OBJECTIVE:To explore bidirectional comorbidity between bipolar disorder (BPD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in youth and to examine the symptom profile and clinical correlates of both disorders in the context of reciprocal comorbidity and ascertainment status.METHODS:Two samples of consecutively referred youth (ages 6-17 years) ascertained contemporaneously for respective studies of BPD and OCD were compared using clinical and scalar assessment and structured diagnostic interviews.RESULTS:A total of 21% (17/82) of the BPD subjects and 15% (19/125) of the OCD subjects met DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria for both disorders. In the presence of BPD, youth with OCD more frequently experienced hoarding/saving obsessions and compulsions along with a clinical profile of greater comorbidity, poorer global functioning, and higher rate of hospitalization that is characteristic of BPD. Multiple anxiety disorders (> or = 3), especially generalized anxiety disorder and social phobia, were present at a higher frequency when OCD and BPD were comorbid than otherwise. In subjects with comorbid OCD and BPD, the primary disorder of ascertainment was associated with an earlier onset and more severe impairment.CONCLUSIONS:An unexpectedly high rate of comorbidity between BPD and OCD was observed in youth irrespective of primary ascertainment diagnosis. In youth with comorbid OCD and BPD, the clinical characteristics of each disorder run true and are analogues to their clinical presentation in youth without reciprocal comorbidity, with the exception of increased risk for obsessions and compulsions of hoarding/saving and comorbidity with other anxiety disorders.

Objective: To examine whether adverse perinatal experiences of children are associated with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) in youth.Methods: Subjects were 130 children and adolescents with OCD recruited from a family genetic study of pediatric OCD and 49 matched controls from a contemporaneous family case-control study of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Subjects were comprehensively assessed in multiple domains of function. A systematic history of pregnancy, delivery, and infancy complications was obtained.Results: Compared to normal controls, children with OCD had mothers with significantly higher rates of illness during pregnancy requiring medical care (chi(2) = 8.61, p = 0.003) and more birth difficulties (induced labor, forceps delivery, nuchal cord, or prolonged labor) (chi(2) = 7.51, p = 0.006). Among the OCD-affected children, we found several significant associations between adverse perinatal experiences and earlier age at onset, increased OCD severity, and increased risk for comorbid ADHD, chronic tic disorder, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder.Conclusion: Although exploratory, our analyses found that children with OCD had higher rates of several adverse perinatal experiences compared with controls. Among OCD-affected children, comorbid psychopathology was predicted by specific perinatal risk factors. Prospective studies of perinatal adverse events that minimize potential recall bias and type I errors are needed.

BACKGROUND:To examine the relationship between obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents using familial risk analysis.METHODS:We assessed for ADHD and OCD in the 1057 first-degree relatives of three groups of index children: those with OCD and ADHD, those with OCD but no ADHD and matched controls with neither disorder.RESULTS:The age-corrected risk for OCD was similarly elevated in families of OCD youth with (14.8%) and without ADHD (17.5%) (p=.78), and both groups had significantly higher rates of OCD compared with controls (.5%) (p<.001). In contrast, the risk for ADHD was significantly elevated only among relatives of youth who had ADHD (15.3%) compared with controls (4.6%) (p<.001). Relatives affected with ADHD also had a significantly elevated risk for OCD compared to relatives unaffected by ADHD (20% vs. 4.9%, hazard ratio 4.8) (p<.001) and the two disorders occurred together with higher than expected frequency in affected relatives of OCD+ADHD probands (p<. 001) suggesting co-segregation between these two disorders. There was no evidence of nonrandom mating between OCD- and ADHD-affected spouses.CONCLUSIONS:These results extend previous findings regarding the familiality of both OCD and ADHD and provide further evidence of a familial relationship between ADHD and pediatric OCD which best fit the hypothesis of a unique familial subtype.

Background: the high prevalence and morbidity of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) ill Youth, the secretive nature of the disorder leading to under-recognition, and the lack of specialized child psychiatry services in many areas suggest that a simple, quick, and reliable screening tool to identify cases Could be very useful to clinicians who work with children.Method: We used 8 items from the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), an empirically derived instrument free of clinician bias, to investigate the usefulness of a previously reported CBCL-based obsessive compulsive scale (OCS) by Nelson et a] [Nelson EC, Hanna GL, Hudziak JJ, Botteron KN, Heath AC, Todd RD. Obsessive - compulsive scale of the Child Behavior Checklist: Specificity, sensitivity, and predictive power. Pediatrics 2001;108(1):E14] in a separate cohort of youth with OCD. We computed the psychometric properties of the OCS in outsample of youth with OCD and in psychiatric and normal controls, and compared these to the published values.Results: Using the recommended Cutoff between the 60th and 70th percentiles of the OCS to best predict the presence of OCD, we round p very high sensitivity (92%-78%), specificity (86%-94%), negative predictive value (96%-90%), and positive predictive value (77%-86%).Conclusions: The OC scale of the CBCL shows good reliability and validity and acceptable psychometric properties to help discriminate youth with OCD. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Treatment decisions are increasingly being guided by research-based evidence 1 rather than by expert opinion or clinical experience. Following the lead from other disciplines, recent efforts to use an evidence-based approach have been made in pediatric psychiatry. 2,3 In view of the great responsibility involved in prescribing psychoactive agents to minors, evidence-based efficacy information and accurate safety data must be accessible to the pediatric practitioner. We used an evidence-based approach to review the extant literature on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) used in pediatric psychopharmacology, attending to both the quality of individual studies and the strength of the entire body of evidence. Due to the quality and number of controlled studies, this review focuses on the use of SSRIs in major depressive disorder (MDD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), with reference to their use in non-OCD anxiety disorders. We weigh the benefit observed in these studies against the risks regarding the safety of SSRIs in pediatric patients. Although nonpharmacologic interventions are widely used in children with both anxiety and depression and have substantial supporting evidence, this review is largely limited to the safety and efficacy of the SSRIs. SSRIs currently available in the United States include citalopram (Celexa(C)), escitalopram (Lexapro(C)), fluoxetine (Prozac(C)), fluvoxamine (Luvox(C)), paroxetine (Paxil(C)), and sertraline (Zoloft(C)). At this time, only fluoxetine (to treat depression and OCD), fluvoxamine (to treat OCD), and sertraline (treat OCD) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in children.

BACKGROUND:To use family study methodology to examine the relationship between obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents. METHODS:We assessed for ADHD and OCD in the 1533 first-degree relatives of three groups of index children: those with ADHD and OCD, those with ADHD but no OCD, and matched controls with neither disorder. RESULTS:The risk for ADHD was similarly elevated in families of ADHD youth with (18.9%) and without OCD (20.1%; p = .91), and both groups had significantly higher rates of ADHD compared with controls (4.6%; p < or = .001), which was consistent with previous research showing a strong familial risk for ADHD. The risk for OCD was significantly elevated only among relatives of youth with ADHD plus comorbid OCD (13.0%) compared with controls (.5%; p < or = .001) and was consistent with previous research showing a strong familial risk for OCD. Relatives affected with ADHD had a significantly elevated risk for OCD compared with relatives unaffected by ADHD (7.4% vs. 1.3%; p < .001), suggestive of co-segregation between these disorders. There was no evidence of nonrandom mating between ADHD- and OCD-affected spouses. CONCLUSIONS:These results extend previously reported findings regarding the heritability of both ADHD and OCD and provide new evidence of a familial relationship between ADHD and pediatric OCD that best fits the hypothesis of a unique familial subtype.