Recent genetic and pharmacological studies have implicated the α3, β4 and α5 subunits of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) in dependence to nicotine and other abused drugs and nicotine withdrawal. The α3β4* nAChR subtype has been shown to co-assemble with the α5 or β3 nAChR subunits, and is found mainly in the autonomic ganglia and select brain regions. It has been difficult to study the α3β4 nAChR because there have been no selective nonpeptidic ligands available to independently examine its pharmacology. We recently reported the synthesis of a [(125)I]-radiolabeled analog of a high affinity, selective small-molecule α3β4 nAChR ligand, AT-1012. We report here the vitro characterization of this radioligand in receptor binding and in vitro autoradiographic studies targeting the α3β4* nAChR. Binding of [(125)I]AT-1012 was characterized at the rat α3β4 and α4β2 nAChR transfected into HEK cells, as well as at the human α3β4α5 nAChR in HEK cells. Binding affinity of [(125)I]AT-1012 at the rat α3β4 nAChR was 1.4 nM, with a B(max) of 10.3 pmol/mg protein, similar to what was determined for unlabeled AT-1012 using [(3)H]epibatidine. Saturation isotherms suggested that [(125)I]AT-1012 binds to a single site on the α3β4 nAChR. Similar high binding affinity was also observed for [(125)I]AT-1012 at the human α3β4α5 nAChR transfected into HEK cells. [(125)I]AT-1012 did not bind with high affinity to membranes from α4β2 nAChR-transfected HEK cells. Binding studies with [(3)H]epibatidine further confirmed that AT-1012 had over 100-fold binding selectivity for α3β4 over α4β2 nAChR. K(i) values determined for known nAChR compounds using [(125)I]AT-1012 as radioligand were comparable to those obtained with [(3)H]epibatidine. [(125)I]AT-1012 was also used to label α3β4 nAChR in rat brain slices in vitro using autoradiography, which showed highly localized binding of the radioligand in brain regions consistent with the discreet localization of the α3β4 nAChR. We demonstrate that [(125)I]AT-1012 is an excellent tool for labeling the α3β4 nAChR in the presence of other nAChR subtypes.

The nociceptin receptor (NOP) and its endogenous agonist, nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), members of the opioid receptor and peptide families respectively, modulate the pharmacological effects of classical opioids, particularly opioid-induced reward and nociception. We hypothesized that compounds containing both NOP and opioid receptor activity in a single molecule may have useful pharmacological profiles as non-addicting analgesics or as drug abuse medications. We report here our forays into the structure–activity relationships for discovering ‘bifunctional’ NOP–mu opioid receptor (MOP) ligands, starting from our NOP-selective scaffolds. This initial SAR suggests pharmacophoric elements that may be modified to modulate/increase opioid affinity, while maintaining high affinity for the NOP receptor, to result in potent bifunctional small-molecule NOP/MOP ligands.

The nociceptin receptor NOP, the fourth member of the opioid receptor family, continues to be of significant interest as a target for therapeutic applications in the treatment of drug dependence, anxiety, and pain, to name a few. Its endogenous ligand, a heptadecapeptide nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) has pharmacological actions distinct from the classical opioid peptides, and has been shown to modulate opioid actions in many neurological circuits. Over the past decade, several nonpeptide (small-molecule) and peptide NOP ligands have been reported both by industry as well as academic laboratories, including our own. NOP agonists as well as NOP antagonists have been reported. The recent resolution of the 'antagonist' bound crystal structure of the NOP receptor and our recent report of the active-state homology model of the NOP receptor will facilitate our understanding of the structure-activity relationships (SAR) of NOP antagonists and agonists respectively. This review presents a ligand and structure-based assessment of the SAR for potent NOP binding pharmacophores. This review also presents rational approaches for designing 'bifunctional' NOP/opioid ligands, which have equipotent affinity for the NOP and mu opioid receptors and the desired functional profile of NOP agonist and mu opioid agonist activity. Such bifunctional NOP/mu agonists may have utility as non-addicting analgesics and drug abuse treatment with lower propensity of withdrawal-related effects.

