Introduction:The extent of in vivo damage to the alveolar-capillary membrane in patients with primary lung injury remains unclear. In cases of ARDS related to COVID-19 and Influenza type A, the complexity of the damage increases further, as viral pneumonia cannot currently be treated with a causal approach. Aims of the study:Our primary goal is to enhance the understanding of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) by demonstrating damage to the alveocapillary membrane in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and influenza type A. We will achieve this by measuring the levels of proteins and albumin in bronchoalveolar fluid (BAL) and serum. Our secondary objective is to assess patient outcomes related to elevated protein and albumin levels in both BAL and blood serum, which will deepen our understanding of this complex condition. Materials and methods:Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and serum samples were meticulously collected from a total of 64 patients, categorized into three distinct groups: 30 patients diagnosed with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), 14 patients with influenza type A (H1N1 strain), also experiencing ARDS, and a control group consisting of 20 patients who were preoperatively prepared for elective surgical procedures without any diagnosed lung disease. The careful selection and categorization of patients ensure the robustness of our study. BAL samples were taken within the first 24 hours following the commencement of invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit, alongside measurements of serum albumin levels. In the control group, BAL and serum samples were collected after the induction of general endotracheal anaesthesia. Results:Patients in the COVID-19 group are significantly older than those in the Influenza type A (H1N1) group, with median ages of 72.5 years and 62 years, respectively (p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test). Furthermore, serum albumin levels (measured in g/L) revealed significant differences across all three groups in the overall sample, yielding a p-value of less than 0.01 according to ANOVA. In terms of treatment outcomes, serum albumin levels also exhibited a significant correlation, with a p-value of 0.03 (Mann-Whitney U test). A reduction in serum albumin levels (below 35 g/L), combined with elevated protein levels in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), serves as a predictor of poor outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), as indicated by a p-value of less than 0.01 (ANOVA). Conclusions:Our findings indicate that protein and albumin levels in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid are elevated in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) cases. This suggests that BAL can effectively evaluate protein levels and fractions, which could significantly assist in assessing damage to the alveolocapillary membrane. Additionally, the increased albumin levels in BAL, often accompanied by a decrease in serum albumin levels, may serve as a valuable indicator of compromised integrity of the alveolar-capillary membrane in ARDS, with potential implications for patient care.

Background: Patients undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation commonly require tracheotomy. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of tracheotomy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) associated with COVID-19 in low-resource settings. Methods: A retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study was performed on patients with ARDS associated with COVID-19. Patients who underwent intubation alone were compared with those who received both intubation and subsequent tracheotomy. The analysis included patient demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes. Results: Patients undergoing tracheotomy (n = 89) were compared with intubated patients (n = 622). The median time from intubation to tracheotomy was 10 days (IQR: 6–15 days). Overall, 608 patients (85.5%) died in the hospital. Thirty-seven patients (35.9%) in the survival group had tracheostomy compared with fifty-two patients (8.5%) in the non-survival group (p < 0.001). The Kaplan–Meier curve shows a higher probability of survival in the tracheotomy group compared with the non-tracheotomy group (log-rank test: p < 0.001). Tracheotomy was found to be independently associated with lower in-hospital mortality (HR = 0.16 [95% CI: 0.11–0.23], p < 0.001) in the multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis after adjusting for potential confounding factors. Furthermore, tracheotomy was associated with a higher cumulative incidence of being alive and off the ventilator at day 28 (SHR = 2.87 [95% CI: 1.88–4.38], p < 0.001). Conclusions: Tracheotomy was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality and longer ventilator-free days.

Objective. To identify the type of the non-invasive ventilatory treatment for patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with respiratory status deteriorated by COVID-19 pneumonia, and in need of treatment in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Materials and Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted over a one-year period in the medical intensive care units of two hospitals. As the patients’ clinical condition deteriorated and the parameters of the arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis worsened, oxygen support was applied via a high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or by non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV). According to the control values of the arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) and the parameters of ABG, the patients were enabled to be transferred between the two types of non-invasive ventilatory support. The primary outcome was the length of hospital stay, while secondary outcomes were the rate of intubation, the mortality rate, and respiratory support-free days. Results. Out of 21 critical patients with COPD and COVID-19, 11 (52.4%) were initially treated with NPPV and 10 (47.6%) with HFNC. The ages (67±9.79 in NPPV group vs. 70.10±10.25 in HFNC group) and severity of illness (SOFA score 5 (3.5) in NPPV group vs. 5 (2.8) in HFNC group) were similar between the two groups. Switching the mode of respiratory support was more common in NPPV (58.3% in survivor group vs. 41.7% in non-survivor group). Patients treated with NPPV compared to HFNC had a nominally longer length of stay (15 (11) vs. 11.5 (4.25)), and higher risk of intubation (66.7% vs. 33.3%) and mortality (66.7% vs. 33.3%), but the comparisons did not reach statistical significance. Survivors had significantly longer Medical Intensive Care Unit and hospital stays, but significantly lower FiO2 (0.60 vs.1) and higher values of PaO2/FiO2 (78(32.4) vs. 56.3(17.8)) than non-survivors. All patients were treated with corticosteroids, and the duration of treatment was similar between groups. Conclusion. In critically ill patients with COPD and COVID-19, both HFNC and NPPV were commonly used as the initial mode of ventilation. Switching to a different mode and adverse patient outcomes were more frequent in patients initially treated with NPPV. Survivors had higher values of PaO2/FiO2 than non-survivors.

