BackgroundFelcisetrag (5-hydroxytryptamine-4 receptor [5-HT4] agonist) is under investigation as prophylaxis or active treatment for accelerating resolution of gastrointestinal function post-surgery.MethodsPhase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel five-arm, double-blind, multicenter study (NCT03827655) in 209 adults undergoing open or laparoscopic-assisted bowel surgery. Patients received intravenous placebo, felcisetrag 0.1mg/100mL or 0.5mg/100mL pre-surgery only, or pre-surgery and daily post-surgery until return of gastrointestinal function or for up to 10 days. Primary endpoint: time to recovery of gastrointestinal function.ResultsMedian time to recovery of gastrointestinal function was 2.6 days for both felcisetrag 0.5mg daily and 0.5 mg pre-surgery versus 1.9 days for placebo (p>0.05). There were no notable differences in adverse events between treatment arms.ConclusionsFelcisetrag was well tolerated with no new safety concerns. However, no clinically meaningful difference in time to recovery of gastrointestinal function versus placebo was observed. Further investigation of the utility of 5-HT4 agonists in complicated, open abdominal surgeries may be warranted.

Background: Incidence of, and potential risk factors for, postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) after gastrointestinal procedures performed in US hospitals were examined. Methods: This retrospective study used hospital discharge data of inpatients who underwent >= 1 gastrointestinal procedures from 1-Jan-2016 to 30-Apr-2019. POGD incidence was calculated based on all hospitalizations for MDC-06 procedures. Predictors of POGD were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Results: POGD incidence was 5.8% among 638 611 inpatient hospitalizations. Major bowel procedures, peritoneal adhesiolysis, and appendectomy were the most notable predictors of POGD among gastro-intestinal procedures assessed (adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 2.71 [2.59-2.83], 2.48 [2.34-2.64], and 2.15 [2.03-2.27], respectively; all p < 0.05). Procedures performed by colorectal/ gastroenterology specialists (0.86 [0.84-0.89]), and those performed percutaneously (0.55 [0.54-0.56]) were associated with significantly lower odds of POGD (both P < 0.05). Conclusions: Findings may help clinicians tailor management plans targeting patients at high-risk of POGD.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Abstract Trazpiroben, a dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist under development to treat gastroparesis, displays decreasing solubility with increasing pH. This single‐sequence, open‐label, two‐period, crossover study evaluated the effect of esomeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor that raises gastric pH, on the single‐dose pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of trazpiroben in healthy adults (NCT03849690). In total, 12 participants were enrolled and entered period 1 (days 1–3), receiving a single oral dose of trazpiroben 25 mg on day 1. After a 4‐day washout, participants then entered period 2 (days 8–13) and received esomeprazole 40 mg once daily on days 8–12, with a single oral dose of trazpiroben 25 mg co‐administered 1 h post esomeprazole dosing on day 11. Geometric mean area under the curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) values were generally similar when trazpiroben was administered alone versus alongside esomeprazole (AUC∞, 44.03 vs. 38.85 ng h/ml; Cmax, 19.76 vs. 17.24 ng/ml). Additionally, the associated geometric mean ratio (GMR; co‐administration: administration alone) 90% confidence intervals (CIs) suggested no clinically meaningful difference between treatment groups (AUC∞, GMR 0.88, 90% CI 0.78–1.00; Cmax, 0.87, 90% CI 0.70–1.09). Mean apparent first‐order terminal elimination half‐life values were similar between treatments, illustrating co‐administration with esomeprazole had minimal effect on trazpiroben elimination. Trazpiroben was well‐tolerated in healthy adults following administration alone and alongside esomeprazole, with no clinically relevant adverse events reported. The lack of evidence of any clinically meaningful drug–drug interaction supports the co‐administration of esomeprazole with trazpiroben.

