INTRODUCTION:The incidence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations is higher among Asian patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer than the general advanced non-small cell lung cancer population. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of amivantamab in combination with lazertinib versus osimertinib in Asian participants from the phase 3 MARIPOSA study who had treatment-naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer with common EGFR mutations. METHODS:Participants were randomized 2:2:1 to receive amivantamab-lazertinib, osimertinib alone, or lazertinib alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival based on blinded independent central review per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response, and safety. Exploratory endpoints included extracranial progression-free survival and post-progression outcomes. RESULTS:Of 1074 randomized participants, 629 were Asian, with 250 and 251 randomized to the amivantamab-lazertinib and osimertinib arms, respectively. Among Asian participants, at a median follow-up of 22.5 months, amivantamab-lazertinib showed a 35 % reduction in the risk of disease progression or death versus osimertinib (hazard ratio, 0.65; P < 0.001). Consistent with the overall population, median progression-free survival was 27.5 and 18.3 months in the amivantamab-lazertinib and osimertinib arms, respectively. The objective response rate was 88 % for amivantamab-lazertinib versus 85 % for osimertinib. The median duration of response among confirmed responders improved by 8.6 months for amivantamab-lazertinib versus osimertinib. Favorable trends were also seen for overall survival, extracranial progression-free survival, and post-progression outcomes for amivantamab-lazertinib over osimertinib. Adverse events in Asian participants were similar to those in the overall population. CONCLUSIONS:Amivantamab-lazertinib demonstrated superior progression-free survival versus osimertinib in Asian participants, with a tolerable safety profile. These results were consistent with those in the overall population.

The spatial role of M1 and M2 tumor-associated macrophages (M1/M2 TAMs) in precision medicine remains unclear. EGFR and TP53 are among the most frequently mutated genes in lung adenocarcinoma. We characterized the mutation status and density of M1/M2 TAMs within tumor islets and stroma in 117 lung adenocarcinomas using next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Stromal M1 TAMs were positively correlated with disease progression and smoking history. In contrast, islet M1/M2 TAMs were predominantly found in tumors with wild-type TP53 (wtp53) but not associated with EGFR status. The presence of wtp53 was associated with the spatial distribution of M1/M2 TAMs in tumor islets and stroma. Additionally, dominance of islet M1 TAMs and M1-signature were significantly associated with improved survival in patients with wtp53 lung adenocarcinoma, unlike in those with mutant TP53. Conditioned medium from M1 macrophages (M1 CM) induced apoptosis in wtp53 cells through increased p53 accumulation. We found that interferons in M1 CM activate JAK1/TYK2 via IFNARs, leading to enhanced STAT1 expression and Y701 phosphorylation. This activation facilitates p53-STAT1 interactions, reduces the interaction between p53 and MDM2, and subsequently decreases p53 ubiquitination. M1 CM inhibited tumorigenesis, and silencing p53 reduced the anti-tumor efficacy of polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poly I:C) in vivo. Furthermore, higher M1-signature was significantly associated with better responses and survival following anti-PD1 treatment in wtp53 melanomas. IFNs/STAT1/p53 signaling was critical for the anti-tumor activity of M1 macrophages. These findings suggest that p53 modulates the spatial balance of M1/M2 TAMs, and the tumoricidal effects of M1 TAMs depend on p53 status. Thus, p53 companion diagnostics could facilitate the development of M1-oriented therapies, which may be particularly beneficial for wtp53 patients when combined with immunotherapy.

Background Previous results from this phase 3 trial showed that progression-free survival among participants with previously untreated EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was significantly improved with amivantamab-lazertinib as compared with osimertinib. Results of the protocol-specified final overall survival analysis in this trial have not been reported.Methods We randomly assigned, in a 2:2:1 ratio, participants with previously untreated EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R substitution), locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC to receive amivantamab-lazertinib, osimertinib, or lazertinib. Overall survival (assessed in an analysis of the time from randomization to death from any cause) in the amivantamab-lazertinib group as compared with the osimertinib group was a key secondary end point. Additional end points included safety.Results A total of 429 participants each were assigned to receive amivantamab-lazertinib or osimertinib. Over a median follow-up of 37.8 months, amivantamab-lazertinib led to significantly longer overall survival than osimertinib (hazard ratio for death, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.92; P=0.005); 3-year overall survival was 60% and 51%, respectively. At the clinical cutoff date, 38% of participants in the amivantamab-lazertinib group and 28% in the osimertinib group were still receiving the assigned treatment. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were more common with amivantamab-lazertinib (in 80% of participants) than with osimertinib (in 52%), particularly skin-related events, venous thromboembolism, and infusion-related events; these findings were consistent with the established safety profile of each treatment. No new safety signals were observed with additional follow-up.Conclusions Amivantamab-lazertinib led to significantly longer overall survival among participants with previously untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC than osimertinib but was associated with an increased risk of adverse events of grade 3 or higher. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; MARIPOSA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04487080.) In advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations, amivantamab-lazertinib led to longer overall survival than osimertinib but was associated with an increased risk of adverse events of grade 3 or higher.

