The role of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 in lung cancer remains controversial. In order to clarify its impact on survival in small and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we performed a systematic review of the literature. Trials were selected for further analysis if they provided an independent assessment of Bcl-2 in lung cancer and reported analysis of survival data according to Bcl-2 status. To make it possible to aggregate survival results of the published studies, their methodology was assessed using a quality scale designed by the European Lung Cancer Working Party (including study design, laboratory methods and analysis). Of 28 studies, 11 identified Bcl-2 expression as a favourable prognostic factor and three linked it with poor prognosis; 14 trials were not significant. No differences in scoring measurement were detected between the studies, except that significantly higher scores were found in the trials with the largest sample sizes. Assessments of methodology and of laboratory technique were made independently of the conclusion of the trials. A total of 25 trials, comprising 3370 patients, provided sufficient information for the meta-analysis. The studies were categorised according to histology, disease stage and laboratory technique. The combined hazard ratio (HR) suggested that a positive Bcl-2 status has a favourable impact on survival: 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.57-0.86) in seven studies on stages I-II NSCLC; 0.50 (0.39-0.65) in eight studies on surgically resected NSCLC; 0.91 (0.76-1.10) in six studies on any stage NSCLC; 0.57 (0.41-0.78) in five studies on squamous cell cancer; 0.75 (0.61-0.93) and 0.71 (0.61-0.83) respectively for five studies detecting Bcl-2 by immunohistochemistry with Ab clone 100 and for 13 studies assessing Bcl-2 with Ab clone 124; 0.92 (0.73-1.16) for four studies on small cell lung cancer; 1.26 (0.58-2.72) for three studies on neuroendocrine tumours. In NSCLC, Bcl-2 expression was associated with a better prognosis. The data on Bcl-2 expression in small cell lung cancer were insufficient to assess its prognostic value.

Objective: To determine prognostic factors predicting success of invasive mechanical ventilation in medical cancer patients admitted to ICU for a complication, in terms of extubation and ICU and hospital discharges. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Medical ICU of an European cancer hospital. Subjects: A total of 168 consecutive cancer patients who were admitted to ICU for an acute medical complication requiring immediate mechanical ventilation or who later needed mechanical ventilation. Measurements: Variables related to the demographic, cancer, scores and complication characteristics. Extubation rates, ICU and hospital mortalities and duration of survival were measured. Results: Respectively, 26%, 22% and 17% of the patients were extubated, discharged from the ICU and discharged from hospital. For weaning from mechanical ventilation, a higher APACHE II score and leucopenia were poor prognostic factors in univariate analysis, but leucopenia remained the only significant one in multivariate analysis. For ICU mortality, no significant prognostic feature was identified. For hospital mortality, leucopenia was the only significant factor in univariate as well as in multivariate analyses. Conclusion: Leucopenia appeared to be the only independent poor prognostic factor for both extubation and hospital discharge. None of the variables related to the cancer disease process was shown to be a predictor of success.

The effectiveness of granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF and GM-CSF) in the treatment of febrile neutropenic cancer patients remains controversial. To assess their role in this condition, we conducted a systematic review of randomised trials published as full papers. A methodological evaluation using a specifically designed quality scale was performed before meta-analysis. Eleven trials were eligible, 8 of which were meta-analysable. The median quality score for the 11 pooled trials was 58.3% (range: 33.3%–68.8%). No significant quality difference was observed between positive (colony-stimulating factor more effective) and negative trials (P=0.36). No quality difference was observed between the 8 meta-analysable studies and the 3 others, with respective median scores of 59.3% and 50%. No advantage was detected for the use of CSF in terms of mortality from febrile neutropenia, with a relative risk of 0.71 (95% CI 0.44–1.15). The relative risk was 0.66 (95% CI 0.39–1.13) in the G-CSF subgroup and 0.97 (95% CI 0.34–2.79) in the GM-CSF subgroup. Aggregation of the results on infection-related mortality, length of stay in hospital, fever and of neutropenia duration, antibiotic therapy adaptation and duration, superinfection rate and toxicity was not possible owing to the lack of adequate data in the publications. On the basis of this review, we cannot recommend the routine use of G-CSF or GM-CSF in established febrile neutropenia.

A systematic review of the literature was carried out to determine the indications of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Twelve randomised trials including 1547 patients were found to be eligible. This meta-analysis reveals a decrease of brain metastases incidence (hazard ratio (HR): 0.48; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.39 - 0.60) for all the studies and an improvement of survival (HR: 0.82; 95 % CI: 0.71 - 0.96) in patients in complete response (CR) in favour of the PCI arm. However, in those studies, no neuropsychological and modern brain imagery assessments were systematically performed. The long-term toxicity has thus so far not been prospectively evaluated. If PCI can be recommended in patients with SCLC and CR, data are lacking to generalise its use to any CR situations such as those including assessments with brain NMR.