Abstract Trazpiroben is a dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist under development for the treatment of gastroparesis. This phase I, open‐label, randomized, two‐way crossover study (NCT04121078) evaluated the effect of single‐dose intravenous rifampin, a potent inhibitor of the organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) 1B1 and 1B3, on the pharmacokinetics and safety of trazpiroben in healthy adults. The utility of coproporphyrin (CP) I and CPIII as biomarkers of OATP inhibition was also assessed. Overall, 12 participants were enrolled and randomized (1:1) into one of two treatment sequences (AB and BA). Participants received either a single oral dose of trazpiroben 25 mg (treatment A) or a single oral dose of trazpiroben 25 mg immediately after a single 30‐min intravenous infusion of rifampin 600 mg (treatment B). After a washout period of at least 7 days, participants received the other treatment. Geometric mean area under the curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞) and maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of plasma trazpiroben were higher in participants receiving treatment B than those receiving treatment A (AUC∞, 168.5 vs. 32.68 ng*h/ml; Cmax, 89.62 vs. 14.37 ng/ml); corresponding geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) showed 5.16 (4.25–6.25) and 6.24 (4.62–8.42)‐fold increases in these parameters, respectively. In this study, trazpiroben was confirmed as a substrate of OATP1B1/1B3, and therefore co‐administration of trazpiroben with moderate to strong inhibitors of OATP1B1/1B3 is not recommended. This is also the first assessment of the utility of CPI and CPIII as endogenous biomarkers of OATP1B1/1B3 inhibition after a single intravenous dose of rifampin.

Felcisetrag (formerly known as TAK‐954) is a selective serotonin receptor agonist under investigation for use in patients with postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction. The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous (i.v.) felcisetrag have been studied, but little is known about the effect of hepatic impairment on the PK of the drug. This phase 1, non‐randomized, open‐label study compared the PK of a single 60‐minute i.v. infusion of felcisetrag between healthy individuals (n = 8) and patients with moderate (n = 10) or severe (n = 7) hepatic impairment. The primary study end points were the total and free maximum observed plasma concentration of felcisetrag at the end of infusion (C max ), area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC last ), and AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC inf ). Concentration–time profiles of felcisetrag were similarly shaped between groups but revealed lower concentrations of total plasma felcisetrag with increasing severity of hepatic impairment, whereas concentrations of free felcisetrag increased. The ratios of AUC last and AUC inf for patients with severe hepatic impairment were up to 29.3% lower for total felcisetrag and up to 29.2% higher for free felcisetrag than found in healthy individuals ( P < .05). Infusions were well tolerated with no discontinuations, severe adverse events, or deaths during the study. Overall, the effect of hepatic impairment on exposure to felcisetrag was minimal, suggesting that dose adjustment may be unnecessary in patients with hepatic impairment.

OBJECTIVES:To determine the incidence of enteral feed intolerance, identify factors associated with enteral feed intolerance, and assess the relationship between enteral feed intolerance and key nutritional and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.DESIGN:Analysis of International Nutrition Survey database collected prospectively from 2007 to 2014.SETTING:Seven-hundred eighty-five ICUs from around the world.PATIENTS:Mechanically ventilated adults with ICU stay greater than or equal to 72 hours and received enteral nutrition during the first 12 ICU days.INTERVENTIONS:None.MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS:We defined enteral feed intolerance as interrupted feeding due to one of the following reasons: high gastric residual volumes, increased abdominal girth, distension, subjective discomfort, emesis, or diarrhea. The current analysis included 15,918 patients. Of these, 4,036 (24%) had at least one episode of enteral feed intolerance. The enteral feed intolerance rate increased from 1% on day 1 to 6% on days 4 and 5 and declined daily thereafter. After controlling for site and patient covariates, burn (odds ratio 1.46; 95% CIs, 1.07-1.99), gastrointestinal (odds ratio 1.45; 95% CI, 1.27-1.66), and sepsis (odds ratio 1.34; 95% CI, 1.17-1.54) admission diagnoses were more likely to develop enteral feed intolerance, as compared to patients with respiratory-related admission diagnosis. enteral feed intolerance patients received about 10% less enteral nutrition intake, as compared to patients without enteral feed intolerance after controlling for important covariates including severity of illness. Enteral feed intolerance patients had fewer ventilator-free days and longer ICU length of stay time to discharge alive (all p < 0.0001). The daily mortality hazard rate increased by a factor of 1.5 (1.4-1.6; p < 0.0001) once enteral feed intolerance occurred.CONCLUSIONS:Enteral feed intolerance occurs frequently during enteral nutrition delivery in the critically ill. Burn and gastrointestinal patients had the highest risk of developing enteral feed intolerance. Enteral feed intolerance is associated with lower enteral nutrition delivery and worse clinical outcomes. Identification, prevention, and optimal management of enteral feed intolerance may improve nutrition delivery and clinical outcomes in important "at risk" populations.

