OBJECTIVE:Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) Intervention and Utilization Study (RADIUS) is a unique, real-world, prospective, 5-year, observational study of over 10 000 patients with RA. RADIUS provides a snapshot of use patterns, effectiveness, and safety of DMARDs, biologics, and combination therapies used to manage RA in clinical practice.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS:Patients with RA requiring a new DMARD or biologic (addition or switch) were eligible for the RADIUS study. Two separate patient cohorts were enrolled; RADIUS 1 patients initiated any new therapy at entry, and RADIUS 2 patients initiated etanercept at entry. Patient demographics and disease activity measures were collected at study entry, and baseline characteristics were summarized for various subgroups. Effectiveness, safety, and patterns of use will be tracked for therapies utilized during the 5-year study.RESULTS:RADIUS 1 enrolled 4959 patients, and RADIUS 2 enrolled 5102 patients, mostly at community private practices (88%). In RADIUS 1, most patients initiated methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy, followed by MTX in combination with a biologic (e.g. infliximab plus MTX) or other DMARD. In RADIUS 2, most patients initiated etanercept in combination with MTX, followed by etanercept monotherapy. When a new therapy was required, physicians tended to add another therapy versus switching therapies. Patients initiating a biologic had a longer duration of RA and more severe disease compared with patients initiating non-biologic therapy.CONCLUSIONS:These real-world data provide evidence of the prescribing practices of rheumatologists in 2001-2003. Future analyses will allow evidence-based comparisons of the long-term safety and effectiveness of DMARDs, biologics, and combination therapies to assist physicians in clinical decision-making.

OBJECTIVE:Biological agents have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Given the previously documented ethnic disparity in the health service literature, we sought to determine if ethnic difference exists in the lag time between the diagnosis of RA and use of first biological agent.METHODS:RADIUS 1 and 2 are observational studies designed to document how rheumatologists treat RA across the United States. The sample analyzed here included early patients with RA who entered RADIUS with the initiation of the first biological agent. Ethnic status was categorized as White (W), African American (AA), and Hispanic (H). Lag time (months from RA diagnosis to initiation of the first biological agent) was the principal outcome variable.RESULTS:Compared to W (n=1616), AA (n=147) and H (n=116) were more likely to be female, younger, and have less than a high school education. Despite similar swollen and tender joint counts, AA and H had more active disease on the basis of Health Assessment Questionnaire and patient global assessments. Almost 97% of patients had some type of insurance coverage. On multivariable analysis, ethnic affiliation was not associated with lag time (14.5 months W vs 14.9 AA vs 14.3 H; p=NS). Similarly, there were also no significant ethnic differences in time to first DMARD (e.g., methotrexate) initiation.CONCLUSION:In a national sample of patients with RA, most of whom were insured, the length of time from diagnosis of RA to initiation of the first biological agent was not significantly different among Whites, African Americans, and Hispanics.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effectiveness of select biologics, methotrexate (MTX), and other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the management of adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in routine clinical practice.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS:RADIUS (Rheumatoid Arthritis DMARD Intervention and Utilization Study) comprises two prospective, 5-year, observational registries of over 10 000 patients. Over 4600 patients who initiated MTX or a biologic regimen (etanercept [ETN], infliximab [INF], ETN + MTX, and INF + MTX) and who had at least one on-regimen, follow-up evaluation, were included in this analysis. Adalimumab was not included because it had not yet received FDA approval at RADIUS initiation. Other common DMARD regimens (N = 762) were also compared with MTX. Patients who initiated less commonly used regimens, such as anakinra or cyclosporine, and those who did not have at least one on-regimen, follow-up evaluation, were not eligible for this analysis. Because ESR/CRP measurements were often not available, a modified ACR20 response (mACR20), defined as three out of four response criteria excluding ESR/CRP, was used to assess response at 12 months. Logistic regression analysis was performed to control for baseline covariates that may affect outcomes.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a mACR20 response at 12 months post-RADIUS entry.RESULTS:After adjusting for baseline covariates, patients receiving either ETN + MTX or ETN monotherapy were more likely to achieve a mACR20 response at 12 months than patients receiving MTX alone (odds ratio [OR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.52; p < 0.01 and OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.47; p < 0.05, respectively). Conversely, patients treated with MTX + leflunomide (LEF) were less likely to achieve a mACR20 response than those receiving MTX alone (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96; p < 0.05). Significant differences were not observed between patients receiving MTX alone and either INF + MTX, MTX + hydroxychloroquine, MTX + hydroxychloroquine + sulfasalazine, INF monotherapy, or LEF monotherapy.CONCLUSION:These data from routine rheumatology clinical practice settings highlight the effectiveness of common biologic and DMARD therapies, and provide additional data beyond those of randomized, controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE:To examine the effect of folic acid on the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at 12 months in 2 phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of leflunomide in which MTX was used as a comparator.METHODS:Analyses were restricted to patients randomized to receive MTX who had rheumatoid factor data. The US study recruited 482 patients with active RA; 179 received at least 1 dose of MTX, and all were mandated to receive 1 mg of oral folic acid once or twice daily. The multinational European study recruited 999 patients with active RA; 489 received at least 1 dose of MTX, and oral folic acid was not required, although 50 received folate after developing an adverse event. Because of similar entry criteria for both studies, the data for patients with available primary outcome data at week 52 were pooled (n = 668), and the patients were grouped by folic acid use (n = 225) and nonuse (n = 443). To account for the significant between-study differences in the MTX groups, baseline covariates were adjusted using propensity scores so that folic acid users could be matched with nonusers. This allowed for a comparison of differences in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% improvement criteria at week 52.RESULTS:At study entry, non-folic acid users had a significantly lower mean body weight, shorter mean RA duration, and higher mean disease activity (measured by joint counts, patient's and physician's global assessments, and acute-phase reactant levels). The mean MTX dosage at week 52 was similar in the 2 RCTs. Using propensity score matching techniques, the proportion of patients achieving an ACR 20% response at week 52 averaged 17% higher in the non-folic acid group than in the folic acid group (range 15-21%). Similarly, the proportion of patients achieving ACR 50% and ACR 70% responses averaged 14% (range 12-16%) and 12% (range 9-14%) higher, respectively, in the non-folic acid group. Adverse events were reported in 93% of US study patients and 94% of the multinational study patients. Elevated liver transaminase levels (above the upper limit of normal) were reported in 29% of the US study patients (majority receiving folic acid) and 62% of the multinational study patients (majority not receiving folic acid).CONCLUSION:After using propensity scores to adjust for differences in the baseline characteristics of folic acid users and non-folic acid users, 9-21% fewer MTX-treated RA patients taking folic acid had ACR 20%, 50%, or 70% improvement at 52 weeks compared with those who did not receive folic acid in the 2 phase III RA clinical trials. As a post hoc analysis, the results of this data analysis should be considered "hypothesis generating" and an impetus for future studies regarding the effects of folic acid on the efficacy of MTX in RA.

