Abstract Background The composition of the gut microbiome is a key determinant in inflammatory bowel disease. Consequently, modifying the composition of the gut microbiota has the potential to transform the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). The clinical use of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has become widespread, especially for the treatment of C. difficile associated diseases, as a method of changing the composition of the gut microbiome from a diseased to a healthy state. FMT is, by its nature, an undefined and variable therapy due to differences between donors. Microbiotica has taken a "patient-first" discovery approach to identify a defined consortium, which is being developed as a live bacterial therapeutic for treatment of mild-to-moderate UC patients in a Phase 1b clinical trial, the COMPOSER-1 study, in 2024. Methods A clinical trial in UC patients (Costello et al., 2019), in which patients were treated with FMT from healthy donors, showed a 32% clinical remission rate in the active treatment group, as compared to 9% in the placebo arm. Donor, pre-treatment recipient, and post-FMT recipient samples were analysed using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. All samples were analysed using Microbiotica’s precision microbiome analysis platform to identify bacteria associated with patient response. These bacteria were assessed in cellular assays using relevant human cell/cell lines including: Caco2, dendritic cells, M1 macrophages, and CD4+ T-cells. Results We defined a signature of therapeutic response based on bacteria that engrafted from the donor into UC patients and were associated with clinical benefit. A sub-species level analysis identified 8 bacteria, which have been developed into a defined live bacterial therapeutic, MB310. The consortium bacteria enhanced the barrier integrity of an epithelial cell monolayer, and protected the barrier from inflammatory challenge by LPS. In vitro, the bacteria also have an anti-inflammatory effect when incubated with different primary innate immune cells, dendritic cells and M1 macrophages. Specific MB310 bacteria, either directly or via metabolites, are able to regulate T-cell responses. Conclusion In summary, we have identified a consortium of bacteria using patient-first discovery in a successful FMT study that is being developed as a treatment for UC. The consortium of 8 bacteria is able to impact multiple disease-relevant mechanisms including epithelial barrier integrity and immunomodulation. MB310 is being advanced to a first-in-human study in 2024 to explore safety and initial signs of efficacy. Costello, et al. (2019) Jama 321.2: 156-164.
The human dendritic cell (DC) family has recently been expanded by CD1c+CD14+CD163+ DCs, introduced as DC3s. DC3s are found in tumors and peripheral blood of cancer patients. Here, we report elevated frequencies of CD14+ cDC2s, which restore to normal frequencies after tumor resection, in non -small cell lung cancer patients. These CD14+ cDC2s phenotypically resemble DC3s and exhibit increased PD -L1, MERTK, IL -10, and IDO expression, consistent with inferior T cell activation ability compared with CD14- cDC2s. In melanoma patients undergoing CD1c+ DC vaccinations, increased CD1c+CD14+ DC frequencies correlate with reduced survival. We demonstrate conversion of CD5+/-CD1c+CD14- cDC2s to CD14+ cDC2s by tumor -associated factors, whereas monocytes failed to express CD1c under similar conditions. Targeted proteomics identified IL -6 and M-CSF as dominant drivers, and we show that IL -6R and CSF1R inhibition prevents tumor -induced CD14+ cDC2s. Together, this indicates cDC2s as direct pre -cursors of DC3-like CD1c+CD14+ DCs and provides insights into the importance and modulation of CD14+ DC3s in anti -tumor immune responses.
The gut mucosal epithelium is one of the largest organs in the body and plays a critical role in regulating the crosstalk between the resident microbiome and the host. To this effect, the tight control of what is permitted through this barrier is of high importance. There should be restricted passage of harmful microorganisms and antigens while at the same time allowing the absorption of nutrients and water. An increased gut permeability, or “leaky gut”, has been associated with a variety of diseases ranging from infections, metabolic diseases, and inflammatory and autoimmune diseases to neurological conditions. Several factors can affect gut permeability, including cytokines, dietary components, and the gut microbiome. Here, we discuss how the gut microbiome impacts the permeability of the gut epithelial barrier and how this can be harnessed for therapeutic purposes.
The human microbiome is recognized as a key factor in health and disease. This has been further corroborated by identifying changes in microbiome composition and function as a novel hallmark in cancer. These effects are exerted through microbiome interactions with host cells, impacting a wide variety of developmental and physiological processes. In this review, we discuss some of the latest findings on how the bacterial component of the microbiome can influence outcomes for different cancer immunotherapy modalities, highlighting identified mechanisms of action. We also address the clinical efforts to utilize this knowledge to achieve better responses to immunotherapy. A refined understanding of microbiome variations in patients and microbiome-host interactions with cancer therapies is essential to realize optimal clinical responses.
