December 2024 and with ICU length of stay ≥72 h were analysed. LEE grade was assigned from AST and ALT according to predefined multiples of the local upper limit of normal, using the higher grade reached by either enzyme. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. Secondary outcomes included renal replacement therapy, ICU length of stay, and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation. A fixed logistic model including SAPS II and admission LEE grade was internally validated by bootstrap resampling. Results: Among 274 patients, ICU mortality was 27.7%. Admission LEE grade showed an adjusted association with ICU mortality (OR 1.26 per grade increase, 95% CI 1.00-1.58; p = 0.048), while SAPS II remained the dominant predictor (OR 1.04 per point, 95% CI 1.02-1.06; p < 0.001). Adding admission LEE grade to SAPS II yielded a small absolute increase in discrimination (AUC 0.737 vs. 0.703; DeLong p = 0.039). Bootstrap-corrected AUC was 0.730, with acceptable overall calibration. Admission LEE grade was also associated with RRT and longer ICU stay in exploratory secondary analyses. Conclusions: Admission LEE grade may provide modest complementary prognostic information beyond SAPS II. These findings are exploratory and require external validation before clinical implementation.

ABSTRACTBackgroundKidney transplantation (KT) is the most effective treatment for end‐stage renal disease. End‐ischemic hypothermic machine perfusion (EI‐HMP) has emerged as a promising method for preserving grafts before transplantation. This study aimed to compare graft function recovery in KT recipients of deceased brain‐death (DBD) grafts preserved with EI‐HMP versus static cold storage (SCS). The primary outcome was the rate of delayed graft function (DGF). Secondary outcomes included urine output, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay duration, and survival rates.MethodsA retrospective, single‐center observational study was conducted at Sapienza University of Rome, analyzing 313 KT patients between January 2014 and September 2021. Patients were stratified into two groups based on graft preservation methods (EI‐HMP, n = 95; SCS, n = 218). A stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) method was employed to adjust for potential confounders.ResultsThere were no significant differences in DGF rates between the two groups (17.9% vs. 15.6% in SCS and EI‐HMP cases, respectively; p = 0.75). EI‐HMP group demonstrated a higher urine output on day 2 (p = 0.046), a shorter ICU stay (p < 0.0001), and a trend toward a shorter overall hospital stay (p = 0.07). No statistically significant differences were found between EI‐HMP and SCS cases in 1‐ and 3‐year overall survival rates (3.2% and 6.7% vs. 5.6% and 6.6%, respectively; log‐rank p = 0.53) or in death‐censored graft loss rates (5.4% and 8.9% vs. 5.7% and 7.3%, respectively; log‐rank p = 0.88). In a sub‐analysis of expanded criteria donors (ECD), EI‐HMP demonstrated a protective effect by reducing the risk of DGF (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.09–0.95; p = 0.047).ConclusionEI‐HMP was associated with certain short‐term benefits, including increased urine output and reduced ICU stays, but showed no significant impact on long‐term survival outcomes. A reduction in DGF rates was observed only in the ECD subgroup. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to further investigate the long‐term clinical benefits of EI‐HMP.

Given the various clinical manifestations that characterize Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), the scientific community is constantly searching for biomarkers with prognostic value. Surfactant proteins A (SP-A) and D (SP-D) are collectins that play a crucial role in ensuring proper alveolar function and an alteration of their serum levels was reported in several pulmonary diseases characterized by Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and pulmonary fibrosis. Considering that such clinical manifestations can also occur during Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, we wondered if these collectins could act as prognostic markers. In this regard, serum levels of SP-A and SP-D were measured by enzyme immunoassay in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 51) at admission (T0) and after seven days (T1) and compared with healthy donors (n = 11). SP-D increased in COVID-19 patients compared to healthy controls during the early phases of infection, while a significant reduction was observed at T1. Stratifying SARS-CoV-2 patients according to disease severity, increased serum SP-D levels were observed in severe compared to mild patients. In light of these results, SP-D, but not SP-A, seems to be an eligible marker of COVID-19 pneumonia, and the early detection of SP-D serum levels could be crucial for preventive clinical management.