Given the limited proteomic insights and high incidence of lung adenocarcinoma, further investigation of uncharacterized proteins in cancer progression remains crucial. In this study, a poorly characterized protein, OCIA domain-containing 2 (OCIAD2), encoded by chromosome 4 was identified as being upregulated in lung adenocarcinoma from our previous proteogenomics data using the Taiwan Cancer Moonshot cohort. OCIAD2 was highly expressed in tumor tissues in 95.5% of lung adenocarcinoma patients in our cohort, with elevated expression correlating with worse survival. Functional studies revealed that the silencing of the OCIAD2 decreased cell migration, invasion, and colony-forming abilities. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) indicated the involvement of OCIAD2 in oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Subsequently, mitochondrial metabolic assay demonstrated that OCIAD2 impairs OXPHOS function, accompanied by a metabolic shift toward glycolysis. These findings suggest that OCIAD2 promotes cancer progression through metabolic reprogramming, highlighting the role of OCIAD2 as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for lung adenocarcinoma.

For patients with advanced EGFR -mutant lung adenocarcinoma, progression-free survival (PFS) is significantly improved by epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) medications. However, a subset of patients still experiences early disease progression. In this study, we aimed to identify potential risk factors associated with shorter PFS through next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. This retrospective study included patients with advanced EGFR -mutant lung adenocarcinoma who received first-line EGFR-TKI treatment with upfront NGS. The genetic alterations included two types, mutations and copy number variations. Alterations involving EGFR downstream signaling pathways were classified as ‘ PIK3CA-AKT/RAS-RAF alterations’. Clinical and histopathological data were also collected and analyzed. We studied a total of 82 advanced lung cancer patients with sensitive EGFR mutations. Multivariable analyses showed associations with a shorter PFS for the following factors: P IK3CA-AKT/RAS-RAF alterations [hazard ratio (HR) 3.197, P = 0.006], age ≤50 (HR 3.034, P = 0.010), and PD-L1 ≥50% (HR 2.256, P = 0.035). Based on the above risk factors, patients were classified into no-risk and ≥1 risk groups. In the no-risk group, third-generation EGFR-TKIs showed a numerically longer PFS compared to first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (not reached vs. 20.0 months, P = 0.084). However, in patients with ≥1 risk factor, third-generation EGFR-TKIs showed no PFS advantages (6.6 vs. 6.2 months, P = 0.831). In conclusion, besides clinicopathological factors, NGS provides additional insights to predict shorter PFS after EGFR-TKI treatment. We identified three risk factors: (1) PIK3CA-AKT/RAS-RAF alterations, (2) age ≤50, and (3) PD-L1 ≥50%. Patients with these factors had poor PFS regardless of EGFR-TKI generation.

INTRODUCTION:Lorlatinib, a third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor, reported significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than crizotinib in the phase 3 CROWN trial (NCT03052608) in patients with previously untreated advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive NSCLC. Efficacy was similar in the Asian subgroup. We present an updated subgroup analysis in Asian patients after five years of follow-up. METHODS:Patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to receive lorlatinib 100 mg once daily (n = 59) or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (n = 61). This post hoc analysis presents updated investigator-assessed efficacy outcomes, safety, and biomarker analyses. RESULTS:After a median follow-up of 62.4 months for lorlatinib and 55.1 months for crizotinib, median PFS was not reached (NR, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 64.3‒NR) and 9.2 months (95% CI: 7.2‒12.7), respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.13‒0.37); the five-year PFS was 63% (95% CI: 49-74) and 7% (95% CI: 2-17). The objective response rate was 81% (95% CI: 69-90) with lorlatinib and 59% (95% CI: 46‒71) with crizotinib. In patients with baseline brain metastases, the intracranial objective response rate was 69% (95% CI: 39‒91) with lorlatinib and 6% (95% CI: <1‒30) with crizotinib. The median time to intracranial progression was NR (95% CI: NR‒NR) and 14.6 months (95% CI: 9.2‒27.4), respectively (HR = 0.01, 95% CI: <0.01‒0.11). Safety profiles were consistent with the entire population. CONCLUSIONS:After five years of follow-up, lorlatinib efficacy and safety in the Asian subgroup of CROWN continue to be consistent with those in the overall population, with PFS remaining unreached with lorlatinib. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03052608.

