We would like to present 23 calcaneal fractures in 22 patients of whom 21 had type I diabetes mellitus. There appear to be three basic fracture types: (1) a superiorly displaced extra-articular avulsion fracture of the posterior calcaneus (or Iowa fracture), which occurred in 12 patients (five men, seven women); (2) a mid-calcaneal compression fracture in six patients (four men, two women), and (3) a cleavage or "wedge" type fracture in four patients extending from the calcaneal tubercle (one man, 3 women). All four of this last group of patients had a history of a chronic penetrating ulcer, and this is noteworthy since only one other patient out of the remaining 18 in groups 1 and 2 had a similar history. Most patients had decreased bone mineralization: 15 patients were on long-term, high-dose steroids, and 18 patients had either poor renal function or complete renal failure (11 of 12). Fourteen patients had received either renal or pancreas transplants. Eight patients were on restricted weight bearing prior to their fractures. We believe that diabetic patients are more prone to calcaneal fractures than the general population, and early diagnosis is imperative, followed by early treatment to prevent significant bony deformity.

Unlike computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound is an inexpensive test of potential use in detecting silicone gel breast implant (SBI) rupture. However, periprosthetic capsular contracture can make ultrasonic diagnosis of rupture difficult because the contracture-related radial folds inside the SBI can lead to a false-positive diagnosis of rupture. This study was conducted to determine the effects of capsular contracture on the ability of ultrasound to diagnose SBI rupture. Preoperative ultrasonic results of 122 SBIs were compared with surgical findings at the time of implant removal. The sensitivity and negative predictive values of ultrasound were lower in the presence of a contracted capsule (41.2% vs. 68.7%, p = 0.062; and 58.3% vs. 79.6%, p = 0.056 respectively). Ultrasound should be considered reliable in diagnosing SBI rupture only in the absence of a contracted capsule.

We reviewed the clinical, surgical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in 80 patients who underwent resection of primary benign or malignant bone or soft tissue tumors. There were 18 benign and 62 malignant tumors. Although 31 patients were originally thought to have recurrence, on review only 20 patients were considered to have recurred. Of these, three were found only to have postoperative changes at surgery. Seventeen patients actually had recurrence of tumor. We believe that the presence of an actual mass lesion on MRI is the cornerstone for the correct diagnosis of recurrent tumor.

OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacies of mammography, sonography, CT, and MR imaging in the detection of breast implant rupture and to analyze the imaging findings.SUBJECTS AND METHODS:Thirty-two women with 63 silicone breast implants participated in the study. All but one had signs and symptoms suggestive of rupture, and all had requested that their implants be removed before they were enrolled in this imaging study. All patients had film-screen mammography, sonography, CT, and MR imaging. Twenty-two ruptures were found at surgery; 21 were intracapsular and one was extracapsular. The relative efficacies of the imaging studies were determined, and the imaging findings were compared with the surgical results.RESULTS:Of the 32 women with 63 implants, mammographic sensitivity for detecting implant rupture was only 23% but the specificity was 98%. Sonography had a higher sensitivity (59%), but its specificity was significantly lower (79%). CT had a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 88%. MR was the only imaging technique that consistently provided evidence that enabled the evaluation of intracapsular and extracapsular ruptures. The sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging were 95% and 93%, respectively.CONCLUSION:Our results show that MR imaging is more sensitive and specific for the detection of breast implant rupture than is mammography, CT, or sonography.