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy actually represents the standard of care for multiple relapsed or refractory primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (r/r PMBCL). Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab, appear to be a safe and effective treatment strategy for patients who are ineligible for or resistant to autologous stem cell transplantation. Although preclinical studies suggested that checkpoint inhibitors may enhance the vitality and anti-tumor activity of CAR T cells, there are no substantial/robust clinical data about the immune-mediated toxicity of their association. We describe a case of a severe cutaneous adverse event arising immediately after Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) on day +6 from CAR T cells infusion in a young r/r PMBCL patient who previously received pembrolizumab. These skin lesions were interpreted as an immune mediated adverse event, considering their prompt improvement and fully recovering achieved with the addition of immunoglobulin infusion to systemic steroid therapy. This case of life-threatening cutaneous adverse event calls for further investigations about off-target immune-related adverse events deriving from the combination of CAR T cell therapy and checkpoint inhibition, whose synergic therapeutic effect is promising.

Background: Severe COVID-19 is associated with an excessive immunothrombotic response and thromboinflammatory complications. Vaccinations effectively reduce the risk of severe clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19, but their impact on platelet activation and immunothrombosis during breakthrough infections is not known. Objectives: To investigate how preemptive vaccinations modify the platelet-immune crosstalk during COVID-19 infections. Methods: Cross-sectional flow cytometry study of the phenotype and interactions of platelets circulating in vaccinated (n = 21) and unvaccinated patients with COVID-19, either admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU, n = 36) or not (non-ICU, n = 38), in comparison to matched SARS-CoV-2-negative patients (n = 48), was performed. Results: In the circulation of unvaccinated non-ICU patients with COVID-19, we detected hyperactive and hyperresponsive platelets and platelet aggregates with adaptive and innate immune cells. In unvaccinated ICU patients with COVID-19, most of whom had severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, platelets had high P-selectin and phosphatidylserine exposure but low capacity to activate integrin alpha IIb beta 3, dysfunctional mitochondria, and reduced surface glycoproteins. In addition, in the circulation of ICU patients, we detected microthrombi and platelet aggregates with innate, but not with adaptive, immune cells. In vaccinated patients with COVID-19, who had no acute respiratory distress syndrome, platelets had surface receptor levels comparable to those in controls and did not form microthrombi or platelet-granulocyte aggregates but aggregated avidly with adaptive immune cells.Conclusion: Our study provides evidence that vaccinated patients with COVID-19 are not associated with platelet hyperactivation and are characterized by platelet-leukocyte aggregates that foster immune protection but not excessive immunothrombosis. These findings advocate for the importance of vaccination in preventing severe COVID-19.

