BackgroundIncremental peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been recommended as a patient-focused prescription; however, its safety and potential clinical benefits are based on retrospective studies.MethodsWe conducted a pilot, randomized controlled study comparing 5-day versus 7-day/week PD in incident patients with preserved residual kidney function in three centers in Australia. Modality of PD accorded to patient and clinician preferences for both groups. Participants on 5-day PD were transitioned to daily PD if symptoms of uremia did not respond to an increase in dialysate volume, or if residual renal creatinine clearance fell to <50 L/week/1.73m2. Duration of the 5-day regimen, quality of life, and clinical outcomes were compared to standard treatment over 12 months.ResultsTwenty-four participants were randomized to 7-day (n = 13) or 5-day (n = 11) PD. At baseline, age, gender, diabetes prevalence, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were similar. The mean and median durations of the 5-day prescription were 8.4 ± 4.7 and 12 (IQR 5-12) months, respectively. On average, participants in the 5-day Group had 73 dialysis-free days/person and utilized less PD fluid (957 ± 218 vs. 1558 ± 436 L/person, P < 0.0001). No differences were observed in peritonitis (0.12 vs. 0.26 episodes/patient-year) or hospitalization (0.12 vs. 0.09 episodes/patient-year) rates between 5- and 7-day groups, respectively. Although physical, mental, and kidney-disease composite scores were comparable between groups, sleep quality and patient satisfaction were higher in the 5-day Group.ConclusionIncremental PD was feasible in patients with preserved residual kidney function in the first year of dialysis and was not associated with more complications compared with daily PD. Differences observed in sleep quality of treatment satisfaction are hypothesis-generating and warrant further evaluation.

Introduction: Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis is one of the leading causes of discontinuation of PD and is considered a critically important outcome for patients on PD. However, there is no universally accepted method of measuring this outcome in clinical trials.Methods: We convened an online consensus workshop to establish a core outcome measure for PD -related peritonitis in clinical trials.Results: A total of 53 participants, including 18 patients and caregivers, from 12 countries engaged in breakout discussions in this workshop. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. We identified the following 3 themes: (i) feasibility and applicability across diverse settings, which reflected the difficulty with implementing laboratory-based measures in resource-limited environments; (ii) ensuring validity, which included mini-mizing false positives and considering the specificity of symptoms; and (iii) being meaningful and tangible to patients, which meant that the measure should be easy to interpret, reflect the impact that symptoms have on patients, and promote transparency by standardizing the reporting of peritonitis among dialysis units.Conclusion: A core outcome measure for PD-related peritonitis should include both symptom-based and laboratory-based criteria. Thus, the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) definition of perito-nitis is acceptable. However, there should be consideration of reporting suspected peritonitis in cases where laboratory confirmation is not possible. The measure should include all infections from the time of catheter insertion and capture both the rate of infection and the number of patients who remain peritonitis free. A core outcome measure with these features would increase the impact of clinical trials on the care and decision-making of patients receiving PD.

Background: The Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS) is an international, prospective study following persons treated by peritoneal dialysis (PD) to identify modifiable practices associated with improvements in PD technique and person survival. The aim of this study was to assess the representativeness of the Australian cohort included in PDOPPS compared to the complete Australian PD population, as reported to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry. Methods: Adults with at least one PD treatment reported to ANZDATA Registry during the census period of PDOPPS Phase I (November 2014 to April 2018) were compared to the Australian PDOPPS cohort. The primary outcomes were the representativeness of centres and persons. Secondary outcomes explored the association of person characteristics with consent to study participation. Results: After data linkage, 511 PDOPPS participants were compared to 5616 Australians treated with PD. Within centres eligible for PDOPPS, selected centres were similar to other Australian centres. The PDOPPS participants' cohort tended to include older persons, more males, a higher proportion of Caucasians and more persons with higher socioeconomic advantage compared to the Australian PD population. Differences in distribution across sex and ethnicities between the PDOPPS cohort and the overall PD population were in part due to the selection and consent processes, during which females and non-Caucasians were more likely to not consent to PDOPPS participation. Conclusion: Sampling methods used in PDOPPS allowed for good national representativeness of the included centres. However, representativeness of the unweighted PDOPPS sample was suboptimal in regard to some participant characteristics.

