Prediction of treatment response by genetic biomarkers has potential for clinical use and contributes to the understanding of pathophysiology and drug mechanism of action. The purpose of this study is to detect genetic biomarkers possibly associated with response to lurasidone, during the first four weeks of treatment. One-hundred and seventy-one acutely psychotic patients from two placebo-controlled clinical trials of lurasidone were included. Genetic associations with changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score at weeks one, two, and four were examined. Genotyping was done with the Affymetrix 6.0 microarray and associations were computed using PLINK regression model. Although genome-wide significance was not reached with a limited sample size, signals of potential interest for further studies were with genes important for neurogenesis. Possible week one marker, rs6459950 (p = 7.05 × 10−7), was close to the sonic hedgehog gene (SHH), involved in neuronal differentiation and neurogenesis. Possible week two marker, rs7435958, was a SNP of GABRB1, encoding the GABAA Receptor β1. Notably, possible week four signals included a SNP within PTCH1, a specific receptor for the SHH, the possible week one marker. Pathway analysis supported the possibility that neurogenesis might be involved in early antipsychotic response. Tissue enrichment analysis suggested that potential signals were enriched in anterior cingulate cortex, reported to be relevant in antipsychotic action. This is the first study to examine genes possibly associated with very early response to lurasidone. Further replication studies in larger sample size should be required.
BACKGROUND:Clozapine is recommended by national and international guidelines for people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, available meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials have not shown superior efficacy of clozapine when compared with other second-generation antipsychotics, with heterogeneity identified between the original studies. We aimed to use individual patient data (IPD) to account for potential reasons of variability and to synthesise an adjusted estimate for the difference in efficacy between clozapine and other second-generation antipsychotics for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. METHODS:In this systematic review and IPD meta-analysis, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register from inception to Jan 24, 2024, and previous reviews for blinded randomised controlled trials comparing clozapine with other second-generation antipsychotics in participants with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Trials were eligible if they included patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and had a duration of at least 6 weeks. IPD were requested from trial investigators. The primary outcome was change in overall schizophrenia symptoms as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) between clozapine and other second-generation antipsychotics after 6-8 weeks of treatment. The effect size measure for the primary outcome was mean difference with 95% credible interval (CrI). We fitted a Bayesian random-effects IPD meta-regression model that included duration of illness, baseline severity, and sex as potential prognostic factors or treatment effect modifiers. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). People with lived experience of mental illness were involved in this study. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021254986. FINDINGS:We screened 13 876 references and included 19 studies with data for 1599 participants; IPD were available for 12 of 19 trials (n=1052; mean age 37·67 years [SD 11·24; range 10-66]; 348 [33·08%] women and 704 [66·92%] men). Data on ethnicity were not available. The estimated mean difference in change from baseline PANSS total score was -0·64 points (95% CrI -3·97 to 2·63; τ=2·68) in favour of other second-generation antipsychotics. Shorter duration of illness and higher baseline severity were prognostic factors associated with a larger reduction in symptoms, but neither those factors nor sex were found to modify the relative effect between clozapine and other second-generation antipsychotics. The confidence in the evidence was graded as very low. INTERPRETATION:This IPD meta-analysis found a small and uncertain advantage of other second-generation antipsychotics, mainly olanzapine and risperidone, and so did not provide evidence for superior efficacy of clozapine compared with other second-generation antipsychotics in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. It is limited by unavailability of IPD for some studies, uncaptured sources of variance, and uncertainty due to premature study discontinuation. Given the side-effects of clozapine, the observed uncertainty regarding clozapine's superiority warrants prudent use and further research. FUNDING:German Ministry of Education and Research.