BACKGROUND:MET amplification is the most common resistance mechanism to first-line osimertinib. We report safety and efficacy data from a phase II study assessing savolitinib plus osimertinib in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated, MET-amplified, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS:Patients with EGFR-mutated, MET-amplified (MET gene copy number ≥ 5 or MET:CEP7 ratio ≥ 2), advanced NSCLC post-osimertinib were enrolled. Patients received savolitinib 300 mg once daily (QD) plus osimertinib 80 mg QD or savolitinib plus placebo. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Exploratory analysis included retrospective efficacy assessment by higher MET cutoffs (immunohistochemistry 3+ staining ≥ 90% tumor cells and / or MET gene copy number ≥ 10). RESULTS:Thirty patients were randomized (14 savolitinib-osimertinib; 16 savolitinib-placebo). Among all patients, ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 57% (29-82) versus 13% (2-38); median PFS (95% CI) was 7.4 months (5.6-not calculable [NC]) versus 1.6 months (1.3-4.1) for savolitinib-osimertinib and savolitinib-placebo, respectively. In patients with higher MET cutoffs, ORR was 63% (24-91) and 29% (4-71); median PFS was 8.2 months (4.1-NC) and 4.0 months (1.3-NC) for savolitinib-osimertinib (n = 8) and savolitinib-placebo (n = 7), respectively. There were no new safety signals. This study was terminated early and the contribution of osimertinib to savolitinib is being assessed further in SAVANNAH (NCT03778229) in patients with higher MET biomarker cutoffs. CONCLUSIONS:Savolitinib plus osimertinib demonstrated numerically higher clinical activity versus savolitinib plus placebo in all patients and patients with higher MET biomarker cutoffs.

PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of zipalertinib, an irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, in pretreated patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations. METHODS REZILIENT1 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04036682 ) is a phase I/II open-label trial enrolling patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR ex20ins-mutant NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy with/without ex20ins-targeted therapies. Asymptomatic, treated and untreated stable CNS metastases are permitted. We report data from patients treated with zipalertinib 100 mg twice daily. The primary end points are objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by independent central review. RESULTS At data cutoff (December 10, 2024), 244 patients had received treatment with zipalertinib 100 mg twice daily. The primary efficacy population (8 months' follow-up) comprised patients who had received prior platinum-based chemotherapy without ex20ins-targeted therapy (125 patients), with amivantamab only (30 patients), or with amivantamab and other ex20ins-targeted therapy (21 patients). The confirmed ORR was 35.2% (95% CI, 28.2 to 42.8); median DOR was 8.8 months (95% CI, 8.3 to 12.7). Among patients who received prior platinum-based chemotherapy without ex20ins-targeted therapy, amivantamab only, or amivantamab and other ex20ins-targeted therapy, the confirmed ORR was 40%, 30%, and 14.3%, and median DOR was 8.8, 14.7, and 4.2 months, respectively. Among 68 patients with CNS metastases, the ORR was 30.9%. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were anemia (7%), pneumonitis and rash (2.5% each), and diarrhea, ALT increased, and platelet count decreased (2% each). CONCLUSION Zipalertinib demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with EGFR ex20ins-mutant NSCLC who received prior platinum-based chemotherapy with or without amivantamab.