Genomic and pharmacologic data have suggested the involvement of the α 3 β 4 subtype of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in drug seeking to nicotine and other drugs of abuse. In order to better examine this receptor subtype, we have identified and characterized the first high affinity and selective α 3 β 4 nAChR antagonist, AT-1001, both in vitro and in vivo . This is the first reported compound with a Ki below 10 nM at α 3 β 4 nAChR and >90-fold selectivity over the other major subtypes, the α 4 β 2 and α 7 nAChR. AT-1001 competes with epibatidine, allowing for [ 3 H]epibatidine binding to be used for structure-activity studies, however, both receptor binding and ligand-induced Ca 2+ flux are not strictly competitive because increasing ligand concentration produces an apparent decrease in receptor number and maximal Ca 2+ fluorescence. AT-1001 also potently and reversibly blocks epibatidine-induced inward currents in HEK cells transfected with α 3 β 4 nAChR. Importantly, AT-1001 potently and dose-dependently blocks nicotine self-administration in rats, without affecting food responding. When tested in a nucleus accumbens (NAcs) synaptosomal preparation, AT-1001 inhibits nicotine-induced [ 3 H]dopamine release poorly and at significantly higher concentrations compared with mecamylamine and conotoxin MII. These results suggest that its inhibition of nicotine self-administration in rats is not directly due to a decrease in dopamine release from the NAc, and most likely involves an indirect pathway requiring α 3 β 4 nAChR. In conclusion, our studies provide further evidence for the involvement of α 3 β 4 nAChR in nicotine self-administration. These findings suggest the utility of this receptor as a target for smoking cessation medications, and highlight the potential of AT-1001 and congeners as clinically useful compounds.

The a3 beta 4 subtype of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) is present in limited but specific areas of the brain unlike the widely distributed a4 beta 2 nAChR subtype, known to be involved in the addictive effects of nicotine. Recently, the a3 beta 4 nAChR subtype has been linked to addiction to nicotine as well as other drugs of abuse. However, there have been no subtype-selective a3 beta 4 nAChR ligands available to study the role of this receptor in drug addiction. Our laboratory has discovered a series of very high affinity and highly selective ligands for the a3 beta 4 nAChR subtype. We now report the synthesis of a radiolabeled 125I analog of N-(2-iodophenyl)-9-methyl-9-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-3-amine (AT-1012), a subnanomolar affinity, highly selective a3 beta 4 nAChR ligand from this series. This analog, [125I] AT-1012, was synthesized by a facile radio-iodination of a tributylstannylated precursor, which gave the radiolabeled compound with high specific activity and radiochemical purity. This high-affinity radioactive a3 beta 4 nAChR antagonist is very useful as a pharmacological tool in autoradiography studies, to elucidate the localization of the a3 beta 4 nAChR in the brain and study its pharmacology in the brain reward circuit. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1-(1-Cyclooctylpiperidin-4-yl)-indolin-2-one (SR14150) and 1-(1-(2,3,3a,4,5,6-hexahydro-1H-phenalen-1-yl)piperidinl-4-yl)-indolin-2-one (SR16835) are moderately selective nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOP) receptor agonists. In the [(35)S]guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) assay in vitro, SR14150 is a partial agonist at both the NOP and μ-opioid receptors, whereas SR16835 is a full agonist at the NOP receptor and has low efficacy at μ receptors. These compounds were tested for antinociceptive and antiallodynic activity, using mice in chronic pain, subsequent to spinal nerve ligation (SNL) surgery. When administered subcutaneously to mice after SNL surgery, SR14150 but not SR16835 increased tail-flick latency, which was blocked by the opioid antagonist naloxone, but not by the NOP receptor antagonist (-)-cis-1-methyl-7-[[4-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)piperidin-1-yl]methyl]-6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-benzocyclohepten-5-ol (SB-612111). In contrast, both SR14150 and SR16835 had antiallodynic activity when mechanical allodynia was measured with von Frey monofilaments. This effect was completely blocked by SB-612111 but not by naloxone. On the other hand, morphine antinociception and antiallodynia were both blocked by naloxone and potentiated by SB-612111. These results indicate that, in mice, circuitry mediating antinociceptive activity in acute and chronic pain states is different. It is possible that during a chronic pain state, an up-regulated NOP system in the spinal cord leads to NOP receptor-mediated antiallodynia, which is blocked by NOP antagonists. However, supraspinal up-regulation could lead to an attenuation of morphine antinociception and antiallodynia, which can be alleviated by an NOP receptor antagonist. Thus, although neither NOP agonists nor antagonists are effective as analgesics in acute pain, they may have efficacy as analgesics, either alone or in combination with morphine, for treatment of chronic pain.

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) peptide (NOP) receptor, a non-opioid branch of the opioid receptor family, shows structural similarities to traditional opioid receptors but binds opioid with very poor affinity. This receptor has been implicated in many physiological functions including pain regulation. This study quantitatively investigated the effect of (−)-cis-1-Methyl-7-[[4-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)piperidin-1 -yl]methyl]-6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-benzocyclohepten-5-ol (SB-612111), a novel non-peptide ligand of NOP receptor, on the native NOP receptors in the midbrain ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG), a crucial region for pain regulation. SB-612111 concentration-dependently antagonized N/OFQ-induced G-protein coupled inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) current in vlPAG neurons. The IC50 value of SB-612111 estimated from dose–response curves is 87.7±1.2nM. SB-612111 had no intrinsic agonistic activity and did not affect the GIRK current induced by [D-Ala2, N-Me-Phe4, Gly5-ol]-enkephalin, a mu-opioid receptor agonist, when tested at concentrations of up to 1μM. It is concluded that SB-612111 is a pure, potent and selective antagonist of NOP receptors that mediate GIRK channel activation in the vlPAG neurons.

Antagonist activity at the α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) is thought to contribute to the antiaddictive properties of several compounds. However, truly selective ligands for the α3β4 nAChR have not been available. We report the discovery and SAR of a novel class of compounds that bind to the α3β4 nAChR and have no measurable affinity for the α4β2 or α7 subtype. In functional assays the lead compound antagonized epibatidine-induced Ca2+ flux in α3β4-transfected cells in a noncompetitive manner.

Activation of brain nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOP) receptors leads to attenuation of μ-opioid receptor (MOP receptor)-mediated antinociception. Buprenorphine, a high-affinity partial MOP receptor agonist also binds to NOP receptors with 80 nM affinity. The buprenorphine-induced inverted U-shaped dose-response curve for antinociception may be due to NOP receptor activation, given that, in the presence of the NOP receptor antagonist, 1-[(3R,4R)-1-cyclooctylmethyl-3-hydroxymethyl-4-piperidyl]-3-ethyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one (J113397), or in NOP receptor knockout mice, buprenorphine has a steeper dose-response curve and acts as a full agonist. To further explore the involvement of the direct activation of NOP receptors by buprenorphine and other compounds that activate both NOP and MOP receptors, the antinociceptive effects of 1-(1-(2,3,3α,4,5,6-hexahydro-1H-phenalen-1-yl)piperidin-4-yl)-indolin-2-one. (SR16435), 3-ethyl-1-(1-(4-isopropylcyclohexyl)piperidin-4-yl)-indolin-2-one (SR16507), buprenorphine, pentazocine, and morphine, compounds with varying levels of MOP and NOP receptor affinity and efficacy, were assessed in mice using the tail-flick assay. The ability of the selective NOP receptor antagonist (−)-cis-1-methyl-7-[[4-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)piperidin-1-yl]methyl]-6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-benzocyclohepten-5-ol (SB-612111) to potentiate antinociception induced by the above compounds was examined to investigate whether activation of NOP receptors leads to attenuation of MOP receptor-mediated antinociception. SB-612111 potentiated antinociception induced by buprenorphine and the other mixed NOP/MOP receptor agonists SR16435 and SR16507. However, SB-612111 had no effect on pentazocine or morphine antinociception, two compounds with no NOP receptor-binding affinity. These results further support the hypothesis that activation of NOP receptors can lead to attenuation of MOP receptor-mediated antinociception elicited by mixed NOP/MOP receptor compounds such as buprenorphine, SR16435, and SR16507 and that, although buprenorphine has low efficacy in vitro, it has significant NOP receptor agonist activity in vivo.

The effect of new NOP receptor agonists and antagonists in the rat chronic constriction injury model was investigated. Intraperitoneally administered NOP receptor agonist SR14150 and antagonists SR16430 and SR14148, had no effect on mechanical allodynia when given alone. The nonselective NOP/mu-opioid receptor agonist SR16435, however, produced an anti-allodynic response, similar to morphine and reversible by naloxone. Notably, co-administration of the NOP receptor antagonists potentiated the anti-allodynic activity of both morphine and SR16435. Increased levels of the NOP receptor are implicated in the reduced efficacy of morphine in neuropathic pain. Our results suggest the utility of NOP receptor antagonists for potentiating opioid efficacy in chronic pain.

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPARdelta) is a ligand-activated, nuclear receptor transcription factor that has a documented role in glucose and lipid homeostasis. Recent studies have implicated this nuclear receptor in numerous aspects of oncogenesis. We report herein the characterization of a novel small-molecule (SR13904) that inhibits PPARdelta agonist-induced transactivation and functions as a PPARdelta antagonist. SR13904 also antagonizes PPARgamma transactivation, albeit with much weaker potency. SR13904 displays inhibitory effects on cellular proliferation and survival in several human carcinoma lines, including lung, breast and liver. These inhibitory effects of SR13904 on tumor cells were linked to a G(1)/S cell cycle block and increased apoptosis. Molecular studies show that SR13904 treatment of a lung cancer cell line, A549, results in markedly reduced levels of a number of cell cycle proteins including cyclin A and D, and cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) 2 and 4. The inhibitory effects on CDK2 appear to be transcriptional. Several of these cell cycle-related genes are known to be upregulated by PPARdelta. The antitumor activities of SR13904 suggest that antagonism of PPARdelta-mediated transactivation may inhibit tumorigenesis and that pharmacological inhibition of PPARdelta may be a potential strategy for treatment or prevention of cancer.

The nociceptin receptor (NOPr), a member of the opioid receptor family, is a target for the treatment of pain and drug abuse. Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), the endogenous peptide for NOPr, not only modulates opioid antinociception, but also blocks the rewarding effects of several abused drugs, such as morphine, cocaine, and amphetamine. We hypothesized that NOPr agonists, with bifunctional activity at the mu-opioid receptor (MOPr), may function as nonaddicting analgesics or as drug abuse medications. Bifunctional small-molecule NOPr agonists possessing different selectivities and efficacies at MOPr were evaluated in an acute thermal antinociception assay, and for their ability to induce conditioned place preference (CPP) and their effect on morphine-induced CPP. 1-(1-Cyclooctylpiperidin-4-yl)-indolin-2-one) (SR14150), a high-affinity NOPr partial agonist, with low MOPr affinity and efficacy, produced analgesia that was naloxone-reversible. SR14150 did not induce CPP alone, nor did it attenuate morphine-induced CPP. 3-Ethyl-1-(1-(4-isopropylcyclohexyl)piperidin-4-yl)-indolin-2-one (SR16507), which has high affinity for both NOPr and MOPr, full agonist activity at NOPr, and partial agonist activity at MOPr, was also a potent analgesic and produced CPP alone, but also modestly attenuated morphine CPP. 1-(1-(2,3,3a, 4,5,6-hexahydro-1H-phenalen-1-yl)-piperidinl-4-yl)-indolin-2-one (SR16835), a NOPr full agonist and low-affinity MOPr partial agonist, was not antinociceptive, did not produce CPP alone, but attenuated morphine CPP. Our results suggest that NOPr full-agonist activity is required to modulate opioid-induced reward, whereas a bifunctional NOPr/MOPr partial agonist profile may be suitable as a nonaddicting analgesic. The opioid-modulating effects of the NOPr ligands may be used effectively to produce better medications for treatment of drug abuse and pain.