Background: SARS-CoV-2 related immunopathology may be the driving cause underlying severe COVID-19. Through an immunophenotyping analysis on paired bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and blood samples collected from mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (CARDS), this study aimed to evaluate the cellular immune responses in survivors and non-survivors of COVID-19. Methods: A total of 36 paired clinical samples of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) mononuclear cells (BALF-MC) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were collected from 18 SARS-CoV-2-infected subjects admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University Hospital in Rome (Italy) for severe interstitial pneumonia. The frequencies of monocytes (total, classical, intermediate and non-classical) and Natural Killer (NK) cell subsets (total, CD56bright and CD56dim), as well as CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets [naïve, central memory (TCM) and effector memory (TEM)], and those expressing CD38 and/or HLADR were evaluated by multiparametric flow cytometry. Results: Survivors with CARDS exhibited higher frequencies of classical monocytes in blood compared to non-survivors (p < 0.05), while no differences in the frequencies of the other monocytes, NK cell and T cell subsets were recorded between these two groups of patients (p > 0.05). The only exception was for peripheral naïve CD4+ T cells levels that were reduced in non-survivors (p = 0.04). An increase in the levels of CD56bright (p = 0.012) and a decrease in CD56dim (p = 0.002) NK cell frequencies was also observed in BALF-MC samples compared to PBMC in deceased COVID-19 patients. Total CD4+ and CD8+ T cell levels in the lung compartment were lower compared to blood (p = 0.002 and p < 0.01, respectively) among non-survivors. Moreover, CD38 and HLA-DR were differentially expressed by CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets in BALF-MC and in PBMC among SARS-CoV-2-infected patients who died from COVID-19 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These results show that the immune cellular profile in blood and pulmonary compartments was similar in survivors and non-survivors of COVID-19. T lymphocyte levels were reduced, but resulted highly immune-activated in the lung compartment of patients who faced a fatal outcome.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still a global health emergency. Its causative agent, the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), has infected more than 300 million people and caused more than 5 million deaths worldwide.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) significantly contribute to postoperative morbidity and mortality. We conducted a study to determine the incidence of PPCs after major elective abdominal surgery and their association with early and 1-year mortality in patient without pre-existing respiratory disease.METHODS: We conducted a multicenter observational prospective clinical study in 40 Italian centers. 1542 patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery were recruited in a time period of 14 days and clinically managed according to local protocol. The primary outcome was to determine the incidence of PPCs. Further, we aimed to identify independent predictors for PPCs and examine the association between PPCs and mortality.RESULTS: PPCs occurred in 12.6% (95% CI 11.1-14.4%) of patients with significant differences among general (18.3%, 95% CI 15.7-21.0%), gynecological (3.7%, 95% CI 2.1-6.0%) and urological surgery (9.0%, 95% CI 6.0-12.8%). PPCs development was associated with known pre- and intraoperative risk factors. Patients who developed PPCs had longer length of hospital stay, higher risk of 30-days hospital readmission, and increased in-hospital and one-year mortality (OR 3.078, 95% CI 1.825-5.191; P<0.001).CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PPCs in patients without pre-existing respiratory disease undergoing elective abdominal surgery is high and associated with worse clinical outcome at one year after surgery. General surgery is associated with higher incidence of PPCs and mortality compared to gynecological and urological surgery.

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) have raised concerns as common, frequent etiologic agents of nosocomial infections, and patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) present the highest risk for colonization and infection. The incidence of colonization and infection in trauma patients remains poorly investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the risk factors for Carbapenem-resistant (CR)-GNB colonization and the clinical impact of colonization acquisition in patients with severe trauma admitted to the ICU in a CR-GNB hyperendemic country. This is a retrospective observational study; clinical and laboratory data were extracted from the nosocomial infection surveillance system database. Among 54 severe trauma patients enrolled in the study, 28 patients were colonized by CR-GNB; 7 (12.96%) patients were already colonized at ICU admission; and 21 (38.89%) patients developed a new colonization during their ICU stay. Risk factors for colonization were the length of stay in the ICU (not colonized, 14.81 days ± 9.1 vs. colonized, 38.19 days ± 27.9; p-value = 0.001) and days of mechanical ventilation (not colonized, 8.46 days ± 7.67 vs. colonized, 22.19 days ± 15.09; p-value < 0.001). There was a strong statistical association between previous colonization and subsequent development of infection (OR = 80.6, 95% CI 4.5–1458.6, p-value < 0.001). Factors associated with the risk of infection in colonized patients also included a higher Charlson comorbidity index, a longer length of stay in the ICU, a longer duration of mechanical ventilation, and a longer duration of treatment with carbapenem and vasopressors (not infected vs. infected: 0(0–4) vs. 1(0–3), p = 0.012; 24.82 ± 16.77 vs. 47 ± 28.51, p = 0.016; 13.54 ± 15.84 vs. 31.7 ± 16.22, p = 0.008; 1.09 ± 1.14 vs. 7.82 ± 9.15, p = 0.008). The adoption of MDR-GNB colonization prevention strategies in critically ill patients with severe trauma is required to improve the quality of care and reduce nosocomial infections, length of hospital stay and mortality.

We herein describe a new ex-situ machine perfusion device as a "technology spotlight" using a model of donors after circulatory death liver grafts procured from slaughterhouse pigs. Fourteen pig liver grafts were included. The device allowed stable perfusion in both hypothermic (n = 6) and normothermic (n = 8) conditions and no technical failure was observed. During perfusion, perfusate and bile samples were collected to assess liver metabolism and viability. An integrated adsorption device showed efficient removal of inflammatory cytokines during treatment. This preliminary experience represents the starting point for further investigations on the potential clinical benefits of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators adsorption during machine perfusion.