The gating strategy applied to isolate and determine the frequency of BDCA1+ DCs, BDCA1+ CD14+ cells, monocytes and MDSCs from PBMCS of melanoma patients or healthy donors by FACS (S1); The distribution of potentially "missed genes" over the RPKM value spectrum in all samples that underwent RNA sequencing (S2); A Venn diagram displaying the overlap between the four gene sets used in GSEA analysis: Mono high, infDC high, MoDC sig and BDCA1+ DC high (S3); The T cell suppressive capacity of BDCA1+ DCs, BDCA1+ CD14+ cells, monocytes and MDSCs (S4); Quantification of immunofluorescence stainings performed on sections of paraffin-embedded resection specimens of healthy and melanoma metastasized lymph nodes or healthy and melanoma metastasized colon (S5); Large view, showing multiple cells, of May-Grunwald/Giemsa-stained healthy donor-derived, FACS-sorted BDCA1+ DCs, BDCA1+CD14+ cells and monocytes (S6); GSEA enrichment plots (S7); BDCA1+ DCs, BDCA1+CD14+ cells and monocytes respond to TLR2 and TLR8 stimulation (S8); IL-12 levels determined in overnight supernatants of BDCA1+ DCs, BDCA1+ CD14+ cells and monocytes cultures following stimulation with pIC and R848 (S9); The T cell polarizing capacity of BDCA1+ DCs, BDCA1+ CD14+ cells and monocytes (S10); The effect of IL-10 on BDCA1+ CD14+ cell-induced T cell proliferation was determined by performing an MLR with allogenic naïve CD4+ T cells in the presence or absence of anit-IL-10 and anti-IL10 receptor or the matching isotype controls (S11); The suppressive capacity of BDCA1+ CD14+ cells is not reversed by PD-L1 blocking (S12).
A list of all molecules detected by antibody microarray (Multiplex analysis) with their UniPort entry name.
Abstract Independent groups have demonstrated that the pre-treatment gut microbiome of cancer patients impacts the subsequent response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICIs) therapy [1-4]. However, each study identified different sets of bacteria linked to outcome, which has limited the development of drug response biomarkers and clinic-first design of novel microbiome-based therapeutics. The Cambridge (UK) MELRESIST study includes a cohort of advanced melanoma patients receiving approved ICIs. Pre-treatment stool samples from MELRESIST were analysed by Microbiotica using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Microbiotica's platform comprises the leading Reference Genome Database to give the most comprehensive and precise mapping of the gut microbiome. A bioinformatic analysis identify a small discrete microbiome signature that was different between responders and non-responders. We extended this signature by reanalysing three published melanoma cohorts [1-3] using the Microbiotica platform. The resultant bacterial signature predicted whether or not a patient responded to anti-PD1-based therapy with an accuracy of 91% in all four studies combined and was also an effective biomarker for each cohort individually. We validated the signature using a NSCLC study [4] indicating that it has great potential as a clinical biomarker for a number of indications. The signature was strongly skewed towards species raised in abundance in responding patients, suggesting that the microbiome influences ICI treatment primarily through bacteria that enhance the efficacy of the drugs. At the core of the signature was nine species strongly associated a positive outcome, which we hypothesized to be a central driver of drug response. MB097 is a consortium comprised of all nine bacteria. In a syngeneic mouse model of cancer, MB097 was able inhibit tumor growth, but most strikingly was potently synergistic when dose with anti-PD1. To understand the mechanisms by which these bacteria drive an anti-tumor response, we have profiled the bacteria individually and as a consortium in multiple assays with primary human immune cells. The bacteria strongly activate dendritic cells with a number inducing high levels of IL-12 relative to IL-10. These bacteria-stimulated dendritic cells went on to trigger Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes (CTLs) to upregulate Granzyme B, Perforin and IFNg. Further, we have demonstrated that these primed CTLs are very effective at tumor cell killing in vitro. In summary, Microbiotica's precision microbiome profiling and the MELRESIST study has allowed us to identify a consortium of bacteria, MB097, strongly linked to response in multiple melanoma cohorts and a NSCLC study. The consortium drives immune-mediated tumor killing in vivo and in vitro. MB097 is being scaled up for manufacture as a novel co-therapy with ICIs. References 1 Matson V et al Science (2018) 359:104 2 Gopalakrishnan V Science (2018) 359:97 3 Frankel AE et al Neoplasia (2017) 19:848 4 Routy B et al Science (2018) 359:91 Citation Format: Matthew J. Robinson, Kevin Vervier, Simon Harris, Amy Popple, Dominika Klisko, Robyne Hudson, Ghaith Bakdash, Laure Castan, Clelia Villemin, David J. Adams, Doreen Milne, Catherine Booth, Christine Parkinson, Roy Rabbie, Sarah J. Welsh, Emily Barker, Katie Dalchau, Pippa Corrie, Trevor Lawley. MB097: A therapeutic consortium of bacteria clinically-defined by precision microbiome profiling of immune checkpoint inhibitor patients with potent anti-tumor efficacy in vitro and in vivo [abstract]. In: Abstracts: AACR Virtual Special Conference: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2021 Oct 5-6. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2022;10(1 Suppl):Abstract nr P074.
