The radiotherapy (RT) expert panel revised and updated the RT guidelines accepted in 2020 at the 4th Hungarian Breast Cancer Consensus Conference, based on new scientific evidence. Radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is indicated in ductal carcinoma in situ (St. 0), as RT decreases the risk of local recurrence (LR) by 50-60%. In early stage (St. I-II) invasive breast cancer RT remains a standard treatment following BCS. However, in elderly (≥70 years) patients with stage I, hormone receptor positive tumour hormonal therapy without RT can be considered. Hypofractionated (15×2,67 Gy) or ultra-hypofractionated (5×5,2 Gy) whole breast irradiation (WBI) and for selected cases accelerated partial breast irradiation are validated treatment alternatives of conventional WBI. Following mastectomy RT significantly decreases the risk of LR and improves overall survival of patients having 1 to 3 or ≥4 positive axillary lymph nodes. In selected cases of patients with 1 to 2 positive sentinel lymph nodes, meeting the ACOSOG Z0011 study criteria, axillary dissection can be substituted with axillary RT. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by BCS WBI is mandatory, while after NAC followed by mastectomy RT should be given in cases of initial stage IIB-IV, and locoregional RT indicated in cases of ypN1-2-3 axillary status.
The radiotherapy (RT) expert panel revised and updated the RT guidelines accepted in 2016 at the 3rd Hungarian Breast Cancer Consensus Conference based on new scientific evidence. Radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is indicated in ductal carcinoma in situ (St. 0), as RT decreases the risk of local recurrence (LR) by 50-60%. In early stage (St. I-II) invasive breast cancer RT remains a standard treatment following BCS. However, in elderly (≥70 years) patients with stage I, hormone receptor positive tumour hormonal therapy without RT can be considered. Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (WBI) and for selected cases accelerated partial breast irradiation are validated treatment alternatives of conventional WBI. Following mastectomy RT significantly decreases the risk of LR and improves overall survival of patients having 1 to 3 or ≥4 positive axillary lymph nodes. In selected cases of patients with 1 to 2 positive sentinel lymph nodes axillary dissection can be substituted with axillary RT. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by BCS WBI is mandatory, while after NAC followed by mastectomy locoregional RT should be given in cases of initial stage III-IV and ypN1 axillary status.
The radiotherapy expert panel revised and updated the radiotherapy (RT) guidelines accepted in 2009 at the 2nd Hungarian Breast Cancer Consensus Conference based on new scientific evidence. Radiotherapy of the conserved breast is indicated in ductal carcinoma in situ (St. 0), as RT decreases the risk of local recurrence by 60%. In early stage (St. I-II) invasive breast cancer RT remains a standard treatment following breast conserving surgery. However, in elderly (≥70 years) patients with stage I, hormone receptor positive tumour hormonal therapy without RT can be considered. Hypofractionated (15×2.67 Gy) whole breast irradiation and for selected cases accelerated partial breast irradiation are validated treatment alternatives of conventional (25×2 Gy) whole breast irradiation. Following mastectomy RT significantly decreases the risk of locoregional recurrence and improves overall survival of patients having 1 to 3 (pN1a) or ≥4 (pN2a, pN3a) positive axillary lymph nodes. In selected cases of patients with 1 to 2 positive sentinel lymph nodes axillary dissection can be omitted and substituted with axillary RT. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by breast conserving surgery whole breast irradiation is mandatory, while after NAC followed by mastectomy locoregional RT should be given in cases of initial stage III-IV and ypN1 axillary status.
Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy (RT) has become the standard of care for the treatment of early-stage (St. I-II) invasive breast carcinoma. However, controversy exists regarding the value of RT in the conservative treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In this article we review the role of RT in the management of DCIS. Retrospective and prospective trials and meta-analyses published between 1975 and 2007 in the MEDLINE database, and recent issues of relevant journals/handbooks relating to DCIS, BCS and RT were searched for. In retrospective series (10,194 patients) the 10-year rate of local recurrence (LR) with and without RT was reported in the range of 9–28% and 22–54%, respectively. In four large randomised controlled trials (NSABP-B-17, EORTC-10853, UKCCCR, SweDCIS; 4,568 patients) 50 Gy whole-breast RT significantly decreased the 5-year LR rate from 16–22% (annual LR rate: 2.6–5.0%) to 7–10% (annual LR rate: 1.3–1.9%). In a recent meta-analysis of randomised trials the addition of RT to BCS resulted in a 60% risk reduction of both invasive and in situ recurrences. In a multicentre retrospective study, an additional dose of 10 Gy to the tumour bed yielded a further 55% risk reduction compared to RT without boost. To date, no subgroups have been reliably identified that do not benefit from RT after BCS. In the NSABP-B-24 trial, the addition of tamoxifen (TAM) to RT reduced ipsilateral (11.1% vs. 7.7%) and contralateral (4.9% vs. 2.3%) breast events significantly. In contrast, in the UKCCCR study, TAM produced no significant reduction in all breast events. Based on available evidence obtained from retrospective and prospective trials, all patients with DCIS have potential benefit from RT after BCS. Further prospective studies are warranted to identify subgroups of low-risk patients with DCIS for whom RT can be safely omitted. Until long-term results of ongoing studies on outcomes of patients treated with BCS alone (with or without TAM or aromatase inhibitors) are available, RT should be routinely recommended after BCS for all patients except those with contraindication.