Dysregulated MET signaling, such as MET overexpression or MET amplification (METamp), is a important mechanism of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Combination therapy with EGFR TKIs and MET TKIs has revealed efficacy in these patients. This study aimed to analyze the real-world experience of TKI combination in patients with EGFR-mutant MET-overexpressed LUAD. This retrospective cohort study included patients with advanced EGFR-mutant LUAD who progressed after EGFR TKIs and were treated with combination therapy of EGFR TKIs and MET TKIs (capmatinib or tepotinib). Immunohistochemistry was used to detect MET overexpression. This study included 27 patients, with a median age of 69 years; 40.7% of the patients were male individuals, and 88.9% never smoked. Overall, the treatment response of the TKI combination reported 29.6% (eight of 27) partial response, 55.6% (15 of 27) stable disease, a median progression-free survival of 7.3 months, and an overall survival of 26.9 months. The adverse events were mostly grade 1 to 2, with only one patient experiencing a grade 3 or greater event, which was peripheral edema. The most common adverse events were hypoalbuminemia (44.4%), increased creatinine (44.4%), and peripheral edema (44.4%). Eight patients underwent next-generation sequencing analysis, and two (25.0%) of them had METamp. Three patients (37.5%) had TP53 mutations, which were the most common concurrent alterations. Those with positive METamp had significantly longer median progression-free survival than those without (25.3 versus 5.8 mo; p = 0.034). The TKI combination reported clinical activities in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant LUAD resistant to EGFR TKIs and mild toxicity in those with MET overexpression.

BACKGROUND:Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) in never-smokers is a major public health burden, especially among East Asian women. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are promising for risk stratification but are primarily developed in European-ancestry populations. We aimed to develop and validate single- and multi-ancestry PRSs for East Asian never-smokers to improve LUAD risk prediction. METHODS:PRSs were developed using genome-wide association study summary statistics from East Asian (8,002 cases; 20,782 controls) and European (2,058 cases; 5,575 controls) populations. Single-ancestry models included PRS-25, PRS-CT, and LDpred2; multi-ancestry models included LDpred2+PRS-EUR128, PRS-CSx, and CT-SLEB. Performance was evaluated in independent East Asian data from the Female Lung Cancer Consortium (FLCCA) and externally validated in the Nanjing Lung Cancer Cohort (NJLCC). We assessed predictive accuracy via AUC, with 10-year and (age 30-80) absolute risks estimates. RESULTS:The best multi-ancestry PRS, using East Asian and European data via CT-SLEB (clumping and thresholding, super learning, empirical Bayes), outperformed the best East Asian-only PRS (LDpred2; AUC = 0.629, 95% CI:0.618,0.641), achieving an AUC of 0.640 (95% CI : 0.629,0.653) and odds ratio of 1.71 (95% CI : 1.61,1.82) per SD increase. NJLCC Validation confirmed robust performance (AUC =0.649, 95% CI: 0.623, 0.676). The top 20% PRS group had a 3.92-fold higher LUAD risk than the bottom 20%. Further, the top 5% PRS group reached a 6.69% lifetime absolute risk. Notably, this group reached the average population 10-year LUAD risk at age 50 (0.42%) by age 41, nine years earlier. CONCLUSIONS:Multi-ancestry PRS approaches enhance LUAD risk stratification in East Asian never-smokers, with consistent external validation, suggesting future clinical utility.

Ubiquitination is a posttranslational modification that regulates tumour progression-associated proteins through the ubiquitin‒proteasome system, making E3 ligases potential antitumour targets. Here, we report that TRIM8, a member of the TRIM family and an E3 ligase, can act as a tumour suppressor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Both gain- and loss-of-function experiments revealed that TRIM8 inhibits the proliferation, colony formation, migration and invasion of NSCLC cells. Experiments with a xenograft model showed that TRIM8 expression suppresses tumour metastasis in vivo. Moreover, low expression of TRIM8 was associated with poor overall survival in both the Taiwanese and GEO lung cancer cohorts. TRIM8 overexpression in lung cancer cells reduced MYOF expression, and restoring MYOF rescued cell migration in TRIM8-overexpressing cells. TRIM8 targeted MYOF for K48-linked ubiquitination, facilitating proteasome-mediated degradation and subsequently suppressing the extracellular secretion of MMPs. Our results provide new insights into the contribution of TRIM8 to lung cancer progression, suggesting that TRIM8 is a new biomarker and a novel therapeutic target for lung cancer.