Uvod / Cilj: Koronavirus predstavlja novi soj virusa koji je u kratkom vremenskom periodu zadobio pandemijske razmjere. Virus dovodi do razvoja COVID-19 bolesti, koja u većini slučajeva ima blažu kliničku sliku i povoljan ishod. Nažalost, u manjem broju slučajeva zahtijeva hospitalni tretman, određeni broj tih pacijenata razvija respiratornu insuficijenciju i potrebu za nekim od vidova podrške disanja. Kod navedenih pacijenata bolest se karakteriše sa izraženim i neuravnoteženim upalnim odgovorom, što se pored kliničke slike i radioloških nalaza, jednostavno može detektovati i pratiti laboratorijskom dijagnostikom. Cilj ovog rada jeste da se utvrdi da li apsolutni broj limfocita ima prediktivni značaj na ishod bolesti. Metodologija: Radi se o retrospektivnoj opservacionoj studiji provedenoj u Univerzitetskom kliničkom centru Republike Srpske u Banja Luci, u Klinici intenzivne medicine za nehirurške grane. Obuhvaćen je vremenski okvir od 1. novembra do 31. decembra 2021. godine. U studiji su učestvovali adultni pacijenti oba pola koji su imali potvrđen COVID-19 sa RT-PCR testom pozitivnim na SARS CoV2 RNK, i koji su zahtijevali neki od vidova podrške disanja. Ishod je definisan kao pozitivan (preživjeli) i kao negativan (preminuli). Kriterijum za ulazak u studiju ispunjavalo je 100 pacijenata. Za ispitivanje uzimala se apsolutna vrijednost limfocita evidentirana u laboratorijskom nalazu na prijemu pacijenta u Kliniku intenzivne medicine za nehirurške grane. Rezultati: Laboratorijski nalaz limfocita je analiziran unutar dvije grupe preživjelih i preminulih, te je uočena značajnost (p-value <0,001). Prosječna starost ispitanika bila je 65 godina, sa 60 slučajeva muškog pola. Negativan ishod evidentiran je kod 53 ispitanika. Zaključak: Apsolutna vrijednost limfocita iz laboratorijske analize uzorkovane na prijemu u jedinice intenzivnog liječenja može se, uz ranije komorbiditete, koristiti kao prediktor lošeg ishoda kod teške forme COVID-19.

Introduction: Treatment of sepsis and septic shock can be a challenge even for intensive care units (ICUs) in high income countries, but it is especially difficult for ICUs with limited resources. Aim: To evaluate the impact of CERTAIN on treatment of critically ill septic patients in low-resource medical ICU. Materials and Methods: In a before-and-after study design, we compared clinical outcomes, processes, and complications (hospital acquired infections) 1 year before and 2 years after (2016 and 2017) introduction of CERTAIN. Results: A total of 125 patients with sepsis were prospectively identified for a 3-year period. Mean patient age, gender distribution, number of patients on mechanical ventilation (33 [76.7%] vs. 42 [84%] vs. 24 [75%]) and vasopressor use (23 [53.5%] vs. 34 [68%] vs. 24 [75%]) were similar before (2015) and 2 years after (2016 and 2017) the implementation of CERTAIN. Severity of illness (Simplified Acute Physiology Score II [SAPS II score]) was higher after the implementation. The checklist was incorporated in the daily practice with 100% adherence to its use. The duration of mechanical ventilation (5.3 ± 5.3 vs. 4.2 ± 3.6 vs. 3.7 ± 5.5), antibiotic treatment (8.2 ± 5.4 vs. 6.9 ± 4.1 vs. 5.8 ± 5.6), central venous catheter use (6.2 ± 5.7 vs. 5.7 ± 4.6 vs. 4.2 ± 6.1), ICU stay (8.4 ± 5.4 vs. 7.1 ± 4.1 vs. 5.8 ± 5.6), and the incidence of nosocomial infection (33.3% vs. 30% vs. 12.5%) decreased in the period after the onset of the intervention, but the results did not reach statistical significance. When adjusted for baseline characteristics, CERTAIN was not associated with hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.88, 0.38-2.04). Conclusion: CERTAIN was readily adopted in the ICU workflow and was associated with improvement in treatment of critically ill patients with sepsis.

Treatment of critically ill patients entails a great risk for intrahospital infections. Systematic monitoring of intrahospital infection data is a widely used practice in developed countries, while in developing and underdeveloped countries these data are scarce. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, a developing country, precise data cannot be found; hence, this study was created with the aim to monitor the profile and resistance patterns of microorganisms isolated from patients being treated in the only medical intensive care unit (MICU) in the country. This is a retrospective observational study of microorganisms isolated from all patients treated at MICU in the University Clinical Center of Republic of Srpska from January 1 through December 31, 2017. Analysis of all samples was performed using standardized microbiological procedures, while sensitivity to antimicrobials was performed using the disk diffusion method. One thousand six hundred twenty-five samples were taken from 633 critically ill patients and sent off for analysis; 572 were positive for bacteria (35.2%). Gram-negative bacteria were isolated more frequently (65.2%), specifically Acinetobacter baumannii (25.5%), followed by Klebsiella spp. (10.8%). A. baumannii was resistant to all antibiotics except for colistin, to which it was highly sensitive (99.7%). It was moderately sensitive (76%) to rifampicin. Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococci were the most prevalent Gram-positive bacteria (15%, 7.3%, and 9.2%, respectively) isolated in this study. It is clear from this study that Gram-negative bacteria are predominant in the newly established MICU. A. baumannii was found to be the most prevalent Gram-negative bacteria, and S. epidermidis was the most prevalent Gram-positive bacteria.