Neuroendocrine neoplasms are histologically defined by a common neuroendocrine cellular phenotype. These are still considered as rare tumours even though their incidence is increasing. Heterogeneity is everywhere whether in the localization of the primitive cancer, the clinical presentation, the histological classification, the prognosis, as well as in therapeutic options, which clearly justifies specialized multidisciplinary care. Heterogeneity and scarcity explain the still fragmented nature of knowledge in this domain. Thanks to an increase in incidence, a desire for standardization of classification as well as the arrival of major therapeutic advances, such as vectorized internal radiotherapy, the future of neuroendocrine neoplasia seems more than promising and exciting. In our daily clinical practice at CHU Liège, we hope to bring our stone to the building by listing as many cases as possible in national and/or international databases, by centralizing therapeutic discussions within specific multidisciplinary concertations and by participating in multicenter study protocols.

Small cell lung cancer is a malignant tumour with a poor prognosis. Standard treatment of metastatic stages has been a platinum doublet since 1980, but the addition of immunotherapy has improved prognosis. For locally advanced stages, the combination of radio-chemotherapy remains the treatment of choice, with no evidence at present of the value of immunotherapy in consolidation, and for localized stages, surgery is the first-line therapy. Unfortunately, in the second line, we have no other molecule than the topotecan despite several studies. Prophylactic brain irradiation remains debated even if it has been validated in localized forms. Finally, there is hope with targeted therapy following the development of subtypes of small cell lung cancer but studies remain difficult to conduct.

The perception of ventilatory effort is common in oncology, especially but not exclusively in the advanced stages of neoplastic disease. Dyspnea is a symptom whose discomfort and anguish it generates in the patient and his/ her entourage require constant management throughout the illness. The first step is to identify and optimize the treatment of comorbidities associated with tumour disease. Relief of respiratory oppression as a symptom requires a multidisciplinary approach. Opiates and benzodiazepines are at the forefront of pharmacological management. The mechanical obstruction that limits ventilatory flow and/or chest ampliation may justify more invasive management, including endoscopic techniques. Oxygen therapy will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Finally, global management includes respiratory revalidation, psychological support and improvement of environmental quality.

Lung cancer is the third most common cancer in Belgium in 2017 and remains the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. There is no longer any doubt that the main cause of lung cancer is smoking. However, the prevalence of lung cancer in never-smokers has been increasing overtime. Moreover, it is now recognized that the lung cancer of non-smoker patients has very distinct characteristics. In this retrospective cohort study (N = 520), we describe the characteristics of non-smoker patients and their non-small cell lung carcinoma and compare them to those of smokers. The patients included in this study were whose with a new diagnostic of lung cancer made at the Liège University Hospital of Liège over 2 years round. Non small cell lung cancer occurring in never-smokers patients is more often seen in young and very old patients, more frequent in female, essentially adenocarcinoma and often associated with mutations. This work confirms that lung cancer in never-smokers shows different features than lung cancer seen in patients with a smoking history.

Empyema and subacute invasive aspergillosis are rare pathologies that should not be overlooked because of the need for early treatment and a different management of bacterial infections which are more frequent. We report the case of a 75-year-old man with subacute invasive aspergillosis and an empyema following drowning and cardiopulmonary arrest.

The majority of non-small cell lung cancers are diagnosed as advanced disease. Subsets of adenocarcinomas and of squamous cell carcinomas in nonsmokers present a molecular aberration leading to tumour survival. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) and Repressor Of Silencing1 (ROS1) have been identified and targeted with good efficacy for fifteen years. Newer inhibitors brought even greater efficacy with a generally better tolerability. Other molecular aberrations (Kirsten Rat Sarcoma, Rearranged during Transfection, MET, NeuroTrophic Receptor yrosine kinase) are targets for newly developed, more selective drugs. As more and more patients will benefit from targeted therapies, the identification of molecular aberration is more than ever crucial for optimal lung cancer patient care.

Background Coronavirus disease COVID-19 has become a public health emergency of international concern. Together with the quest for an effective treatment, the question of the post-infectious evolution of affected patients in healing process remains uncertain. Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) is a high molecular weight mucin-like glycoprotein produced by type II pneumocytes and bronchial epithelial cells. Its production is raised during epithelial lesions and cellular regeneration. In COVID-19 infection, KL-6 serum levels could therefore be of interest for diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic response evaluation. Materials and methods Our study retrospectively compared KL-6 levels between a cohort of 83 COVID-19 infected patients and two other groups: healthy subjects (n = 70) on one hand, and a heterogenous group of patients suffering from interstitial lung diseases (n = 31; composed of 16 IPF, 4 sarcoidosis, 11 others) on the other hand. Demographical, clinical and laboratory indexes were collected. Our study aims to compare KL-6 levels between a COVID-19 population and healthy subjects or patients suffering from interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Ultimately, we ought to determine whether KL-6 could be a marker of disease severity and bad prognosis. Results Our results showed that serum KL-6 levels in COVID-19 patients were increased compared to healthy subjects, but to a lesser extent than in patients suffering from ILD. Increased levels of KL-6 in COVID-19 patients were associated with a more severe lung disease. Discussion and conclusion Our results suggest that KL-6 could be a good biomarker to assess ILD severity in COVID-19 infection. Concerning the therapeutic response prediction, more studies are necessary.