Savo is an oral, potent and highly selective MET-TKI. In the Phase 2 SAVANNAH study (NCT03778229), savo + osi had a high rate of durable responses in pts with EGFRm advanced NSCLC and high MET OverExp and/or Amp levels. Early clearance of plasma EGFRm may predict outcomes. We report an exploratory analysis of plasma EGFRm clearance and its association with MET tissue biomarker status, ORR and PFS. Pts with EGFRm advanced NSCLC and MET OverExp and/or Amp with PD on 1L+ osi received savo 300 mg QD, 300 mg BID or 600 mg QD + osi 80 mg QD. MET OverExp/Amp was centrally confirmed (by IHC [Roche], 3+ intensity in ≥50% of tumor cells [MET IHC3+/≥50%]; by FISH [Abbott Molecular], MET gene copy number ≥5 or MET:CEP7 ratio ≥2 [FISH5+], or at higher thresholds of MET IHC3+/≥90% or FISH10+). Baseline (BL) and Wk 3 plasma EGFRm (Ex19del/L858R) were analyzed by ddPCR (Biodesix) as an estimate of tumor burden. MET Amp was not monitored in ctDNA due to low detection sensitivity. Clearance was defined as undetected EGFRm ctDNA at Wk 3, when detected at BL. PFS was investigator-assessed (RECIST 1.1). DCO: Aug 23, 2024. Of 344 pts with evaluable BL ctDNA, 259 (75%) had detected EGFRm ctDNA. Of these, 225 had evaluable ctDNA at Wk 3 (82 [36%] had EGFRm clearance at Wk 3). Confirmed ORR was higher in pts with EGFRm Wk 3 clearance (56/82; 68%) vs non-clearance (38/143; 27%). PFS was longer in pts with vs without EGFRm clearance at Wk 3 (Table). Across all pts evaluable for ctDNA at Wk 3, clearance rates were higher in pts with vs without high MET (69/162 [43%] vs 13/63 [21%]; odds ratio [95% CI] 0.35 [0.16, 0.72]). Similar results were seen in the savo 300 mg QD + osi subgroup. In SAVANNAH, among pts with detected EGFRm ctDNA at BL, clearance at Wk 3 was associated with improved ORR and PFS. Plasma EGFRm clearance at Wk 3 is enriched in pts with MET IHC3+/≥90% or FISH10+ status, consistent with improved efficacy in this biomarker subgroup. Jonathan W. Riess, Filippo de Marinis, Benjamin Levy, Tae Min Kim, Laura Bonanno, Quincy Chu, Marcello Tiseo, Adrian Sacher, Silvia Novello, Christina Baik, Lyudmila Bazhenova, Jacques Cadranel, Giulio Metro, Cheng-Ta Yang, Tsung-Ying Yang, Gee-Chen Chang, Konstantinos Leventakos, Lorenzo Livi, James Chih-Hsin Yang, Lecia V. Sequist, John Argue, Wanning Xu, Aleksandra Markovets, Ryan Hartmaier, Myung-Ju Ahn. SAVANNAH: Clearance of plasma EGFRm in patients with EGFRm MET-overexpressed (OverExp) and/or -amplified (Amp) NSCLC post-osimertinib (osi) treated with savolitinib (savo) + osi [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr LB416.

INTRODUCTION:Lazertinib is a central nervous system-penetrant, third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that was selected for combination with amivantamab due to its relatively low rates of wild-type EGFR toxicities. In the phase 3 MARIPOSA study, amivantamab plus lazertinib (amivantamab-lazertinib) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; p < 0.001) versus osimertinib in participants with treatment-naive EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. A lazertinib monotherapy arm was included to assess the contribution of components in the combination. This is the first randomized, double-blind comparison of two third-generation EGFR TKIs, lazertinib and osimertinib. METHODS:In MARIPOSA, 1074 participants were randomized 2:2:1 to receive amivantamab-lazertinib (n = 429), osimertinib monotherapy (n = 429), or lazertinib monotherapy (n = 216). This exploratory analysis compared the efficacy and safety of lazertinib and osimertinib. RESULTS:At a median follow-up of 22.0 months, median PFS was 18.5 months for lazertinib versus 16.6 months for osimertinib (hazard ratio = 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.79-1.22; p = 0.86). PFS results were comparable between arms among predefined subgroups. Among participants with measurable disease at baseline, objective response rate was 83% for lazertinib versus 85% for osimertinib, with a median duration of response among confirmed responders of 16.6 months versus 16.8 months, respectively. Median overall survival was not reached for both arms (hazard ratio = 1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.73-1.38) at the interim analysis. Adverse events for both arms were mostly grades 1 to 2 and frequently related to EGFR inhibition. Lazertinib was associated with lower rates of QT interval prolongation versus osimertinib. CONCLUSIONS:Lazertinib demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to osimertinib, including in predefined subgroups.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors have transformed lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) treatment in EGFR-mutant (MT) patients, but strategies targeting wild-type (WT) EGFR tumors remain necessary. This study analyzed a diverse LUAD patient cohort with EGFR mutation statuses and wild-type profiles for ALK and KRAS to identify stage-specific biomarkers. Using quantitative proteomics and multiomics, we discovered 21 dysregulated proteins in early-stage EGFR-WT LUAD, identifying myeloid-derived growth factor (MYDGF) as a key candidate biomarker. Elevated MYDGF levels in tissue (n = 117) and serum (n = 196) correlated significantly with cancer stage in EGFR-WT patients but not EGFR-MT cases. Notably, a higher tumor-to-normal MYDGF ratio predicted a favorable prognosis in early-stage EGFR-WT LUAD. Functional studies demonstrated that MYDGF exerts distinct roles in cell viability and migration depending on its cellular localization and the invasive potential of cancer cells. Specifically, secreted MYDGF promoted a protumorigenic phenotype, whereas excess intracellular MYDGF appeared to suppress the oncogenic capacity of aggressive cancer cells. MYDGF knockdown and subsequent proteomic analysis provided further insights into these context-dependent functions. These findings highlight EGFR status- and stage-specific proteomic profiles in LUAD, emphasizing the importance of context-dependent biomarker assessment for personalized treatment strategies.