BACKGROUND:Gastroparesis is a chronic gastric motility disorder. Dopamine D2 /D3 receptor antagonists metoclopramide and domperidone are current treatment options but are associated with central nervous system and cardiovascular safety concerns, respectively, precluding chronic use. Trazpiroben (TAK-906), a dopamine D2 /D3 receptor antagonist, is under development for chronic treatment of moderate-to-severe gastroparesis. Nonclinical data suggest trazpiroben will have D2 /D3 receptor antagonism comparable with metoclopramide or domperidone.AIMS:To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (effect on prolactin and gastric function) of twice-daily trazpiroben (5, 25 and 100 mg) in participants with gastroparesis.METHODS:This phase 2a pilot study evaluated gastric emptying using the gastric emptying breath test, with metoclopramide as an internal control. Gastric accommodation and gastroparesis symptoms were assessed using the nutrient drink test and American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index-Daily Diary, respectively.RESULTS:Overall, 51 participants were enrolled. Trazpiroben was well tolerated, demonstrating a favourable safety profile without cardiovascular or central nervous system adverse events. All trazpiroben doses were rapidly absorbed and eliminated (t1/2z 4-5 hours), and D2 /D3 receptor target engagement confirmed by increased serum prolactin (peaking at trazpiroben 25 mg). No effect on gastric emptying was demonstrated with trazpiroben or metoclopramide (P > 0.05), although benefits in volume-to-fullness were seen at trazpiroben 5 mg (P > 0.05) and 25 mg (88.5 vs -26.3 mL; P = 0.019), and nonsignificant numerical aggregate symptom score improvements were observed with trazpiroben 25 mg vs placebo (P = 0.182).CONCLUSIONS:Trazpiroben was well tolerated with a favourable safety profile, supporting its further development for the treatment of gastroparesis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03268941.

SummaryBackgroundGastroparesis is defined by delayed gastric emptying with associated symptoms in the absence of mechanical obstruction.AimTo evaluate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of felcisetrag, a highly selective 5‐HT4 receptor agonist, on total gut transit in patients with documented delayed gastric emptying of solids.MethodsSingle‐centre, placebo‐controlled study of 36 participants receiving placebo, 0.1mg, 0.3mg or 1.0mg of felcisetrag I.V. infusion, daily, for 3 days. At baseline, each participant completed a 4h, 99mTc‐egg meal (300 kcal, 30% fat) gastric emptying test. Following infusion (Day 2), gastric, small bowel and colonic transit of solids were measured over 48h (same meal plus 111In‐charcoal delivered in methacrylate‐coated capsule). Samples were collected for pharmacokinetics. The primary endpoint was gastric emptying T1/2. Statistical analysis used baseline parameters as covariates (ANCOVA).ResultsPatients (22 idiopathic, 14 diabetic gastroparesis) were randomised to felcisetrag (0.1 mg, n = 10; 0.3 mg, n = 9; 1.0 mg, n = 7) or placebo (n = 10). Compared to placebo, felcisetrag significantly accelerated gastric emptying T1/2, colonic filling at 6h, and 10% small bowel transit time (overall P < 0.01; all three doses individually Bonferroni corrected P < 0.05) for all three measurements. Ascending colon emptying (T1/2) was significantly accelerated (all doses), and colonic transit at 48 hours was accelerated with 0.1 mg and 0.3 mg felcisetrag compared to placebo. Pharmacokinetic results were dose proportional. Felcisetrag was well tolerated with no clinically significant findings from clinical laboratory, vital signs or ECG.ConclusionI.V. felcisetrag significantly accelerated gastric, small bowel and colonic transit in patients with gastroparesis, and should be further evaluated for short‐term treatment of gastric and intestinal motility disorders.ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT03281577

