The preovulatory luteinizing hormone (LH) surge results from the integration of complex interactions among gonadal steroids and hypothalamic and pituitary hormones. To evaluate changes in LH secretory dynamics that occur during the rat LH surge, we have 1) obtained frequently sampled serum LH concentration time series, 2) used both waveform-dependent and waveform-independent convolution analyses, and 3) independently assessed proestrous LH half-life and basal non-gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-dependent LH secretion during the LH surge. Waveform-independent pulse analysis revealed a 24-fold increase in the maximal pulsatile LH secretory rate attained during late proestrus compared with early proestrus. A 15-fold increase was quantified for the mean LH secretory rate. In complementary analyses, we applied a measured LH half-life of 17 +/- 2.7 min and a median basal LH secretion rate of 0.0046 microgram. l-1. min-1 for convolution analysis, revealing a 16-fold increase in the mass of LH released/burst and more than sixfold rise in the amplitude of the secretory peaks. Evaluation of the approximate entropy of the LH surge profiles was performed, showing an increase in the orderliness of the LH release process during the surge. We conclude that both quantitative (mass/burst) and qualitative (approximate entropy) features of LH release are regulated during the proestrous LH surge.

Peripheral administration of N-methyl-D,L-aspartate (NMA), an analogue of the excitatory amino acid aspartate, elicits LH and prolactin (PRL) release in rats, most likely by increasing endogenous releasing-hormone secretion. These experiments were carried out to assess the degree to which NMA stimulates FSH and to analyze the relationship between endocrine status and responsiveness to NMA in female rats, in contrast to male rats, as described in the companion paper [Biol Reprod 48:000-000]. In experiment 1, estrous rats (n = 10) and diestrous rats (n = 10) and in experiment 2, estrous rats (n = 11) and rats ovariectomized (OVX) 8 days previously (n = 10) were fitted with atrial catheters and injected s.c. with 100 micrograms of an LHRH antagonist or vehicle at 2100 h. Starting at 0900 h the next day (metestrus, proestrus, or Day 9 post-OVX), blood was withdrawn every 10 min for 3 h. Each animal received i.v. 5 mg NMA after the first hour and i.v. 500 ng LHRH after the second hour. NMA significantly increased LH in metestrous and proestrous females, and LHRH antagonist blunted the increases. In OVX females, LH decreased after NMA. FSH was not affected by NMA in any group. PRL increased after NMA in proestrous and metestrous animals. LHRH caused surge-like LH and small FSH increases in vehicle groups; these increases did not differ in amplitude between intact and OVX animals and were blunted by pretreatment with LHRH antagonist. In experiment 3, 10 diestrous rats were fitted with atrial catheters and were serially bled at 2-h intervals from 1200 h on the following day (proestrus) until 0600 h on estrus morning. After the first sample the animals were injected s.c. with 0.2 mg/kg MK801, a noncompetitive NMA receptor antagonist, or with saline. Four of the 5 saline-treated animals exhibited surges of LH and FSH as well as elevated progesterone levels, with LH and progesterone peaking at 2000 h. Five of 5 MK801-treated animals failed to have elevated LH, FSH, or progesterone levels at any time point. These data demonstrate that LHRH mediates the LH response to NMA in rats and that endogenous NMA receptor binding may be necessary for the preovulatory gonadotropin surges. The lack of FSH responses to NMA during periods of low-level gonadotropin secretion suggests that physiological increments in endogenous LHRH secretion sufficient to induce a pulse of LH are insufficient to stimulate pulse-like FSH release.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Peripheral administration of N-methyl-D,L-aspartate (NMA), a neuroexcitatory amino acid agonist, probably stimulates 1,H release through an increase in endogenous LHRH secretion. In the present study, NMA and a potent LHRH antagonist were used to determine the degree to which release of FSH is similarly dependent upon the acute secretion of LHRH. A second aim was to compare responsiveness of LHRH neurons to NMA in castrated and intact male rats. Adult male rats were castrated (n = 10) or sham castrated (n = 11) on the morning of Day 0. After 8 days, rats were fitted with atrial catheters between 0900 and 1200 h; at 2 100 h they received s.c. either oil vehicle or 100 mug of an LHRH antagonist. Starting at 0900 h on Day 9, 0.5-ml blood samples were collected every 10 min for 3 h. After 1 h of sampling each animal received i.v. 5 mg of NMA in 0.5 ml 0.9% saline. An hour later each rat received i.v. 500 ng of LHRH in 0.5 ml saline. Plasma LH, FSH, and prolactin (PRL) levels were determined by RIA. In the oil-treated sham castrates, mean plasma LH levels were increased by 110% (p < 0.0 1) within 10 min and remained elevated for 30 min after the injection of NMA. The profile of this LH secretory response was similar to or slightly more robust than endogenous LH pulses observed previously. The NMA-induced I.H release was completely blocked by pretreatment with LHRH antagonist. In both oil- and antagonist-treated sham-castrated rats, NMA administration failed to elicit a concomitant increase in plasma FSH levels. In both castrated groups, neither LH nor FSH release was elevated after administration of NMA. Treatment with NMA produced similar PRL increments in sham-castrated and castrated groups. In all animals, the injection of LHRH stimulated robust increases in LH secretion and much smaller increases in FSH release. Our data indicate that although a large dose of exogenous LHRH can stimulate FSH release, the amount of endogenously secreted LHRH required to induce a pulse of LH is inadequate to stimulate a coincident pulse of FSH secretion. Thus, it is hypothesized that FSH secretion is regulated by two or more mechanisms; LHRH maintains, in part, basal secretion of FSH, while pulse-like increments in FSH secretion arc either constitutive endocrine events or are driven by a separate hypothalamic FSH-releasing factor. On the basis of our second major finding-that NMA-stimulated LH secretion is attenuated in castrated rats-it is also hypothesized that the readily releasable pool of LHRH is diminished following castration.