Aims To describe the baseline characteristics and treatment of Australian patients diagnosed with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) reported to the Global aHUS Registry. Methods Descriptive analysis of the Australian cohort with aHUS (n = 106) was undertaken for demographics, disease characteristics and prior treatment with eculizumab; comparing with the global cohort (n = 1688) for certain pre-specified disease characteristics. Results In Australia, almost two-thirds of patients diagnosed with aHUS were female and over 80% of patients were Caucasians, with similar proportions reported in the global cohort. Less than 6% of patients in the Australia and global cohorts were reported to have a history of autoimmune disease (4% vs 2%, respectively; P = .21) or cancer (5% vs 5%, respectively; P = .93), conditions that have been associated with secondary HUS. In the Australian cohort, 26% had received a kidney transplant and 68% of patients had received eculizumab. Kidneys were the most common organ involvement, followed by gastrointestinal tract (26%) and cardiovascular system (19%), with 35% of patients reported to have had at least two organs involved within 6 months prior to baseline visit or entry into the registry. Complement factor H was the most common pathogenic complement gene variant in the Australian patients. Conclusion Data from the aHUS registry confirms and defines region-specific disease characteristics among a selected group of Australian children and adults with aHUS reported to the registry. Ongoing and more inclusive data will provide further information about temporal trends and treatment outcomes, representing a unique opportunity for clinicians and researchers to further develop knowledge surrounding this rare disease.

Background In Australia, Lupus Nephritis (LN) affects a culturally diverse population of patients. We established the Lupus Nephritis Australian Registry (LUNAR) to better understand the population of patients receiving Myfortic and other immunosuppressants, and to analyse the safety and efficacy of the treatments they received. Methods A non-interventional, multicentre, registry of patients with biopsy-proven ISN/RPS class III, IV or V LN, treated with Myfortic or other immunosuppressants, was established. We collected baseline demographic and 6-monthly follow-up data over a 5-year period (2013–2018), including clinical data, laboratory tests and safety outcomes. Results 149 patients were enrolled in LUNAR across 8 sites, with 83.7% female and a mean age of 38.8 years. Most patients were Caucasian (45.2%) – patients of Asian ethnicity (29.6%) and Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander or Maori/Pacific Islander descent (10.4%) were significantly over-represented compared to the general population. The mean and median duration of SLE was 8.6 and 6 years, respectively (range 0–42 years), and of LN was 5.4 and 3.9 years, respectively (range 0–30 years). Most patients had class IV LN on their initial kidney biopsy (59.3%), with 21.5% having class III and 11.1% having class V LN. Immunosuppressants used prior to screening included corticosteroids (68.9%), mycophenolate mofetil ((MMF) 61.5%), Myfortic (41.5%) and cyclophosphamide (32.6%). At enrolment or during the study, most patients were treated with Myfortic (76.3%), MMF (65.2%) and/or hydroxychloroquine (67.4%). Rituximab and azathioprine were each started in 8.9% of patients during the study period. Kidney function was stable/improved for most patients over the study period and mycophenolate-based therapy was well-tolerated. Conclusions LUNAR is the first study outlining the demographics, outcomes and practice patterns in the management of patients with LN in Australia. Acknowledgements Supported by funding from Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

BACKGROUNDElevated serum urate levels are associated with progression of chronic kidney disease. Whether urate-lowering treatment with allopurinol can attenuate the decline of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with chronic kidney disease who are at risk for progression is not known.METHODSIn this randomized, controlled trial, we randomly assigned adults with stage 3 or 4 chronic kidney disease and no history of gout who had a urinary albumin:creatinine ratio of 265 or higher (with albumin measured in milligrams and creatinine in grams) or an eGFR decrease of at least 3.0 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area in the preceding year to receive allopurinol (100 to 300 mg daily) or placebo. The primary outcome was the change in eGFR from randomization to week 104, calculated with the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine equation.RESULTSEnrollment was stopped because of slow recruitment after 369 of 620 intended patients were randomly assigned to receive allopurinol (185 patients) or placebo (184 patients). Three patients per group withdrew immediately after randomization. The remaining 363 patients (mean eGFR, 31.7 ml per minute per 1.73 m2; median urine albumin:creatinine ratio, 716.9; mean serum urate level, 8.2 mg per deciliter) were included in the assessment of the primary outcome. The change in eGFR did not differ significantly between the allopurinol group and the placebo group (-3.33 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 per year [95% confidence interval {CI}, -4.11 to -2.55] and -3.23 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 per year [95% CI, -3.98 to -2.47], respectively; mean difference, -0.10 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 per year [95% CI, -1.18 to 0.97]; P = 0.85). Serious adverse events were reported in 84 of 182 patients (46%) in the allopurinol group and in 79 of 181 patients (44%) in the placebo group.CONCLUSIONSIn patients with chronic kidney disease and a high risk of progression, urate-lowering treatment with allopurinol did not slow the decline in eGFR as compared with placebo. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and the Health Research Council of New Zealand; CKD-FIX Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12611000791932.).