Background.The purpose of this study was to evaluate three findings in cardiac transplant patients: the appearance, etiology, and incidence of "incisura" (a characteristic indentation) of the ascending aorta; the vascular pedicle width, which usually appears enlarged on standard chest radiographs; and clearing of the retrosternal clear space. Material. Two hundred sixty-one cardiactransplantations were performed at the University of Minnesota before December 31, 1992.The appearance, etiology, and incidence of an incisura were studied; the vascular pedicle width was measured; and the rate of clearing of the retrosternal clear space was determined.Results.Forty-six percent of the patients whose ascending aorta could be visualized on the lateral chest radiogram showed an incisura.Approximately one third of the patients showed continued opacification of the retrosternal space postoperatively.The width of the vascular pedicle in this series of cardiac transplant patients measured 60.9 + 22.8 mm (standard deviation, 11.4 mm), in comparison to a normal of 48 + 5.0 mm.Conclusions.An incisura of the ascending aorta and the widened vascular pedicle are normal postoperative chest radiographic findings in cardiac transplant patients and should not be misconstrued as abnormalities.

Postoperative impingement of the knee following ACL reconstruction does occur. MRI can be useful in the diagnosis of the patient who is not recovering as quickly as expected following surgical reconstruction. MRI allows the assessment of 1) tunnel position and alignment, 2) graft integrity, 3) the menisci for possible re-tear or extension of previous tears, and 4) joint for scar tissue and cartilaginous bodies either loose or fixed.

MRH is somewhat similar to, and probably occasionally mistaken for, psoriatic arthritis, Reiter's syndrome, or less frequently, rheumatoid arthritis. However, several important features distinguish MRH from the other arthritides. Rheumatoid arthritis more commonly involves the metacarpophalangeal joints, while MRH ordinarily affects the distal interphalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints. Furthermore, MRH rarely exhibits the degree of articular osteopenia that is the hallmark of rheumatoid disease. While psoriatic arthritis and Reiter's often affect the DIP joints, they rarely display the symmetry of MRH. In addition, MRH does not demonstrate the periosteal new bone formation that is seen in both psoriatic arthritis and Reiter's syndrome. Hence, the diagnosis of MRH may be made with reasonable confidence on the radiologic findings alone, even before the cutaneous nodules appear, which can then be biopsied to confirm the diagnosis.

MRH is somewhat similar to, and probably occasionally mistaken for, psoriatic arthritis, Reiter's syndrome, or less frequently, rheumatoid arthritis. However, several important features distinguish MRH from the other arthritides. Rheumatoid arthritis more commonly involves the metacarpophalangeal joints, while MRH ordinarily affects the distal interphalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints. Furthermore, MRH rarely exhibits the degree of articular osteopenia that is the hallmark of rheumatoid disease. While psoriatic arthritis and Reiter's often affect the DIP joints, they rarely display the symmetry of MRH. In addition, MRH does not demonstrate the periosteal new bone formation that is seen in both psoriatic arthritis and Reiter's syndrome. Hence, the diagnosis of MRH may be made with reasonable confidence on the radiologic findings alone, even before the cutaneous nodules appear, which can then be biopsied to confirm the diagnosis.

MRH is somewhat similar to, and probably occasionally mistaken for, psoriatic arthritis, Reiter's syndrome, or less frequently, rheumatoid arthritis. However, several important features distinguish MRH from the other arthritides. Rheumatoid arthritis more commonly involves the metacarpophalangeal joints, while MRH ordinarily affects the distal interphalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints. Furthermore, MRH rarely exhibits the degree of articular osteopenia that is the hallmark of rheumatoid disease. While psoriatic arthritis and Reiter's often affect the DIP joints, they rarely display the symmetry of MRH. In addition, MRH does not demonstrate the periosteal new bone formation that is seen in both psoriatic arthritis and Reiter's syndrome. Hence, the diagnosis of MRH may be made with reasonable confidence on the radiologic findings alone, even before the cutaneous nodules appear, which can then be biopsied to confirm the diagnosis.

Staging of musculoskeletal neoplasms is important for planning chemotherapy and surgical procedures. Accurate staging has increased in importance with advancements in limb salvage procedures. This article outlines concepts, techniques, and potential problems with staging of neoplasms. It is important to remember that biopsy should be preformed after consultation with an orthopedic surgeon specialized in tumor surgery.

FROULAR STRESS FRACTURE IN A 20-YEAR-OLD WOMAN