Introduction: Patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD) can be suspected to be at risk of experiencing a rapid flare-up due to COVID-19. However, no specific data are currently available for these patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 401 patients with ILD and determined the proportion of patients hospitalized for proven severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and specific symptoms of COVID-19. Results: We found that 1% of patients (n = 4) were hospitalized (1 in ICU) for COVID-19. In total, 310 of the 401 patients answered the phone call. Only 33 patients (0.08%) experienced specific symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusion: Our study did not demonstrate any increased occurrence of severe COVID-19 in ILD patients compared to the global population. Based on our findings, we could not make any conclusion on the incidence rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with ILDs, or on the overall outcome of immunocompromised patients affected by COVID-19. (c) 2020 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

No specific safety data concerning systemic oncological treatments were available at time of COVID-19 outbreak in Belgium. In our hospital we decided to maintain adjuvant and early line treatments for metastatic disease in patients under 65 and without specific comorbidities and to apply a shared decision approach in other patients while following closely the safety of these treatments. Real time safety monitoring was proposed to all patients treated for solid tumours in our day-care unit starting March 1st, 2020. After signing informed consent patients were asked questions concerning protective measures at home, signs of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation. Patients' charts were reviewed for outcome, including death, after suspected or proven SARS-CoV-2 infection. Minimum follow-up was 5 weeks after day care unit attendance. 387 patients were included in our registry between March 1st and March 31st, 2020. Median age was 64 years-old (range 27-90). Most patients suffered from lung (n=96), breast (n=93), gastrointestinal (n=87), gynaecological (n=38) or urological (n=33) cancers. 131 patients received (neo)adjuvant treatments, 256 patients were treated for metastatic disease. Patients received chemotherapy (n=170), immunotherapy (n=103), targeted therapy (n=68) or other combinations (n=46). Although Belgium had one of the highest infection rates in the world, safety data concerning risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and outcomes were rather reassuring. A total of 11 patients had either suspected (n=5, 1.3%) or proven (n=6, 1.6%) SARS-CoV-2 infection. Only one 74 years old patient died of COVID-19, another 51 years old patient died of progressive disease but presented also suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of death. Analysis of our data for patients treated in March 2020 in the day-care unit are reassuring and suggest higher risk related to under-treatment compared to risk related to continuation of systemic therapy at time of COVID-19 outbreak. Patients' follow-up will be updated and additional analyses and data in particular for April 2020, when the infection rate was still extremely high in Belgium, will be presented.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare disease originating from mesothelial cells of the pleura and is related to asbestos exposure. The tumor is generally extended at the time of diagnosis and the treatment consists of a systemic palliative therapy. Radical approach is limited to very selected patients and is performed in expert centers but without validated schema. Radiotherapy alone is mainly used in palliative intent. Platinum-based chemotherapy in association with pemetrexed is the frontline standard of care and provides a 12-month overall survival. The addition of bevacizumab, an antiangiogenic drug, shows an improvement in median survival. To date, there is no second-line treatment approved for this disease and therefore inclusion in trials is recommended. Currently, various studies are investigating target therapy, immunotherapy and intrapleural perioperative treatment.

Introduction. - The incidence of pleural disease continues to increase worldwide. Medical thoracoscopy remains the standard method for exploration of the pleural cavity. Method. - We report the retrospective evaluation, the efficacy and the observed complications in 1024 medical thoracoscopies undertaken in the University Hospital of Liege between 2000 and 2017. Results. - In total, 100 pneumothoraces and 400 benign and 501 malignant pleural diseases were identified. The main indication for thoracoscopy remains the diagnosis of an exudative, lymphocytic pleural effusion of unknown aetiology after thoracocentesis. The diagnostic sensibility of thoracoscopy was 99.2% in distinguishing benign from malignant pleural disease. Talc pleurodesis was performed in 69.5% of the total population and in 66.1% of pleural effusions or thickening. Failure of pleurodesis was observed in 11% of the patients with recurrent pneumothorax and in 7.8% of neoplastic pleural effusion. We report a mortality of 0.6% in the 30 days post procedure, long duration of drainage in 8.3% and serious complications in 4.7%. In 22/1024 (2.1%) thoracoscopic evaluation was not feasible because of dense pleural fibrosis. Conclusion. - Medical thoracoscopy is a safe, well-tolerated procedure with high accuracy in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of pleural disease. (C) 2019 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.