BACKGROUND:Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related infections lead to significant morbidity. The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) guidelines for the prevention and treatment of PD-related infections are based on variable evidence. We describe practice patterns across facilities participating in the Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS).METHODS:PDOPPS, a prospective cohort study, enrolled nationally representative samples of PD patients in Australia/New Zealand (ANZ), Canada, Thailand, Japan, the UK and the USA. Data on PD-related infection prevention and treatment practices across facilities were obtained from a survey of medical directors'.RESULTS:A total of 170 centers, caring for >11 000 patients, were included. The proportion of facilities reporting antibiotic administration at the time of PD catheter insertion was lowest in the USA (63%) and highest in Canada and the UK (100%). Exit-site antimicrobial prophylaxis was variably used across countries, with Japan (4%) and Thailand (28%) having the lowest proportions. Exit-site mupirocin was the predominant exit-site prophylactic strategy in ANZ (56%), Canada (50%) and the UK (47%), while exit-site aminoglycosides were more common in the USA (72%). Empiric Gram-positive peritonitis treatment with vancomycin was most common in the UK (88%) and USA (83%) compared with 10-45% elsewhere. Empiric Gram-negative peritonitis treatment with aminoglycoside therapy was highest in ANZ (72%) and the UK (77%) compared with 10-45% elsewhere.CONCLUSIONS:Variation in PD-related infection prevention and treatment strategies exist across countries with limited uptake of ISPD guideline recommendations. Further work will aim to understand the impact these differences have on the wide variation in infection risk between facilities and other clinically relevant PD outcomes.

A 25-year-old man presented with microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and acute kidney injury. With a normal ADAMTS-13 level, negative faecal shiga-toxin test and strong family history of atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome, he was commenced on eculizumab to good clinical response. Subsequent genetic testing revealed a heterozygous complement factor H mutation. Eculizumab was discontinued after 44months of treatment, and he relapsed within 6months, with the first sign being downtrending haptoglobin levels, with no other markers of haemolysis or thrombocytopaenia, 5weeks prior to development of acute kidney injury. He was recommenced on eculizumab and to date still remains on it. This case highlights the unusual pattern of relapse and discusses the considerations for eculizumab discontinuation in patients with stable atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome receiving maintenance therapy.

Background Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is recommended for adults with residual kidney function and without significant comorbidities. However, peritonitis is a serious and common complication that is associated with hospitalization, pain, catheter loss, and death. This study aims to describe the beliefs, needs, and experiences of PD patients about peritonitis, to inform the training, support, and care of these patients. Methods Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 patients from 3 renal units in Australia who had previous or current experience of PD. The interviews were conducted between November 2014 and November 2015. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results We identified 4 themes: constant vigilance for prevention (conscious of vulnerability, sharing responsibility with family, demanding attention to detail, ambiguity of detecting infection, ineradicable inhabitation, jeopardizing PD success); invading harm (life-threatening, wreaking internal damage, debilitating pain, losing control and dignity); incapacitating lifestyle interference (financial strain, isolation and separation, exacerbating burden on family); and exasperation with hospitalization (dread of hospital admission, exposure to infection, gruelling follow-up schedule, exposure to harm). Conclusions Patients perceived that peritonitis could threaten their health, treatment modality, and lifestyle, which motivated vigilance and attention to hygiene. They felt a loss of control due to debilitating symptoms including pain and having to be hospitalized, and they were uncertain about how to monitor for signs of peritonitis. Providing patients with education about the causes and signs of peritonitis and addressing their concerns about lifestyle impact, financial impact, hospitalization, and peritonitis-related anxieties may improve treatment satisfaction and outcomes for patients requiring PD.