The 5-HT7 receptor subtype is expressed throughout the brain, including the cortex and hippocampus, and it has been implicated in the molecular mechanisms underlying memory and affective behaviors. Although aging also affects memory and behavior, how 5-HT7 receptor interacts with age-related changes of these phenotypes has not been fully elucidated. To further understand the role of 5-HT7 receptor on memory and affective behaviors across the lifespan, we assessed age-related changes in locomotor activity, spatial and recognition memory, sociability, anxiety- and depression-like behaviors in young (3-month-old) and aged (24-month-old) 5-HT7 receptor gene knockout (5-HT7 OK) and wild-type (WT) mice. Additionally, the mRNA expression levels of the htr7, htr1a, and htr2a in the cortex and hippocampus were determined using qPCR. Results indicated that 5-HT7 KO impaired short-time spatial memory and sociability, with more pronounced deficits in the aged group. Depression-like behavior was reduced in young and aged 5-HT7 KO mice, suggesting deletion of 5-HT7 receptor gene may involve an antidepressant-like effect. In the cortex, there was no differences in htr7 expression were observed between young and aged WT mice, and no differences in htr1a and htr2a expression across genotype groups. However, in the hippocampus, there was a significant reduced htr7 expression in aged WT mice and significant decreased htr1a and htr2a expression in aged 5-HT7 KO mice. Our results suggest that 5-HT7 signaling plays an important role in regulating spatial memory, social and affective behaviors during aging, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic target for age-related neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders.
Background The serotonin type 7 (5-HT7) receptor is one of 14 5-HT receptors. It has received attention for its possible role in mood disorders and cognition. The 5-HT7 receptor antagonist, JNJ-18038683, has been reported to be effective in rodent models of depression and REM sleep. Also, 5-HT7 receptor blockade has been postulated to be a key component of cognitive enhancement in a number of drugs. Bipolar disorder (BD) usually endures cognitive impairment (CI); however, no treatment for CI in BD has been approved. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of JNJ-18038683 to improve the CI of BD compared to a placebo. Methods We conducted a placebo-controlled, 8-week trial of JNJ-18038683 in BD patients. Each patient's data were analyzed and reassessed blindly with a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, depression and hypomania ratings, and overall social and work function measures. Results Of 60 patients, 38 (63%) were female, 43 (72%) had BD type 1, and most patients were Caucasian and married. The overall time effect for the combined group shows statistically significant improvement from baseline to week 8 for most of the neurocognitive battery measures. This indicates a significant improvement in psychopathology and cognition during the study time in both JNJ-18038683 and placebo groups, but no difference between groups. Conclusions This study showed no efficacy for the improvement of CIBD or mood symptoms with JNJ-18038683 compared to the placebo.
Lee, Myung A. MD; Cola, Philip PhD; Jayathilake, Karu MS; Meltzer, Herbert Y. MD Author Information
The serotonin (5-HT)2 C receptor(R) is a widely distributed G-protein-coupled receptor, expressed abundantly in the central nervous system. Alstonine is a natural product that has significant properties of atypical antipsychotic drugs (AAPDs), in part attributed to 5-HT2 CR agonism. Based on alstonine, we developed NU-1223, a simplified β carboline analog of alstonine, which shows efficacies comparable to alstonine and to other 5-HT2 CR agonists, Ro-60-0175 and lorcaserin. The 5-HT2 CR antagonism of some APDs, including olanzapine, contributes to weight gain, a major side effect which limits its tolerability, while the 5-HT2 CR agonists and/or modulators, may minimize weight gain. We used the well-established rodent subchronic phencyclidine (PCP) model to test the efficacy of NU-1223 on episodic memory, using novel object recognition (NOR) task, positive (locomotor activity), and negative symptoms (social interaction) of schizophrenia (SCH). We found that NU-1223 produced both transient and prolonged rescue of the subchronic PCP-induced deficits in NOR and SI. Further, NU-1223, but not Ro-60-0175, blocked PCP and amphetamine (AMPH)-induced increase in LMA in subchronic PCP mice. These transient efficacies in LMA were blocked by the 5-HT2 CR antagonist, SB242084. Sub-chronic NU-1223 treatment rescued NOR and SI deficits in subchronic PCP mice for at least 39 days after 3 days injection. Chronic treatment with NU-1223, ip, twice a day for 21 days, did not increase average body weight vs olanzapine. These findings clearly indicate NU-1223 as a class of small molecules with a possible 5-HT2 CR-agonist-like mechanism of action, attributing to its efficacy. Additional in-depth receptor mechanistic studies are warranted, as this small molecule, both transiently and chronically rescued PCP-induced deficits. Furthermore, NU-1223 did not induce weight gain post long-term administrations vs AAPDs such as olanzapine, making NU-1223 a putative therapeutic compound for SCH.
Abstract Purpose/Background The favorable effect of clozapine on psychotic symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant (TR) schizophrenia (SCZ) in short-term studies is well established. However, prospective studies of the long-term outcome of clozapine treatment on psychopathology, cognition, quality of life, and functional outcome in TR-SCZ are limited. Methods/Procedures Here, we have examined the long-term (mean duration of follow-up 14 years) effects of clozapine on those outcomes in a prospective, open label study in 54 TR-SCZ patients. Assessments were performed at baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, and at the last follow-up. Findings/Results Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total, positive symptoms, and anxiety/depression at the last follow-up improved significantly from baseline, as well as from the 6-month evaluation (P < 0.0001), with a 70.5% responder rate (≥20% improvement at the last follow-up from baseline). Quality of Life Scale (QLS) total improved by 72% at the last follow-up, with 24% of patients rated as having “good” functioning compared with 0% at baseline. Suicidal thoughts/behavior was significantly reduced at the last follow-up from the baseline. No significant change in negative symptoms was found at the last follow-up in the total sample. Short-term memory function declined at the last follow-up from baseline, but there was no significant change in processing speed. The QLS total showed a significant negative correlation with BPRS positive symptoms but not with cognitive measures, or negative symptoms, at the last follow-up. Implications/Conclusions For patients with TR-SCZ, improving psychotic symptoms with clozapine seems to have a more significant impact than negative symptoms or cognition on improving psychosocial function.
This chapter describes the basic principles behind neuroendocrine challenge studies, and reviews the evidence for the role of 5-HT in hormone secretion. It presents critique clinical studies of the effects of various serotonergic challenge drugs on hormone secretion in normal volunteers and psychiatric patients, and discusses the potential contribution of neuroendocrine studies with regard to understanding biological abnormalities in psychiatric disorders and the mechanisms by which thymoleptic drugs may correct or influence these mechanisms. Neuroendocrinology is the study of the neural mechanisms involved in hormone secretion. The lack of specificity of many drugs for a given subtype of 5-HT receptor, as well as effects on non-5-HT systems that may influence hormone secretion, makes it hazardous to draw conclusions concerning 5-HT-receptor-mediated processes. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis is generally considered the prototypical stress-responsive system in the mammalian organism. Serotonin is synthesized in neurons from the essential amino acid L-tryptophan.
Rapastinel, a positive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) modulator with rapid-acting antidepressant properties, rescues memory deficits in rodents. We have previously reported that a single intravenous dose of rapastinel, significantly, but only transiently, prevented and rescued deficits in the novel object recognition (NOR) test, a measure of episodic memory, produced by acute or subchronic administration of the NMDAR antagonists, phencyclidine (PCP) and ketamine. Here, we tested the ability of single and multiple subcutaneous doses per day of rapastinel to restore NOR and operant reversal learning (ORL) deficits in subchronic PCP-treated mice. Rapastinel, 1 or 3 mg/kg, administered subcutaneously, 30 min before NOR or ORL testing, respectively, transiently rescued both deficits in subchronic PCP mice. This effect of rapastinel on NOR and ORL was mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-dependent. Most importantly, 1 mg/kg rapastinel given twice daily for 3 or 5 days, but not 1 day, restored NOR for at least 9 and 10 weeks, respectively, which is an indication of neuroplastic effects on learning and memory. Both rapastinel (3 mg/kg) and ketamine (30 mg/kg), moderately increased the efflux of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin in medial prefrontal cortex; however, only ketamine increased cortical glutamate efflux. This observation was likely the basis for the contrasting effects of the two drugs on cognition.
