PURPOSE:In a prospective randomized multicenter trial we compared the treatment results of conventional external sphincterotomy with those of UroLume sphincteric stent prosthesis placement in men with spinal cord injury and external detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We randomized 57 men with spinal cord injury in whom urodynamics verified external detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia into 2 groups to undergo either sphincter defeating procedure. We compared the primary urodynamic parameter of maximum detrusor pressure, and secondary urodynamic parameters of bladder capacity and post-void residual urine volume in men who underwent sphincterotomy or sphincteric stent placement. Parameters were measured preoperatively, and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Patients completed questionnaires regarding voiding sensation and quality of life issues at each followup visit. RESULTS:Demographic data of the 26 patients treated with sphincterotomy and the 31 treated with sphincteric stent placement were statistically similar. Preoperatively mean maximum detrusor pressure plus or minus standard deviation in sphincterotomy and stent cases was 98.3 +/- 27.6 and 95.7 +/- 27.7 cm. water, respectively (p = 0.73). At 12 months mean maximum detrusor pressure decreased to 48.9 +/- 16.4 and 52.6 +/- 31.6 cm. water in the sphincterotomy and stent groups, respectively (p = 0). Preoperatively mean bladder capacity in sphincterotomy and stent cases was 245 +/- 158 and 251 +/- 145 ml., respectively (p = 0.87). Bladder capacity did not change significantly in either treatment group throughout followup. Preoperatively mean post-void residual urine volume in the sphincterotomy and stent groups was 212 +/- 163 and 168 +/- 114 ml., respectively (p = 0.33). Residual urine volume decreased in each group at some but not all followup evaluations. The duration of hospitalization was greater for sphincterotomy than stenting (p = 0.036). Six stents required explantation. CONCLUSIONS:The UroLume stent is as effective as conventional external sphincterotomy for treating external detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. However, sphincteric stent placement is advantageous because it involves shorter hospitalization and is potentially reversible.

Health care professionals who choose to treat the elderly have a responsibility to be knowledgeable about incontinence. The elderly present challenging and complex problems that may require a collaborative approach from a dedicated team, to include family members, home health nurses, continence nurses, physical therapists, as well as primary care physicians, geriatricians, urologists, and gynecologists. The elderly patient should be reminded that they are a member of that team and their commitment and participation will facilitate successful outcomes.

This study is a prospective multicenter cooperative survey of the evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction in men with spinal cord injury (SCI). Uniform database questionnaires were completed prospectively by patients seeking therapy for erectile dysfunction. Eighty-five SCI men aged 17-68 years (mean age = 26 +/- 17) were enrolled. Mean duration of traumatic SCI was 3 +/- 3.2 years (Range = 0.3-18 years). The level of injury was cervical in 20 patients, thoracic in 31, lumbar in 29 and sacral in five. Patients were fully evaluated and then counseled as to their therapeutic options. Twenty-eight chose to use a vacuum erection device (VED), 26 preferred pharmacological penile injection and five used both intracorporeal therapy and VED. The remainder were managed with marriage and sexual counseling in 10 patients, three underwent penile prosthesis placement and two used topical pharmacotherapy. Four patients used other forms of treatment and in nine no therapy was recommended. Of the patients that used pharmacologic injection only, 74 percent used papaverine as a single agent, 20 percent used papaverine with phentolamine, five percent used prostaglandin E (PGE1) alone and one percent used a mixture. Patients using injection therapy report sexual intercourse a mean of 3 +/- 3.4 times per month as compared with 5 +/- 3.2 times per month in those using VED. Five intracorporeal injection patients developed priapism while two patients using the VED developed subcutaneous bleeding and one developed penile ischemia. We conclude that although a spectrum of erectile dysfunction treatment is present among SCI centers, VED and pharmacological penile injection are by far the two most popular methods of treatment and papaverine is the most common drug. The incidence of complications is small in the model centers.

Purpose: We determined whether the self-expanding sphincter stent, a potential alternative to conventional external sphincterotomy for the treatment of detrusor external sphincter dyssynergia, causes a permanent effect on the lower urinary tract.Materials and Methods: Four spinal cord injured men with voiding symptoms of detrusor external sphincter dyssynergia as noted by complete urological evaluation, including a video urodynamic study, were treated with the self-expanding sphincter stent. However, the device was explanted 6 months or longer after insertion in all 4 cases due to stent migration (3) and difficulty with condom catheter urinary drainage (1).Results: All stents were removed completely without damage to the urethra. Mean voiding pressure decreased from 62.5 +/- 39.4 to 20.7 +/- 6.5 cm. water after sphincter stent placement. One year after stent explantation mean voiding pressure remained unchanged from preoperative values of 58.5 +/- 21.5 cm. water. No patient had stress urinary incontinence or endoscopically apparent urethral strictures.Conclusions: The stent can be removed even after complete epithelialization and an extended interval without damage to external sphincter function or urethral stricture formation. The urinary sphincter stent is an effective, reversible treatment for patients with detrusor external sphincter dyssynergia.

This effort represents a subset analysis of the long-term Multicenter North American Trial of the UroLume sphincter stent prosthesis to determine the effect of the sphincter stent prosthesis in SCI men afflicted with detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia (DESD) and chronically managed with an indwelling urinary catheter. Forty-one of 153 male patients in this study were evaluated urodynamically before and after placement of the sphincter stent prosthesis. Of the 41 patients, 34 (81 percent) suffered cervical-level injury while 10 patients (25 percent) had been treated previously with external sphincterotomy. Forty patients (98 percent) were troubled with recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI), with a mean of 4.6 +/- 3 episodes of UTI per year. Seven patients (17 percent) demonstrated hydronephrosis prior to stent placement. Follow-up ranged from six to 44 months. Voiding pressures decreased from a mean of 77 +/- 23 cmH2O preoperatively to 35 +/- 18 cmH2O at 12 months (n = 34) and 33 +/- 20 cmH2O at 24 months (n = 22) after stent insertion (p = 0.001). Post-void residual urinary volume decreased from 202 +/- 187 ml preinsertion to 64 +/- 69 ml at 24 months (p = 0.001) postinsertion. Maximum cystometric capacity remained constant at 201 +/- 144 ml preinsertion to 203 +/- 79 ml at 24 months (p = 0.75) postinsertion. No significant changes in any of the urodynamic parameters occurred after 24 months of follow-up between patients with (n = 10) and without (n = 31) previous external sphincterotomy. Neither hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, obstructive hyperplastic epithelial overgrowth, stent encrustation or stone formation, nor soft tissue erosion occurred in any patient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)