Supplementary Data from Trilaciclib Prior to Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Final Efficacy and Subgroup Analysis from a Randomized Phase II Study

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. Final overall survival (OS) in SOPHIA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02492711 ), a study of margetuximab versus trastuzumab, both with chemotherapy, in patients with previously treated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive advanced breast cancer, is reported with updated safety. Overall, 536 patients in the intention-to-treat population were randomly assigned to margetuximab (15 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks; n = 266) plus chemotherapy or trastuzumab (6 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks after a loading dose of 8 mg/kg; n = 270) plus chemotherapy. Primary end points were progression-free survival, previously reported, and OS. Final OS analysis was triggered by 385 prespecified events. The median OS was 21.6 months (95% CI, 18.89 to 25.07) with margetuximab versus 21.9 months (95% CI, 18.69 to 24.18) with trastuzumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.17; P = .620). Preplanned, exploratory analysis of CD16A genotyping suggested a possible improvement in OS for margetuximab in CD16A-158FF patients versus trastuzumab (median OS, 23.6 v 19.2 months; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.00) and a possible improvement in OS for trastuzumab in CD16A-158VV patients versus margetuximab (median OS, 31.1 v 22.0 months; HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.01 to 3.12). Margetuximab safety was comparable with trastuzumab. Final overall OS analysis did not demonstrate margetuximab advantage over trastuzumab. Margetuximab studies in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer with different CD16A allelic variants are warranted.

OBJECTIVE:To assess safety and efficacy of niraparib + bevacizumab as a first-line maintenance therapy for patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS:This multicenter, phase II, single-arm, open-label study enrolled adult patients with stage IIIB to IV ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (NCT03326193). Patients were required to have an attempt at debulking surgery and have a complete response, partial response, or no evidence of disease following first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy with ≥3 cycles of bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 18 months. Secondary endpoints included PFS, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS:Among the 105 evaluable patients, the PFS rate at 18 months was 62% (95% CI 52-71%) in the overall population and 76% (95% CI 61-87) in the homologous recombination deficient (HRd), 47% (95% CI 31-64%) in the HR proficient (HRp), and 56% (95% CI 31-79%) in the HR not determined (HRnd) subgroups (December 24, 2020, cutoff). After a median follow-up time of 28.7 months (IQR, 23.9-32.5 months), median PFS was 19.6 months (95% CI 16.5-25.1) in the overall population (N = 105) and 28.3 months (95% CI 19.9-NE), 14.2 months (95% CI 8.6-16.8), and 12.1 months (95% CI 8.0-NE) in the HRd, HRp, and HRnd subgroups, respectively (June 16, 2021, cutoff). The most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (related to niraparib and/or bevacizumab) were thrombocytopenia (74/105), fatigue (60/105), and anemia (55/105; December 24, 2020, cutoff). CONCLUSION:Niraparib + bevacizumab first-line maintenance therapy displayed promising PFS results. Safety was consistent with the known safety profiles of niraparib and bevacizumab as monotherapy.

Background: CTX + dual HER2-targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAb) remains a standard of care for treatment (Tx) of both HER2+ early-stage and MBC. However, when the SOPHIA trial was launched, limited Tx options existed after progression on T, pertuzumab (P), and ado-trastuzumab emtansine. M, an Fc-engineered anti-HER2 mAb, targets the same epitope as T and exerts similar antiproliferative effects. M enhances CD16A-mediated ADCC compared to T. Furthermore, M treatment is associated with increased HER2-specific T- and B-cell responses and increased T-cell clonality compared to baseline. The phase 3 SOPHIA (NCT02492711) study demonstrated PFS benefit of M vs T, both + CTX, in HER2+ MBC pts. M improved PFS over T, with a 24% relative risk reduction (HR .76; 95% CI .59-.98; P=.033; median, 5.8 [95% CI 5.5-7.0] months (mo) vs 4.9 [95% CI 4.2-5.6] mo (Rugo HS, et al. JAMA Oncol 2021), resulting in FDA approval. Median OS after 270 mortality events (2nd interim analysis) was 21.6 mo with M vs 19.8 mo with T (HR .89; 95% CI .69-1.13; P=.33). Here we report final OS after 385 events, as well as updated safety.Methods: Pts with disease progression after ≥2 lines of anti-HER2 Tx, including P, and 1-3 lines of Tx for HER2+ MBC were randomized 1:1 to CTX + either M (15 mg/kg) or T (8 mg/kg loading dose, then 6 mg/kg), both given IV every 3 weeks. Randomization was stratified by number of metastatic sites (≤2, >2), lines of Tx for MBC (≤2, >2), and CTX choice (capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine). Sequential primary end points were central-blinded review of PFS and OS.Results: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population comprised 536 pts (M, 266; T, 270). At the median follow-up of 20.2 mo among all ITT pts, pts received a median of 7 cycles of M + CTX vs 6 cycles of T + CTX. Median OS after 385 events in the ITT population was 21.6 mo with M vs 21.9 mo with T (HR .95; 95% CI .77-1.17; P=.62; Table). Based on a prespecified, non-α-allocated exploratory analysis, a numerical OS advantage in favor of the M arm was observed in the subgroup of pts homozygous for the CD16A-158F low-affinity allele (median OS, 23.6 vs 19.2 mo; HR .72; 95% CI .52-1.00; nominal P=.05). In contrast, in the small subgroup of CD16A-158V homozygotes, median OS was longer for T vs M (31.1 mo vs 22.0 mo; HR 1.77; 95% CI 1.01-3.12; nominal P=.04). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AE) occurred in 146 pts (55.3%) receiving M vs 141 pts (53.0%) receiving T. Serious AEs were seen in 47 pts (17.8%) receiving M vs 51 pts (19.2%) receiving T. Incidence of infusion-related reactions was higher with M (36 [13.6%]) vs T (9 [3.4%]). Left ventricular dysfunction requiring delay or cessation of M/T administration occurred in 4 pts (1.5%) receiving M and in 7 pts (2.6%) receiving T. Conclusions: The median OS in the ITT population was not statistically different between the 2 arms. An exploratory analysis of CD16A genotyping indicates a numerical OS advantage in favor of M in F homozygous pts, along with a numerical OS advantage in favor of T in V homozygous pts. Safety of M + CTX was similar to previous reports and consistent with M FDA-approved label. Studies of M in HER2+ breast cancer pts with different CD16A allelic variants are warranted, including MARGOT, the neoadjuvant investigator-initiated study on the efficacy of M vs T in pts carrying F-allelic variants of CD16A. Median OSITT analysisPrespecified, non-α-allocated exploratory analysis (n=506)N=536CD16A-158F carriers (F/F and F/V)(n=437)CD16A-158F homozygotes (F/F)(n=192)CD16A-158F/V heterozygotes(n=245)CD16A-158V homozygotes (V/V)(n=69)aM + CTX, mo21.6 (n=266)23.3 (n=221)23.6 (n=102)21.3 (n=119)22.0 (n=37)T + CTX, mo21.9 (n=270)20.8 (n=216)19.2 (n=90)22.0 (n=126)31.1 (n=32)HR (95% CI)0.95 (0.77-1.17)0.86 (0.69-1.08)0.72 (0.52-1.00)0.96 (0.71-1.30)1.77 (1.01-3.12)P value0.620.19b0.05b0.78b0.04bAbbreviations: CTX, chemotherapy; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intent to treat; M, margetuximab; mo, months; OS, overall survival; T, trastuzumab. Cutoff date: June 14, 2021. aThis subgroup was characterized by an imbalance in poor prognostic features. bNominal P value. Citation Format: Hope Rugo, Seock-Ah Im, Fatima Cardoso, Javier Cortes, Giuseppe Curigliano, Antonino Musolino, Mark D. Pegram, Thomas Bachelot, Gail S. Wright, Cristina Saura, Santiago Escrivá-de-Romaní, Michelino De Laurentiis, Gary N. Schwartz, Timothy Pluard, Francesco Ricci, William Gwin, III, Christelle Levy, Ursa Brown-Glaberman, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Maaike de Boer, Sung-Bae Kim, Katarína Petráková, Denise A. Yardley, Orit Freedman, Erik H. Jakobsen, Einav Nili Gal-Yam, Rinat Yerushalmi, Peter A. Fasching, Emily Ashley, Shengyan Hong, Minori Rosales, William J. Gradishar. Phase 3 SOPHIA study of margetuximab (M) + chemotherapy (CTX) vs trastuzumab (T) + CTX in patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after prior anti-HER2 therapies: Final overall survival (OS) analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD8-01.