Peritoneal dialysis technique survival in Australia and New Zealand is lower than in other parts of the world. More than two-thirds of technique failures are related to infective complications (predominantly peritonitis) and 'social reasons'. Practice patterns vary widely and more than one-third of peritoneal dialysis units do not meet the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis minimum accepted peritonitis rate. In many cases, poor peritonitis outcomes reflect significant deviations from international guidelines. In this paper we propose a series of practical recommendations to improve outcomes in peritoneal dialysis patients through appropriate patient selection, prophylaxis and treatment of infectious complications, investigation of social causes of technique failure and a greater focus on patient education and clinical governance.

Background: Fibrillary glomerulonephritis (FGN) and immunotactoid glomerulopathy (IG) are uncommon and characterised by non-amyloid fibrillary glomerular deposits. The aim of this study was to investigate characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) secondary to FGN and IG. Methods: All ESKD patients who commenced RRT in Australia and New Zealand 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2010 were included. Outcomes were assessed by Kaplan-Meier, multivariate logistic-regression analysis and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards survival analysis. Results: Of 45,216 individuals with ESKD, 55 (0.12%) had FGN and 11 (0.02%) had IG. The median survival of FGN patients on dialysis (5.63 years, 95% CI 3.31-7.96) was not significantly different from patients with other ESKD causes (median 4.01 years, 95% CI 4.34-4.47; log-rank 1.32, p = 0.25), but was significantly longer than that of IG patients (median 2.93 years, 95% CI 0.00-6.17; log-rank 4.8, p = 0.03). Thirteen (24%) FGN patients received 13 renal-allografts, 4 (36%) IG patients received 4 renal-allografts and 11,528 (26%) other ESKD patients received 12,278 renal-allografts. FGN patients experienced comparable outcomes to other ESKD patients for both 10-year patient survival (100 vs. 84%, p = 0.93) and renal-allograft survival (67 vs. 76%, p = 0.06). For IG, the median follow-up was 3.66 years with 75% patient survival and 100% renal-allograft survival. One (8%) FGN patient and 1 (25%) IG patient experienced recurrent FGN and IG respectively in their allograft. Conclusion: Patients with FGN have comparable dialysis and renal transplant outcomes to patients with other causes of ESKD. IG patients have inferior survival on dialysis, although renal transplant outcomes are acceptable. Disease recurrence in renal-allografts was low for both FGN and IG.

♦ Background: The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between socio-economic status (SES) and peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis. ♦ Methods: Associations between area SES and peritonitis risk and outcomes were examined in all non-indigenous patients who received PD in Australia between 1 October 2003 and 31 December 2010 (peritonitis outcomes). SES was assessed by deciles of postcode-based Australian Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), including Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD), Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD), Index of Economic Resources (IER) and Index of Education and Occupation (IEO). ♦ Results: 7,417 patients were included in the present study. Mixed-effects Poisson regression demonstrated that incident rate ratios for peritonitis were generally lower in the higher SEIFA-based deciles compared with the reference (decile 1), although the reductions were only statistically significant in some deciles (IRSAD deciles 2 and 4 – 9; IRSD deciles 4 – 6; IER deciles 4 and 6; IEO deciles 3 and 6). Mixed-effects logistic regression showed that lower probabilities of hospitalization were predicted by relatively higher SES, and lower probabilities of peritonitis-associated death were predicted by less SES disadvantage status and greater access to economic resources. No association was observed between SES and the risks of peritonitis cure, catheter removal and permanent hemodialysis (HD) transfer. ♦ Conclusions: In Australia, where there is universal free healthcare, higher SES was associated with lower risks of peritonitis-associated hospitalization and death, and a lower risk of peritonitis in some categories.

Nocardia infections are an uncommon but important cause of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients. The present study was carried out to determine the spectrum of Nocardia infections in a renal transplant centre in Australia.

BACKGROUNDThere has not been a comprehensive examination to date of peritoneal dialysis (PD) outcomes after temporary haemodialysis (HD) transfer for peritonitis.METHODSThe study included all incident Australian patients who experienced peritonitis between 1 October 2003, and 31 December 2011, using Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry data. Patients were grouped into three categories: Interim HD, Permanent HD and Never HD based on HD transfer status after the first peritonitis. The independent predictors of HD transfer and subsequent return to PD were determined by multivariable, multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis. Matched case-control analyses were performed to compare clinical outcomes (e.g. patient survival) between groups.RESULTSOf the 3305 patients who experienced peritonitis during the study period, 553 episodes (16.7%) resulted in transfer to HD and 101 patients subsequently returned to PD. HD transfer was significantly and independently predicted by inpatient treatment of peritonitis [odds ratio (OR) 11.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.14-18.36] and the recovered microbiologic profile of organisms recognized to be associated with moderate (20-40%) to high (>40%) rates of catheter removal (moderate: OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.89-3.17; high: OR 8.63, 95% CI 6.44-11.57). Matched case-control analyses yielded comparable results among Interim, Permanent and Never HD groups in terms of patient survival (P = 0.28), death-censored technique survival [hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 95% CI 0.59-1.28; P = 0.48] and peritonitis-free survival (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.50-1.39, P = 0.49).CONCLUSIONSIn an observational registry study of first peritonitis episodes, temporary HD transfer was not associated with inferior patient-level clinical outcomes when compared with others who either never required HD transfer or remained on HD permanently if all patient-level and peritonitis-related factors were considered equal. Therefore, return to PD after a temporary HD due to peritonitis should not be discouraged in appropriate PD patients.

BACKGROUND Alport syndrome is a rare inheritable renal disease. Clinical outcomes for patients progressing to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are not well described. METHODS This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients from Australia and New Zealand commencing renal replacement therapy (RRT) for ESKD due to Alport syndrome between 1965 and 1995 (early cohort) and between 1996 and 2010 (contemporary cohort) compared with propensity score-matched, RRT-treated, non-Alport ESKD controls. RESULTS A total of 58 422 patients started RRT during this period of which 296 (0.5%) patients had Alport ESKD. In the early cohort, Alport ESKD was associated with superior dialysis patient survival [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.20-0.83, P = 0.01], renal allograft survival (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.54-1.01, P = 0.05) and renal transplant patient survival (HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.28-0.66, P < 0.001) compared with controls. In the contemporary cohort, no differences were observed between the two groups for dialysis patient survival (HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 0.65-3.11, P = 0.38), renal allograft survival (HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.57-1.79, P = 0.98) or renal transplant patient survival (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.26-1.73, P = 0.41). One Alport patient (0.4%) had post-transplant anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease. Four female and 41 male Alport patients became parents on RRT with generally good neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION Alport syndrome patients experienced comparable dialysis and renal transplant outcomes to matched non-Alport ESKD controls in the contemporary cohort due to relatively greater improvements in outcomes for non-Alport ESKD patients over time. Post-transplant anti-GBM disease was rare.

BACKGROUND:Non-randomized studies suggest an association between serum uric acid levels and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this systematic review is to summarize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the benefits and risks of uric acid-lowering therapy on renal outcomes. METHODS:Medline, Excerpta Medical Database and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched with English language restriction for RCTs comparing the effect of uric acid-lowering therapy with placebo/no treatment on renal outcomes. Treatment effects were summarized using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS:Eight trials (476 participants) evaluating allopurinol treatment were eligible for inclusion. There was substantial heterogeneity in baseline kidney function, cause of CKD and duration of follow-up across these studies. In five trials, there was no significant difference in change in glomerular filtration rate from baseline between the allopurinol and control arms [mean difference (MD) 3.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -0.9, 7.1; heterogeneity χ2=1.9, I2=0%, P=0.75]. In three trials, allopurinol treatment abrogated increases in serum creatinine from baseline (MD -0.4 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.8, -0.0 mg/dL; heterogeneity χ2=3, I2=34%, P=0.22). Allopurinol had no effect on proteinuria and blood pressure. Data for effects of allopurinol therapy on progression to end-stage kidney disease and death were scant. Allopurinol had uncertain effects on the risks of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS:Uric acid-lowering therapy with allopurinol may retard the progression of CKD. However, adequately powered randomized trials are required to evaluate the benefits and risks of uric acid-lowering therapy in CKD.