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effect of age adjustment on baseline erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA, age > or = 55 yrs) and younger-onset RA (YORA, age < 55 yrs) in a cohort with early, rheumatoid factor (RF) positive RA that has not received disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD).METHODSIn an ongoing prospective cohort study of 263 patients with seropositive RA who were enrolled within 14 months of symptom onset, baseline assessments included ESR, CRP, tender and swollen joint counts, and functional status. Westergren ESR determinations were performed in the rheumatologist's office or in a local laboratory using appropriate methods. CRP were performed at the Specialty Laboratories in Santa Monica, CA, using Behring nephelometry. Percentages of patients with greater than the upper limit of normal (ULN) laboratory values using both age-unadjusted and age-adjusted ESR and CRP values were determined. The late-onset and younger-onset RA patients were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-square tests.RESULTSAt study entry, both the YORA and LORA patients had comparable symptom duration, disease activity scores, tender and swollen joint counts, and Health Assessment Questionnaire values. RF, CRP, and ESR were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in LORA patients. Although the percentages of patients with age-unadjusted ESR and CRP above ULN were higher in LORA patients, the percentages exceeding the age-adjusted ULN did not differ significantly between the YORA and LORA groups.CONCLUSIONIn patients with late-onset and younger-onset RA with similar disease duration and severity, the apparent discrepancy in elevation of both the baseline ESR and CRP disappears after age-adjustment.

OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of patient age at symptom onset on radiographic joint damage at study entry, and on subsequent progression of damage in a cohort of patients with early seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS We studied 186 patients with RA of <15 months' duration. All patients had active disease and had not received disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. At study entry and during followup, total Sharp scores (TSS), RA-associated joint space narrowing (RA-JSN), and erosions were determined on hand and foot radiographs. Baseline radiographs were also scored for osteoarthritis (OA)-related JSN (OA-JSN) and osteophytes. Older patients (>55 years) and younger patients (=55 years) were compared by t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square, or Fisher's exact test. Multiple linear regression models were also constructed. RESULTS The older group (n = 74) had a higher baseline total Sharp score (median 6.21) compared with the younger group (n = 112) (median 2.33) (P = 0.0002). This was mainly due to a higher baseline JSN score in the older group (median 3.96 versus 1.08) and not to differences in erosion score (median 0.91 versus 0.70). Disease activity and duration of RA symptoms were similar in the 2 groups, as were progression rates of the TSS, JSN score, and erosion score. At baseline, 26% of patients had osteophytes, with a prevalence of 13% in the younger age group and 50% in the older group. The presence of OA-JSN was highly correlated with the presence of osteophytes (r = 0.72). Also, increased age and RA-JSN were associated with increased severity of osteophytes and OA-JSN at baseline. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that both age and hand osteophytes contributed to the increase in baseline RA-JSN score and TSS, but not to erosion score. CONCLUSION In a cohort of patients with early RA, an increase in the baseline RA-JSN score and TSS can be accounted for in part by the presence of hand OA.

OBJECTIVE:A "window of therapeutic opportunity" has been hypothesized to be present in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To determine the date of this window, we must know the symptom-onset date of the RA. Patients participating in an observational study of early aggressive rheumatoid factor (RF) positive RA were evaluated to assess the accuracy of their recall of symptom-onset date by comparing the onset date they reported at the first visit with that reported on subsequent 6-monthly questionnaires.METHODS:One hundred eighty-six patients with early RA (at entry: median disease duration 5.8 mo, mean RF 413.8 +/- 630.7 IU/ml, 20.6 +/- 10.9 swollen and 23.7 +/- 13.4 tender joints) completed a self-reported mailed questionnaire every 6 months for up to 5 years. As a part of each questionnaire, patients were asked to recall their RA symptom-onset date. These dates were then compared to the dates reported on the initial questionnaire.RESULTS:Thirteen months after symptom onset (i.e., about 6 mo after study entry) 61% of patients recalled the symptom-onset date (within 1 mo) that they had reported at baseline; the proportion decreased to 39% at 31 months and 25% after 70 months. During this period, the proportion overestimating RA duration remained about 20%, but the proportion underestimating it increased from 23% at 13 months to 39% at 31 months, and to 50% after 56 months. Patients with longer disease duration, less disease activity, and higher pain levels tended to be less accurate.CONCLUSION:Accuracy of recall of RA symptom-onset date by patients tends to decline over a period of 5 years. This should be taken into consideration when enrolling patients, when interpreting the findings of early RA clinical trials, and when attempting to ascertain the presence of a window of therapeutic opportunity.

Objective. To quantitate patient retention and radiographic progression rates in serial hand/wrist radiographs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were not being treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD).Methods. A total of 1433 RA patients with 1-7 years' disease duration entered a 3-year prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing the nonsteroidal antiiflammatory drugs (NSAID) etodolac (300 or 1000 mg daily) and ibuprofen (2400 mg daily). Standardized hand/wrist radiographs were obtained yearly and at dropout if > 6 months after entry. DMARD were not permitted. Joint erosion, joint space narrowing (JSN), and total scores of 3 readers were averaged.Results. At entry, mean duration of RA was 3.5 years (range 1-7); ages were 21-78 years; patients were 71% female, 84% Caucasian, 67% rheumatoid factor (RF) positive; tender joint count was 29, swollen joint count 22, Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) 49, and C-reactive protein (CRP) 2.44. There were 824 (57.5%) patients who completed greater than or equal to 6 months and had paired radiographs; 46% completed 48 weeks; 31%, 98 weeks; and 19%, 147 weeks. Months between paired radiographs (time in study) averaged 23.1 (range 6-36). Mean progression rates for total, erosion, and JSN scores (5.08, 2.53, and 2.54 units per year, respectively) were significantly associated with time in study, baseline RF, ESR, CRP, swollen joint count, presence of erosions at entry, and with 20% and 50% composite clinical responses. Painful joint count and RA duration were weakly associated only with progression of erosions. Progression rates were not associated with age, sex, corticosteroid use, or prior DMARD use. Patients who completed the 3-year trial had less severe disease activity and radiographic progression than those who dropped out.Conclusion. In this 3-year prospective double-blind clinical trial that prohibited DMARD, retention rates (57.5%, 46%, 31%, and 19% at 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 years) were similar to those in the non-DMARD-treated placebo groups of recent published studies. Radiographic progression rates are reported for 824 non-DMARD-treated patients during RA of 1-10 years' duration. This information may be useful as background information in the interpretation of longterm clinical trials that evaluate joint radiographic outcomes.