Abstract Purpose: We report final antitumor efficacy results from a phase II study of trilaciclib, an intravenous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor, administered prior to gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCb) in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (NCT02978716). Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to group 1 [GCb (days 1, 8); n = 34], group 2 [trilaciclib prior to GCb (days 1, 8); n = 33], or group 3 [trilaciclib (days 1, 8) and trilaciclib prior to GCb (days 2, 9); n = 35]. Subgroup analyses were performed according to CDK4/6 dependence, level of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and RNA-based immune signatures using proportional hazards regression. T-cell receptor (TCR) β CDR3 regions were amplified and sequenced to identify, quantify, and compare the abundance of each unique TCRβ CDR3 at baseline and on treatment. Results: Median overall survival (OS) was 12.6 months in group 1, not reached in group 2 (HR = 0.31; P = 0.0016), 17.8 months in group 3 (HR = 0.40; P = 0.0004), and 19.8 months in groups 2 and 3 combined (HR = 0.37; P < 0.0001). Efficacy outcomes were comparable regardless of cancer CDK4/6 dependence status and immune signatures. Administering trilaciclib prior to GCb prolonged OS irrespective of PD-L1 status but had greater benefit in the PD-L1–positive population. T-cell activation was enhanced in patients receiving trilaciclib. Conclusions: Administering trilaciclib prior to GCb enhanced antitumor efficacy, with significant improvements in OS. Efficacy outcomes in immunologic subgroups and enhancements in T-cell activation suggest these improvements may be mediated via immunologic mechanisms.