The overall objective of this review is to analyze the literature published on artificial ventilation in cancer patients. First, we reviewed series of cancer patients treated by mechanical ventilation or intensive care series with data on artificial ventilation in a context of malignant solid Minors, hematology malignancies. es or complications of bone marrow transplantation. A second part of the review is devoted to characteristic diseases for which specific literature is available, with description of the clinical presentation, the causes and the proposed therapies. The third part is a discussion of considerations on care and therapeutic techniques. Finally, we propose guidelines for a practical approach to this type of patient taking into account the prognosis and new techniques such as noninvasive ventilation.

Though acute myocardial infarction is one of the most frequent causes of ST segment elevation, there are other, less frequent, reasons for such electrocardiographic changes. In the present case, a cardiac metastasis from a squamous cell lung carcinoma was responsible for these changes. The secondary lesion was located in the apex of the left ventricle and induced an ECG alteration mimicking myocardial ischaemia. The literature includes few reports that describe the relation between electrocardiographic changes and heart metastases, since heart metastases are not usually discovered except at autopsy.

The overall objective of this review is to analyze the literature published on artificial ventilation in cancer patients. First, we reviewed series of cancer patients treated by mechanical ventilation or intensive care series with data on artificial ventilation in a context of malignant solid tumors, hematology malignancies or complications of bone marrow transplantation. A second part of the review is devoted to characteristic diseases for which specific literature is available, with description of the clinical presentation, the causes and the proposed therapies. The third part is a discussion of considerations on care and therapeutic techniques. Finally, we propose guidelines for a practical approach to this type of patient taking into account the prognosis and new techniques such as noninvasive ventilation.

The role of p53, as a prognostic factor for survival in lung cancer, is controversial and the purpose of the present systematic review of the literature is to determine this effect. Published studies were identified with the objective to aggregate the available survival results after a methodological assessment using a scale specifically designed by the European Lung Cancer Working Party (ELCWP). To be eligible, a study had to deal with p53 assessment in lung cancer (primary site) only, and to provide a survival comparison according to the p53 status. Among the 74 eligible papers, 30 identified p53 abnormalities as a univariate statistically significant poor prognostic factor and 56 provided sufficient data to allow survival results aggregation. There was no significant difference between the trials that either showed or did not show a prognostic effect of p53 according to the methodological score or to the laboratory technique used. The studies were categorized by histology, disease stage, treatment and laboratory technique. Combined hazard ratios suggested that an abnormal p53 status had an unfavourable impact on survival: in any stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the mean (95% confidence interval) was 1.44 (1.20-1.72) (number of studies included in the subgroup was 11), 1.50 (1.32-1.70) in stages I-H NSCLC (n=19), 1.68 (1.23-2.29) in stages I-IIIB NSCLC (n=5), 1.68 (1.30-2.18) in stages III-IV NSCLC (n=9), 1.48 (1.29-1.70) in surgically resected NSCLC (n=20), 1.37 (1.02-1.85) in squamous cell carcinoma (n=9), 2.24 (1.70-2.95) in adenocarcinoma (n=9), 1.57 (1.28-1.91) for a positive immunohistochemistry with antibody 1801 (n=8), 1.25 (1.09-1.43) for a positive immunohistochemistry with antibody DO-7 (n=16), and 1.65 (1.35-2.00) for an abnormal molecular biology test (n=13). Data were insufficient to determine the prognostic value of p53 in small cell lung cancer. In each subgroup of nonsmall cell lung cancer, p53 abnormal status was shown to be associated with a poorer survival prognosis.

In order to clarify the role of mitomycin (MMC) in the treatment of NSCLC, we performed a systematic review of the literature and qualitatively assessed the selected studies using the ELCWP and Chalmers scales. 5 trials (202 patients) assessed the activity of MMC as single-agent chemotherapy in NSCLC. The overall response rate was 25% (95% Cl 19–31). In 10 randomized phase III trials (1769 patients), we studied the role of MMC in combination therapy. A meta-analysis, based on the available published data, failed to show any survival advantage of the MMC containing regimens (hazard ratio = 0.95; 95% Cl 0.83–1.10). Finally, 4 eligible trials (139 patients) assessed the activity of MMC regimens as salvage therapy, 3 in combination with vindesine and one with cisplatin and vinblastine. The overall response rate for the MMC-vindesine regimen was 10.5% (95% Cl 1.7–19.4). In conclusion, MMC is an active drug for NSCLC but does not improve survival when combined with other active drugs, particularly cisplatin. Its use for salvage therapy appears to be associated with marginal activity only. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com