mortality following major postoperative complications.These results support the idea that early discharge is safe in the appropriate patient population.

BackgroundCamicinal is a novel, nonmacrolide, motilin receptor agonist that accelerates gastric emptying in critically ill patients with established feed intolerance. The primary question was whether the preemptive administration of camicinal increased the provision of enteral nutrition (EN) to critically ill patients with risk factors that predisposed to feed intolerance. MethodsThis was an international, multicenter, parallel-group, blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients at risk for feed intolerance, defined as receiving moderate to high doses of vasopressors or opiates, or admitted because of multiple traumatic injuries or with brain injury, received either enteral camicinal 50 mg or placebo daily for a maximum of 7 days, along with EN administered according to a standardized feeding protocol. The primary outcome was the daily adequacy of enteral feed delivered, as assessed by percentage of goal volume (delivered/prescribed x 100) before development of intolerance. ResultsEighty-four patients participated. The administration of camicinal did not result in a statistically significant clinical difference in the daily average percentage goal volume delivered (camicinal vs placebo: 77% [95% confidence interval: 71, 83] vs 68% (58, 78); mean difference 9% [-5, 23]; P = 0.21). Similarly, there were no differences in the percentage goal calories (76% [65, 88] vs 68% [60, 77]) and protein (76% [66, 86] vs 70% [61, 80]) administered, or the incidence of feed intolerance (15% vs 14%). ConclusionThe incidence of feed intolerance was low in both groups. In this cohort the preemptive administration of enteral camicinal did not significantly augment the provision of goal EN.

Background: Delayed gastric emptying may impair l‐dopa absorption, contributing to motor fluctuations. We evaluated the effect of camicinal (GSK962040), a gastroprokinetic, on the absorption of l‐dopa and symptoms of PD.