Purpose: H3B-6545, a novel Selective ERα Covalent Antagonist (SERCA), inactivates both and wild-type and mutant ERα by targeting cysteine 530 and enforcing antagonist conformation. H3B-6545 demonstrated preclinical high activity in breast cancer models with constitutively active ESR1 mutations (Furman C, SABCS 2020) and clinical activity in pretreated women with ER+ breast cancer (Hamilton EP, ASCO 2021). Patients and Methods: The primary objective of the phase II is to estimate the objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary objectives include safety. Results: 94 pts were treated with 450 mg daily, the recommended phase II dose: 11 in the phase I and 83 in the phase II parts of the trial. Patients and tumor characteristics were presented previously (Hamilton EP, ASCO, 2021). As of March 31, 2021, grade (gr) 2 or higher adverse events (AE) reported in ≥10% were anemia (19%), nausea (17%), fatigue (16%), and diarrhea (12%). Laboratory gr 2 or higher abnormalities reported in ≥10% pts were creatinine clearance decrease (39%), hemoglobin decrease (38%), Lymphocytes decrease (37%), ALT increase (14%), AST increase (13%), bilirubin increase (12%), and creatinine increase (12%). AE of gr 1 sinus bradycardia (asymptomatic) was reported in 35% and gr 2 (symptomatic, no intervention needed) was reported in 5%. Gr 2 and 3 QTcF prolongation were reported in 2 and 3 pts, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Efficacy estimates are presented in Table 1. CI: Confidence interval. N: total number of pts in full analysis set, used in PFS analysis. n: number of response-evaluable pts, used in ORR and CBR analysis. Efficacy estimates were consistent across the various subgroups. Responses were demonstrated in heavily pretreated pts, pts with visceral metastases, pts with constitutionally active ESR1 Y537S mutations, and in pts who received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Numerically higher response rate and longer PFS were observed in pts with ESR1 Y537s. Conclusions: H3B-6545 has a manageable safety profile and demonstrated single-agent anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated ER+, HER2- mBC patients. Clinical activity was consistent across the various subgroups. Tumors harboring the constitutionally active ESR1 Y537S mutation may present higher ERα activity, and consequently enrich for luminal A traits and demonstrate greater lineage dependence on ERα. Table 1.Consistency of H3B-6545 activity across the key subgroupsEfficacyClinical CharacteristicORR % (95% CI)CBR % (95% CI)Median PFS mo (95% CI)Overall population (N=94, n=72)16.7 (8.9, 27.3)40.3 (28.9, 52.5)5.1 (3.2, 6.2)Liver and/or lung metastases (N=76, n=62)17.7 (9.2, 29.5)41.9 (29.5, 55.2)5.4 (1.8, 7.2)≥3 prior regimens (N=49, n=39)20.5 (9.3, 36.5)48.7 (32.4, 65.2)5.4 (3.5, 7.3)Prior chemotherapy (N=47, n=35)17.1 (6.6, 33.6)51.4 (34.0, 68.6)5.5 (3.6, 7.3)PgR+ (N=38, n=32)15.6 (5.3, 32.8)50.0 (31.9, 68.1)5.4 (2.0, 8.8)ESR1 clonal Y537S (N=10, n=10)30.0 (6.7, 65.2)60.0 (26.2, 87.8)7.3 (0.8, 11.2)ESR1 clonal D538G (N=19, n=17)0.0 (0.0, 19.5)35.3 (14.2, 61.7)5.4 (1.7, 7.2) Citation Format: Erika P Hamilton, Judy S Wang, Timothy Pluard, Aki Morikawa, E Claire Dees, Robert H Jones, Barbara Haley, Anne Armstrong, Adam L Cohen, Pamela Munster, Gail S Wright, Fadi Kayali, Lisa Cantagallo, Manav Korpal, Jenny Long, Jianjun Xiao, Benoit Destenaves, Lei Gao, Tarek Sahmoud, Antonio Gualberto, Dejan Juric. H3B-6545, a novel selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonist (SERCA), in estrogen receptor positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer - A phase II study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-17-10.

Purpose Androgen receptor (AR) expression occurs in up to 86% of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancers. In vitro , AR inhibitors enhance antitumor activity of trastuzumab, an anti-HER2 antibody, in trastuzumab-resistant HER2+ cell lines. This open-label, single-arm, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide, an AR-signaling inhibitor, in patients with advanced HER2+ AR+ breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab. Methods Eligible patients had measurable or non-measurable evaluable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status ≤ 1, no history of brain metastases, and previously received ≥ 1 anti-HER2 regimen for advanced disease. Patients received 160 mg oral enzalutamide daily and 6 mg/kg intravenous trastuzumab every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Results Overall, 103 women were enrolled [median age 60 years (range 34–83)]; 62% had received ≥ 3 lines of prior anti-HER2 therapy. CBR24, comprising patients with confirmed partial responses (5%) and durable stable disease at 24 weeks (19%), was 24% in the efficacy evaluable set ( n = 89). CBR24 did not seem related to AR-expression levels or hormone receptor status. Median PFS was 3.4 months (95% confidence interval 2.0–3.8). Overall, 97 (94%) patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with fatigue most common (34%). Dyspnea (4%) and malignant neoplasm progression (3%) were the only TEAEs grade ≥ 3 reported in ≥ 3 patients. 22 patients (21%) reported serious TEAEs. Four patients (4%) experienced fatal, non-drug-related TEAEs. Conclusions Enzalutamide plus trastuzumab was well tolerated, and a subset of patients in this heavily pretreated population had durable disease control. Determination of biomarkers is needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from this combination. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02091960

IMPORTANCE:ERRB2 (formerly HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) remains typically incurable with optimal treatment undefined in later lines of therapy. The chimeric antibody margetuximab shares ERBB2 specificity with trastuzumab but incorporates an engineered Fc region to increase immune activation. OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical efficacy of margetuximab vs trastuzumab, each with chemotherapy, in patients with pretreated ERBB2-positive ABC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:The SOPHIA phase 3 randomized open-label trial of margetuximab plus chemotherapy vs trastuzumab plus chemotherapy enrolled 536 patients from August 26, 2015, to October 10, 2018, at 166 sites in 17 countries. Eligible patients had disease progression on 2 or more prior anti-ERBB2 therapies and 1 to 3 lines of therapy for metastatic disease. Data were analyzed from February 2019 to October 2019. INTERVENTIONS:Investigators selected chemotherapy before 1:1 randomization to margetuximab, 15 mg/kg, or trastuzumab, 6 mg/kg (loading dose, 8 mg/kg), each in 3-week cycles. Stratification factors were metastatic sites (≤2, >2), lines of therapy (≤2, >2), and chemotherapy choice. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:Sequential primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by central blinded analysis and overall survival (OS). All α was allocated to PFS, followed by OS. Secondary end points were investigator-assessed PFS and objective response rate by central blinded analysis. RESULTS:A total of 536 patients were randomized to receive margetuximab (n = 266) or trastuzumab (n = 270). The median age was 56 (27-86) years; 266 (100%) women were in the margetuximab group, while 267 (98.9%) women were in the trastuzumab group. Groups were balanced. All but 1 patient had received prior pertuzumab, and 489 (91.2%) had received prior ado-trastuzumab emtansine. Margetuximab improved primary PFS over trastuzumab with 24% relative risk reduction (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98; P = .03; median, 5.8 [95% CI, 5.5-7.0] months vs 4.9 [95% CI, 4.2-5.6] months; October 10, 2018). After the second planned interim analysis of 270 deaths, median OS was 21.6 months with margetuximab vs 19.8 months with trastuzumab (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.69-1.13; P = .33; September 10, 2019), and investigator-assessed PFS showed 29% relative risk reduction favoring margetuximab (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.86; P < .001; median, 5.7 vs 4.4 months; September 10, 2019). Margetuximab improved objective response rate over trastuzumab: 22% vs 16% (P = .06; October 10, 2018), and 25% vs 14% (P < .001; September 10, 2019). Incidence of infusion-related reactions, mostly in cycle 1, was higher with margetuximab (35 [13.3%] vs 9 [3.4%]); otherwise, safety was comparable. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, margetuximab plus chemotherapy had acceptable safety and a statistically significant improvement in PFS compared with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in ERBB2-positive ABC after progression on 2 or more prior anti-ERBB2 therapies. Final OS analysis is expected in 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02492711.