We have analyzed the mechanisms by which several known regulators of the LHRH release process may exert their effects. For each, we have attempted to determine how and where the regulatory input is manifest and, according to our working premise, we have attempted to identify factors which specifically regulate the LHRH pulse generator. Of the five regulatory factors examined, we have identified two inputs whose primary locus of action is on the pulse-generating mechanism--one endocrine (gonadal negative feedback), and one synaptic (alpha 1-adrenergic inputs) (see Fig. 29). Other factors which regulate LHRH and LH release appear to do so in different ways. The endogenous opioid peptides, for example, primarily regulate LHRH pulse amplitude (Karahalios and Levine, 1988), a finding that is consistent with the idea that these peptides exert direct postsynaptic or presynaptic inhibition (Drouva et al., 1981). Gonadal steroids exert positive feedback actions which also result in an increase in the amplitude of LHRH release, and this action may be exerted through a combination of cellular mechanisms which culminate in the production of a unique, punctuated set of synaptic signals. Gonadal hormones and neurohormones such as NPY also exert complementary actions at the level of the pituitary gland, by modifying the responsiveness of the pituitary to the stimulatory actions of LHRH. The LHRH neurosecretory system thus appears to be regulated at many levels, and by a variety of neural and endocrine factors. We have found examples of (1) neural regulation of the pulse generator, (2) hormonal regulation of the pulse generator, (3) hormonal regulation of a neural circuit which produces a unique, punctuated synaptic signal, (4) hormonal regulation of pituitary responsiveness to LHRH, and (5) neuropeptidergic regulation of pituitary responsiveness to LHRH. While an attempt has been made to place some of these regulatory inputs into a physiological context, it is certainly recognized that the physiological significance of these mechanisms remains to be clarified. We also stress that these represent only a small subset of the neural and endocrine factors which regulate the secretion or actions of LHRH. A more comprehensive list would also include CRF, GABA, serotonin, and a variety of other important regulators. Through a combination of design and chance, however, we have been able to identify at least one major example of each type of regulatory mechanism.

An in vivo isolated pituitary paradigm was used to examine the extent to which negative feedback actions of testicular hormones are exerted directly at the level of the anterior pituitary gland. Hypophysectomized male rats received single anterior pituitary transplants under the kidney capsule. On the next day each hypophysectomized, graft-bearing (H/G) animal was fitted with a concentric atrial catheter system which allowed for intermittent infusions of LHRH (250 ng/5 min.h) and chronic blood sampling. On the fifth or sixth day of infusions, blood samples were obtained 2 h before sham-castration (n = 6) or castration (n = 5) and at every 2-h interval for 24 h thereafter. For comparison, blood samples were similarly obtained from a group of normal pituitary-intact male rats before and after sham-castration (n = 5) or castration (n = 5). Plasma LH and PRL levels in all animals were determined by RIA. In the H/G sham-castrate rats, LH levels remained constant throughout the 24-h postsurgery period. By contrast, plasma LH concentrations in the H/G castrate rats increased steadily for 18 h, reaching a plateau at levels 2- to 3-fold higher than pretreatment values. The absolute amounts of immunoreactive LH, and the trajectory of the LH rise in the H/G castrates closely resembled those in the normal castrates during the initial 20 h after castration; at subsequent time points, however, these similarities were not apparent, as LH levels in normal castrates continued to rise, while those in H/G castrates did not. PRL levels were not significantly different in H/G rats compared to those in their pituitary-intact counterparts. We conclude from these studies that most of the acute (less than 20 h) effects of castration on LH secretion can be accounted for by pituitary escape from direct negative feedback suppression. At longer times after orchidectomy, however, the continued postcastration rise in LH secretion may increasingly depend upon additional hypothalamic input. It is hypothesized that this added input consists of an acceleration of LHRH pulse frequency.