Abstract Background Few studies explored the role of hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) in the sub‐group of non‐standard renal grafts with a biopsy‐proven advanced histological impairment. This study aimed to investigate the role of HMP in grafts with a Karpinski Score >3 in terms of the need for dialysis, creatinine reduction ratio at day‐7 (CRR7), and 3‐year graft survival. Methods Twenty‐three perfused grafts with Karpinski Score >3 evaluated between November 2017 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed and compared with a control group of 32 non‐perfused grafts transplanted between January 2014 and October 2017. Results After transplantation, perfused grafts had fewer cases requiring dialysis (8.7% vs. 34.4%; p = 0.051), a better reduction in serum creatinine (median at 7 days: 2.2 vs. 4.3 mg/dl; p = 0.045), and shorter length of hospital stay (median 11 vs. 15 days; p = 0.01). Three‐year death‐censored graft survival was better in the perfused cases (91.3% vs. 77.0%; p = 0.16). In perfused grafts, initial renal resistance (RR) had the best predictive value for renal function recovery after the first week, as defined by CRR7 ≤ 70% (AUC = 0.83; p = 0.02). A cut‐off value of 0.5 mm Hg/ml/min showed a sensitivity of 82.4%, a specificity of 83.3%, and diagnostic odds ratio = 23.4. After dividing the entire population into a Low‐RR (n = 8) and a High‐RR Group (n = 15), more cases with CRR7 ≤ 70% were reported in the latter group (86.7 vs. 13.3%; p = 0.03). Conclusion HMP yielded promising results in kidneys with Karpinski Score >3. Initial RR should be of interest in selecting non‐standard organs for single kidney transplantation even in impaired histology.

BACKGROUND:The use of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) is less invasive than extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and intraoperative control of gas exchange could be feasible. The aim of this study in intermediate intraoperative severity patients undergoing LT was to assess the role of intraoperative ECCO2R on emergency ECMO requirement in patients. METHODS:Thirty-eight consecutive patients undergoing lung transplantation (LT) with "intermediate" intraoperative severity in the intervals 2007 to 2010 or 2011 to 2014 were analyzed as historical comparison of case-matched cohort retrospective study. The "intermediate" intraoperative severity was defined as the development of intraoperative severe respiratory acidosis with maintained oxygenation function (i.e., pH <7.25, PaCO2 >60 mmHg, and PaO2/FiO2 >150), not associated with hemodynamic instability. Of these 38 patients, twenty-three patients were treated in the 2007-2010 interval by receiving "standard intraoperative treatment," while 15 patients were treated in the 2011-2014 interval by receiving "standard intraoperative treatment + ECCO2R." RESULTS:ECMO requirement was more frequent among patients that received "standard intraoperative treatment" alone than in those treated with "standard intraoperative treatment + ECCO2R" (17/23 vs. 3/15; p = 0.004). The use of ECCO2R improved pH and PaCO2 while mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) decreased. CONCLUSION:In intermediate intraoperative severity patients, the use of ECCO2R reduces the ECMO requirement.

Esophageal cancer is currently the eighth most common cancer, and the sixth leading cause of death from cancer in the world due to its highly aggressive nature. Better prognosis can be achieved with early diagnosis in early stages of the disease. The increasing incidence rate and the distribution of esophageal cancer varies with tumor type location and with geographical area. Multiple factors like ethnicity, genetic factors, and lifestyle play a role. Currently, Barrett’s esophagus is still the only known precursor. Due to its natural history, esophageal cancer is commonly diagnosed in more advanced stages. In tumors confined to the mucosa, local endoscopic treatment is considered curative whereas when the tumor invades the submucosa, surgical esophagectomy is the current standard treatment. In case of locally advanced disease, neoadjuvant chemo or chemo-radio therapy is now considered the gold standard treatment. The advent of minimally invasive surgical techniques has reduced morbidity and mortality of esophagectomy without compromising the oncological outcomes. In the chapter, the McKeown mini-invasive esophagectomy technique is described.