Abstract Background Trilaciclib is an intravenous (IV) cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor. Preliminary data showed that adding trilaciclib prior to gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCb) significantly increased overall survival (OS) compared with GCb alone among patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) (Tan et al., Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1587-1601). Here, final antitumor efficacy results (objective response rate [ORR], progression-free survival [PFS], and OS) are reported for the whole study population, and in cohorts according to CDK4/6 dependence and level of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. Methods This was a randomized, open-label, phase 2 study of patients with mTNBC who had received ≤2 previous lines of chemotherapy in the recurrent/metastatic setting (NCT02978716). Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive GCb on days 1 and 8 (group 1, n=34), trilaciclib prior to GCb on days 1 and 8 (group 2, n=33), or trilaciclib alone on days 1 and 8 and prior to GCb on days 2 and 9 (group 3, n=35), in 21-day cycles. PFS and OS (prespecified secondary endpoints) were assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, and ORR in response-evaluable patients. Patient tumors were characterized as CDK4/6 independent (basal-like) or indeterminate (HER2-enriched, normal-like, luminal A/B) according to the established PAM50 signature, or CDK4/6 dependent (luminal androgen receptor) or indeterminate (basal-like 1/2, mesenchymal) according to the established Lehmann signature. PD-L1 expression was scored as negative or positive if <1% or ≥1% of the total tumor area contained PD-L1-labelled immune cells, respectively, using the Ventana SP142 assay. Association of CDK4/6 dependence and PD-L1 expression with antitumor efficacy was assessed using proportional hazards regression. Results Median follow-up was 8.4 months (range: 0.1-25.7) for group 1, 14.0 months (1.3-33.6) for group 2, and 15.3 months (3.5-33.7) for group 3. The ORR among response-evaluable patients was 7/24 (29.2%) in group 1, 15/30 (50.0%) in group 2, and 12/31 (38.7%) in group 3. Median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) in the ITT population was 5.7 (3.3, 9.9) months in group 1, 9.4 (6.1, 11.9) months in group 2, and 7.3 (6.2, 13.9) months in group 3, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.62 (P = 0.2099) and 0.63 (P = 0.1816), for groups 2 and 3 versus group 1, respectively. Overall, 73.5%, 39.4%, and 57.1% of patients in groups 1, 2, and 3 had died. Median OS (95% CI) was 12.6 (6.3, 15.6) months in group 1, not reached (NR) (10.2, NR) in group 2 (HR = 0.31, P = 0.0016), and 17.8 (12.9, 32.7) months in group 3 (HR = 0.40, P = 0.0004). For groups 2 and 3 combined, median OS was 19.8 (14.0, NR) months (HR = 0.37, P <0.0001 vs group 1). ORR, PFS, and OS were comparable in tumors categorized as CDK4/6 dependent, independent, or indeterminate. Antitumor efficacy by PD-L1 status is provided in the Table. Conclusions Mature data from this study confirm that administering trilaciclib prior to GCb enhances antitumor efficacy compared with GCb alone, with statistically significant improvements in OS. Subgroup analyses suggest that adding trilaciclib prior to GCb benefits patients regardless of CDK4/6 dependence status and PD-L1 expression. Additional immune subtyping analyses are ongoing and will be presented. Group 1Group 2Group 3PD-L1 +vePD-L1 –vePD-L1 +vePD-L1 –vePD-L1 +vePD-L1 –vePatients, n171016101616ORR, n (%)4 (23.5)3 (30.0)8 (50.0)4 (40.0)7 (43.8)4 (25.0)Median PFS, months (95% CI)3.5 (2.2, NR)9.5 (5.2, NR)7.9 (4.3, NR)11.9 (8.8, NR)9.0 (6.2, NR)6.9 (6.4, NR)P value (Wald Test)––0.3470.6040.0690.766HR (95% CI)––0.70 (0.3, 1.5)0.76 (0.3, 2.2)0.46 (0.2, 1.1)1.16 (0.4, 3.1)Median OS, months (95% CI)10.5 (6.3, 18.8)13.9 (12.6, NR)20.1 (10.2, NR)NR (9.4, NR)32.7 (15.3, NR)17.8 (12.9, NR)P value (Wald Test)––0.0280.0830.020.239HR (95% CI)––0.35 (0.1, 0.9)0.34 (0.1, 1.2)0.33 (0.1, 0.8)0.57 (0.2, 1.5)HR and P values are for comparisons between group 2 versus group 1, and group 3 versus group 1.+ve, positive; –ve, negative; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; NR, not reached; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PD-L1, programmed death ligand-1; PFS, progression-free survival. Citation Format: Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Gail S Wright, Anu R Thummala, Michael A Danso, Lazar Popovic, Timothy J Pluard, Hyo S Han, Željko Vojnović, Nikola Vasev, Ling Ma, Donald A Richards, Sharon T Wilks, Dušan Milenković, Jie Xiao, Jessica A Sorrentino, Janet Horton, Antoinette R Tan. Trilaciclib improves overall survival when given with gemcitabine/carboplatin in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Final analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-06.

