Background & Aims: Ferroportin disease is a rare genetic iron overload disorder which may be underdiagnosed, with recent data suggesting it occurs at a higher prevalence than suspected. Costs and the lack of defined criteria to prompt genetic testing preclude large-scale molecular screening. Hence, we aimed to develop a readily available scoring system to promote and enhance ferroportin disease screening. Methods: Our derivation cohort included probands tested for ferroportin disease from 2008 to 2016 in our rare disease network. Data were prospectively recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine significant criteria, and odds ratios were used to build a weighted score. A cut-off value was defined using a ROC curve with a predefined aim of 90% sensitivity. An independent cohort was used for cross validation. Results: Our derivation cohort included 1,306 patients. Mean age was 55 +/- 14 years, ferritin 1,351 +/- 1,357 mu g/L, and liver iron concentration (LIC) 166 +/- 77 mu mol/g. Pathogenic variants (n = 32) were identified in 71 patients. In multivariate analysis: female sex, younger age, higher ferritin, higher LIC and the absence of hypertension or diabetes were significantly associated with the diagnosis of ferroportin disease (AUROC in whole derivation cohort 0.83 [0.78-0.88]). The weighted score was based on sex, age, the presence of hypertension or diabetes, ferritin level and LIC. An AUROC of 0.83 (0.77-0.88) was obtained in the derivation cohort without missing values. Using 9.5 as a cut-off, sensitivity was 93.6 (91.7-98.3) %, specificity 49.5 (45.5-53.6) %, positive likelihood ratio 1.8 (1.6-2.0) and negative likelihood ratio 0.17 (0.04-0.37). Conclusion: We describe a readily available score with simple criteria and good diagnostic performance that could be used to screen patients for ferroportin disease in routine clinical practice. Lay summary: Increased iron burden associated with metabolic syndrome is a very common condition. Ferroportin disease is a dominant genetic iron overload disorder whose prevalence is higher than initially thought. They can be difficult to distinguish from each other, but the limited availability of genetic testing and the lack of definitive guidelines prevent adequate screening. We herein describe a simple and definitive clinical score to help clinicians decide whether to perform genetic testing. (C) 2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Juvenile hemochromatosis is a rare autosomal recessive disease due to variants in the Hemojuvelin (HJV) gene. Although biological features mimic HFE hemochromatosis, clinical presentation is worst with massive iron overload diagnosed during childhood. Our study describes clinical features and results of genetic testing for a group of patients initially referred for a hepcidino-deficiency syndrome and for whom HJV hemochromatosis was finally diagnosed. 662 patients with iron overload and high serum transferrin saturation were tested, and five genes (HFE, HJV, HAMP, TFR2, SLC40A1) were sequenced. Among our cohort, ten unrelated patients were diagnosed with HJV hemochromatosis. Genetic testing revealed five previously published and five undescribed variants: p.Arg41Pro, p.His180Arg, p.Lys299G1u, p.Cys361Arg and p.A1a384Val. Surprisingly, this study revealed a late age of onset in some patients, contrasting with the commonly accepted definition of "juvenile" hemochromatosis. Five of our patients were 30 years old or older, including two very late discoveries. Biological features and severity of iron overload were similar in younger and older patients. Our study brings new insight on HJV hemochromatosis showing that mild phenotype and late onset are possible. Genetic testing for HJV variants should thus be performed for all patients displaying a non-p.Cys282Tyr homozygous HFE hemochromatosis with hepcidin deficiency phenotype.

1 -Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, INSERM, French reference center for hemochromatosis and iron metabolism disease, F-35000 Rennes, France 2 Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, CNRS, IGDR, UMR 6290, Molecular Genetics Department, F-35000, Rennes, France 3 Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, INSERM, Liver Disease Department, F-35000 Rennes, France 4 Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, INSERM, Biochemistry Department, F-35000 Rennes, France 5 EPH Belfort, Pediatric Department, El Harrach, Alger, DZ 16000 6 Hopital Universitaire Robert-Debré, Endocrinology and Pediatric Diabetology, Paris, FR 75019 7 Hopital Bicêtre, Hepatogastroenterology, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, FR 94275