OBJECTIVE:Human cartilage glycoprotein 39 (HC gp-39) appears to be a relevant autoantigen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Administration of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class II complexed antigens without requisite costimulatory signals can induce immunologic tolerance. We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of AG4263 in patients with RA. AG4263 is a soluble complex of native HLA-DR4 (beta*0401) complexed to Org 36601, a 13-mer peptide derived from HC gp-39 (also referred to as CDP263).METHODS:Thirty-one HLA-DRB1*0401 positive patients with persistent RA disease activity despite concurrent methotrexate were randomized to 7 infusions of AG4263 (n = 24) or placebo (n = 7) over 6 weeks. The initial dose of 0.5 micro g/kg was escalated in subsequent cohorts to a maximum of 150 micro g/kg. Safety analyses included recording of adverse events and measurement of CD4/CD8 counts, reactivity to recall antigens, and development of antibodies to HLA-DR4. Efficacy was assessed using the Paulus 20 criteria.RESULTS:Treatment was well tolerated, with injection site reaction the most common adverse event. There was no loss of reactivity to recall antigens, change in cell counts, or antibodies to HLA-DR. The mean half-life of AG4263 was 12.5 h. Some evidence of clinical response was seen; responses were more common among patients receiving the highest doses of AG4263 and among those with baseline T cell reactivity to CDP263.CONCLUSION:AG4263 was safe, well tolerated, and without evidence of generalized immune suppression. Along with the observed trend toward clinical efficacy, the results suggest that this therapeutic approach warrants further investigation in patients with RA.

OBJECTIVE:Aggressive treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is recommended to prevent irreversible joint damage. We evaluated the usefulness of single time-point joint radiographs for deciding whether early RA is erosive or nonerosive. METHODS:In an observational study, 179 patients with recent onset of RA symptoms (median 5.1 mo), positive rheumatoid factor, and active polyarthritis had 2 to 8 radiographic observations of hands, wrists, and forefeet during 6 to 60 months of followup. Linear regression lines for all available radiographs were used to determine progression rates of total Sharp score (TSS), erosion score (ES), and joint space narrowing score (JSNS) of each patient. RESULTS:Using the average of 2 readers' scores, intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.97 and smallest detectable difference was 3.07 for ES, 0.93 and 7.52 for JSNS, and 0.90 and 12.71 for TSS. Mean progression rates per year were 1.20 (ES), 0.67 (JSNS), and 1.85 (TSS). Single time-point radiographs taken within 6 months of symptom onset did not correlate with progression rates (r = 0.01 to 0.07); between 7 and 18 months correlations were weak (r = 0.23 to 0.35), but were better for ES between 19 and 72 months (r = 0.60 to 0.81). Among 53 patients (31%) with no progression of TSS, only 10 of them had zero scores at baseline. Among all 630 radiographs with TSS > or = 1, 25% were associated with progression rates < or = 0. CONCLUSION:Erosion scores of single radiographic examinations done > 18 months after onset of RA symptoms correlated with progression rates, but earlier radiographs did not sufficiently predict erosive or nonerosive status to guide disease modifying antirheumatic drug treatment decisions.