Background/Objectives: Osimertinib is a standard sequential therapy for advanced and recurrent Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with the T790M mutation, following treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs). This study aims to investigate the differences in clinical outcomes between osimertinib as a 2nd-line treatment and as a ≥3rd-line treatment in this patient population. Methods: Between September 2014 and March 2023, we enrolled advanced and recurrent T790M + NSCLC patients who had received osimertinib as sequential treatment for analysis. All patients had previously been treated with gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib as first-line therapy. Results: A total of 158 patients who received osimertinib as sequential treatment were included in the final analysis. Of these, 99 patients (62.7%) received osimertinib as a 2nd-line treatment, while 59 patients (37.3%) were treated with osimertinib as ≥3rd-line therapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.7 months for the 2nd-line group and 8.9 months for the ≥3rd-line group. The median overall survival (OS) from first-line treatment was 73.2 months in the 2nd-line group and 57.5 months in the ≥3rd-line group. No statistically significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between the two groups. Conclusions: Our research demonstrated that osimertinib is effective not only as a 2nd-line therapy but also as a ≥3rd-line treatment, offering promising clinical benefits for advanced and recurrent EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with acquired T790M mutations who have developed resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI therapy.

Background: Bevacizumab is extensively used in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Numerous clinical trials have proven the clinical efficacies of bevacizumab biosimilars (BB). Objective: Our study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between bevacizumab reference product (RP) and BB among advanced NSCLC patients in a real-world setting. Design: We retrospectively analyzed stage IV metastatic NSCLC patients who were treated with bevacizumab as part of a combination therapy. Patients were categorized into chemotherapy (CT) and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) groups. We compared the patients’ characteristics, treatment efficacy, and adverse events between RP and BB in the two treatment groups. Methods: From January 2020 to July 2022, a total of 171 patients who underwent combination therapy with bevacizumab were screened. Seventy-nine of these patients met the study’s inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the final analysis. We utilized the Kaplan–Meier method to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and the log-rank test to compare PFS between groups. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify predictors of PFS. Results: Within the CT cohort, 34 patients were treated with RP in combination with platinum and pemetrexed, and 25 patients received a combination regimen with BB. The median PFS was 6.9 months in the RP group and 8.9 months in the BB group ( p = 0.255). Within the EGFR-TKI cohort, 20 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC received first-line treatment with EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab. Of these patients, 9 were treated with a combination regimen that included RP, and 11 patients received EGFR-TKI in combination with BB. The median PFS was 18.4 months for the RP group and 13.6 months for the BB group ( p = 0.363). Conclusion: In our advanced NSCLC patients, we found no difference in clinical outcomes when receiving treatment with RP or BB. Given a combination regimen, BB was as effective as RP together with either CT or EGFR-TKIs.