BACKGROUND:Up to 70% of patients with primary biliary cholangitis develop pruritus (itch) during the course of their disease. Treatment of pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis is challenging and novel therapies are needed. Ursodeoxycholic acid, the standard first-line treatment for primary biliary cholangitis, is largely ineffective for pruritus. We investigated the efficacy and safety of GSK2330672, a selective inhibitor of human ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT), in patients with primary biliary cholangitis with pruritus. METHODS:We conducted this phase 2a, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in two UK medical centres. Following 2 weeks of open placebo run-in, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio with a block size of 4 to receive GSK2330672 or placebo twice daily during two consecutive 14-day treatment periods in a crossover sequence. The treatment periods were followed by a 14-day single-blinded placebo follow-up period. The primary endpoints were safety of GSK2330672, assessed using clinical and laboratory parameters, and tolerability as rated by the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale. The secondary endpoints were changes in pruritus scores measured using the 0 to 10 numerical rating scale (NRS), primary biliary cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) itch domain score and 5-D itch scale, changes in serum total bile acids and 7 alpha hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4), and changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of ursodeoxycholic acid and its conjugates. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01899703. FINDINGS:Between March 10, 2014, and Oct 7, 2015, we enrolled 22 patients. 11 patients were assigned to receive intervention followed by placebo (sequence 1), and 11 patients were assigned to receive placebo followed by intervention (sequence 2). One patient assigned to sequence 2 withdrew consent prior to receiving randomised therapy. One patient did not attend the placebo follow-up period, but was included in the final analysis. GSK2330672 treatment for 14 days was safe with no serious adverse events reported. Diarrhoea was the most frequent adverse event during treatment with GSK2330672 (seven with GSK2330672 vs one with placebo) and headache was the most frequent adverse event during treatment with placebo (seven with placebo vs six with GSK2330672). After GSK2330672 treatment, the percentage changes from baseline itch scores were -57% (95% CI -73 to -42, p<0·0001) in the NRS, -31% (-42 to -20, p<0·0001) in the PBC-40 itch domain and -35% (-45 to -25, p<0·0001) in the 5-D itch scale. GSK2330672 produced significantly greater reduction from baseline than the double-blind placebo in the NRS (-23%, 95% CI -45 to -1; p=0·037), PBC-40 itch domain, (-14%, -26 to -1; p=0·034), and 5-D itch scale (-20%, -34 to -7; p=0·0045). After GSK2330672 treatment, serum total bile acid concentrations declined by 50% (95% CI -37 to -61, p<0·0001) from 30 to 15 μM, with a significant 3·1-times increase (95% CI 2·4 to 4·0, p<0·0001) in serum C4 concentrations from 7·9 to 24·7ng/mL. INTERPRETATION:In patients with primary biliary cholangitis with pruritus, 14 days of ileal bile acid transporter inhibition by GSK2330672 was generally well tolerated without serious adverse events, and demonstrated efficacy in reducing pruritus severity. GSK2330672 has the potential to be a significant and novel advance for the treatment of pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis. Diarrhoea, the most common adverse event associated with GSK2330672 treatment, might limit the long-term use of this drug. FUNDING:GlaxoSmithKline and National Institute for Health Research.

The promotility agents currently available to treat gastroparesis and feed intolerance in the critically ill are limited by adverse effects. The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics of single doses of the novel gastric promotility agent motilin agonist camicinal (GSK962040) in critically ill feed-intolerant patients.

Pruritus (itch) is a symptom commonly experienced by patients with cholestatic liver diseases such as primary biliary cholangitis (PBC, previously referred to as primary biliary cirrhosis). Bile acids (BAs) have been proposed as potential pruritogens in PBC. The ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) protein expressed in the distal ileum plays a key role in the enterohepatic circulation of BAs. Pharmacological inhibition of IBAT with GSK2330672 may reduce BA levels in the systemic circulation and improve pruritus.

Background and PurposeHere we have investigated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of single doses of camicinal in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients with a history of slow gastric emptying with symptoms consistent with gastroparesis.Experimental ApproachIn a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, incomplete block, three‐period, two‐centre crossover study, patients received oral administration of placebo and two of the three possible doses of camicinal (25, 50 or 125 mg). Gastric emptying (13C‐octanoic acid breath test), pharmacokinetics and safety were primary outcomes.Key ResultsNine of the 10 patients enrolled completed the study. Gastric half‐emptying time decreased by −95 min (95% CI: −156.8, −34.2) after a single dose of camicinal 125 mg compared with placebo (52 vs. 147 min, P < 0.05), representing a 65% improvement. A decrease of the gastric half‐emptying time compared with placebo (approximately 39 min) was observed with camicinal 25 and 50 mg, representing a 27% reduction for both doses (not statistically significant). A positive exposure–response relationship was demonstrated across all doses. The effects of camicinal on gastric half‐emptying time were not influenced by fasting glucose levels. Single doses up to 125 mg were well tolerated. Camicinal was well absorbed, exhibiting linear and approximately dose‐proportional pharmacokinetic characteristics and a clear exposure–response relationship with gastric emptying.Conclusions and ImplicationsCamicinal significantly accelerated gastric emptying of solids in T1DM patients following administration of a single oral dose. Camicinal was well tolerated and exhibited similar pharmacokinetic characteristics in diabetic patients to those previously reported in healthy volunteers.