The beliefs that antipsychotic drugs (APDs) are 1) effective only to treat delusions and hallucinations (positive symptoms), 2) that typical and atypical APDs differ only in ability to cause extrapyramidal side effects, and 3) that their efficacy as antipsychotics is due solely to their dopamine D2 receptor blockade are outmoded concepts that prevent clinicians from achieving optimal clinical results when prescribing an APD. Atypical APDs are often more effective than typical APDs in treating negative symptoms, cognitive impairment, and mood symptoms as well as reducing the risk for suicide and decreasing aggression. This applies not only to those diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder but also to bipolar disorder, major depression, and other psychiatric diagnoses. The greater advantage of an atypical APD is not evident in all patients for every atypical APD due, in part, to individual differences in genetic and epigenetic endowment and differences in the pharmacology of the atypical APDs, their mode of action being far more complex than that of the typical APDs. A common misconception is that among the atypical APDs, only clozapine is effective for reducing psychosis in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Aripiprazole, lurasidone, olanzapine, and risperidone also can be more effective than typical APDs for treatment-resistant schizophrenia; clozapine is uniquely indicated for reducing the risk for suicide. The ability of the atypical APDs to improve cognition and negative symptoms in some patients together with lower propensity to cause tardive dyskinesia (an underappreciated advantage) leads to better overall outcomes. These advantages of the atypical APDs in efficacy and safety are due, in part, to initiation of synaptic plasticity via direct and indirect effects of the atypical APDs on a variety of proteins, especially G proteins, and release of neurotrophins (e.g., brain-derived neurotrophic factor). The typical APDs beneficial effects on psychosis are mainly the result of D2 receptor blockade, which can be associated with serious side effects and lack of tolerability.
Background: Antipsychotics, especially most of the second-generation antipsychotics, have a high risk for metabolic syndrome and antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG). A promoter variant of the leptin (LEP) gene, -2548G/A (rs7799039), has been associated with AIWG in several studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate this association in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) sample, followed by meta-analysis. Methods: We investigated the association between rs7799039 and AIWG in a sub-sample of European (N = 164) individuals from the CATIE study. Body mass index (BMI) change and weight gain (presence or absence) was analyzed using ANCOVA and logistic regression, respectively. For the meta-analysis, a literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO up to October 2019. The pooled odds ratio was calculated for presence or absence of weight gain (>= 7% weight change) using a random effects model. Results: We did not detect an association between rs7799039 and BMI change or weight gain (presence or absence) in the CATIE sample. As for the meta-analysis, we included 12 studies. No significant associations between the LEP rs7799039 polymorphism and AIWG were observed under the allelic genetic model (allele A vs. allele G) (OR = 1.10 [0.71, 1.70], p = .68). In the subgroup analyses of first-episode schizophrenia patients, a significant association between the A-allele and weight gain was observed, respectively (OR = 2.32 [1.41, 3.82], p = .0009). Conclusions: The present meta-analysis showed no significant effect of rs7799039 on AIWG. However, this variant may influence AIWG in first-episode schizophrenia patients. Further investigation of a larger and more homogenous sample is required to elucidate the role of the LEP gene in AIWG.
Antipsychotic drugs are utilized for far more than the treatment of psychosis in schizophrenia, their first indication. They now find wide use in a variety of psychotic disorders, mood disorders, developmental disorders, and drug-induced disorders. The classification of drugs as typical or atypical is based on their differences in extra-pyramidal side effects (EPS). This chapter emphasizes the greater diversity, efficacy, and safety of the atypical drugs, and the risk of tardive dyskinesia of the typical drugs. The atypical drug action may produce improvement in cognitive function and negative symptoms, as well as psychosis and mood in some patients. This diversity includes atypical drugs which produce minimal weight gain. Long-acting injectable formulations are recommended for non-adherent patients. The exceptional ability of clozapine to reduce the risk for suicide and to decrease mortality in schizophrenia is discussed. Anticholinergic and other drugs to treat EPS are also discussed.
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND:In addition to clozapine, other atypical antipsychotic drugs pharmacologically similar to clozapine, for example, olanzapine, risperidone, and melperone, are also effective in a similar proportion of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) patients, ~40%. The major goal of this study was to compare 2 doses of lurasidone, another atypical antipsychotic drug, and time to improvement in psychopathology and cognition during a 6-month trial in TRS patients. METHODS/PROCEDURES:The diagnosis of TRS was based on clinical history and lack of improvement in psychopathology during a 6-week open trial of lurasidone 80 mg/d (phase 1). This was followed by a randomized, double-blind, 24-week trial of lurasidone, comparing 80- and 240-mg/d doses (phase 2). FINDINGS/RESULTS:Significant non-dose-related improvement in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Total and subscales and in 2 of 7 cognitive domains, speed of processing and executive function, were noted. Twenty-eight (41.8%) of 67 patients in the combined sample improved ≥20% in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Total. Of the 28 responders, 19 (67.9%) first reached ≥20% improvement between weeks 6 and 24 during phase 2, including some who had previously failed to respond to clozapine. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Improvement with lurasidone is comparable with those previously reported for clozapine, melperone, olanzapine, and risperidone in TRS patients. In addition, this study demonstrated that 80 mg/d lurasidone, an effective and tolerable dose for non-TRS patients, was also effective in TRS patients but required longer duration of treatment. Direct comparison of lurasidone with clozapine in TRS patients is indicated.
Sub-chronic(sc) treatment with phencyclidine (PCP), a noncompetitive antagonist of NMDA receptors, induces persistent deficits in rodent cognition which can be reversed by atypical antipsychotic drugs (AAPDs), e.g. lurasidone. We examined scPCP-induced synaptic proteins dysregulation followed by 7 days treatment with lurasidone, using a quantitative synaptic proteomics.
Diminished dopamine (DA) D1 stimulation may contribute to cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, and schizophrenia. However, orthosteric D1 receptor (D1R) agonists produce receptor desensitization and an inverted U-shaped-response, while a positive allosteric potentiator (PAP) did not (Svensson et al JPET 360: 2017).
Biomarkers which predict response to atypical antipsychotic drugs (AAPDs) increases their benefit/risk ratio. We sought to identify common variants in genes which predict response to lurasidone, an AAPD, by associating genome-wide association study (GWAS) data and changes (Δ) in Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores from two 6-week randomized, placebo-controlled trials of lurasidone in schizophrenia (SCZ) patients. We also included SCZ risk SNPs identified by the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium using a polygenic risk analysis. The top genomic loci, with uncorrected p < 10 − 4 , include: 1) synaptic adhesion ( PTPRD , LRRC4C , NRXN1 , ILIRAPL1 , SLITRK1 ) and scaffolding ( MAGI1 , MAGI2, NBEA ) genes, both essential for synaptic function; 2) other synaptic plasticity-related genes ( NRG1/3 and KALRN) ; 3) the neuron-specific RNA splicing regulator, RBFOX 1; and 4) ion channel genes, e.g. KCNA10 , KCNAB1 , KCNK9 and CACNA2D3 ). Some genes predicted response for patients with both European and African Ancestries. We replicated some SNPs reported to predict response to other atypical APDs in other GWAS. Although none of the biomarkers reached genome-wide significance, many of the genes and associated pathways have previously been linked to SCZ. Two polygenic modeling approaches, GCTA-GREML and PLINK-Polygenic Risk Score, demonstrated that some risk genes related to neurodevelopment, synaptic biology, immune response, and histones, also contributed to prediction of response. The top hits predicting response to lurasidone did not predict improvement with placebo. This is the first evidence from clinical trials that SCZ risk SNPs are related to clinical response to an AAPD. These results need to be replicated in an independent sample.