Background Cytotoxic chemotherapy is generally ineffective in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. We assessed the intravenous perfusion of doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in whom previous sorafenib therapy had failed. Methods We did a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial at 70 sites in 11 countries. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with one or more previous systemic therapies, including sorafenib, were randomly assigned to receive 30 mg/m(2) doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles (30 mg/m(2) group), 20 mg/m(2) doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles (20 mg/m(2) group), or standard care using a computer-generated randomisation list prepared by the funder and stratified by geographic region. Patients in the experimental groups received perfusion of the drug every 4 weeks and those in the control group received any systemic anticancer therapy (except sorafenib) as per investigator decision. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the population of patients who received at least one dose of their assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01655693. Findings Between June 15, 2012, and Jan 27, 2017, 541 patients were screened, of whom 144 were excluded and 397 were randomly assigned to one of the groups (133 to the 30 mg/m(2) group; 130 to the 20 mg/m(2) group; and 134 to the control group). Median follow-up was 22.7 months (IQR 11.2-34.9). After pooling the doxorubicin groups for the efficacy analysis, median overall survival was 9.1 months (95% CI 8.1-10.4) in the pooled doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles group and 9.0 months (7.1-11.8) in the control group (HR 1.00 [95% CI 0.78-1.28], two-sided p=0.99). 227 (94%) of 242 patients who received doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles and 100 (75%) of 134 patients in the control group had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. The most common drug-related grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (25 [10%] of 242 treated with doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles and eight [6%] of 134 in the control group), asthenia (six [2%] and four [3%]), and thrombocytopenia (three [1%] and ten [7%]). Six (2%) patients treated with doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles and one (1%) of those in the control group were deemed by investigators to have had a drug-related death. Serious adverse events occurred in 74 (31%) patients who received doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles and 48 (36%) in the control group. Interpretation Doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles did not improve overall survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in whom previous sorafenib treatment had failed. Copyright (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Background Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT), a nanoformulation of doxorubicin, was demonstrated to overcome the chemoresistance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in preclinical models. Its efficacy and safety were thus investigated in phase I and randomised phase II trials in unresectable HCC. Patients and methods Phase I was a single dose of DT through the hepatic intra-arterial (HIA) route, dose-escalating 3+3 trial, evaluating five-dose levels from 10 to 40 mg/m2 with maximal tolerated dose (MTD) as primary endpoint. The multicentre phase II trial randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) patients to receive either 30 mg/m2 of DT through HIA route every 4 weeks for up to three courses or best standard of care (BSC). Progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 3 months was the primary endpoint. Overall survival (OS) and disease control rate (DCR) were secondary endpoints. Results In phase I, haematological and respiratory limited toxicities were reported at 35 and 40 mg/m2, giving MTD at 30 mg/m2. Partial response rate was 10%, and stable disease 70%. Phase II was discontinued due to three severe acute respiratory distress events in the DT group while 17 patients had received 30 mg/m2 DT and 11 BSC. At 3 months, PFS was 64% (95% CI 31 to 89) vs 75% (95% CI 35 to 97), and DCR 35% vs 27% in DT and BSC, respectively (p=NS). Median OS was 32.6 months (95% CI 8.2 to 34.1) in DT group and 15 months (95% CI 8.0 to 18.8) in BSC group (p<0.05). Conclusion DT increased OS in unresectable HCC but induced severe respiratory distress. Efficacy data deserve further investigation using a safer dosing and schedule regimen. Trial registration number EUDRACT 2006-004088-77; Results.

Background Data: In compensated cinhotics with early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC-cirr), upfront liver resection (LR) and salvage liver transplantation (sun in case of recurrence may have outcomes comparable to primary LT (PLT).Objective: An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis comparing PIT and SIT strategics.Methods: Of 130 HCC-cirr patients who underwent upfront LR (group LR), 90 (69%) recurred, 31 could undergo SLT (group SLT). During the same period, 366 patients were listed for LT (group LLT); 26 dropped-out (7.1%), 340 finally underwent PLT (group PLT). We compared survival between groups LR and HT, LR and PLT, and PLT and SLTResults: Feasibility of SLT strategy was 34% (31/90). In an ITT analysis, group LLT had better 5-yr/10-yr overall survival (OS) compared with group LR (68%/58% vs. 58%/35%; P = 0.008). Similarly, 5-yr/10-yr OS and disease-free survival (DFS) were better in group PLT versus group LR (OS 73%/63% vs. 58%/35%, P=0.0007; DFS 69%/61% vs. 27%/21%, P<0.0001). Upfront resection and microvascular tumor invasion were poor prognostic factors for both OS and DFS, presence of satellite tumor nodules additionally predicted worse DFS. Group SLT had similar postoperative and long-term outcomes compared with group PLT (starting from time of LT) (OS 54%/54% vs. 73%/63%, P = 0.35; DFS 48%/48% vs. 69%/61%, P = 0.18, respectively).Conclusions: In initially transplantable HCC-chr patients, ITT survival was better in group PLT compared with group LR. SLT was feasible in only a third of patients who recurred after LR. Post SLT, short and long-term outcomes were comparable with PIT. Better patient selection for the "resection first" approach and early detection of recurrence may improve outcome of the SLT strategy.