Introduction: For patients with unresectable, stage III non -small -cell lung cancer (NSCLC), current standard of care is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) followed by consolidation durvalumab. However, earlier initiation of durvalumab simultaneously with cCRT may increase antitumor activity relative to initiation after cCRT. The phase 1 CLOVER study (NCT03509012) evaluated durvalumab combined with cCRT in patients with advanced solid tumors; we report findings from the NSCLC cohort. Methods: CLOVER comprised a dose -limiting toxicity (DLT) assessment part, followed by an expansion part. In the NSCLC cohort, patients with previously untreated, unresectable, stage III NSCLC were enrolled in three treatment arms: durvalumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) + cisplatin + etoposide + radiotherapy (Arm 1); durvalumab Q4W + carboplatin + paclitaxel + radiotherapy (Arm 2); or durvalumab Q4W + carboplatin or cisplatin + pemetrexed + radiotherapy (non-squamous histology only; Arm 3). Patients received durvalumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. Results: Sixty-four patients were enrolled: 21, 22, and 21 in Arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively. One patient in Arm 1 had DLT (grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase increase and grade 4 alanine aminotransferase increase); no DLTs were observed in Arms 2 or 3. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 76.6 % of patients overall; the most common were neutropenia (51.6 %), leukopenia (20.3 %), and anemia (17.2 %). In a post -hoc analysis, 7.8 % of patients had grade 3 pneumonitis/radiation pneumonitis (grouped term) events. Overall, the objective response rate was 60.9 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 47.9-72.9); median duration of response was 15.8 months (95 % CI, 9.0-not estimable [NE]). Median progression -free survival was 13.4 months (95 % CI, 8.8-20.1) and median overall survival was not reached (95 % CI, 21.9-NE). Conclusion: Durvalumab in combination with cCRT was well tolerated, with a manageable safety profile and showed encouraging antitumor activity in patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC.

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and incomplete resection have poor clinical outcomes. The present study aimed to identify risk factors for disease progression and mortality. A total of 65 patients with early-stage NSCLC that underwent operation but had a non-R0 resection between August 2011 and December 2020 were included in the present study, and the clinicopathological features and driver gene mutation status were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 36.2 months; 39 patients (60.0%) experienced disease progression and 3 patients (4.6%) died. In total, 22 patients (33.8%) harbored mutations in driver genes. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of driver gene mutations was associated with an increased risk of disease progression [adjusted odds ratio, 24.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.77-209.01; P=0.004]. Tumors classed as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2 [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 3.49; 95% CI, 1.10-11.03; P=0.033], stage II-IIIB tumors (adjusted HR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.06-6.17; P=0.037) and the presence of a driver gene mutation (adjusted HR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.55-6.94; P=0.002) were associated with a significantly reduced progression-free survival (PFS). Driver gene-targeted therapy was associated with an increased post-progression survival for patients that were reported to have disease progression (adjusted HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16-0.91; P=0.030). There was no significant impact of driver gene mutation status on the overall survival (OS) of patients. Although the presence of a driver gene mutation was associated with an increased risk of disease progression and a reduced PFS, it was demonstrated that patients with disease progression may benefit from driver gene-targeted therapy, as patients with driver gene-targeted therapy had a similar OS compared with that of patients with a driver gene-negative or unknown status. Therefore, early comprehensive analysis of driver gene mutation status may be recommended for early-stage NSCLC cancer patients experiencing non-R0 resection.

Background: Lorlatinib is a brain-penetrant, third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor indicated for ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a global phase II study, patients who experience disease progression despite prior treatment with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was assessed. Herein, we report real-world clinical outcomes of lorlatinib-treated patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC who were heavily pretreated and progressed on first- and second-generation ALK-TKIs, in a Taiwanese population under the lorlatinib expanded access program (EAP). Methods: This multicenter observational study examined the effectiveness and safety of ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients that progressed from previous second-generation ALK-TKI therapy and received lorlatinib treatment subsequently. Patients who received lorlatinib treatment under EAP between Jul 2017 and Sep 2019 were eligible. Patients were followed for at least one year from the first lorlatinib treatment until study completion. Results: Sixty-three patients were eligible for safety analysis (male: 46.0 %; median age: 52.8 [27.5-78.3] years; brain metastases: 81.0 %). Fifty-four patients with more than one-month lorlatinib treatment were included in the effectiveness analysis. Prior to lorlatinib treatment, 10 patients (18.5 %) received one ALK-TKI, 27 (50.0 %) received two ALK-TKIs, and 17 (31.5 %) received three or more ALK-TKIs. The overall median rwPFS was 9.2 months (95 % confidence interval: 5.3-21.1). The best overall response rate (n = 51) was 13.7 %, with a disease control rate of 80.4 %. Conclusion: Lorlatinib exhibits substantial activity and tolerability when used clinically in a later-line setting in a Taiwanese population with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC.