Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses significant health challenges globally, particularly in regions with considerable HBV prevalence such as Egypt. Despite immunisation programmes, HBV remains a leading cause of liver cancer in Egypt, often diagnosed at advanced stages, complicating management and worsening prognosis. This retrospective multicentre study included 365 Egyptian patients diagnosed with HBV-related HCC between February 2007 and July 2023 from six tertiary care centres across Egypt. Clinical, laboratory, tumour characteristics, treatment outcomes and overall survival were collected and analysed. Diagnosis was confirmed according to international guidelines using triphasic CT or dynamic MRI. Treatment responses were assessed using modified RECIST criteria, and survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Patients had a median age of 59 years, predominantly male (76.4%), and most (98.4%) presented with cirrhosis at diagnosis. The majority were not receiving antiviral treatment (76.71%) at presentation. Intermediate and advanced BCLC stages (B-D) comprised over 75% of cases. Trans-arterial chemoembolization was the primary treatment modality (34.5%), followed by sorafenib (24.1%) and best supportive care (28.8%). Median overall survival was 13.1 months. Independent factors associated with mortality included high ALBI score, positive HBV DNA at diagnosis, and advanced Child-Pugh classification. In conclusion: this study underscores the advanced stage at which HBV-related HCC is typically diagnosed in Egypt and the resulting poor survival outcomes. Strengthening early detection through surveillance programmes, increasing antiviral therapy coverage and adherence to treatment protocols are critical strategies to enhance patient prognosis.

We studied the characteristics and survival of patients with sorafenib-treated HCC and impact of underlying etiology on outcomes. This retrospective multicenter study recruited patients with sorafenib-treated advanced HCC (12/2016 to 4/2023) till death or the study end (2/2024). Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were recorded. We evaluated; Clinico-laboratory and imaging predictors of OS, The impact of underlying etiology on tumor variables, outcomes and tolerance for sorafenib > 6 months. This study included 706 patients. Median duration of Sorafenib therapy was 240.00 (90.00-360.00) days. Median OS was 314.00(146.00-601.00) days. Median TTP was 180.00(90.00-330.00) days. COX regression revealed that the independent factors of mortality were baseline AST, Tumor size, hepatic vein thrombosis (HVT), development of jaundice and shifting to Regorafenib. Advanced HCCs were more common on top of non-cirrhotic non-viral and HBV-related liver disease. Adverse events, TTP and tumor response didn't differ with the underlying etiology. Median OS was lower in non-viral-related HCC than HCV-related HCC (218.00 versus 326.50 days, P-value = 0.048). Patients who continued sorafenib > 6 months had lower AFP, HVT, adverse effects and better tumor response after 3 months. OS is lower in non-viral Sorafenib-treated HCC compared with viral-related HCC and Sorafenib was well-tolerated among different HCC etiologies.

Background: Viral hepatitis B and C are the leading causes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). With obesity, metabolic-related disorders are increasingly associated with a higher incidence of nonviral HCC. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics, tumor features, treatment outcomes, and survival of patients with viral versus nonviral HCC. Methods: This multicenter cohort study was conducted at six tertiary care centers. Patients were recruited between February 2007 and June 2022 and follow-up was recorded until death or the study end (July 2023). The patients were divided into viral-related and nonviral HCC groups. We studied baseline patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and overall survival (OS). Results: This study included 2233 patients, 1913 patients with viral and 320 patients with nonviral HCC. Patients with nonviral HCC presented with more advanced Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages (BCLC stage C or D were present in 26.3% and 53.8% of patients with viral and nonviral HCC, respectively) that affected the median OS (19.167 vs. 13.830 months, P-value <0.001 for viral and nonviral HCC, respectively). The OS did not differ between patients with viral and nonviral HCC treated with resection, percutaneous ablation, trans-arterial chemoembolization, or Sorafinib. The independent factors affecting the survival of nonviral HCC were albumin-bilirubin score (hazard ratio = 2.323, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.696-3.181, P-value <0.001), tumor size (hazard ratio = 1.085, 95% CI: 1.019-1.156, P-value 0.011), and alpha-fetoprotein (hazard ratio = 1.000, 95% CI: 1.000-1.000, P-value 0.042). Conclusion: Patients with nonviral HCC had higher BMI, worse performance status, BCLC stage, and tumor response than those with viral HCC.

Background and study aims: Few studies have considered patients treated with trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for non-viral-induced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with some reporting that those patients may have larger tumors, emphasizing the need for determination of the factors affecting survival in such patients. This work aims to study the characteristics and survival of patients with non-viral related HCC treated with TACE. Patients and methods: This is a multicenter observational study. Patients (166) with non-viral related HCC treated with TACE were recruited from six tertiary care centers (January 2008- June 2022). Follow-up continued until death or the end of the study (August 2023). Results: The patients had a mean age of 60.2 +/- 9.5 years, a male predominance of 79.5%. The mean size of the lesions was 5.71 +/- 3.02 cm, and 42.8% of the patients had a single lesion. After a median follow-up period of 27.02 months (IQR 14.99-39.37), the median overall survival (OS) was 42.14 months. The Cox regression hazard model revealed that the independent factors affecting survival were: multiple focal lesions, exceeding five in number, have a substantially higher hazard of death (HR = 8.5, p-value = 0.001) compared to those with a single focal lesion. HAP score grade D exhibited a threefold increase in the hazard of death (HR = 3.8, p-value 0.007). Individuals who did not respond positively to treatment faced a significantly higher risk of death (HR = 10.76, p-value 0.001). Albuminbilirubin score (ALBI), Easy ALBI, platelet albumin (PAL), platelet albumin bilirubin score (PALBI), The hepatoma arterial-embolisation (HAP) and Tumor burden score were found not to impact the survival of our patients. Conclusion: Tumor burden is an important determinant of survival after TACE in patients with non-viral HCC. HAP score can be implemented in selecting patients who would benefit from TACE.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been linked to lower tumor growth rates, higher sorafenib efficacy, and greater survival of patients treated for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In real-world settings, we tried to elucidate the effectiveness of sorafenib therapy for patients with HCV-related HCC with previous direct-acting antiviral (DAAs) therapy or not. This retrospective multicenter work recruited participants with sorafenib-treated HCC with and without previous DAAs therapy from November 2016 to April 2023 and followed up until death or the study end in April 2024. We compared the patients’ clinico-laboratory, imaging variables, and overall survival (OS). This work included 622 patients; 535 patients received DAAs before the development of HCC (group I), and 87 patients did not (group II). Group II patients showed higher rates of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea than group I patients, while group I patients experienced higher rates of jaundice during sorafenib therapy. None of the patients achieved complete response (CR) after sorafenib. Patients previously treated with DAAs were less common to show partial response (PR) (12.9

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a well-established endoscopic therapy for achalasia with high success rates. Severe submucosal fibrosis correlates with prolonged procedure duration, higher perioperative complications, and even failed POEM. Methods to overcome severe submucosal fibrosis include changing to an anterior approach, simultaneous submucosal tunnel dissection [1], open POEM [2], and initial submucosal tunneling followed by through-muscle dissection [3], with variable rates of success and complications. Here, we present a novel and successful method of initial intramuscular dissection (IIMD) in two patients with severe submucosal fibrosis where submucosal tunneling was not possible ([Video 1]).

Background & Aims: The safety and efficacy of hepatitis C (HCV) direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have been established in several real-world trials; however, some reports have claimed an association between DAAs and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurrence or aggressive behavior. We aimed to prospectively examine differences in de-novo HCC tumor behavior and overall survival (OS) in DAAs-treated versus HCV-untreated patients as measured by BCLC progression during a two-year follow-up period. Methods: This multicenter cohort study recruited 523 patients with de-novo HCV-related HCC. After exclusion criteria were applied, 353 patients were placed into; Group 1, including 236 patients without a history of DAAs therapy, and Group 2 including 117 patients with de-novo HCC developed after receiving DAAs. Patients were then stratified in each group according to BCLC staging (Liver, 2018). All patients received standard of care management and were followed until death or a maximum of 2 years. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding tumor characteristics (number and size of lesions) and criteria for aggressiveness upon presentation. Among all BCLC stages, DAAs treated patients showed significantly lower baseline Fib4 values than DAA untreated patients in BCLC-0 stage (4.1 vs 7.7, p 0.019). No statistically significant differences were evident in HCC progression in the different BCLC stages at 12 and 24 months follow up periods (p 0.0718 and 0.279 respectively). Significantly better survival was recorded in Group 1 compared to Group 2 patients for BCLC stages C and D (p = 0.003 and 0.01, respectively). Conclusion: HCC may develop at an earlier stage of liver disease after DAAs therapy. No defensive role was found for DAAs treatment in delaying HCC progression that occurs after viral eradication.

INTRODUCTION:COVID-19 severity and mortality predictors could determine admission criteria and reduce mortality. We aimed to evaluate the clinical-laboratory features of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 to develop a novel score of severity and mortality.METHODOLOGY:This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to five Egyptian university hospitals. Demographics, comorbidities, clinical manifestations, laboratory parameters, the duration of hospitalization, and disease outcome were analyzed, and a score to predict severity and mortality was developed.RESULTS:A total of 1308 patients with COVID-19, with 996 (76.1%) being moderate and 312 (23.9%) being severe cases, were included. The mean age was 46.5 ± 17.1 years, and 61.6% were males. The overall mortality was 12.6%. Regression analysis determined significant predictors, and a ROC curve defined cut-off values. The COVEG severity score was defined by age ≥ 54, D-dimer ≥ 0.795, serum ferritin ≥ 406, C-reactive protein ≥ 30.1, and neutrophil: lymphocyte ratio ≥ 2.88. The COVEG mortality score was based on COVEG severity and the presence of cardiac diseases. Both COVEG scores had high predictive values (area under the curve 0.882 and 0.883, respectively).CONCLUSIONS:COVEG score predicts the severity and mortality of patients with COVID-19 accurately.

Background and study aims: Currently, there is no therapy approved for COVID-19. We evaluated the effi-cacy and safety of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and nitazoxanide for the treatment of patients with COVID-19 infection.Patients and methods: A multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial included one hundred and ninety patients with non-severe COVID-19 infection. Patients were randomized into three groups. All groups received standard care treatment (SCT). In addition, group 1 received sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, and group 2 received nitazoxanide. Follow-up by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was done at intervals of 5, 8, 11, and 14 days. The primary endpoint was viral clearance.Results: Viral clearance was significantly higher in the sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and nitazoxanide groups compared to the SCT group in all follow-up intervals (p < 0.001). In the sofosbuvir/ledipasvir arm, 36.9% showed early viral clearance by day 5. By day 14, 83.1% of the sofosbuvir/ledipasvir group, 39.7% of the nitazoxanide group, and 19.4% of the SCT group tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Sofosbuvir/ledi-pasvir and nitazoxanide treatment were the only significant factors in Cox regression of negative RT-PCR with the highest OR (17.88, 95% CI: 6.66-47.98 and 2.59, 95% CI: 1.11-6.07, respectively). No mor-tality or serious adverse events were recorded. Conclusion: The addition of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir or nitazoxanide to the SCT results in an early and high viral clearance rate in mild and moderate patients with COVID-19. These drugs represent a safe and affordable treatment for COVID-19.(c) 2022 Pan-Arab Association of Gastroenterology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Introduction: The recently discovered novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has emerged in Wuhan, China, since January 2020. Egypt reported a low incidence of infection when compared with other countries. The aim of the study was to assess the characterization of COVID-19 infection among the Egyptian population. Methodology: Data were collected from a single COVID-19 quarantine hospital in Cairo. A total number of 195 cases were included with their clinical, laboratory, and radiological data. Results: Three different age groups behaved differently for COVD-19 infection. The pediatric age group was asymptomatic entirely, the middle age group (18-50 years) were asymptomatic in 53.3% of cases, while 77.9% of those above 50 years were symptomatic (p ≤ 0.001). The latter group had a high incidence of COVID-pneumonia in (83.1%), and moderate to critical presentations were encountered in 66.3% of them. Neutrophil to lymphocyte (N/L) ratio correlated directly with the age and case severity. C-reactive protein (CRP) and computed tomography scan chest (CT-chest) had added value on COVID-19 diagnosis in suspected cases. Conclusions: In Egypt, patients above 50 years are at a higher risk for symptomatic COVID-19 infection and leaner for moderate to critical COVID-19 presentation. The triad of CT-chest, CRP, and N/L ratio could be an integrated panel for assessing disease severity.

Evidence-based treatment involving multidisciplinary decision making is warranted to treat COVID-19 in pregnancy. This case presents the management of a critically ill pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2.