Background and purpose: Compounds that activate both NOP and μ‐opioid receptors might be useful as analgesics and drug abuse medications. Studies were carried out to better understand the biological activity of such compounds. Experimental approach: Binding affinities were determined on membranes from cells transfected with NOP and opioid receptors. Functional activity was determined by [ 35 S]GTPγS binding on cell membranes and using the mouse vas deferens preparation in vitro and the tail flick antinociception assay in vivo . Key results: Compounds ranged in affinity from SR14150, 20‐fold selective for NOP receptors, to buprenorphine, 50‐fold selective for μ‐opioid receptors. In the [ 35 S]GTPγS assay, SR compounds ranged from full agonist to antagonist at NOP receptors and most were partial agonists at μ‐opioid receptors. Buprenorphine was a low efficacy partial agonist at μ‐opioid receptors, but did not stimulate [ 35 S]GTPγS binding through NOP. In the mouse vas deferens, each compound, except for SR16430, inhibited electrically induced contractions. In each case, except for N/OFQ itself, the inhibition was due to μ‐opioid receptor activation, as determined by equivalent results in NOP receptor knockout tissues. SR14150 showed antinociceptive activity in the tail flick test, which was reversed by the opioid antagonist naloxone. Conclusions and implications: Compounds that bind to both μ‐opioid and NOP receptors have antinociceptive activity but the relative contribution of each receptor is unclear. These experiments help characterize compounds that bind to both receptors, to better understand the mechanism behind their biological activities, and identify new pharmacological tools to characterize NOP and opioid receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2008) 153 , 609–619; doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707598 ; published online 3 December 2007

We identified a novel nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOP)/mu-opioid receptor agonist, SR 16435 [1-(1-( bicyclo[3.3.1] nonan-9-yl) piperidin4- yl)indolin-2-one], with high binding affinity and partial agonist activity at both receptors. It was hypothesized that SR 16435 would produce antinociception and yet, unlike morphine, would have diminished rewarding properties and tolerance development. Antinociception was assessed in mice using the tail-flick assay, whereas behavioral and rewarding effects were assessed using the place conditioning (PC) paradigm. PC was established by pairing drug injections with a distinct compartment. Behavioral effects were measured after acute and repeated drug administration, and the test for PC was carried out 24 h after four drug-and vehicle-pairing sessions. SR 16435 produced an increase in tail-flick latency, but SR 16435-induced antinociception was lower than that observed with morphine. Given that naloxone blocked SR 16435-induced antinociception, it is highly likely that this effect was mediated by mu-opioid receptors. Compared with morphine, chronic SR 16435 treatment resulted in reduced development of tolerance to its antinociceptive effects. SR 16435-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) was evident, an effect that was probably mediated via mu-opioid receptors, as it was reversed by coadministration of naloxone. NOP agonist activity was also present, given that SR 16435 decreased global activity, and this effect was partially reversed with the selective NOP antagonist, SR 16430 [1-( cyclooctylmethyl)- 4-(3-(trifluoromethyl) phenyl) piperidin-4-ol]. Naloxone, however, also reversed the SR 16435-induced decrease in activity, indicating that both opioid and NOP receptors mediate this behavior. In summary, the mixed NOP/mu-opioid partial agonist SR 16435 exhibited both NOP and mu-opioid receptor mediated behaviors.

An entry from the Cambridge Structural Database, the world’s repository for small molecule crystal structures. The entry contains experimental data from a crystal diffraction study. The deposited dataset for this entry is freely available from the CCDC and typically includes 3D coordinates, cell parameters, space group, experimental conditions and quality measures.

The recently discovered fourth member of the opioid receptor family, the nociceptin receptor (NOP) and its endogenous ligand, the heptadecaptide nociceptin, are involved in several central nervous system pathways, such as nociception, reward, tolerance, and feeding. The discovery of small-molecule ligands for NOP is being actively pursued for several therapeutic applications. This review presents a brief overview of the several recently reported NOP ligands, classified as NOP agonists and antagonists, with an emphasis on the analysis of the structural features that may be important for modulating the agonist/antagonist profile (intrinsic activity) of these ligands. Structure-activity relationships in our own series of dihydroindolinone-based NOP ligands and those of the various reported ligands indicate that the lipophilic substituent on the common basic nitrogen present in all NOP ligands plays a role in determining the agonist/antagonist profile of the NOP ligand. This analysis provides a basis for the rational drug design of NOP ligands of desired intrinsic activity and provides a framework for developing pharmacophore models for high affinity binding and intrinsic activity at the NOP receptor. Since NOP agonists and antagonists both have therapeutic value, rational approaches for obtaining both within a high-affinity binding class of compounds are very useful for designing potent and selective NOP ligands with the desired profile of intrinsic efficacy.