The aim of this work is to report the preliminary results of the Hungarian multicentric randomised DCIS study. Between 2000 and 2007, 278 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated by breast-conserving surgery were randomised according to predetermined risk groups. Low/intermediate-risk patients (n=29) were randomised to 50 Gy whole-breast irradiation (WBI) or observation. High-risk cases (n=235) were allocated to receive 50 Gy WBI vs. 50 Gy WBI plus 16 Gy tumour bed boost. Very high-risk patients (patients with involved surgical margins; n=14) were randomised to 50 Gy WBI plus 16 Gy tumour bed boost or reoperation (reexcision plus radiotherapy or mastectomy alone). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to detect the expression of potential molecular prognostic markers (ER, PR, Her2, p53, Bcl-2 and Ki-67). At a median follow-up of 36 months no recurrence was observed in the low/intermediate- and very high-risk patient groups. In the high-risk group, 4 (1.7%) local recurrences and 1 (0.4%) distant metastasis occurred. No patient died of breast cancer. In the high-risk group of patients, the 3- and 5-year probability of local recurrence was 1.1% and 3.1%, respectively. The positive immunostaining for Her2 (38%), p53 (37%) and Ki-67 (44%) correlated with a high nuclear grade. Significant inverse correlation was found between the expression of ER (77%), PR (67%), Bcl-2 (64%) and grade. Preliminary results suggest that breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy yields an annual local recurrence rate of less than 1% in patients with DCIS. IHC of molecular prognostic markers can assist to gain insight into the biologic heterogeneity of DCIS.
289 duktalis in situ emlőrak (DCIS) miatt emlőmegtarto műtettel kezelt beteget randomizaltunk a lokalis recidiva szempontjabol meghatarozott riziko csoportok szerinti besorolas utan. Immunhisztokemiai (IHK) modszerrel vizsgaltuk a lehetseges molekularis prognosztikai markerek (ER, PR, Her2, p53, Bcl2 es Ki-67) expressziojat. A pozitiv IHK reakcio a Her2 (38%), p53 (36%) es Ki-67 (47%) markereknel a nuklearis grade-del korrelalt. Ezzel szemben az ER (77%), PR (67%) es Bcl2 (67%) pozitivitas szignifikans inverz osszefuggesben volt a grade-del. A klinikai eredmenyeket 3 eves median kovetesi idő utan 278 betegnel elemeztuk. A magas rizikoju betegcsoportban emlőmegtarto műtet es sugarkezeles utan 4 (1,7%) lokalis recidiva es 1 (0,4%) tavoli attet alakult ki, emlődaganatos halaleset nem volt. A helyi daganatkiujulas 3 es 5 eves valoszinűsege 1,1% es 3,1% volt. Tapasztalataink alapjan a DCIS egyertelmű diagnozisa eseten az őrszem nyirokcsomo biopszia rutinszerű elvegzese nem indokolt. Korai eredmenyeink alapjan az emlő DCIS kezeleseben az emlőmegtarto műtet es posztoperativ sugarkezeles alkalmazasaval a helyi daganatkiujulas eves aranya 1% alatt marad. A tumoragy kezeles hatekonysaganak megitelesere es a vizsgalt molekularis markerek prognosztikai/prediktiv ertekenek elemzesere hosszabb kovetesi idő utan lesz lehetősegunk. A molekularis prognosztikai faktorok IHK vizsgalata segitsegunkre lehet a DCIS biologiai heterogenitasanak felterkepezeseben. | 289 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated by breast-conserving surgery were randomised according to predetermined risk groups. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to detect the expression of potential molecular prognostic markers (ER, PR, Her2, p53, Bcl2, and Ki-67). The positive immunostaining for Her2 (38%), p53 (36%), and Ki-67 (47%) correlated with a high nuclear grade. Significant inverse correlation was found between the expression of ER (77%), PR (67%), Bcl2 (67%) and grade. Clinical results was analysed for 278 patients at a median follow-up of 36 months. In the high-risk patient group 4 (1.7%) local recurrences and 1 (0.4%) distant metastasis occurred. No patient died of breast cancer. The 3- and 5-year probability of local recurrence was 1.1% and 3.1%, respectively. Based on our experience, the definitive diagnosis of DCIS does not warrant sentinel lymph node biopsy. Preliminary results suggest that breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy yields an annual local recurrence rate of less than 1% in patients with DCIS. Further follow-up is needed to define the clinical benefit of tumour bed boost irradiation and to analyse the prognostic/predictive value of molecular prognostic factors. IHC of molecular prognostic markers can assist to gain insight into the biologic heterogeneity of DCIS.