Background: Because traditional therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) such as methotrexate (MTX) do not produce an adequate response in many patients, newer therapies that block the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) are increasingly being used in combination with MTX.Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety profile of adalimumab, a fully human anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody, when added to continuing MTX therapy.Methods: This Phase I, randomized, dose-titration study consisted of a 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase and a 26-month, open-label continuation phase. Patients with RA who had been taking stable doses of MTX (mean dose, 17 mg/wk) for greater than or equal to3 months before enrollment with an inadequate response were randomly assigned to receive 2 single doses of either adalimumab 0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, or 5 mg/kg IV or placebo in the double-blind phase. In the open-label phase, patients received treatment with 1 of the doses of adalimumab every other week or monthly for 18 months; patients were then switched to adalimumab 40 mg IV or SC every other week or monthly The main efficacy end point was 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20). Other efficacy end points included 50% (ACR50) and 70% improvements in ACR response criteria. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed for adalimumab and MTX during both phases of the study Serum adalimumab concentrations were analyzed using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay relying on the double-antigen principle. Peak and trough concentrations were determined from observed concentration-time data, and a modeling approach was used to estimate total serum clearance, mean apparent terminal half-life, apparent volume of distribution at steady state, and area under the concentration-time curve.Results: Sixty patients entered the double-blind phase, 45 receiving adalimumab and 15 receiving placebo; I placebo recipient chose not to continue into the open-label phase. Overall, the study population included 47 (78.3%) women and 13 (21.7%) men. The mean age was 52.9 years (range, 24-73 years), and the mean body weight was 69.7 kg (range, 43-98 kg). ACR20 and ACR50 responses were achieved on at least I assessment during the 4-week double-blind phase by a respective 29 (64.4%) and 11 (24.4%) of 45 patients receiving active treatment and by 4 (26.7%) and none of the 15 patients receiving placebo. Responses to adalimumab were rapid, with 10 (22.2%) of 45 patients achieving an ACR20 response within 24 hours of dosing. Of 29 adalimumab recipients who had an ACR20 response, 18 (62.1%) had a duration of response (time from first occurrence of a response to first occurrence of a nonresponse) of 1 to 2 weeks, and 11 (37.9%) had a duration of response of 3 to 13 weeks. The pharmacokinetic properties of adalimumab appeared to be linear. The mean apparent terminal half-life after a single intravenous dose of adalimumab ranged from 15 to 19 days in the 5 dose groups. Repeated administration of adalimumab had no statistically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of MTX, indicating that dose adjustment of MTX is not necessary Adalimumab was well tolerated, and there were no dose-related adverse events.Conclusions: Among patients with active RA who had not had an adequate response to MTX, addition of adalimumab to MTX achieved statistically significant, long-term improvement compared with placebo plus MTX (P less than or equal to 0.05), as indicated by ACR responses at 26 months. The combination was well tolerated. Adalimumab exhibited linear pharmacokinetics. In this selected patient population, adalimumab's long half-life of 15 to 19 days supports every-other-week dosing. Coadministration of adalimumab did not alter serum levels of MTX. Copyright (C) 2003 Excerpta Medica, Inc.

OBJECTIVE:Autoantibodies observed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during clinical trials of immunomodulating agents may cause concern about possible induction of autoimmunity by the therapeutic intervention. We determined the frequency and variability of selected autoantibodies in patients with early rheumatoid factor (RF) positive RA during a prospective observational study.METHOD:The study cohort consisted of 276 patients with active RA and with RF > or = 40 IU, who were enrolled between January 1, 1993, and April 1, 2000, before starting disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy (average duration of symptoms, 7 mo). During an average of 3.5 years followup, a panel of autoantibodies was determined at entry, 6 months, 12 months, and yearly thereafter, in addition to routine clinical, radiographic, and laboratory assessments. After enrollment, patients were treated with DMARD at the discretion of their rheumatologists.RESULTS:At entry before any DMARD therapy, antinuclear antibody (ANA; by HEp-2) values were negative in 31%, borderline (8 IU/ml) in 26%, and > 8 (mean 65.5 IU/ml) in 41%. Tender and swollen joint counts, Disease Activity Score, and RF values were significantly higher in those with ANA > 8. During followup 726 paired serial specimens were available; 12.5% changed from negative to positive ANA and 12.3% from positive to negative. Additional autoantibodies were present in specimens of 20% of the subjects; 8% had 2 and 1.4% had 3 other autoantibodies. Anti-dsDNA was detected in 13 (5.5%) patients; 4 changed from negative to positive and one from positive to negative. SSA IgG and SSB IgG autoantibodies were both present in one of these patients. Ribosomal P protein autoantibodies were noted in 2 other patients, but Sm (Smith) and uRNP/snRNP IgG autoantibodies were not present in any patient. No patient had a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Antithyroid peroxidase (20 patients), parietal cell (15), smooth muscle (14), reticulin (9), mitochondrial (5), striational (2), SSB (2) and SCL-70 (1) autoantibodies were detected in some specimens. Seven patients were diagnosed with hypothyroidism, one with chronic thyroiditis, one with hepatitis C, and 9 with malignancies.CONCLUSION:In patients with early RF positive RA the frequent occurrence of autoantibodies before and during treatment with standard DMARD may make it difficult to attribute their presence to new therapies.