Abstract Introduction: There is still uncertainty regarding the efficacy and optimal modalities of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. The aims of the present study were to assess the safety and the efficacy of ESWL, either alone or followed by therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (adjuvant ERCP) and to determine predictive factors of efficacy, in a real-life setting. Patients and methods: This study included all consecutive patients who underwent an ESWL in a single University Hospital between 2001 and 2012. The indication for ESWL was obstructive stone(s) of the main pancreatic duct resulting in either painful chronic pancreatitis or recurrent acute pancreatitis. Success was defined by resolution of pain, no analgesic treatment, no acute pancreatitis and no surgical treatment for chronic pancreatitis 6 months after the ESWL. Results: One hundred and forty-six patients were studied; 6/146 (4%) had a complication of ESWL. Among the 132 patients in whom follow-up was completed, 91 (69%) had an adjuvant ERCP. After 6 months of follow-up, 100/132 (76%) patients achieved success. In multivariate analysis, the single significant predictive factor of the success of the ESWL treatment was chronic pain (p = 0.03). Patients who had chronic pain and needed opioid treatment had less chance of success than patients without chronic pain (OR 95%CI 0.31 [0.07–1.14]). We found no difference in the success rates between patients who underwent adjuvant ERCP and those who had ESWL only (p = 0.93). Conclusion: This study shows that the ESWL is a safe and effective treatment for patients with chronic pancreatitis and obstructive stones within the main pancreatic duct. Systematic association with therapeutic ERCP appears to provide no additional benefit and is therefore not recommended.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the best curative treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis. However, the current shortage of organs causes prolonged waiting times and poorer intention-to-treat (ITT) survival (i.e., after listing) owing to tumor progression and dropout. Portal hypertension (PH) is a recognized risk factor of HCC development in patients with cirrhosis and its recurrence after resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential impact of PHT on the results of LT on an ITT basis. Patients with cirrhosis listed for LT for HCC were included and their outcomes after listing were compared according to the presence or absence of PH defined as presence of esophageal varices or ascites or low platelet count and splenomegaly. Among 243 consecutively listed patients, 70% were affected by PH, which was associated with a significantly higher risk of tumor progression (38% vs. 22%; P=0.017) and a higher risk of dropout (22% vs. 8%; P=0.01). Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was similarly applied to the two groups (60% vs. 67%; P=0.325). An absence of TACE was the only other independent risk factor of dropout owing to tumor progression. Under an ITT analysis, PH reduced overall survival (OS), but there was no difference in OS and time to recurrence post-LT. The only pathological feature that could potentially explain this observation was the lower complete response to TACE in the PHT group (12% vs. 36%; P=0.001). Conclusion: PH should be regarded as a major risk factor of dropout owing to tumor progression and should be taken into consideration when managing patients with HCC who are waiting for LT. (Hepatology 2015;62:179-187)

Hepatitis E is currently diagnosed after all other causes of hepatitis have been excluded. Moreover, HEV testing is not performed to prevent blood transmission in developed countries. We report here on the case of a patient with acute hepatitis while receiving potentially hepatotoxic medications for autoimmune disorders, with low-level autoimmune markers and negative "standard" viral markers; it was finally determined that he was suffering from transfusion-transmitted hepatitis E.

Background: Resection and liver transplantation (LT) are the only curative options for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients (HCC-cirr).Objective: We tried to define the best primary intention-to-treat strategy in patients undergoing either resection or LT for early single HCC-cirr (<= 5 cm).Methods: From 1990 to 2010, 198 patients with early HCC-cirr underwent either resection (group R, n = 97) or LT (group T, n = 101) as the primary procedure. Our policy was to prioritize Childs A patients with peripheral lesions for resection rather than LT. Patient and tumor characteristics, and outcomes (recurrence-free survival [RFS] and overall survival [OS]), were studied.Results: A longer diagnosis-to-surgery interval, more Child Pugh B/C patients, and more tumor nodules (on histopathological examination) were found in group T patients. The postoperative mortality (4.1% vs 3.0%, P = 0.72) and rate of major complications (19.1% vs 24.7%, P = 0.35) were similar in groups R and T, respectively, whereas tumor recurrence was higher in group R (62% vs 10% in group T, P < 0.0001). The 5-year OS (75% vs 52%, P = 0.0008) and RFS (72% vs 20%, P < 0.0001) were better in group T; similarly, more patients were disease free at last follow-up (27% vs 62%, P < 0.0001). Resection as the surgical procedure, tumor diameter 3 cm or more on histology, and microvascular tumor invasion were poor prognostic factors for OS and RFS. Including dropout patients from LT list in the analysis, the outcomes in group T were still better (70% and 61% vs 51% and 36% at 5 and 10 years, P = 0.01).Conclusions: On an intention-to-treat basis, LT is associated with the best survival outcomes in patients with early HCC-cirr. Resection may achieve comparable OS in patients with single HCC-cirr of size smaller than 3 cm; however, the RFS still remains lower than that in patients of group T. This study could serve as a guide for HCC-cirr patients who are candidates for either resection or LT.

No treatment is recommended for silent gallstones. The diagnosis of acute cholecystitis is based on clinical and biological signs and on abdominal sonography. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice, except in case of severe (grade III) cholecystitis where a percutaneous cholecystostomy associated with antibiotic therapy is recommended. The diagnostic accuracy of abdominal sonography for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones is poor. A second-line MR cholangiopancreatography or an endoscopic sonography is often needed to confirm the diagnosis. The treatment of acute cholangitis is based on both antibiotic therapy and biliary drainage. Results of the treatment of common bile duct stone with either laparoscopic surgery or with the combined endoscopic sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy are comparable when performed by well-trained practitionners. The choice of the method should be based on the locally available treatment.

No treatment is recommended for silent gallstones.