Cariprazine is an approved antipsychotic and antidepressant which is a dopamine (DA) D3-preferring D3/D2 receptor partial agonist, serotonin (5-HT) 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist, and 5-HT2B and 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, a profile unique for atypical antipsychotic drugs. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of cariprazine and selective D3 receptor ligands on neurotransmitter efflux in the rat nucleus accumbens (NAC) and ventral hippocampus (HIP), brain regions important for reality testing, rewarded behavior, and cognition. In vivo microdialysis was performed in awake, freely moving rats after administration of cariprazine; (+)-PD-128907 [(4aR,10bR)-3,4a,4,10b-tetrahydro-4-propyl-2H,5H-[1]benzopyrano-[4,3-b]-1,4-oxazin-9-ol hydrochloride], a D3 receptor-preferring agonist; and SB-277011A [trans-N-[4-[2-(6-cyano-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolin-2-yl)ethyl]cyclohexyl]-4-quinolininecarboxamide hydrochloride], a selective D3 receptor antagonist, alone or combined, and extracellular levels of multiple neurotransmitters and metabolites were measured in the NAC and HIP by ultraperformance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Cariprazine increased DA, norepinephrine (NE), and 5-HT efflux in both regions, whereas it increased glycine (Gly) and glutamate efflux only in the NAC and efflux of DA metabolites 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA) only in the HIP. Similarly, SB-277011A increased DA, NE, DOPAC, and HVA, but not 5-HT, efflux in the NAC and HIP, and acetylcholine efflux in the HIP. Most of these effects of cariprazine and SB-277011A were fully or partially attenuated by the D3 receptor agonist (+)-PD-128907, suggesting these effects of cariprazine are related to its D3 receptor partial agonism, and that this mechanism, leading to diminished stimulation of D3 receptors, may contribute to its efficacy in both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. The possible role of Gly in the action of cariprazine is discussed. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The novel atypical antipsychotic drug cariprazine increased nucleus accumbens and hippocampal neurotransmitter efflux, similar to the actions of the D3 receptor antagonist SB-277011A [trans-N-[4-[2-(6-cyano-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolin-2-yl)ethyl]cyclohexyl]-4-quinolininecarboxamide hydrochloride]. The D3 receptor-preferring agonist (+)-PD-128907 [(4aR, 10bR)-3,4a,4,10b-tetrahydro-4-propyl-2H,5H-[1]benzopyrano-[4,3-b]-1,4-oxazin-9-ol hydrochloride], diminished the effects of both compounds on neurotransmitter efflux in both regions. These results suggested D3 receptor partial agonist activity of cariprazine, producing functional antagonism, may contribute to its efficacy in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
Objective The efficacy of clozapine for treatment-resistant mania was examined in a prospective trial for patients with bipolar or schizoaffective disorder. Method The subjects were 25 acutely manic patients with either bipolar disorder (N=10) or schizoaffective disorder—bipolar subtype (N=15) for whom lithium, anticonvulsants, and neuroleptics had been ineffective, had produced intolerable side effects, or both. After a 7-day washout, the patients were treated with clozapine monotherapy. They were evaluated over 13 weeks with the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Results Of the 25 patients, 18 (72%) exhibited marked improvement on the Young Mania Rating Scale, and eight (32%) exhibited marked improvement on the BPRS. The bipolar patients as compared to schizoaffective patients, and the nonrapid as compared to rapid cyclers, had significantly greater improvement in total BPRS score. Conclusions These results suggest that clozapine is an effective therapy for treatment-resistant bipolar and schizoaffective mania. (Am J Psychiatry 1996; 153:759–764)