The METRIC study (NCT#0199733) explored a novel antibody–drug conjugate, glembatumumab vedotin (GV), targeting gpNMB that is overexpressed in ~40% of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and associated with poor prognosis. The study was a randomized, open-label, phase 2b study that evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) of GV compared with capecitabine in gpNMB-overexpressing TNBC. Patients who had previously received anthracycline and taxane-based therapy were randomized 2:1 to receive, GV (1.88 mg/kg IV q21 days) or capecitabine (2500 mg/m2 PO daily d1–14 q21 days). The primary endpoint was RECIST 1.1 PFS per independent, blinded central review. In all, 327 patients were randomized to GV (213 treated) or capecitabine (92 treated). Median PFS was 2.9 months for GV vs. 2.8 months for capecitabine. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities for GV were neutropenia, rash, and leukopenia, and for capecitabine were fatigue, diarrhea, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved PFS over capecitabine or demonstrate a relative risk/benefit improvement over capecitabine.

This phase 3 randomized clinical trial compares the clinical efficacy of margetuximab vs trastuzumab, each with chemotherapy, in patients with pretreated ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer.

Objectives: The key objectives of CONTESSA are to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tesetaxel plus a reduced dose of capecitabine as an all-oral regimen versus capecitabine alone in patients with HER2-, HR+ MBC previously treated with a taxane. Rationale: Tesetaxel is a novel, oral taxane with several properties that make it unique, including: oral administration with a low pill burden; a long (8-day) terminal plasma half-life in humans, enabling infrequent, once-every-3 weeks (Q3W) dosing; no observed hypersensitivity reactions; and significant activity against chemotherapy-resistant breast cancer cell lines. More than 1,000 patients have been treated with tesetaxel in clinical studies. Tesetaxel had encouraging monotherapy activity in a Phase 2 study in 38 patients with HER2-, HR+ MBC, with a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 of 45% and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.4 months (Seidman et al, 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting). Methodology: CONTESSA is a multinational, multicenter, randomized (1:1), Phase 3 registration study comparing tesetaxel (27 mg/m2 on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle) plus a reduced dose of capecitabine (1,650 mg/m2/day on Days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) to the approved dose of capecitabine alone (2,500 mg/m2/day on Days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) in patients with HER2-, HR+ MBC who have received no more than one chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease and have received a taxane in the (neo)adjuvant setting. There was no restriction on the disease-free interval following taxane therapy. The primary endpoint is PFS assessed by an Independent Radiologic Review Committee (IRC). CONTESSA was designed with 90% power to detect a 2.5-month improvement in median PFS (HR=0.71). Secondary endpoints are overall survival (OS), ORR and disease control rate. Results: CONTESSA, which enrolled 685 patients, met the primary endpoint of improved PFS as assessed by the IRC. Median PFS was 9.8 months for tesetaxel plus a reduced dose of capecitabine versus 6.9 months for capecitabine alone, an improvement of 2.9 months [HR=0.716 (95% CI: 0.573-0.895); p=0.003]. ORR was 57% for tesetaxel plus a reduced dose of capecitabine versus 41% for capecitabine alone (p=0.0002). OS data are immature. Tesetaxel plus capecitabine was associated with a manageable side effect profile consistent with previous clinical studies. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) that occurred in ≥5% of patients (tesetaxel plus capecitabine vs. capecitabine alone) were: neutropenia (71.2% vs. 8.3%); diarrhea (13.4% vs. 8.9%); hand-foot syndrome (6.8% vs. 12.2%); febrile neutropenia (12.8% vs. 1.2%); fatigue (8.6% vs. 4.5%); hypokalemia (8.6% vs. 2.7%); leukopenia (10.1% vs. 0.9%); and anemia (8.0% vs. 2.1%). TEAEs resulting in treatment discontinuation in ≥1% of patients (tesetaxel plus capecitabine vs. capecitabine alone) were: neutropenia or febrile neutropenia (4.2% vs. 1.5%); neuropathy (3.6% vs. 0.3%); diarrhea (0.9% vs. 1.5%); and hand-foot syndrome (0.6% vs. 2.1%). Treatment discontinuation due to any adverse event occurred in 23.1% of patients treated with tesetaxel plus capecitabine versus 11.9% of patients treated with capecitabine alone. Grade 2 alopecia occurred in 8.0% of patients treated with tesetaxel plus capecitabine versus 0.3% of patients treated with capecitabine alone. Grade ≥3 neuropathy occurred in 5.9% of patients treated with tesetaxel plus capecitabine versus 0.9% of patients treated with capecitabine alone. Conclusion: An all-oral regimen of tesetaxel plus a reduced dose of capecitabine significantly improved PFS versus capecitabine alone. Neutropenia was the most frequent Grade ≥3 TEAE. Rates of clinically significant alopecia and neuropathy were low. Citation Format: Joyce O9Shaughnessy, Lee Schwartzberg, Martine Piccart, Hope S. Rugo, Denise A Yardley, Javier Cortes, Michael Untch, Nadia Harbeck, Gail S. Wright, Igor Bondarenko, John Glaspy, Zbigniew Nowecki, Fadi Kayali, Arlene Chan, Christelle Levy, Mei-Ching Liu, Sung-Bae Kim, Julie Lemieux, Alexey Manikhas, Sara Tolaney, Elaine Lim, Andrea Gombos, Agostina Stradella, Mark Pegram, Peter Fasching, Laszlo Mangel, Vladimir Semiglazov, Veronique Dieras, Luca Gianni, Michael A Danso, Jeff Vacirca, Stew Kroll, Joseph O9Connell, Kevin Tang, Thomas Wei, Andrew Seidman. Results from CONTESSA: A phase 3 study of tesetaxel plus a reduced dose of capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in patients with HER2-, hormone receptor + (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who have previously received a taxane [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-01.

Abstract Background: Addition of CDK 4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy has provided significant improvements in outcomes for patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, acquired resistance to front-line therapy remains a challenge, and response to late lines of therapy is poor. H3B-6545 is a selective, orally available, small molecule covalent antagonist of the estrogen receptor (ERα) H3B-6545 binds covalently to a cysteine residue at position 530 of both wild-type and the constitutively active mutant ERα proteins, including Y537S. H3B-6545 demonstrated significant antitumor activity in multiple PDX breast cancer models, including those with mutated ESR1 (the gene encoding ERα).Methods: This is a multicenter phase I/II trial. The primary objective of the phase I is to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in pretreated pts with ER+, HER2- mBC. Secondary objectives include safety and antitumor activity. The primary objective of the phase II is to estimate the objective response rate (ORR) and secondary objectives include clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. The trial was designed to exclude a lower limit of ORR of 5% at one-sided level of significance of 0.05 and a power of 90%. Results: Between August 2017 and February 2020, 130 pts were enrolled; 47 in the Phase I part and 83 in the Phase II part of the trial. A total of 105 pts, including 73 patients on 450 mg, were response-evaluable. The phase I evaluated once daily doses from 100 to 600 mg. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed at doses up to 450 mg and 2 DLTs were observed in 2 (grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 drug eruption) of 7 pts on the 600 mg cohort. Consequently, the dose of 450 mg was selected as the RP2D. Median age was 62 years (range: 31 to 87 years), 82% had liver and/or lung metastases, and the median number of prior therapies for metastatic disease was 3 (range: 1 to 10), with 41% of the pts receiving ≥ 4 prior therapies in the metastatic setting. Prior CDK4/6 inhibitors, fulvestrant, and chemotherapy were received by 87%, 71%, and 54% of the pts, respectively. 75 pts (58%) had detectable ESR1 mutations. As of May 31, 2020, grade 2 or higher adverse events reported in ≥10% were anemia (20%), fatigue (16%), nausea (14%), diarrhea (11%) and AST increase (11%). Three cases of grade 4 AE were reported (serum bilirubin, urinary tract obstruction, and hyponatremia), all considered related to disease progression. Grade 1 sinus bradycardia (asymptomatic) was reported in 35% and grade 2 (symptomatic, no intervention needed) was reported in 4%. Grade 2 and 3. QTcF prolongation were reported in 2 and 3 patients, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. In the response-evaluable group, 13 confirmed partial responses (PR, 12%. 90% confidence limits: 7.5%-19%), including 11 PRs (15%, 90% confidence limits: 8.7%-23.7) on 450 mg dose, were observed, thus achieving the primary objective of the trial. Stable disease (SD) and clinical benefit rates (≥23 weeks) were 45% and 33% respectively at 450 mg and 46% and 34%, respectively on all doses. Responses were observed in heavily pretreated pts, pts with visceral metastases and in pts who received prior fulvestrant, prior CDK4/6 inhibitor, and/or prior chemotherapy, in the metastatic setting. Three PRs (25%) and 4 SDs were observed in 12 pts in whom clonal ESR1 Y537S was the main ERα driver. Median PFS, in all pts and in pts with clonal ESR1 Y537S was 3.7 months and 7.3 months, respectively. Conclusions: H3B-6545 has a manageable safety profile and demonstrated single-agent anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated ER+, HER2- mBC patients including those with a constitutively active clonal ESR1 Y537S mutation. Citation Format: Erika P Hamilton, Judy S Wang, Timothy Pluard, Stephen Johnston, Aki Aki Morikawa, Claire E Dees, Robert H Jones, Barbara Haley, Anne Armstrong, Adam L Cohen, Pamela Munster, Gail Wright, Fadi Kayali, Manav Korpal, Lihua Yu, Lisa Cantagallo, Benoit Destenaves, Zhaojie Zhang, Lei Gao, Marc J Pipas, Tarek Sahmouud, Antonio Gualberto, Dejan Juric. Phase I/II trial of H3B-6545, a novel selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonist (SERCA), in estrogen receptor positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD8-06.

A SUMMARY PRIME 2 Randomised Trial (Postoperative Radiotherapy in Minimum-Risk Elderly): Wide Local Excision and Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy +/- Whole Breast Irradiation in Women >= 65 Years With Early Invasive Breast Cancer: 10-Year Results The PRIME 2 phase 3 trial enrolled 1326 women ages 65 years or older with hormone receptor-positive, unilateral invasive breast cancer with a tumor size of 3 cm or less and no regional lymph node involvement (Abstract GS2-03). Patients underwent breast-conserving surgery and received neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. They were randomly assigned to receive whole breast radiotherapy (n=658) or not to receive radiotherapy (n=668). The mean age was approximately 71 years. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was the primary endpoint. The 10-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rate was 9.8% without radiotherapy and 0.9% with radiotherapy (HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.05-0.31; P<.0001). Regional recurrence was reported in 2.3% vs 0.5%, respectively (P=.014). No differences were seen for subgroups such as patients with contralateral breast cancer (1% vs 2.2%; P=.20), distant metastases (1.4% vs 3.6%; P=.07), or new cancers (excluding breast cancer; 10.2% vs 8.7%; P=.41). Metastasis-free survival was 98.1% without radiotherapy and 96.4% with radiotherapy (P=.28). OS at 10 years was 80.4% vs 81.0%, respectively (P=.68). Most deaths were not attributable to breast cancer recurrence.

Abstract Background: Margetuximab (M), an investigational Fc-engineered, immune-activating, HER2-targeted monoclonal antibody, shares specificity with trastuzumab (T) and is being studied in HER2 overexpressing tumors including MBC. The randomized phase 3 SOPHIA trial (NCT02492711) in pretreated HER2+ MBC demonstrated PFS superiority by blinded analysis of M + chemotherapy over T + chemotherapy. M demonstrated a tolerable safety profile. Here, patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is reported. Methods: In SOPHIA, 536 patients with HER2+ MBC and ≥ 2 prior HER2+ directed therapies, including pertuzumab, were randomized 1:1 to M (15mg/kg IV q3w) or T (6 [8 for loading dose] mg/kg IV q 3wk). Each antibody was given with physician’s choice chemotherapy (standard dose capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine). HRQOL was measured at baseline and on D1 of each odd cycle using the Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI) - 16 and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5 level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were performed on NFBSI-16 total score (possible score range: 0 [most symptomatic] - 64 [least symptomatic]), EQ-5D-5L overall score (possible score range: 0 [most symptomatic] - 100 [least symptomatic]), and subscales of each measures. Lower scores reflect a higher impact on HRQOL domains. Changes from baseline in NFBSI-16 total score and in EQ-5D-5L utility score were assessed using mixed model repeated measures analysis (MMRM) with treatment group, stratification factors, time, and treatment group by time interaction as covariates. Each analysis used an unstructured covariance matrix, and least square mean estimates were calculated at each time point. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess time to symptom progression, defined as a ≥ 5-point decrease from baseline in NFBSI-16, using the same covariates as in MMRM analyses.Results: HRQOL questionnaire completion rates were comparable between M and T treatment groups. Mean NFBSI-16 total scores and EQ-5D-5L overall scores were similar between treatment arms at baseline and at end of treatment. During cycles 11-17, a greater proportion of patients in the M group reported being bothered by side effects and fatigue “quite a bit” or “very much” on the NFBSI-16. However, adverse event assessments at corresponding time points were largely attributed to concomitant chemotherapy. Also, a smaller proportion of patients on T completed these measures at these times. Overall, least mean square estimates (95% CIs) of change from baseline NFBSI-16 total scores were -1.99 (-3.395, -0.594) in the M group, and -2.13 (-3.794, -0.469) in the T group. A slightly higher proportion of patients in the M group had ≥ 5-point decrease from baseline NFBSI-16 total score compared to those in the T group (M: 105 [39.5%]; T: 100 [37%]). However, this difference was neither prespecified nor statistically significant (Cox model HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.672, 1.164; p=0.382). Overall least square mean estimates (95% CIs) of change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L total scores were -0.93 (-4.493, 2.637) in the M group, and -3.93 (-8.253, 0.387) in the T group, suggesting that patients on M had less signs of deterioration compared to the T group; statistical significance testing was not prespecified. Conclusions: Overall, HRQOL domains, including symptoms and functioning, were maintained. Changes from baseline were similar between the 2 treatment groups. Treatment-specific symptoms were consistent with side effects associated with chemotherapy, not antibody study therapy. Findings support similar, acceptable safety profiles demonstrated previously for margetuximab and trastuzumab. Citation Format: Fatima Cardoso, Javier Cortes, William Gradishar, Seock-Ah Im, Mark D. Pegram, Hope S. Rugo, Gail S. Wright, Michelino De Laurentiis, Christelle Levy, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Janine Mansi, Raul Oyola, Francesco Ricci, Erik H. Jakobsen, Beatriz Uziely, Daniel Egle, Aristoteles Giagounidis, Kirstin Williams, Shengyan Hong, Edwin Rock, Giuseppe Curigliano. Health-related quality of life for margetuximab + chemotherapy vs. trastuzumab + chemotherapy in the phase 3 SOPHIA trial of patients with pretreated HER2+ metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS9-11.

Objective: Niraparib improves progression-free survival (PFS) in newly diagnosed and recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) in patients after platinum-based chemotherapy in all biomarker-defined subgroups. OVARIO (NCT03326193) is a single-arm study evaluating niraparib + bevacizumab treatment in advanced OC after response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy + bevacizumab.

1018 Background: H3B-6545, a selective, small molecule covalent antagonist of ERα demonstrated preclinical and preliminary clinical activity against ER+ breast cancer (Hamilton EP, SABCS, 2020). This study evaluated the activity and tolerability of H3B-6545 in patients (pts) with metastatic ER+, HER2-, breast cancer refractory to endocrine therapy. Methods: Patients received H3B-6545 once daily at the recommended phase II dose of 450 mg. The primary objective of the phase II is to estimate the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and secondary objectives include safety. Results: 83 pts were treated with 450 mg in the phase II part of the trial. Additionally, 11 pts were treated with 450 mg in the phase I part of the trial and are included in this analysis. Median age was 62 years (range: 38 to 87 years), 81% had liver and/or lung metastases, and the median number of prior therapies for metastatic disease was 3 (range: 1 to 8). Prior CDK4/6 inhibitors, aromatase inhibitors, fulvestrant, and chemotherapy were received by 85%, 80%, 72%, and 50% of the pts, respectively. 58 pts (62%) had detectable ESR1 mutations in liquid biopsies, including 10 (11%) and 19 pts (20%) who had clonal Y537S and clonal D538G mutation, respectively. As of January 29, 2021, grade (gr) 2 or higher adverse events (AE) reported in ≥10% were anemia (19%), fatigue (16%), nausea (17%), and diarrhea (12%). Laboratory gr 2 or higher abnormalities reported in ≥10% pts were creatinine clearance decrease (38%), hemoglobin decrease (37%), bilirubin increase (12%), ALT increase (14%), AST increase (13%), and creatinine increase (11%). AE of gr 1 sinus bradycardia (asymptomatic) was reported in 34% and gr 2 (symptomatic, no intervention needed) was reported in 5%. Gr 2 and 3 QTcF prolongation were reported in 2 and 3 pts, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Efficacy estimates are presented in the table below. Responses were observed in heavily pretreated pts, pts with visceral metastases and in pts who received prior fulvestrant, CDK4/6 inhibitor, and/or chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Conclusions: H3B-6545 has a manageable safety profile and demonstrated single-agent anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated ER+, HER2- mBC patients. Clinical activity was observed in pts with ESR1 mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT03250676 .[Table: see text]

Abstract Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAb) are the standard of care in early-to-advanced HER2+ breast cancer. However, for relapsed/refractory disease, limited options exist after progression on trastuzumab (T), pertuzumab (P), and ado-trastuzumab emtansine. Margetuximab (M) is an Fc-engineered anti-HER2 mAb that targets the same epitope as T and exerts similar antiproliferative effects. Compared with T, M has higher affinity for both 158V (high binding) and 158F (low binding) alleles of the activating Fc receptor, CD16A. M enhances innate immunity, including CD16A-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, more effectively than T. M also potentiates adaptive immunity in treated patients (pts), including enhanced clonality of the T-cell repertoire and induction of HER2-specific T- and B-cell responses. SOPHIA (NCT02492711) is a phase 3 trial that demonstrated the benefit of M vs T, both with chemotherapy, in pts with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This trial is the first prospective analysis of the effect of CD16A genotype on anti-HER2 antibody efficacy. Methods: Pts with disease progression after at least 2 lines of anti-HER2 therapy, including P, and 1-3 lines of therapy for HER2+ MBC were randomized 1:1 to chemotherapy + either M (15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 wk) or T. Randomization was stratified by number of metastatic sites (≤2, >2), lines of treatment for MBC (≤2, >2), and chemotherapy choice (capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine). Primary endpoints were central-blinded review of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The first interim OS analysis at time of PFS analysis (October 10, 2018) was immature, with 158 of 385 deaths (41%) needed for final OS analysis. The stopping boundary was not crossed. A second interim OS analysis was planned after 270 deaths and will be reported here. Results: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population comprised 536 pts (M, 266; H, 270). M + chemotherapy prolonged PFS vs T + chemotherapy (median PFS, 5.8 vs 4.9 mo; hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.98; P=0.033). Results were more pronounced in pts with CD16A genotypes containing a 158F allele (median PFS, 6.9 vs 5.1 mo; HR, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.52-0.90; nominal P=0.005). OS at the first interim analysis demonstrated a HR (95% CI) of 0.95 (0.69-1.31) for the ITT population (n=536) and an HR of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.58-1.17) for the CD16A/FF or FV genotype population (n=457). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 138 pts (52%) receiving M vs 128 pts (48%) receiving T. Serious AEs were seen in 39 (15%) receiving M vs 46 (17%) receiving T. The second planned interim analysis of OS (at n=270), as well as updated safety, will be presented. Conclusions: M + chemotherapy in pts with treated HER2+ MBC improves PFS vs T. Safety was comparable. CD16A genotyping suggests a greater benefit in pts with a 158F allele. Maturing data comparing the OS of pts treated with M vs T with chemotherapy will provide important new insights in characterizing clinical activity of this regimen in pts with MBC. Citation Format: Hope S. Rugo, Seock-Ah Im, Fatima Cardoso, Javier Cortes, Giuseppe Curigliano, Mark D. Pegram, Antonino Musolino, Thomas Bachelot, Gail S. Wright, Michelino De Laurentiis, Peter A. Kaufman, Timothy Pluard, Francesco Ricci, Lupe G. Salazar, Denise A. Yardley, Sutton Edlich, Shengyan Hong, Edwin Rock, William J. Gradishar, SOPHIA Study Group. Phase 3 SOPHIA study of margetuximab + chemotherapy vs trastuzumab + chemotherapy in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer after prior anti-HER2 therapies: second interim overall survival analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-02.

Background Trilaciclib is an intravenous cell-cycle inhibitor that transiently maintains immune cells and haemopoietic stem and progenitor cells in G1 arrest. By protecting the immune cells and bone marrow from chemotherapy-induced damage, trilaciclib has the potential to optimise antitumour activity while minimising myelotoxicity. We report safety and activity data for trilaciclib plus gemcitabine and carboplatin chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Methods In this randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study, adult patients (aged >= 18 years) with evaluable, biopsy-confirmed, locally recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who had no more than two previous lines of chemotherapy were recruited from 26 sites in the USA, three in Serbia, two in North Macedonia, one in Croatia, and one in Bulgaria; sites were academic and community hospitals. Availability of diagnostic samples of tumour tissue confirming triple-negative breast cancer was a prerequisite for enrolment. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by an interactive web-response system, stratified by number of previous lines of systemic therapy and the presence of liver metastases, to receive intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) and intravenous carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve 2 mu g x h/mL) on days 1 and 8 (group 1), gemcitabine and carboplatin plus intravenous trilaciclib 240 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (group 2), or gemcitabine and carboplatin on days 2 and 9 plus trilaciclib on days 1, 2, 8, and 9 (group 3) of 21-day cycles. Patients continued treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation by the investigator. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of combining trilaciclib with gemcitabine and carboplatin chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were duration of severe neutropenia during cycle 1 and the occurrence of severe neutropenia during the treatment period. Overall survival was included as a key secondary endpoint. Analyses were in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with EudraCT, 2016-004466-26, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02978716, and is ongoing but closed to accrual. Findings Between Feb 7, 2017, and May 15, 2018, 142 patients were assessed for eligibility and 102 were randomly assigned to group 1 (n=34), group 2 (n=33), or group 3 (n=35). Of all patients, 38 (37%) had received one or two lines of previous chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Median follow-up was 8.4 months (IQR 3.8-13.6) for group 1, 12.7 months (5 .5-17.4) for group 2, and 12.9 months (6.7-16 .8) for group 3. Data cutoff for myelosuppression endpoints was July 30, 2018, and for antitumour activity endpoints was May 17, 2019. During cycle 1, mean duration of severe neutropenia was 0.8 day (SD 2.4) in group 1, 1.5 days (3.5) in group 2, and 1.0 day (2.6) in group 3 (group 3 vs group 1 one-sided adjusted p=0.70). Severe neutropenia occurred in nine (26%) of 34 patients in group 1, 12 (36%) of 33 patients in group 2, and eight (23%) of 35 patients in group 3 (p=0.70). Overall survival was 12.6 months (IQR 5.8-15.6) in group 1, 20. 1 months (9.4-not reached) in group 2, and 17.8 months (8. 8-not reached) in group 3 (group 3 vs group 1 two-sided p=0.0023). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia (22 [73%] of 34), neutropenia (21 [70%]), and thrombocytopenia (18 [60%]) in group 1; neutropenia (27 [82%] of 33), thrombocytopenia (18 [55%]) and anaemia (17 [52%]) in group 2; and neutropenia (23 [66%] of 35), thrombocytopenia (22 [63%]), and nausea (17 [49%]) in group 3. There were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation No significant differences were observed in myelosuppression endpoints with trilaciclib plus gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer; however, the regimen was generally well tolerated and overall survival results were encouraging. Further studies of trilaciclib in this setting are warranted.