Nanocomposites (SiC-PANI) based on silicon carbide nanoparticles (SiC) encapsulated in conducting polyaniline (PANI) are synthesized by direct polymerization of PANI on the nanoparticle surfaces. The conductivity of PANI and the nanocomposites was modulated by several doping levels of camphor sulfonic acid (CSA). Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) investigations were carried out on representative SiC-PANI samples over the temperature range [100–300K]. The features of the EPR spectra were analyzed taking into account the paramagnetic species such as polarons with spin S=1/2 involved in two main environments realized in the composites as well as their thermal activation. A critical temperature range 200–225K was revealed through crossover changes in the thermal behavior of the EPR spectral parameters. Insights on the electronic transport properties and their thermal evolutions were inferred from polarons species probed by EPR and the electrical conductivity in doped nanocomposites.

Spinel and zirconia were studied by measuring the total secondary electron emission (SEE) yield σ in a dedicated scanning electron microscope (SEM) especially equipped to study the fundamental aspects of the charge trapping in insulating materials during a 1.1keV electron irradiation at room temperature. The variation of the total SEE yield with the injected dose for both spinel and zirconia is different. In spinel the coefficient σ starts from its intrinsic value σ0=4 and reaches a plateau at σ=1 at the end of irradiation, which corresponds to the self-regulated regime. The continuity of the curves, shot after shot, proves that the trapped charges are stable and does not spread out in the material as injection proceeds. In this case spinel is called “trapper insulator”. In contrast with the spinel, σ in zirconia, never reaches unity while the injected charge increases: it evolves from its intrinsic yield σ0=2.3 to a steady value a few percent above 1. The curve shows the relaxation of the positive generated charge. In this case zirconia is called “conductive insulator”. The difference in the charging kinetics of the two materials is attributed to the difference in conductivities.