The human dendritic cell (DC) family has recently been expanded by CD1c+CD14+CD163+-DCs, introduced as DC3. DC3 are found in tumors and peripheral blood of cancer patients. Here we report elevated frequencies of CD14+-cDC2s in non-small cell lung cancer patients, which restore to normal frequencies after tumor resection. These CD14+-cDC2s phenotypically resemble DC3 and exhibit increased PD-L1, MERTK, IL-10, and IDO expression, consistent with inferior T-cell activation ability compared to CD14--cDC2s. In melanoma patients undergoing CD1c+ DC-vaccinations, increased CD1c+CD14+-DC frequencies correlate with reduced survival. We demonstrate conversion of CD5+/-CD1c+CD14--cDC2s to CD14+-cDC2s by tumor-associated factors, whereas monocytes failed to express CD1c. Targeted proteomics identified IL-6 and M-CSF as dominant drivers and IL6R and CSF1R inhibition indeed prevents tumor-induced CD14+-cDC2s. Together, this indicates cDC2s as pre-cursors of DC3-like CD1c+CD14+-DCs and provides insights in the importance and modulation of CD14+-cDC2s in anti-tumor immune responses.
There has recently been a paradigm shift in the field of dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy, where several clinical studies have confirmed the feasibility and advantageousness of using directly isolated human blood-derived DCs over in vitro differentiated subsets. There are two major DC subsets found in blood; plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) and myeloid DCs (mDCs), and both have been tested clinically. CD1c+ mDCs are highly efficient antigen-presenting cells that have the ability to secrete IL-12p70, while pDCs are professional IFN-α-secreting cells that are shown to induce innate immune responses in melanoma patients. Hence, combining mDCs and pDCs poses as an attractive, multi-functional vaccine approach. However, type I IFNs have been reported to inhibit IL-12p70 production and mDC-induced T-cell activation. In this study, we investigate the effect of IFN-α on mDC maturation and function. We demonstrate that both recombinant IFN-α and activated pDCs strongly enhance mDC maturation and increase IL-12p70 production. Co-cultured mDCs and pDCs additionally have beneficial effect on NK and NKT-cell activation and also enhances IFN-γ production by allogeneic T cells. In contrast, the presence of type I IFNs reduces the proliferative T-cell response. The mere presence of a small fraction of activated pDCs is sufficient for these effects and the required ratio between the subsets is non-stringent. Taken together, these results support the usage of mDCs and pDCs combined into one immunotherapeutic vaccine with broad immunostimulatory features.
Dendritic cell (DC) vaccines show promising effects in cancer immunotherapy. However, their efficacy is affected by a number of factors, including (1) the quality of the DC vaccine and (2) tumor immune evasion. The recently characterized BDCA1+CD14+ immunosuppressive cells combine both aspects; their presence in DC vaccines may directly hamper vaccine efficacy, whereas, in patients, BDCA1+CD14+ cells may suppress the induced immune response in an antigen-specific manner systemically and at the tumor site. We hypothesize that BDCA1+CD14+ cells are present in a broad spectrum of cancers and demand further investigation to reveal treatment opportunities and/or improvement for DC vaccines. In this review, we summarize the findings on BDCA1+CD14+ cells in solid cancers. In addition, we evaluate the presence of BDCA1+CD14+ cells in leukemic cancers. Preliminary results suggest that the presence of BDCA1+CD14+ cells correlates with clinical features of acute and chronic myeloid leukemia. Future research focusing on the differentiation from monocytes towards BDCA1+CD14+ cells could reveal more about their cell biology and clinical significance. Targeting these cells in cancer patients may improve the outcome of cancer immunotherapy.
Ovarian cancer is one of the most fatal tumors in women. Due to a lack of symptoms and adequate screening methods, patients are diagnosed at advanced stages with extensive tumor burden (Jelovac and Armstrong, 2011). Interestingly, ovarian cancer metastasis is generally found within the peritoneal cavity rather than other tissues (Lengyel, 2010; Tan et al., 2006 ). The reason behind this tissue tropism of the peritoneal cavity remains elusive. A prominent feature of this selectivity is ascites, the accumulation of fluid within the peritoneal cavity, containing, amongst others, immune cells, tumor cells and various soluble factors that can be involved in the progression of ovarian cancer ( Kipps et al., 2013 ). The protocol described here is used to isolate mononuclear cells from ascites to study the functionality of the immune system within the peritoneal cavity.
Effective stimulation of immune cells is crucial for the success of cancer immunotherapies. Current approaches to evaluate the efficiency of stimuli are mainly defined by known flow cytometry-based cell activation or cell maturation markers. This method however does not give a complete overview of the achieved activation state and may leave important side effects unnoticed. Here, we used an unbiased RNA sequencing (RNA-seq)-based approach to compare the capacity of four clinical-grade dendritic cell (DC) activation stimuli used to prepare DC-vaccines composed of various types of DC subsets; the already clinically applied GM-CSF and Frühsommer meningoencephalitis (FSME) prophylactic vaccine and the novel clinical grade adjuvants protamine-RNA complexes (pRNA) and CpG-P. We found that GM-CSF and pRNA had similar effects on their target cells, whereas pRNA and CpG-P induced stronger type I interferon (IFN) expression than FSME. In general, the pathways most affected by all stimuli were related to immune activity and cell migration. GM-CSF stimulation, however, also induced a significant increase of genes related to nonsense-mediated decay, indicating a possible deleterious effect of this stimulus. Taken together, the two novel stimuli appear to be promising alternatives. Our study demonstrates how RNA-seq based investigation of changes in a large number of genes and gene groups can be exploited for fast and unbiased, global evaluation of clinical-grade stimuli, as opposed to the general limited evaluation of a pre-specified set of genes, by which one might miss important biological effects that are detrimental for vaccine efficacy.
Human blood dendritic cells (DCs) hold great potential for use in anticancer immunotherapies. CD1c+ myeloid DCs and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) have been successfully utilized in clinical vaccination trials against melanoma. We hypothesize that combining both DC subsets in a single vaccine can further improve vaccine efficacy. Here, we have determined the potential synergy between the two subsets in vitro on the level of maturation, cytokine expression, and effector cell induction. Toll-like receptor (TLR) stimulation of CD1c+ DCs induced cross-activation of immature pDCs and vice versa. When both subsets were stimulated together using TLR agonists, CD86 expression on pDCs was increased and higher levels of interferon (IFN)-α were produced by DC co-cultures. Although the two subsets did not display any synergistic effect on naive CD4+ and CD8+ T cell polarization, CD1c+ DCs and pDCs were able to complement each other's induction of other immune effector cells. The mere presence of pDCs in DC co-cultures promoted plasma cell differentiation from activated autologous B cells. Similarly, CD1c+ DCs, alone or in co-cultures, induced high levels of IFN-γ from allogeneic peripheral blood lymphocytes or activated autologous natural killer (NK) cells. Both CD1c+ DCs and pDCs could enhance NK cell cytotoxicity, and interestingly DC co-cultures further enhanced NK cell-mediated killing of an NK-resistant tumor cell line. These results indicate that co-application of human blood DC subsets could render DC-based anticancer vaccines more efficacious.
Dendritic cells (DCs) are central players of immune responses; they become activated upon infection or inflammation and migrate to lymph nodes, where they can initiate an antigen-specific immune response by activating naive T cells. Two major types of naturally occurring DCs circulate in peripheral blood, namely, myeloid and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs). Myeloid DCs (mDCs) can be subdivided based on the expression of either CD1c or CD141. These human DC subsets differ in surface marker expression, Toll-like receptor (TLR) repertoire, and transcriptional profile, suggesting functional differences between them. Here, we directly compared the capacity of human blood mDCs and pDCs to activate and polarize CD4+ T cells. CD141+ mDCs show an overall more mature phenotype over CD1c+ mDC and pDCs; they produce less IL-10 and more IL-12 than CD1c+ mDCs. Despite these differences, all subsets can induce the production of IFN-γ in naive CD4+ T cells. CD1c+ and CD141+ mDCs especially induce a strong T helper 1 profile. Importantly, naive CD4+ T cells are not polarized towards regulatory T cells by any subset. These findings further establish all three human blood DCs—despite their differences—as promising candidates for immunostimulatory effectors in cancer immunotherapy.
Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are a group of immune cells of the lymphoid lineage that do not possess antigen specificity. The group includes natural killer (NK) cells, lymphoid tissue inducer (LTi) cells and the recently identified ILC1s, ILC2s and ILC3s. Although the role of NK cells in the context of cancer has been well established, the involvement of other ILC subsets in cancer progression and resistance is just emerging. Here, we review the literature on the role of the different ILC subsets in tumor immunity and discuss its implications for cancer treatment and monitoring.