Bone and muscle impairment, named osteoporosis and sarcopenia, may co-occur with age, and patients with both disorders might exhibit physical frailty. One-hundred sixty-three patients were included. 14.2

Objectives Validation of the Danish version of the SARC-F (Strength, Assistance in walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs, and Falls) for hospitalized geriatric medical patients, compared against the original EWGSOP (European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People) and revised EWGSOP2 definition for sarcopenia. Additionally, investigation of the ability of SARC-F to individually identify low strength/function and muscle mass. Design Cross-sectional analysis of data from an RCT. Setting Hospital, Medical Department. Participants 122 geriatric medical patients (65.6% women) ≥ 70 years of age with mixed medical conditions. Measurements SARC-F screening, diagnostic assessment of sarcopenia (hand-grip strength, muscle mass measured by dual-frequency bio-impedance analysis, and 4-m usual gait speed). Results The prevalence of risk of sarcopenia (SARC-F ≥ 4) was 48.3%, while it was diagnosed in 65.8% and 21.7%, with EWGSOP and EWGSOP2, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value according to EWGSOP were 50.0 %, 53.7 %, 67.2% and 36.1%, while they were 53.8 %, 53.2 %, 24.1% and 80.6%, according to EWGSOP2 (all participants). The ability of SARC-F to predict reduced strength, function, and muscle mass was modest. There was a significant negative linear, yet weak, relationship between total SARC-F score and hand-grip strength (R 2 =0.033) and 4-m gait speed (R 2 =0.111), but not muscle mass (R 2 =0.004). Conclusion SARC-F does not seem to be a suitable screening tool for identifying and excluding non-sarcopenic geriatric patients. Furthermore, the SARC-F score was more strongly correlated with reduced muscle strength and physical function than with low muscle mass.

Introduction: As life expectancy increases, a growing percentage of older individuals with age-related diseases such as osteoporosis and sarcopenia are expected. Patients with both conditions, i.e. patient with osteosarcopenia, are suggested to have a higher risk of fall and fracture compared to individuals with either condition. Aim: To investigate the potential relationship between low bone mineral density (BMD) and muscle dysfunction in a Danish cohort of older home-dwelling individuals. Furthermore, to examine the prevalence of osteosarcopenia and alterations in prevalence depending on cut-off values chosen. Method: Measures of BMD, relative appendicular lean mass and hand grip strength were assessed in 529 individuals aged 65+ from the population-based cross-sectional Copenhagen Sarcopenia Study (CSS). Osteoporosis was diagnosed according to the World Health Organization guidelines. Sarcopenia was diagnosed in accordance with the guidelines from the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) with application of cut-off values from the EWGSOP2 paper compared to cut-off values derived from a local cohort (CSS). Results: 19.2% had osteoporosis (66 women and 35 men), whereas 2.7% (6 women and 8 men) and 4.2% (7 women and 15 men) had sarcopenia with application of EWGSOP2 and CSS cut-off values, respectively. Using the EWGSOP2 cut-off values, 1.5% (4 women and 4 men) were diagnosed with osteosarcopenia compared to 1.4% (4 women and 3 men) using CSS cut-off values. In the osteoporosis sub-population, 8% (EWGSOP2) and 7% (CSS) had sarcopenia and within the sarcopenia sub-population, 61.5% (EWGSOP2) and 33.3% (CSS) had osteoporosis. At all sites, BMD was lower among individuals with sarcopenia and sarcopenia increased the risk of osteoporosis (odds ratios: EWGSOP2: 7.3 (p < 0.001) and CSS: 2.2 (ns)). Conclusion: Osteosarcopenia was present in 1.5% of a group of healthy home-dwelling older individuals. Notably, individuals with sarcopenia had lower BMD and a higher risk of osteoporosis, whereas the opposite (prevalence of sarcopenia in individuals with osteoporosis) was not as frequent. Our data indicate that screening for sarcopenia and osteoporosis should be performed simultaneously in older individuals at high risk of falls and fractures. However, further studies with outcome-related results are needed to identify optimal measures of osteosarcopenia and cut-off values for sarcopenia.

Background and aims: To identify predictors of further falls among older Danes presenting at emergency department (ED) with falls, evaluate the predictive value of risk factors and compare them with those found in previous studies.Methods: Three hundred and ninety-two older participants in a fall prevention trial were assessed for presence of risk factors at baseline and followed for 12 months for occurrence of falls. Through multivariate regression analysis independent predictors of falls were determined, and predictive value assessed. Predictors from other studies were applied to the present cohort.Results: Three independent predictors of having one or more falls during 12 months of follow-up were more or equal to three falls in the previous year, Activity Balance Score below median and use of anxiolytics in the previous year. Presence of at least one of the predictors identified 74% of those who fell and 84% of those who fell at least twice. Application of predictors from previous studies revealed that they did not predict falls well in the present cohort.Conclusions: Previously published predictors of further falls do not correctly identify high risk individuals among older Danes with falls. This stresses the importance of testing screening tools in different populations before implementation. (C) 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS and European Union Geriatric Medicine Society. All rights reserved.