In Response We thank McGrath et al 1 for the interest in our article and, the further recommendations they give ultimately help in stressing the importance of several technical and general aspects in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients undergoing tracheostomy. A complete and definitive description of safety for operators is given in point 1, while an important recommendation for neuromuscular monitoring is advised, due to the risk of tachyphylaxis, in severe conditions (point 2). We totally agree with this statement even though prolonged neuromuscular block was not always necessary in our experience. In point 3, the authors refer to a significant possibility given by the exclusion of the upper airway undergoing manipulation. When the tube is advanced and the cuff is inflated, the proximal airway is excluded from ventilation and the risk for aerosol spread is eliminated. In that moment, the operator can perform the tracheotomy in a highly safe condition while the patient is still ventilated. Regarding the percutaneous technique, some important technical details are provided and help indeed to detail our original description (point 4).2 the device illustrated is less restrictive than some other boxes developed for this purpose, we nonetheless have reservations about the use of Perspex, Plexiglas, or other acrylic/plastic barriers. We acknowledge that not all institutions have negative pressure environments and specialized equipment to protect staff during tracheostomy, but the foremost consideration is nonetheless standardized protocols and adequate PPE. Our own experience with simulated airway management behind barrier enclosures is similar to that of reports in the literature—the risk of the barrier impeding emergency airway management outweighs protective benefit.5 If such devices are used, the extent of barricade should be minimized, and all staff should have ample experience, including instruction on how to manage emergencies and circumvent the barrier if needed.

Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) for severe respiratory failure. The aim is to evaluate the rate of AKI, defined according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome guidelines, in a series of critical COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU of a single tertiary teaching hospital. Methods: From April to May 2020, all consecutive critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU who did not meet exclusion criteria (length of ICU stay <48 h, ESRD requiring dialysis, and patients still hospitalized in ICU at the time of data analysis) were enrolled in this study. Patients were stratified according to the highest AKI stage attained during ICU stay. Results: Sixty-one patients were included in the analysis. AKI was observed in 35/61 patients (57.4%): 25/35 episodes (71.4%) were observed within the first 7 days. AKI was classified as follows: 17.1% stage 1, 25.7% stage 2, and 57.2% stage 3. Fourteen out of 20 stage-3 patients required continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), mostly related to persistent oliguria. The overall ICU mortality was 68.9%, and it was higher in patients developing AKI if compared to no-AKI patients (p = 0.006). Renal function recovery of any grade was observed in 14 out of 35 AKI patients (40%). Among patients undergoing CRRT, 13 patients were still dialysis dependent at the time of death. Conclusion: In critical COVID-19 patients, ICU mortality is particularly high, especially in patients developing AKI. An accurate monitoring of renal function in early phases of respiratory failure should be ensured in order to timely apply any strategy aimed at limiting renal complications during ICU stay.

BACKGROUND:Little is known in distinguishing clinical features and outcomes between coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) and influenza (FLU). MATERIALS/METHODS:Retrospective, single-centre study including patients with COVID-19 or FLU pneumonia admitted to the Intensive care Unit (ICU) of Policlinico Umberto I (Rome). Aims were: (1) to assess clinical features and differences of patients with COVID-19 and FLU, (2) to identify clinical and/or laboratory factors associated with FLU or COVID-19 and (3) to evaluate 30-day mortality, bacterial superinfections, thrombotic events and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in patients with FLU versus COVID-19. RESULTS:Overall, 74 patients were included (19, 25.7%, FLU and 55, 74.3%, COVID-19), median age 67 years (58-76). COVID-19 patients were more male (p = 0.013), with a lower percentage of COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (p = 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively) than FLU. SOFA score was higher (p = 0.020) and lymphocytes were significantly lower in FLU than in COVID-19 [395.5 vs 770.0 cells/mmc, p = 0.005]. At multivariable analysis, male sex (OR 6.1, p < 0.002), age > 65 years (OR 2.4, p = 0.024) and lymphocyte count > 725 cells/mmc at ICU admission (OR 5.1, p = 0.024) were significantly associated with COVID-19, whereas CKD and COPD were associated with FLU (OR 0.1 and OR 0.16, p = 0.020 and p < 0.001, respectively). No differences in mortality, bacterial superinfections and thrombotic events were observed, whereas IPA was mostly associated with FLU (31.5% vs 3.6%, p = 0.0029). CONCLUSIONS:In critically ill patients, male sex, age > 65 years and lymphocytes > 725 cells/mmc are related to COVID-19. FLU is associated with a significantly higher risk of IPA than COVID-19.

Background Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) may experience venous thrombosis while data regarding arterial thrombosis are sparse. Methods Prospective multicenter study in 5 hospitals including 373 patients with Covid-19-related pneumonia. Demographic data, laboratory findings including coagulation tests and comorbidities were reported. During the follow-up any arterial or venous thrombotic events and death were registered. Results Among 373 patients, 75 (20%) had a thrombotic event and 75 (20%) died. Thrombotic events included 41 venous thromboembolism and 34 arterial thrombosis. Age, cardiovascular disease, intensive care unit treatment, white blood cells, D-dimer, albumin and troponin blood levels were associated with thrombotic events. In a multivariable regression logistic model, intensive care unit treatment (Odds Ratio [OR]: 6.0; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.8–12.6; p < 0.001); coronary artery disease (OR: 2.4; 95% CI 1.4–5.0; p = 0.022); and albumin levels (OR: 0.49; 95% CI 0.28–0.87; p = 0.014) were associated with ischemic events. Age, sex, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, heart failure, coronary heart disease, intensive care unit treatment, in-hospital thrombotic events, D-dimer, C-reactive protein, troponin, and albumin levels were associated with mortality. A multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that in-hospital thrombotic events (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.72; 95% CI 1.59–4.65; p < 0.001), age (HR: 1.035; 95% CI 1.014–1.057; p = 0.001), and albumin (HR: 0.447; 95% CI 0.277–0.723; p = 0.001) predicted morality. Conclusions Covid-19 patients experience an equipollent rate of venous and arterial thrombotic events, that are associated with poor survival. Early identification and appropriate treatment of Covid-19 patients at risk of thrombosis may improve prognosis.

Transplanted patients are particularly exposed to a major risk of infectious diseases due to prolonged immunosuppressive treatment. Over the last decade, the growing migration flows and the transplant tourism have led to increasing infections caused by geographically restricted organisms. Malaria is an unusual event in organ transplant recipients than can be acquired primarily or reactivation following immunosuppression, by transfusion of blood products or through the transplanted organ. We report a rare case of Plasmodium falciparum infection in a liver transplanted two years-old African boy who presented to one Italian Asylum Seeker Center on May 2019. We outlined hereby diagnostic challenges, possible aetiologies of post-transplantation malaria and finally we summarized potential drug interactions between immunosuppressive agents and antimalarials. This report aims to increase the attention to newly arrived migrants, carefully evaluating patients coming from tropical areas and taking into consideration also rare tropical infections not endemic in final destination countries.

Background: Mounting evidence suggests SARS-CoV-2 may impact on host microbiota and gut inflammation, infecting intestinal epithelial cells. This possible link and its implications can be investigated by observing the effects of modulation of the microbial flora in patients with COVID-19. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of mortality, the need of ICU hospitalization and the length of hospitalization in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia who received the best available therapy (BAT) vs. patients treated with BAT and supplemented with oral bacteriotherapy. Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study included 200 adults with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. All patients received therapeutic regimens including low molecular weight heparin plus one or more between hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, antivirals, and Tocilizumab. Oral bacteriotherapy was used as complementary treatment. Results: Out of the 200 patients, 112 received BAT without oral bacteriotherapy, and 88 BAT with oral bacteriotherapy. Crude mortality was 22%. Eleven percent died in the group of patients treated with BAT plus oral bacteriotherapy vs. 30% subjects in the group of patients managed only with BAT ( p < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, the age >65 years, CRP >41.8 mg/L, Platelets <150.000 mmc, and cardiovascular events were associated with the increased risk of mortality. Oral bacteriotherapy was an independent variable associated with a reduced risk for death. Despite large prospective trials are needed, this study highlights a possible role for oral bacteriotherapy in the management of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia.